Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Medium-term outcome of percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation in the treatment of fecal incontinence

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Techniques in Coloproctology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction

Fecal incontinence (FI) is a multifactorial disease that affects patients’ quality of life. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of posterior tibial nerve stimulation (PTNS) in the treatment of FI and to assess the medium-term results.

Methods

A prospective cohort of patients with FI treated with PTNS between 2012 and 2014 was analysed. Endoluminal ultrasound and anorectal physiologic studies were performed in all patients. The efficacy of PTNS was assessed using a validated questionnaire (Cleveland Clinic Incontinence Score) at baseline, after treatment, and 2 years later. The Vaizey score was also used at 2-year follow-up to assess urge incontinence.

Results

Fifty-six patients (38 females; mean age 59.7 years) with FI were treated. The causes of FI were mainly obstetric injury and previous colorectal surgery. A decrease of 50% from baseline CCIS was seen in 41.1% of patients after PTNS. One-third maintained a minimum of 50% decrease of their initial CCIS after 2 years. Comparing CCIS at baseline, after treatment, and at 2-year follow-up, a statistically significant difference was observed (p < 0.0001 and p < 0.0004 respectively). Medium-term improvement was not maintained in patients with passive and mixed FI, while it was maintained in those with urge incontinence. At 2 years, patients with mild incontinence maintained the greatest response.

Conclusions

PTNS is a safe, effective, non-invasive treatment for FI with good results in almost half of the patients at the end of the treatment. There is also an acceptable maintained response at 2-year follow-up. It seems to be most successful in patients with mild incontinence and urge incontinence.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Benezech A, Bouvier M, Vitton V (2016) Faecal incontinence: current knowledges and perspectives. World J Gastrointest Pathophysiol 7(1):59–71

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Johanson JF, Lafferty J (1996) Epidemiology of fecal incontinence: the silent affliction. Am J Gastroenterol 91(1):33–36

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Madoff RD, Parker SC, Varma MG, Lowry AC (2004) Faecal incontinence in adults. Lancet 364:621–632

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Norton C, Cody JD (2012) Biofeedback and/or sphincter exercises for the treatment of faecal incontinence in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD002111.pub3

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Shafik A, Ahmed I, El-Sibai O, Mostafa RM (2003) Perrcutaneous peripheral neuromodulation in the treatment of fecal incontinence. Eur Surg Res 35(2):103–107

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Gupta P, Ehlert MJ, Sirls LT et al (2015) Percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation and sacral neuromodulation: an update. Curr Urol Rep 16(2):4. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11934-014-0479-1

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Cooperberg MR, Stoller ML (2005) Percutaneous neuromodulation. Urol Clin N Am 32(1):71–78 (vii. Review)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Peña Ros E, Parra Baños PA, Benavides Buleje JA, Muñoz Camarena JM, Escamilla Segade C, Candel Arenas MF, Gonzalez Valverde FM, Albarracín Marín-Blázquez A (2016) Short-term outcome of percutaneous posterior tibial nerve stimulation (PTNS) for the treatment of faecal incontinence. Tech Coloproctol 20(1):19–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Thomas GP, Dudding TC, Rahbour G, Nicholls RJ, Vaizey CJ (2013) A review of posterior tibial nerve stimulation for faecal incontinence. Colorectal Dis 15:519–526

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Horrocks EJ, Thin N, Thaha MA et al (2014) Systematic review of tibial nerve stimulation to treat faecal incontinence. Br J Surg 101:457–468

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Tan E, Ngo NT, Darzi A, Shenouda M, Tekkis PP (2011) Meta-analysis: sacral nerve stimulation versus conservative therapy in the treatment of faecal incontinence. Int J Colorectal Dis 26:275–294

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Edenfield AL, Amundsen CL, Wu JM, Levin PJ, Siddiqui NY (2015) Posterior tibial nerve stimulation for the treatment of fecal incontinence: a systematic evidence review. Obstet Gynecol Surv 70(5):329–341

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Knowles CH, Horrocks EJ, Bremner SA, Stevens N, Norton C, O’Connell PR (2015) Percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation versus sham electrical stimulation for the treatment of faecal incontinence in adults (CONFIDeNT): a double-blind, multicentre, pragmatic, parallel-group, randomised controlled trial. Lancet 386(10004):1640–1648

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. De la Portilla F, Rada R, Vega J, González CA, Cisneros N, Maldonado VH (2009) Evaluation of the use of posterior tibial nerve stimulation for the treatment of fecal incontinence: preliminary results of a prospective study. Dis Colon Rectum 52(8):1427–1433. https://doi.org/10.1007/DCR.0b013e3181a7476a

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Glasgow SC, Lowry AC (2012) Long-term outcomes of anal sphincter repair for fecal incontinence: a systematic review. Dis Colon Rectum 55:482–490

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Halverson AL, Hull TL (2002) Long-term outcome of overlapping anal sphincter repair. Dis Colon Rectum 45:345–348

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Hotouras A, Murphy J, Walsh U, Allison M, Curry A, Williams NS, Knowles C, Chan CL (2014) Outcome of percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation (PTNS) for fecal incontinence: a prospective cohort study. Ann Surg 259(5):939–943

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Marti L, Galata C, Beutner U, Hetzer F, Pipitone N, Wolff K, Borovicka J, Brunner W, Sulz MC, Maurus C (2017) Percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation (pTNS): success rate and the role of rectal capacity. Int J Colorectal Dis 32(6):789–796

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Van der Wilt AA, Giuliani G, Kubis C, van Wunnik BPW, Ferreira I, Breukink SO, Lehur PA, La Torre F, Baeten CGMI (2017) Randomized clinical trial of percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation versus sham electrical stimulation in patients with faecal incontinence. Br J Surg 104(9):1167–1176

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Vall d’Hebron Hospital, Barcelona, Spain

    M. Hidalgo-Pujol

  2. Colorectal Unit, Aldo Moro University Bari, Bari, Italy

    V. Andriola

  3. Department of Colorectal Surgery, Vall d’Hebron Hospital, Barcelona, Spain

    L. M. Jimenez-Gomez & E. Espin

  4. CAP Sant Andreu, Barcelona, Spain

    F. Ostiz

Authors
  1. M. Hidalgo-Pujol
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. V. Andriola
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. L. M. Jimenez-Gomez
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. F. Ostiz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. E. Espin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. Hidalgo-Pujol.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors have no commercial associations that might be a conflict of interest in relation to this article.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all participants.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hidalgo-Pujol, M., Andriola, V., Jimenez-Gomez, L.M. et al. Medium-term outcome of percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation in the treatment of fecal incontinence. Tech Coloproctol 22, 875–879 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10151-018-1892-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10151-018-1892-0

Keywords

Search

Navigation