Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Comparison of safety and efficacy of S-1 monotherapy and S-1 plus cisplatin therapy in elderly patients with advanced gastric cancer

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Journal of Clinical Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Although S-1 plus cisplatin (SP) therapy is recognized as the standard treatment for advanced gastric cancer (AGC) in Japan, its safety and efficacy in elderly patients have not been investigated sufficiently.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed the data of 58 patients with AGC selected from 82 consecutive patients who were ≥70 years old and were treated with SP or S-1 monotherapy as the first-line therapy. In SP, S-1 (40 mg/m2, bid) was administered for 3 weeks and cisplatin (60 mg/m2) on day 8, every 5 weeks. In S-1 monotherapy, S-1 (40 mg/m2, bid) was administered for 4 weeks, every 6 weeks.

Results

SP and S-1 was administered in 21 and 37 patients, respectively. There were some differences in patient characteristics between the treatment groups, such as histological type (P = 0.16); the presence of liver metastasis (P = 0.07); and the presence of peritoneal metastasis (P = 0.02). The incidences of grade 3/4 hematological toxicities were 57% (12/21) in the SP and 35% (13/37) in the S-1 group (P = 0.17). Those of non-hematological toxicities were 14% (3/21) and 14% (5/37) for anorexia, 10% (2/21) and 14% (5/37) for fatigue, and 5% (1/21) and 5% (2/37) for nausea in the SP and S-1 groups, respectively. Median progression-free survival and median overall survival in the SP and S-1 groups were 5.0 and 5.2 months, and 14.4 and 10.9 months, respectively.

Conclusion

SP and S-1 therapy were both feasible in elderly patients, though there is the risk of a high incidence of hematological toxicities.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Munoz N, Franceschi S (1997) Epidemiology of gastric cancer and perspectives for prevention. Salud Publica Mex 39:318–330

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Kamangar F, Dores GM, Anderson WF (2006) Patterns of cancer incidence, mortality, and prevalence across five continents: defining priorities to reduce cancer disparities in different geographic regions of the world. J Clin Oncol 24:2137–2150

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Murad AM, Santiago FF, Petroianu A et al (1993) Modified therapy with 5-fluorouracil, doxorubicin, and methotrexate in advanced gastric cancer. Cancer 72:37–41

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Glimelius B, Hoffman K, Haglund U et al (1994) Initial or delayed chemotherapy with best supportive care in advanced gastric cancer. Ann Oncol 5:189–190

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Pyrhonen S, Kuitunen T, Nyandoto P et al (1995) Randomized comparison of fluorouracil, epidoxorubicin and methotrexate (FEMTX) plus best supportive care alone in patients with non-resectable gastric cancer. Br J Cancer 71:587–591

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Boku N, Yamamoto S, Fukuda H et al (2009) Fluorouracil versus combination of irinotecan plus cisplatin versus S-1 in metastatic gastric cancer: a randomised phase 3 study. Lancet Oncol 10:1063–1069

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Koizumi W, Narahara H, Hara T et al (2007) S-1 plus cisplatin versus S-1 alone for first-line treatment of advanced gastric cancer (SPIRITS trial): a phase III trial. Lancet Oncol 9:215–221

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Narahara H, Iishi H, Imamura H et al (2011) Randomized phase III study comparing the efficacy and safety of irinotecan plus S-1 with S-1 alone as first-line treatment for advanced gastric cancer (study GC0301/TOP-002). Gastric Cancer 14:72–80

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Jemal A, Siegel R, Ward E et al (2009) Cancer statistics, 2009. CA Cancer J Clin 59:225–249

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Koo DH, Ryoo BY, Kim HJ et al (2011) A prognostic model in patients who receive chemotherapy for metastatic or recurrent gastric cancer: validation and comparison with previous models. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 68:913–921

    Google Scholar 

  11. Lee JL, Kang YK, Kang HJ et al (2008) A randomised multicentre phase II trial of capecitabine vs S-1 as first-line treatment in elderly patients with metastatic or recurrent unresectable gastric cancer. Br J Cancer 99:584–590

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Lichtman SM, Wildiers H, Chatelut E et al (2007) International society of geriatric oncology chemotherapy taskforce: evaluation of chemotherapy in older patients—an analysis of the medical literature. J Clin Oncol 25:1832–1843

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Lichtman SM, Boparai MK (2008) Anticancer drug therapy in the older cancer patient: pharmacology and polypharmacy. Curr Treat Options Oncol 9:191–203

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Hurria A, Lichtman SM (2008) Clinical pharmacology of cancer therapies in older adults. Br J Cancer 98:517–522

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Tatsumi K, Fukushima M, Shirasaka T et al (1987) Inhibitory effects of pyrimidine, barbituric acid and pyridine derivatives on 5-fluorouracil degradation in rat liver extracts. Jpn J Cancer Res 78:748–755

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Hirata K, Horikoshi N, Aiba K et al (1999) Pharmacokinetic study of S-1, a novel oral fluorouracil antitumor drug. Clin Cancer Res 5:2000–2005

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Nagashima F, Ohtsu A, Yoshida S et al (2005) Japanese nationwide post-marketing survey of S-1 in patients with advanced gastric cancer. Gastric Cancer 8:6–11

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Lindeman RD, Tobin J, Shock NW (1985) Longitudinal studies of decline in renal function with age. J Am Geriatr Soc 33:278–285

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Balducci L, Beghe C (2000) The application of the principles of geriatrics to the management of the older person with cancer. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 35:147–154

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Repetto L, Frantino L, Audisio RA et al (2002) Comprehensive geriatric assessment adds information to eastern cooperative oncology group performance status in elderly cancer patients: an italian group for geriatric oncology study. J Clin Oncol 20:494–502

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Chen H, Cantor A, Meyer J et al (2003) Can older cancer patients tolerate chemotherapy? A prospective pilot study. Cancer 97:1107–1114

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Freyer G, Geay JF, Touzet S et al (2005) Comprehensive geriatric assessment predicts tolerance to chemotherapy and survival in elderly patients with advanced ovarian carcinoma: a GINECO study. Ann Oncol 16:1795–1800

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Monfardini S, Ferrucci L, Fratino L et al (1996) Validation of a multidimensional scale for use in elderly cancer patients. Cancer 77:395–401

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Extermann M, Hurria A (2007) Comprehensive geriatric assessment for older patients with cancer. J Clin Oncol 25:1824–1831

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Graziano F, Santini D, Testa E et al (2003) A phase II study of weekly cisplatin, 6S-stereoisomer leucovorin and fluorouracil as first-line chemotherapy for elderly patients with advanced gastric cancer. Br J Cancer 89:1428–1432

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Santini D, Graziano F, Catalano V et al (2006) Weekly oxaliplatin, 5-fluorouracil and folinic acid (OXALF) as first-line chemotherapy for elderly patients with advanced gastric cancer: results of a phase II trial. BMC Cancer 6:125

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Kim YJ, Kim JH, Park MS et al (2011) Comprehensive geriatric assessment in Korean elderly cancer patients receiving chemotherapy. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 137:839–847

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

No author has any conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Takahiro Tsushima.

About this article

Cite this article

Tsushima, T., Hironaka, S., Boku, N. et al. Comparison of safety and efficacy of S-1 monotherapy and S-1 plus cisplatin therapy in elderly patients with advanced gastric cancer. Int J Clin Oncol 18, 10–16 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10147-011-0335-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10147-011-0335-y

Keywords

Navigation