Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Author’s reply to “The nerve of blaming the curve”

  • Author's Reply
  • Published:
Techniques in Coloproctology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

A Correction to this article was published on 19 May 2021

This article has been updated

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Change history

References

  1. Orangio G, Quintero L, Gachabayov M, Rojas A, Bergamaschi R (2021) The nerve of blaming the curve. Tech Coloproctol. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10151-020-02380-w

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. van Oostendorp SE, Roodbeen SX, Chen CC, Caycedo-Marulanda A, Joshi HM, Tanis PJ, Cunningham C, Tuynman JB, Hompes R (2020) Transperineal minimally invasive APE: preliminary outcomes in a multicenter cohort. Tech Coloproctol 24(8):823–831. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10151-020-02234-5

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. McCulloch P, Altman DG, Campbell WB et al (2009) No surgical innovation without evaluation: the IDEAL recommendations. Lancet 374:1105–1112

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. How P, Shihab O, Tekkis P, Brown G, Quirke P, Heald R, Moran B (2011) A systematic review of cancer related patient outcomes after anterior resection and abdominoperineal excision for rectal cancer in the total mesorectal excision era. Surg Oncol 20(4):e149–e155. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.suronc.2011.05.001

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Jones H, Moran B, Crane S, Hompes R, Cunningham C, LOREC group (2017) The LOREC APE registry: operative technique, oncological outcome and perineal wound healing after abdominoperineal excision. Colorectal Dis 19(2):172–180. https://doi.org/10.1111/codi.13423

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Musters GD, Buskens CJ, Bemelman WA, Tanis PJ (2014) Perineal wound healing after abdominoperineal resection for rectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Dis Colon Rectum 57(9):1129–1139. https://doi.org/10.1097/DCR.0000000000000182

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Miles WE (1971) A method of performing abdomino-perineal excision for carcinoma of the rectum and of the terminal portion of the pelvic colon (1908). CA Cancer J Clin 21(6):361–364

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Bergamaschi R, Gachabayov M, Orangio G, Remzi F (2020) Comment on “local recurrence after taTME for rectal cancer.” Ann Surg. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000004094

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Felsenreich DM, Gachabayov M, Rojas A, Bendl R, Palmer S, Bergamaschi R (2020) Comment on: “Neyman’s bias in online voluntary databases!” Ann Surg. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000003900

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Gachabayov M, Di Saverio S, Orangio G, Remzi FH, Bokey L, Bergamaschi R (2020) Consensus statement on transanal total mesorectal excision: other thoughts. Colorectal Dis. https://doi.org/10.1111/codi.15391

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, Location VUmc, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands

    S. E. van Oostendorp & J. B. Tuynman

  2. Department of surgery, Amsterdam UMC, location AMC, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands

    R. Hompes

Authors
  1. S. E. van Oostendorp
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. R. Hompes
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. J. B. Tuynman
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S. E. van Oostendorp.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no relevant conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed Consent

Informed consent was not required for this retrospective cohort study.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

The original online version of this article was revised due to a retrospective Open Access Cancellation.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

van Oostendorp, S.E., Hompes, R. & Tuynman, J.B. Author’s reply to “The nerve of blaming the curve”. Tech Coloproctol 25, 483–484 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10151-021-02418-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10151-021-02418-7

Search

Navigation