Abstract
It is commonly believed that the bulge structure cannot be generated in the Pearl River region due to the trumpet-like estuary and the relatively wide mouth. However, the bulge structure was observed by Advanced Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR). Then, the potential of the existence of the Pearl River plume bulge is proved by a theoretical framework applied with the Lantau channel parameters. The theoretical analysis suggests that the Lantau channel is one of principal influence factors of the bulge formation. This suggestion was carried out with a numerical model applying a theoretical framework using the Regional Ocean Modeling System (ROMS). Model results confirmed that an anticyclonic bulge was generated under southeasterly winds. The position of the simulated bulge is in accordance with that observed by SAR. The no-channel case run also proved that the Lantau channel, which serves as a water-road for the river water, can dramatically affect the bulge scale. In a word, this work aims at revealing the existence of the bulge structure in the Pearl River plume, which may require more observations and better understanding of the dynamic characteristics of the Pearl River plume bulge.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Avicola G, Huq P (2003a) The characteristics of recirculating bulge region in coastal buoyant outflows. J Mar Res 61:435–463
Avicola G, Huq P (2003b) The role of outflow geometry in the formation of the recirculating bulge region in coastal buoyant outflows. J Mar Res 61(4):411–434
Bai P, Gu YZ, Luo L, Zhang WL, Fan KG (2015) Observation of the supercritical Pearl River plume front under the downwelling-favorable winds. Sci China Earth Sci 58:2059–2066. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11430-015-5108-4
Callahan J, Dai M, Chen RF, Li X, Lu Z, Huang W (2004) Distribution of dissolved organic matter in the Pearl River estuary, China. Mar Chem 89:211–224. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marchem.2004.02.013
Chant RJ, Geyer WR, Houghton R, Hunter E, Lerczak J (2007) Estuarine boundary layer mixing processes: insights from dye experiments. J Phys Oceanogr 37:1859–1877
Chant RJ, Glenn SM, Hunter E, Kohut J, Chen RF, Houghton RW, Bosch J, Schofield O (2008) Bulge Formation of a buoyant river outflow. J Geophys Res 113:C01017. https://doi.org/10.1029/2007JC004100
Chao S-Y, Boicourt WC (1986) Onset of estuarine plumes. J Phys Oceanogr 16:2137–2149
Chen ZY, Pan JY, Jiang Y (2016) Role of pulsed winds on detachment of low salinity water from the Pearl River plume: upwelling and mixing processes. J Geophys Res 121:2769–2788
Chen ZY, Jiang YW, Liu JT, Gong WP (2017a) Development of upwelling on pathway and freshwater transport of Pearl River plume in northeastern South China Sea. J Geophys Res Oceans 122:6090–6109
Chen ZY, Gong WP, Cai HY, Chen YZ, Zhang H (2017b) Dispersal of the Pearl River plume over continental shelf in summer. Estuar Coast Shelf Sci 194:252–262
Chen ZY, Pan JY, Jiang YW, Lin H (2017c) Far-reaching transport of Pearl River plume water by upwelling jet in the northeastern South China Sea. J Mar Syst 173:60–69
Choi BJ, Wilkin JL (2007) The effect of wind on the dispersal of the Hudson River plume. J Phys Oceanogr 37(7):1878–1897
Dong L, Su J, Wong L, Cao Z, Chen J (2004) Seasonal variation and dynamics of the Pearl River plume. Cont Shelf Res 24:1761–1777
Fong D, Geyer WR (2002) The alongshore transport of freshwater in a surface-trapped river plume. J Phys Oceanogr 32:957–972
Gan JZL, Dai M, Cheung AYY, Liu H, Harrison P (2010) Biological response to intensified upwelling and to a river plume in the northeastern South China Sea: a modeling study. J Geophys Res 115. https://doi.org/10.1029/2009JC005569
Garvine RW (1982) A steady state model for buoyant surface plume hydrodynamics in coastal waters. Tellus 34:293–306
Ge Q, Liu JP, Xue Z, Chu F (2014) Dispersal of the Zhujiang River (Pearl River) derived sediment in the Holocene. Acta Oceanol Sin 33(8):1–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13131-014-0407-8
Gu Y, Pan J, Lin H (2012) Remote sensing observation and numerical modeling of an upwelling jet in Guangdong coastal water. J Geophys Res 117:C08019. https://doi.org/10.1029/2012JC007922
Horner-Devine AR (2009) The bulge circulation in the Columbia River plume. Cont Shelf Res 29:234–251
Horner-Devine AR, Jay DA, Orton PM, Spahn EY (2009) A conceptual model of the strongly tidal Columbia River plume. J Mar Syst 78:460–475. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmarsys.2008.11.025
Huq P (2009) The role of kelvin number on bulge formation from estuarine buoyant outflows. Estuar Coasts 32(4):709–719
Isobe A (2005) Ballooning of river plume bulge and its stabilization by tidal currents. J Phys Oceanogr 35:2337~2351
Lentz S. J., and K. R. Helfrich, (2002). Buoyant gravity currents along a sloping bottom in a rotating frame. J. Fluid Mech., 464, 251–278
Masse AK, Murthy CR (1992) Analysis of the Niagara River plume dynamics. J Geophys Res 97:2403–2420
O’Donnell J (1990) The formation and fate of a river plume: a numerical model. J Phys Oceanogr 20:551–559
O’Donnell J, Marmorino GO, Trump CL (1998) Convergence and downwelling at a river plume front. J Phys Oceanogr 28:1481–1495
Oey L-Y, Mellor GL (1993) Subtidal variability of estuarine outflow, plume, and coastal current: a model study. J Phys Oceanogr 23:164–171
Ou S, Zhang H, Wang D (2009) Dynamics of the buoyant plume off the Pearl River estuary in summer. Environ Fluid Mech 9:471–492
Pan J, Gu Y (2016) Cruise observation and numerical modeling of turbulent mixing in the Pearl River estuary in summer. Cont Shelf Res 120:122–138
Pan J, Gu Y, Wang D (2014) Observations and numerical modeling of the Pearl River plume in summer season. J Geophys Res Oceans 119:2480–2500. https://doi.org/10.1002/2013JC009042
Qiu Z, Doglioli AM, Hu Z, Marsaleix P, Carlotti F (2010) The influence of hydrodynamic processes on zooplankton transport and distributions in the North Western Mediterranean estimates from a Lagrangian model. Ecol Model 221:2816–2827. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2010.07.025
Wong L, Chen J, Xue H, Dong L, Su J, Heinke G (2003) A model study of the circulation in the Pearl River estuary (PRE) and its adjacent coastal waters: 1. Simulations and comparison with observations. J Geophys Res 108:3156. https://doi.org/10.1029/2002JC001451
Wu H, Zhu J, Shen J, Wang H (2011) Tidal modulation on the Changjiang River plume in summer. J Geophys Res 116:C08017. https://doi.org/10.1029/2011JC007209
Yankovsky A, Chapman DC (1997) A simple theory for the fate of buoyant coastal discharges. J Phys Oceanogr 27:1386–1401
Yin K (2002) Monsoonal influence on seasonal variations in nutrients and phytoplankton biomass in coastal waters of Hong Kong in the vicinity of the Pearl River estuary. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 245:111–122
Yin K, Song X, Sun J, Wu M (2004) Potential P limitation leads to excess N in the Pearl River estuarine coastal plume. Cont Shelf Res 24:1895–1907
Zhao, H. (1990). The evolution of the Pearl River estuary (in Chinese) (pp. 1–357). Beijing: China Ocean Press
Zu TT, Gan JP (2007) Process-oriented study of the river plume and circulation in the Pearl River estuary: response to the wind and tidal forcing. Adv Geosci 12:225–242
Cheng Xiang-ju, Zhan Wei, et al., (2012). A modeling study on saltwater intrusion to western four watercourses in the Pearl River estuary. China Ocean Eng, 26(4): 575–590.DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/s13344-012-0044-y
Acknowledgments
The Envisat SAR data can be download at the webpage of the Remote Sensing Satellite Ground Receiving Station of the Chinese University of Hong Kong. We are also grateful to the anonymous reviewers for their valuable suggestions and comments.
Funding
This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation (Grant No. 41606107) and the Natural Science Foundation of Shandong Province (Grant No. ZR2014DQ013).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Responsible Editor: Guoping Gao
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Gu, Y., Li, P. & Li, M. Numerical modeling and theoretical analysis of the existence of the Pearl River plume bulge. Ocean Dynamics 69, 1155–1163 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10236-019-01300-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10236-019-01300-3