Abstract
Background
The injection of bulking agents into the anal canal has been reported to help patients with fecal incontinence. Although it has been advocated as a safe and effective option, substantial data concerning long-term efficacy are still lacking, and the resorption process of the implants has not yet been carefully studied. The aim of our study was to investigate the long-term outcomes of bulking agents for the treatment of fecal incontinence and the behavior of implanted materials in the anorectum.
Methods
At a median follow-up of 7 years, 19 patients with idiopathic fecal incontinence who had received bulking agent implants were evaluated. Clinical, manometric and ultrasound assessments were carried out.
Results
The clinical improvements that were achieved in the short term were not maintained over time. For each patient, the number of implants that could no longer be identified on ultrasound was significantly correlated with poorer clinical long-term outcomes. On average, only 14 % of the originally injected volume was still detectable.
Conclusions
In the long term, perianally injected bulking agents seem to lose effectiveness. The ultrasound assessment suggests that the process of resorption is almost complete, and the implants are no longer effective in treating incontinence.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Shafik A (1993) Polytetrafluoroethylene injection for the treatment of partial fecal incontinence. Int Surg 78:159–161
Altomare DF, La Torre F, Rinaldi M, Binda G, Pescatori M (2008) Carbon-coated microbeads anal injection in outpatient treatment of minor fecal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum 5:432–435
Guerra F, Velluti F, Crocetti D, La Torre F (2010) PTQTM bulking agent injection for the treatment of fecal incontinence: QoL and manometric evaluation. Pelviperineology 29:27–29
Dodi G, Jongen J, de la Portilla F, Raval M, Altomare DF, Lehur PA (2010) An open-label, noncomparative, multicenter study to evaluate efficacy and safety of NASHA/Dx gel as a bulking agent for the treatment of fecal incontinence. Gastroenterol Res Pract 2010:467136. doi:10.1155/2010/467136
Graf W, Mellgren A, Matzel KE, Hull T, Johansson C, Bernstein M (2011) Efficacy of dextranomer in stabilized hyaluronic acid for treatment of faecal incontinence: a randomized, sham-controlled trial. Lancet 377:997–1003
La Torre F, de la Portilla F (2013) Long-term efficacy of dextranomer in stabilized hyaluronic acid (NASHA/Dx) for treatment of faecal incontinence. Colorectal Dis 15:569–574
Hussain ZI, Lim M, Stojkovic SG (2011) Systematic review of perianal implants in the treatment of fecal incontinence. Br J Surg 98:1526–1536
Jorge JM, Wexner SD (1993) Etiology and management of faecal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum 36:77–97
Ratto C, Parello A, Dionisi L et al (2011) Novel bulking agent for faecal incontinence. Br J Surg 98:1644–1652
Gorton E, Stanton S, Monga A, Wiskind AK, Lentz GM, Bland DR (1999) Periurethral collagen injection: a long-term follow-up study. BJU Int 84:966–971
Chrouser KL, Fick F, Goel A, Itano NB, Sweat SD, Lightner DJ (2004) Carbon coated zirconium beads in beta-glucan gel and bovine glutaraldehyde cross-linked collagen injections for intrinsic sphincter deficiency: continence and satisfaction after extended followup. J Urol 171:1152–1155
Maeda Y, Laurberg S, Norton C (2010) Perianal injectable bulking agents as treatment for faecal incontinence in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 12:CD007959
Luo C, Samaranayake CB, Plank LD, Bisset IP (2010) Systematic review on the efficacy and safety of injectable bulking agents for passive faecal incontinence. Colorectal Dis 12:296–303
Watson NFS, Kochy A, Sagar PM (2012) Anal bulking agents for faecal incontinence. Colorectal Dis 14(suppl 3):29–33
Maeda Y, Vaizey CJ, Kamm MA (2007) Long-term results of perianal silicone injection for faecal incontinence. Colorectal Dis 9:357–361
Bartlett L, Ho YH (2009) PTQ™ anal implants for the treatment of faecal incontinence. Br J Surg 96:1468–1475
Tjandra JJ, Chan MK, Yeh HC (2009) Injectable silicone biomaterial (PTQ) is more effective than carbon-coated beads (Durasphere) in treating passive faecal incontinence—a randomized trial. Colorectal Dis 11:382–389
Tjandra JJ, Lim JF, Hiscock R, Rajendra P (2004) Injectable silicone biomaterial for fecal incontinence caused by internal anal sphincter dysfunction is effective. Dis Colon Rectum 47:2138–2146
Acknowledgments
Dr Guerra wishes to thank both Dr Marco Bisello, one of his mentors in coloproctology, and Dr Francesco Antonio Polistina for their helpful review and comments.
Conflict of interest
None.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Guerra, F., La Torre, M., Giuliani, G. et al. Long-term evaluation of bulking agents for the treatment of fecal incontinence: clinical outcomes and ultrasound evidence. Tech Coloproctol 19, 23–27 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10151-014-1236-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10151-014-1236-7