Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Calcium silicate cement interface with restorative materials through layering after different time intervals

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Odontology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The aim was to evaluate the interfacial characteristics of Biodentine, CEM Cement, and ProRoot MTA when restored with different final restorative materials after different time intervals. Biodentine, CEM Cement and ProRoot MTA were layered with amalgam, composite resin or light cure glass ionomer cement. Layering was done either immediately, 24 or 72 h after cement placement. The interface of cements with restorative materials was characterized using scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS) after separation. Vickers surface microhardness test was also performed on the interface. Statistical analysis included two-way Anova, Dunnett T3, and Tukey HSD. The significance level was set at P < 0.05. The highest microhardness values were seen when restorative materials were layered after 24 h in the case of Biodentine, and after 72 h in the case of CEM Cement and ProRoot MTA. In ProRoot MTA no significant difference was seen in the microhardness when layered with different restorative materials regardless of the time of layering. In immediate layering, Biodentine exhibited the highest microhardness values. Both immediate and delayed layering resulted in element transfer between calcium silicate cements (CSCs) and restorative materials. Deposition and depletion of element occurs subsequent to layering of restorative materials on CSCs. When immediate layering is necessary, Biodentine may be a better option compared to other CSCs evaluated.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Shahriari S, Faramarzi F, Alikhani MY, Farhadian M, Hendi SS. Apical sealing ability of mineral trioxide aggregate, intermediate restorative material and calcium enriched mixture cement: a bacterial leakage study. Iran Endod J. 2016;11:336–40.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Kim JR, Nosrat A, Fouad AF. Interfacial characteristics of Biodentine and MTA with dentine in simulated body fluid. J Dent. 2015;43:241–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Torabinejad M, Hong CU, McDonald F, Pitt Ford TR. Physical and chemical properties of a new root-end filling material. J Endod. 1995;21:349–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Collado-Gonzalez M, Garcia-Bernal D, Onate-Sanchez RE, Ortolani-Seltenerich PS, Alvarez-Muro T, Lozano A, et al. Cytotoxicity and bioactivity of various pulpotomy materials on stem cells from human exfoliated primary teeth. Int Endod J. 2017;50(Suppl 2):e19–e30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Parirokh M, Torabinejad M. Mineral trioxide aggregate: a comprehensive literature review—Part III: Clinical applications, drawbacks, and mechanism of action. J Endod. 2010;36:400–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Roberts HW, Toth JM, Berzins DW, Charlton DG. Mineral trioxide aggregate material use in endodontic treatment: a review of the literature. Dent Mater. 2008;24:149–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Mohebbi P, Tour Savadkouhi S. Tooth discoloration induced by calcium-silicate based materials: a literature review. Miner Stomatol. 2016 (epub ahead of print).

  8. Marconyak LJ Jr, Kirkpatrick TC, Roberts HW, Roberts MD, Aparicio A, Himel VT, et al. A comparison of coronal tooth discoloration elicited by various endodontic reparative materials. J Endod. 2016;42:470–3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Kohli MR, Yamaguchi M, Setzer FC, Karabucak B. Spectrophotometric analysis of coronal tooth discoloration induced by various bioceramic cements and other endodontic materials. J Endod. 2015;41:1862–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Nosrat A, Nekoofar MH, Bolhari B, Dummer PM. Unintentional extrusion of mineral trioxide aggregate: a report of three cases. Int Endod J. 2012;45:1165–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Camilleri J. Scanning electron microscopic evaluation of the material interface of adjacent layers of dental materials. Dent Mater. 2011;27:870–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Eid AA, Komabayashi T, Watanabe E, Shiraishi T, Watanabe I. Characterization of the mineral trioxide aggregate-resin modified glass ionomer cement interface in different setting conditions. J Endod. 2012;38:1126–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Mente J, Geletneky B, Ohle M, Koch MJ, Friedrich Ding PG, Wolff D, et al. Mineral trioxide aggregate or calcium hydroxide direct pulp capping: an analysis of the clinical treatment outcome. J Endod. 2010;36:806–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Mente J, Hufnagel S, Leo M, Michel A, Gehrig H, Panagidis D, et al. Treatment outcome of mineral trioxide aggregate or calcium hydroxide direct pulp capping: long-term results. J Endod. 2014;40:1746–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Hilton TJ. Keys to clinical success with pulp capping: a review of the literature. Oper Dent. 2009;34:615–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Kayahan MB, Nekoofar MH, Kazandag M, Canpolat C, Malkondu O, Kaptan F, et al. Effect of acid-etching procedure on selected physical properties of mineral trioxide aggregate. Int Endod J. 2009;42:1004–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Kayahan MB, Nekoofar MH, McCann A, Sunay H, Kaptan RF, Meraji N, et al. Effect of acid etching procedures on the compressive strength of 4 calcium silicate-based endodontic cements. J Endod. 2013;39:1646–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Nandini S, Ballal S, Kandaswamy D. Influence of glass-ionomer cement on the interface and setting reaction of mineral trioxide aggregate when used as a furcal repair material using laser Raman spectroscopic analysis. J Endod. 2007;33:167–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Meraji N, Camilleri J. Bonding over dentin replacement materials. J Endod. 2017;43:1343–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Tulumbaci F, Almaz ME, Arikan V, Mutluay MS. Shear bond strength of different restorative materials to mineral trioxide aggregate and Biodentine. J Conserv Dent JCD. 2017;20:292–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Altunsoy M, Tanriver M, Ok E, Kucukyilmaz E. Shear bond strength of a self-adhering flowable composite and a flowable base composite to mineral trioxide aggregate, calcium-enriched mixture cement, and Biodentine. J Endod. 2015;41:1691–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Al-Sarheed MA. Evaluation of shear bond strength and SEM observation of all-in-one self-etching primer used for bonding of fissure sealants. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2006;7:9–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Davidson CL, de Gee AJ, Feilzer A. The competition between the composite-dentin bond strength and the polymerization contraction stress. J Dent Res. 1984;63:1396–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Grazziotin-Soares R, Nekoofar MH, Davies T, Hubler R, Meraji N, Dummer PMH. Crystalline phases involved in the hydration of calcium silicate-based cements: semi-quantitative Rietveld X-ray diffraction analysis. Austr Endod J. 2017.

  25. Nekoofar MH, Oloomi K, Sheykhrezae MS, Tabor R, Stone DF, Dummer PM. An evaluation of the effect of blood and human serum on the surface microhardness and surface microstructure of mineral trioxide aggregate. Int Endod J. 2010;43:849–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Lee YL, Lee BS, Lin FH, Yun Lin A, Lan WH, Lin CP. Effects of physiological environments on the hydration behavior of mineral trioxide aggregate. Biomaterials. 2004;25:787–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Bolhari B, Nekoofar MH, Sharifian M, Ghabrai S, Meraji N, Dummer PM. Acid and microhardness of mineral trioxide aggregate and mineral trioxide aggregate-like materials. J Endod. 2014;40:432–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Ashofteh Yazdi K, Ghabraei S, Bolhari B, Kafili M, Meraji N, Nekoofar MH, et al. Microstructure and chemical analysis of four calcium silicate-based cements in different environmental conditions. Clin Oral Investig. 2018.

  29. Mount GJ, Makinson OF. Glass-ionomer restorative cements: clinical implications of the setting reaction. Oper Dent. 1982;7:134–41.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Pham CL, Kratunova E, Marion I, da Fonseca MA, Alapati SB. Effect of overlying material on final setting of Biodentine (R) in primary molar pulpotomies. Pediatr Dent. 2019;41:140–5.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Woolford MJ. The surface pH of glass ionomer cavity lining agents. J Dent. 1989;17:295–300.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Kazemipoor M, Azizi N, Farahat F. Evaluation of microhardness of mineral trioxide aggregate after immediate placement of different coronal restorations: an in vitro study. J Dent (Tehran, Iran). 2018;15:116–22.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Hals E. Root caries: distribution and uptake of elements in lesions adjacent to silicate or amalgam restorations. Scand J Dent Res. 1976;84:367–71.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Kaup M, Schafer E, Dammaschke T. An in vitro study of different material properties of Biodentine compared to ProRoot MTA. Head Face Med. 2015;11:16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Kaur M, Singh H, Dhillon JS, Batra M, Saini M. MTA versus Biodentine: review of literature with a comparative analysis. J Clin Diagn Res JCDR 2017;11:Zg01–Zg05.

Download references

Acknowledgement

The authors deny any conflicts of interest or involvement with any commercial organization with direct financial interest in the subject or materials discussed in this manuscript. This study was supported by a grant from Tehran University of Medical Sciences (Grant no. 8911272068)

Funding

The work was supported by Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran (Grant no. 8911272068).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Naghmeh Meraji.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

Dr. Behnam Bolhari declares that he has no conflict of interest. Dr. Kazem Ashofteh Yazdi declares that he has no conflict of interest. Dr. Mehdi Abbasi declares that he has no conflict of interest. Dr. Sasan Sanjari declares that he has no conflict of interest. Dr. Naghmeh Meraji declares that she has no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

This research was approved by the Ethics Committee of Tehran University of Medical Sciences (Reg. No. 8911272068).

Informed consent

Not applicable.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bolhari, B., Ashofteh Yazdi, K., Abbasi, M. et al. Calcium silicate cement interface with restorative materials through layering after different time intervals. Odontology 109, 210–221 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10266-020-00521-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10266-020-00521-z

Keywords

Navigation