Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The SiLaC procedure for pilonidal sinus disease: long-term outcomes of a single institution prospective study

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Techniques in Coloproctology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

In 2014, we started to treat pilonidal sinus disease in our institution with sinus laser-assisted closure (SiLaC) procedure. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the SiLaC procedure in a single institution prospective study on a large cohort of patients and with a long follow-up period, and try to determine what factors that could influence healing and recurrence.

Methods

A prospective study was conducted on consecutive patients with primary pilonidal sinus disease operated on with the SiLaC procedure at our institution from March 2015 to August 2017. Demographic and surgical data, outcomes, and complications were prospectively recorded and compared between the healed and not healed/recurrence groups to find factors influencing healing. Postoperative follow-up was performed in the outpatient clinic every 2 weeks for 2 months. In March 2018, patients were questioned by mail or phone to assess long-term recurrences.

Results

There were 200 patients. The healing rate was high (94%) with a mean healing time of 19.5 ± 14.4 days. Mean operative time (9.4 ± 2.6 min) and mean duration of postoperative analgesic therapy (4.72 ± 5.64 days) were short. Postoperative complications (15%) were mainly infection (9.5%). There was a response rate of 77.5% to mail/phone questionnaires about recurrence. The recurrence rate was 14.9%. Mean time until recurrence was 193.5 ± 87.19 days. The incidence of secondary openings, complications, and infection in the healing vs not healed or recurrence groups, was 24.8% vs 56.6%, 19.2% vs 40%, and 8.8% vs 30%, respectively.

Conclusions

SiLaC is an effective, easy to perform, reproducible, and almost painless procedure. Factors influencing healing seem to be the presence of secondary openings, postoperative complications, and, especially, infection. The SiLaC procedure could become one of the treatments of choice for pilonidal sinus disease.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Dessily M, Charara F, Ralea S, Allé JL (2017) Pilonidal sinus destruction with a radial laser probe: technique and first Belgian experience. Acta Chir Belg 117(3):164–168

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Petrucci A, Morin N, Boutros M (2016) Pilonidal disease. In: Zutshi M (ed) Anorectal disease, Chap 13. Springer International Publishing, Switzerland, pp 283–305

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  3. Hull TL, Wu J (2002) Pilonidal disease. Surg Clin N Am 82:1169–1185

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Dawson P (2017) Pilonidal disease. In: Herold A et al (eds) Coloproctology, European manual of medicine, Chapt 8. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, pp 81–85

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  5. Doody DP (2011) Pilonidal cyst disease. In: Mattei P (ed) Fundamentals of pediatric surgery, Chap 60. Springer Science +Business Media, LLC, Berlin, pp 467–474

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  6. Pini Prato A, Mazzola C, Mattioli G, Escolino M, Esposito C, D’Alessio A et al. (2018) Preliminary report on endoscopic pilonidal sinus treatment in children: results of a multicentric series. Pediatr Surg Int 34:687–692

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Segre D, Pozzo M, Perinotti R, Roche B (2015) The treatment of pilonidal disease: guidelines of the Italian Society of Colorectal Surgery (SICCR). Tech Coloproctol 19:607–613

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Bascom J (1983) Pilonidal disease: long-term results of follicle removal. Dis Colon Rectum 26:800–807

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Bascom J (1994) Pilonidal sinus. Curr Pract Surg 6:175–180

    Google Scholar 

  10. Karidakis GE (1992) Easy and successful treatment of pilonidal sinus after explanation of its causative process. Aust N Z J Surg 62:385–389

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Pappas AF, Christodoulou DK (2018) A new minimally invasive treatment of pilonidal sinus disease with the use of a diode laser: a prospective large series of patients. Colorectal Dis 20:0207–0214

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Meinero P, Stazi A, Carbone A, Fasolini F, Regusci L, La Torre M (2015) Endoscopic pilonidal sinus treatment: a prospective multicentre trial. Colorectal Dis 18:0164–0170

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Wilhelm A (2011) A new technique for sphincter- preserving anal fistula repair using a novel radial emitting laser probe. Tech Coloproctol 15:110–115

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Georgiou GK (2018) Outpatient laser treatment of primary pilonidal disease: the PiLaT technique. Tech Coloproctol 22:773–778

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Georgiou GK (2016) Outpatient treatment of pilonidal disease with a 1470 nm diode laser: initial experience. Int J Surg Surg Proced 1:103–106

    Google Scholar 

  16. Albahadili MA, Majeed AW (2016) Pilonidal sinus management using 980 nm diode laser. JHMN 33:106–111

    Google Scholar 

  17. Iesalnieks I, Ommer A, Petersen S, Doll D, Herold A (2016) German national guideline on the management of pilonidal disease. Langenbecks Arch Surg 401:599–609

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Lindholt-Jensen CS, Lindholt JS, Beyer M, Lindholt JS (2012) Nd-YAG laser treatment of primary and recurrent pilonidal sinus. Lasers Med Sci 27:505–508

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Okus A, Sevinc B, Karahan O, Eryilmaz MA (2012) Comparison of Limberg flap and tension-free primary closure during pilonidal sinus surgery. World J Surg 36:431–435

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Favuzza J, Brand M, Francescatti A, Orkin B (2015) Cleft lift procedure for pilonidal disease: technique and perioperative management. Tech Coloproctol 19:477–482

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Tien T, Athem R, Arulampalam T (2018) Outcomes of endoscopic pilonidal sinus treatment (EPSIT): a systematic review. Tech Coloproctol 22:325–331

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Emile SH, Elfeki H, Shalaby M, Sakr A, Giaccaglia V, Sileri P et al. (2018) Endoscopic pilonidal sinus treatment: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Surg Endosc 32(9):3754–3762

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Sian TS, Herrod PJJ, Blackwell JEM, Hardy EJO, Lund JN (2018) Fibrin glue is a quick and effective treatment for primary and recurrent pilonidal sinus disease. Tech Coloproctol 22(10):779–784

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Pronk AA, Eppink L, Smakman N, Furnee EJB (2018) The effect of hair removal after surgery for sacrococcygeal pilonidal disease: a systematic review of the literature. Tech Coloproctol 22:7–14

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Bosche F, Luedi MM, van der Zypen D, Moersdorf P, Krapohl B, Doll D (2017) The hair in the sinus: sharp-ended rootless head hair fragments can be found in large amounts in pilonidal sinus nests. World J Surg 42:567–573

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Doll D, Luedi MM (2017) Laser may reduce recurrence rate in pilonidal sinus disease by reducing captured occipital hair. Lasers Med Sci 32:481–482

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Oram Y, Kahraman F, Karingaoglu Y, Koyuncu E (2009) Evaluation of 60 patients with pilonidal sinus treated with epilation after surgery. Dermatol Surg 36:88–91

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Khan MAA, Javed AA, Govindan KS, Rafiq S, Thomas K, Baker L, Kenealy J (2016) Control of hair growth using long-pulsed alexandrite laser is an efficient and cost effective therapy for patients suffering from recurrent pilonidal disease. Laser Med Sci 31:857–862

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Fj Conroy, Kandamany N, Mahaffey PJ (2008) Laser depilation and hygiene: preventing recurrent pilonidal sinus disease. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 61:1069–1072

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. Dessily.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

Dr Dessily received grants From Biolitec to perform workshops on the SiLaC procedure for European Surgeons in 2018. The other authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

This prospective study was approved by the local institutional review board and faculty ethics committee.

Informed consent

Written informed consent was obtained from all patients.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Dessily, M., Dziubeck, M., Chahidi, E. et al. The SiLaC procedure for pilonidal sinus disease: long-term outcomes of a single institution prospective study. Tech Coloproctol 23, 1133–1140 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10151-019-02119-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10151-019-02119-2

Keywords

Navigation