Skip to main content
Log in

Modelling and evaluation of anaerobic digestion process of tomato processing wastes for biogas generation

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
Journal of Material Cycles and Waste Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Anaerobic digestion is the most attractive technique for biogas production from organic materials. This research studies and models such production from anaerobic digestion of tomato processing wastes in a single-stage laboratory digester and the variation of pH of the process. The single-stage digester was designed and built on a laboratory scale and the tomato processing wastes used as feed materials for digestion were collected from the Zoshk Khorasan Company (Mashhad-Iran). Some properties of digested materials were determined. The results revealed that the tomato processing wastes could be an appealing option for production of biogas by anaerobic digestion process. The digester was controlled under mesophilic conditions (35 °C) with continuous mixing. Also, the percentage of total solids content was adjusted 8%. The amount of production of biogas from the waste was approximately 142.00 L (130.00 L in STP conditions) which is equivalent to 0.14 m3 per kilogram of volatile solids (m3/kg vs). The methane content in the produced biogas was approximately 60.50% (about 86.00 L).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Jury C, Benetto E, Koster D, Schmitt B, Welfring J (2010) Life cycle assessment of biogas production by monofermentation of energy crops and injection into the natural gas grid. Biomass Bioenerg 34:54–66

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Kim DH, Oh SE (2011) Continuous high-solids anaerobic co-digestion of organic solid wastes under mesophilic conditions. Waste Manage 31:1943–1948

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Richter F, Fricke T, Wachendorf M (2011) Influence of sward maturity and pre-conditioning temperature on the energy production from grass silage through the integrated generation of solid fuel and biogas from biomass (IFBB): 1. The fate of mineral compounds. Biores Technol 102:4855–4865

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Rao PV, Baral SS, Dey R, Mutnuri S (2010) Biogas generation potential by anaerobic digestion for sustainable energy development in India. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 14:2086–2094

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Arbabi M, Omrani QA (2011) Biogas technology. Fanavaran, Tehran

    Google Scholar 

  6. Taleghani G, Kia AS (2005) Technical–economical analysis of the Saveh biogas power plant. Renew Energy 30:441–446

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Fazli F (1986) Biogas in China. Ministry of Planning and Budget, Tehran

  8. Jiang X, Sommer SG, Christensen KV (2011) A review of the biogas industry in China. Energy Policy 39:6073–6081

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Arthur R, Baidoo MF, Brew-Hammond A, Bensah EC (2011) Biogas generation from sewage in four public universities in Ghana: a solution to potential health risk. Biomass Bioenergy 35:3086–3093

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Ossai OS (2013) Comparative evaluation of qualitative and quantitative biogas production potential of oil palm fronds and co-digestion with cow dung. J Energy Technol Policy 3:25–33

    Google Scholar 

  11. Kurmanov A (2014) The biogas production effectiveness increase. Life Sci J 11(11s):24–29

    Google Scholar 

  12. Mshandete A, Björnsson L, Kivaisi AK, Rubindamayugi MS, Mattiasson B (2006) Effect of particle size on biogas yield from sisal fibre waste. Renew Energy 31:2385–2392

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Singh S, Prerna P (2009) Review of recent advances in anaerobic packed-bed biogas reactors. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 13:1569–1575

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Christy PM, Gopinath L, Divya D (2014) A review on anaerobic decomposition and enhancement of biogas production through enzymes and microorganisms. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 34:167–173

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Coskun C, Bayraktar M, Oktay Z, Dincer I (2012) Investigation of biogas and hydrogen production from waste water of milk-processing industry in Turkey. Int J Hydrog Energy 37:16498–16504

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Sarada R, Nand K (1989) Start-up anaerobic digestion of tomato-processing wastes for methane generation. Biol Wastes 30:231–237

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. El-Shimi S, El-Housseini M, Ali B, El-Shinnawi M (1992) Biogas generation from food-processing wastes. Resour Conserv Recycl 6:315–327

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Saev M, Koumanova B, Simeonov M (2009) Anaerobic co-digestion of wasted tomatoes and cattle dung for biogas production. J Univ Chem Technol Metall 44:55–60

    Google Scholar 

  19. Federation WE, Association A (2005) Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater. American Public Health Association (APHA), Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  20. Forster-Carneiro T, Pérez M, Romero L, Sales D (2007) Dry-thermophilic anaerobic digestion of organic fraction of the municipal solid waste: focusing on the inoculum sources. Bioresour Technol 98:3195–3203

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Zennaki-Bensouda Z, Zaid A, Lamini H, Aubineau M, Boulif M (1996) Methane fermentation of cattle manure: effects of hydraulic retention time, temperature and substrate concentration. Tropicultura 14:134–140

    Google Scholar 

  22. Dueblein D, Steinhauser A (2008) Biogas from waste and renewable resources. Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH and Co 276, KGaA

  23. Zhang C, Su H, Baeyens J, Tan T (2014) Reviewing the anaerobic digestion of food waste for biogas production. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 38:383–392

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Gerardi MH (2003) The microbiology of anaerobic digesters. In: Gerardi (ed) Wastewater microbiology series. Wiley, Hoboken, NJ

  25. Omrani G (1996) Basics biogas production from urban and rural waste. University of Tehran Publication, Iran

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to sincerely thank the senior management and staff of Laboratory of Recycling Organization of Mashhad Municipality. And the authors sincerely thank Dr. Abedini, Mr. Aryan Nejad and Mr. Hassan Nejad.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Abbas Rohani.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Saghouri, M., Mansoori, Y., Rohani, A. et al. Modelling and evaluation of anaerobic digestion process of tomato processing wastes for biogas generation. J Mater Cycles Waste Manag 20, 561–567 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10163-017-0622-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10163-017-0622-4

Keywords

Navigation