Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Clinical utility of a focused hip MRI for assessing suspected hip fracture in the emergency department

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Emergency Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

A focused hip MRI (FHMR) for the detection of radiographically occult hip fractures was implemented in our emergency department (ED) in 2013. The goal of this study was to assess the clinical utility of this protocol.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed radiology reports of 262 unique patients who underwent 263 FHMR (coronal T1, coronal STIR, axial T2 fat saturated) for suspected hip fracture in the ED from October 2013 to March 2020. Electronic medical records were reviewed for the ED course, follow-up imaging, and clinical management within 90 days.

Results

Seventy-one patients had one or more fractures identified by FHMR: one-third had proximal femoral fractures; two-third had pelvic fractures. Of these 71 patients, 53 (74%) had radiographically occult fractures, including 14 (20%) with occult proximal femoral fractures; 4 patients had fractures occult on CT. Nineteen patients with a suspected fracture on radiography were found to have no fracture on FHMR. Four fractures not reported on FHMR were later seen on follow-up imaging: these included 1 isolated greater trochanter, 1 additional ischial tuberosity, 1 additional superior pubic ramus, and 1 additional sacrum. All four fractures were treated non-operatively. Muscle/tendon injury was the most common type of injury, seen in 50% (130/262) patients with the most commonly torn tendons being the hamstring (44%; 15/34) followed by gluteus medius tendon (18%; 6/34). A full-hip or pelvis MRI was done after FHMR in only 5 patients, primarily for the purpose of better characterizing findings already identified on FHMR (2 for fracture, 2 for tendon injury, 1 for soft tissue metastasis). Only one of these five studies provided new information: ruling out a previously questioned fracture. Clinical management of the vast majority of patients was based solely on findings from the FHMR.

Conclusions

FHMR offers reliable identification of radiographically occult hip fractures and muscle/tendon injuries. The protocol is well trusted in guiding patient management in our ED.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

Yes, if requested.

References

  1. Ross AB, Lee KS, Chang EY, Amini B, Bussell JK, Gorbachova T, Ha AS, Khurana B, Klitzke A, Mooar PA, Shah NA, Singer AD, Smith SE, Taljanovic MS, Kransdorf MJ (2019) ACR Appropriateness Criteria® acute hip pain-suspected fracture. J Am Coll Radiol 16:S18–S25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacr.2019.02.028

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Dominguez S, Liu P, Roberts C, Mandell M, Richman PB (2005) Prevalence of traumatic hip and pelvic fractures in patients with suspected hip fracture and negative initial standard radiographs-a study of emergency department patients. Acad Emerg Med 12:366–369. https://doi.org/10.1197/j.aem.2004.10.024

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Kirby MW, Spritzer C (2010) Radiographic detection of hip and pelvic fractures in the emergency department. Am J Roentgenol 194:1054–1060. https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.09.3295

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Deleanu B, Prejbeanu R, Tsiridis E, Vermesan D, Crisan D, Haragus H, Predescu V, Birsasteanu F (2015) Occult fractures of the proximal femur: imaging diagnosis and management of 82 cases in a regional trauma center. World J Emerg Surg 10:1–6. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13017-015-0049-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Haj-Mirzaian A, Eng J, Khorasani R, Raja AS, Levin AS, Smith SE, Johnson PT, Demehri S (2020) Use of advanced imaging for radiographically occult hip fracture in elderly patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Radiology:192167. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2020192167

  6. Hu F, Jiang C, Shen J, Tang P, Wang Y (2012) Preoperative predictors for mortality following hip fracture surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Injury 43:676–685. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2011.05.017

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Simunovic N, Devereaux PJ, Sprague S, Guyatt GH, Schemitsch E, DeBeer J, Bhandari M (2010) Effect of early surgery after hip fracture on mortality and complications: systematic review and meta-analysis. Can Med Assoc J 182:1609–1616. https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.092220

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Pincus D, Wasserstein D, Ravi B, Huang A, Paterson JM, Jenkinson RJ, Kreder HJ, Nathens AB, Wodchis WP (2018) Medical costs of delayed hip fracture surgery. J Bone Joint Surg Am 100:1387–1396. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.17.01147

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Veronese N, Maggi S (2018) Epidemiology and social costs of hip fracture. Injury 49:1458–1460. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2018.04.015

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Collin D, Geijer M, Göthlin JH (2016) Computed tomography compared to magnetic resonance imaging in occult or suspect hip fractures. A retrospective study in 44 patients. Eur Radiol 26:3932–3938. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-015-4189-y

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Hakkarinen DK, Banh KV, Hendey GW (2012) Magnetic resonance imaging identifies occult hip fractures missed by 64-slice computed tomography. J Emerg Med 43:303–307. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jemermed.2012.01.037

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Alabousi M, Gauthier ID, Li N, dos Santos GMF, Golev D, Patlas MN, Alabousi A (2019) Multi-detector CT for suspected hip fragility fractures: a diagnostic test accuracy systematic review and meta-analysis. Emerg Radiol 26:549–556. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10140-019-01696-x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Haubro M, Stougaard C, Torfing T, Overgaard S (2015) Sensitivity and specificity of CT- and MRI-scanning in evaluation of occult fracture of the proximal femur. Injury 46:1557–1561. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2015.05.006

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Kellock TT, Nicolaou S, Kim SSY, al-Busaidi S, Louis LJ, O’Connell TW, Ouellette HA, McLaughlin PD (2017) Detection of bone marrow edema in nondisplaced hip fractures: utility of a virtual noncalcium dual-energy CT application. Radiology 284:798–805. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2017161063

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Kellock TT, Khurana B, Mandell JC (2019) Diagnostic performance of CT for occult proximal femoral fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Roentgenol 213:1324–1330. https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.19.21510

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Verbeeten KM, Hermann KL, Hasselqvist M, Lausten GS, Joergensen P, Jensen CM, Thomsen HS (2005) The advantages of MRI in the detection of occult hip fractures. Eur Radiol 15:165–169. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-004-2421-2

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Saboo SS, Lin YC, Juan YH, Patel K, Weaver M, Sodickson A, Khurana B (2015) Magnetic resonance imaging for acute hip pain in the emergency department. Emerg Radiol 22:409–422. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10140-014-1293-2

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Collin D, Geijer M, Göthlin JH (2016) Prevalence of exclusively and concomitant pelvic fractures at magnetic resonance imaging of suspect and occult hip fractures. Emerg Radiol 23:17–21. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10140-015-1350-5

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Cabarrus MC, Ambekar A, Lu Y, Link TM (2008) MRI and CT of insufficiency fractures of the pelvis and the proximal femur. Am J Roentgenol 191:995–1001. https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.07.3714

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Yun BJ, Myriam Hunink MG, Prabhakar AM, Heng M, Liu SW, Qudsi R, Raja AS (2016) Diagnostic imaging strategies for occult hip fractures: a decision and cost–effectiveness analysis. Acad Emerg Med 23:1161–1169. https://doi.org/10.1111/acem.13026

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Khoury NJ, Birjawi GA, Chaaya M, Hourani MH (2003) Use of limited MR protocol (coronal STIR) in the evaluation of patients with hip pain. Skelet Radiol 32:567–574. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00256-003-0671-8

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Khurana B, Okanobo H, Ossiani M, Ledbetter S, Dulaimy KA, Sodickson A (2012) Abbreviated MRI for patients presenting to the emergency department with hip pain. Am J Roentgenol 198:17–19. https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.11.7258

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Ross AB, Chan BY, Yi PH, Repplinger MD, Vanness DJ, Lee KS (2019) Diagnostic accuracy of an abbreviated MRI protocol for detecting radiographically occult hip and pelvis fractures in the elderly. Skelet Radiol 48:103–108. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00256-018-3004-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Wilson MP, Nobbee D, Murad MH et al (2020) Diagnostic accuracy of limited MRI protocols for detecting Radiographically occult hip fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Roentgenol:1–9. https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.19.22676

  25. Sembler Soles GL, Lien J, Tornetta P (2012) Nonoperative immediate weightbearing of minimally displaced lateral compression sacral fractures does not result in displacement. J Orthop Trauma 26:563–567. https://doi.org/10.1097/BOT.0b013e318251217b

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Coccolini F, Stahel PF, Montori G, Biffl W, Horer TM, Catena F, Kluger Y, Moore EE, Peitzman AB, Ivatury R, Coimbra R, Fraga GP, Pereira B, Rizoli S, Kirkpatrick A, Leppaniemi A, Manfredi R, Magnone S, Chiara O, Solaini L, Ceresoli M, Allievi N, Arvieux C, Velmahos G, Balogh Z, Naidoo N, Weber D, Abu-Zidan F, Sartelli M, Ansaloni L (2017) Pelvic trauma: WSES classification and guidelines. World J Emerg Surg 12:5. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13017-017-0117-6

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Author notes

  1. Vera Kimbrell

    Present address: Department of Radiology, Duke University Hospital, 2301 Erwin Rd, Durham, NC, 27710, USA

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Radiology, Division of Emergency Radiology, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, 75 Francis St, Boston, MA, 02215, USA

    Ellen X. Sun

  2. Department of Radiology, Division of Musculoskeletal Imaging and Intervention, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, 75 Francis St, Boston, MA, 02215, USA

    Jacob C. Mandell

  3. Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, 75 Francis St, Boston, MA, 02215, USA

    Michael J. Weaver

  4. Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, 75 Francis St, Boston, MA, 02215, USA

    Vera Kimbrell

  5. Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, 55 Fruit Street, Boston, MA, 02114, USA

    Mitchel B. Harris

  6. Trauma Imaging Research and Innovation Center, Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, 75 Francis St, Boston, MA, 02215, USA

    Bharti Khurana

Authors
  1. Ellen X. Sun
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Jacob C. Mandell
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Michael J. Weaver
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Vera Kimbrell
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Mitchel B. Harris
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Bharti Khurana
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ellen X. Sun.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

No relevant disclosure. Other declarations per specific authors are listed on the nonblinded title page. Ellen X. Sun: no relevant disclosure. Jacob C. Mandell: no relevant disclosure. Other affiliations to disclose: Book Royalties from the Cambridge University Press. Michael J. Weaver: no relevant disclosure. Vera L. Kimbrell: no relevant disclosure. Mitchel B. Harris: no relevant disclosure. Other affiliations to disclose: research support from GE Healthcare. Bharti Khurana: no relevant disclosure. Other affiliations to disclose: research support from GE Healthcare; Book Royalties from Cambridge University Press; Emergency Radiology section editor royalties from UpToDate; and grant support not relevant to this work: Stepping Strong Injury Prevention Innovation, BCRISP, and Innovation Discovery Grants, Mass General Brigham.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This retrospective study was approved by the institutional review board with waiver of informed consent.

Consent for publication

Yes.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

ESM 1

(DOCX 2529 kb).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sun, E.X., Mandell, J.C., Weaver, M.J. et al. Clinical utility of a focused hip MRI for assessing suspected hip fracture in the emergency department. Emerg Radiol 28, 317–325 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10140-020-01870-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10140-020-01870-6

Keywords

Search

Navigation