Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Does aPDT reduce bacterial load in endodontic infected teeth? A systematic review and meta-analysis

  • Review Article
  • Published:
Lasers in Medical Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This systematic review investigated whether antimicrobial photodynamic therapy (aPDT) after chemomechanical root canal disinfection (CD) yields a greater microbial load reduction than only CD. An electronic literature search was conducted on four databases up to November 2022, with no language or publication date restrictions. Randomized and non-randomized clinical trials were included if participants had a primary endodontic infection in permanent teeth, and if microbial loads before and after using aPDT were compared. Two researchers independently screened titles and abstracts to determine study eligibility. Assessments included risk of bias and methodological quality. This review was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42020181783). Eight studies were included in the qualitative analysis, and six were eligible for meta-analysis. In the random effects model, aPDT significantly improved the results of root canal disinfection when compared with standard protocols for cleaning and shaping (p = 0.04, 95% CI -1.72, -0.05). Subgroup analysis suggested that aPDT has a better effect on reducing the load of anaerobic microorganisms (p = 0.003, 95% CI -3.36, -0.69). The use of aPDT as an adjunct to chemomechanical disinfection promotes additional reduction of the microbial load and, therefore, seems to improve the results of root canal treatments in permanent teeth with a primary endodontic infection. However, certainty of evidence should be improved.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

Not applied.

References

  1. de Oliveira BP, Aguiar CM, Câmara AC, de Albuquerque MM, Correia AC, Soares MF (2015) The efficacy of photodynamic therapy and sodium hypochlorite in root canal disinfection by a single-file instrumentation technique. Photodiagnosis Photodyn Ther 12:436–443. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pdpdt.2015.05.004

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Rosa RAD, Santini MF, Figueiredo JAP, Visioli F, Pereira JR, Vivan RR et al (2017) Effectiveness of photodynamic therapy associated with irrigants over two biofilm models. Photodiagnosis Photodyn Ther 20:169–174. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pdpdt.2017.10.003

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Wainwright M (1998) Photodynamic antimicrobial chemotherapy (PACT). J Antimicrob Chemother 42:13–28. https://doi.org/10.1093/jac/42.1.13

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Carrera ET, Dias HB, Corbi SCT, Marcantonio RAC, Bernardi ACA, Bagnato VS et al (2016) The application of antimicrobial photodynamic therapy (aPDT) in dentistry: a critical review. Laser Phys 26:123001. https://doi.org/10.1088/1054-660X/26/12/123001

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Kalka K, Merk H, Mukhtar H (2000) Photodynamic therapy in dermatology. J Am Acad Dermatol 42:389–413. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0190-9622(00)90209-3

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Konopka K, Goslinski T (2007) Photodynamic therapy in dentistry. J Dent Res 86:694–707. https://doi.org/10.1177/154405910708600803

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Gursoy H, Ozcakir-Tomruk C, Tanalp J, Yilmaz S (2013) Photodynamic therapy in dentistry: a literature review. Clin Oral Investig 17:1113–1125. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-012-0845-7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Aveiro E, Chiarelli-Neto VM, de-Jesus-Soares A, Zaia AA, Ferraz CCR, Almeida JFA et al (2020) Efficacy of reciprocating and ultrasonic activation of 6% sodium hypochlorite in the reduction of microbial content and virulence factors in teeth with primary endodontic infection. Int Endod J 53:604–618. https://doi.org/10.1111/iej.13261

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Nair PN (2006) On the causes of persistent apical periodontitis: a review. Int Endod J 39:249–281. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2591.2006.01099.x

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Larsson DGJ, Flach CF (2022) Antibiotic resistance in the environment. Nat Rev Microbiol 20:257–269. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41579-021-00649-x

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Abdelkarim-Elafifi H, Parada-Avendaño I, Arnabat-Dominguez J (2021) Photodynamic therapy in endodontics: a helpful tool to combat antibiotic resistance? A literature review. Antibiotics (Basel) 13:1106. https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics10091106

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Ng R, Singh F, Papamanou DA, Song X, Patel C, Holewa C et al (2011) Endodontic photodynamic therapy ex vivo. J Endod 37:217–222. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2010.10.008

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Fimple JL, Fontana CR, Foschi F, Ruggiero K, Song X, Pagonis TC (2008) Photodynamic treatment of endodontic polymicrobial infection in vitro. J Endod 34:728–734. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2008.03.011

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Asnaashari M, Mojahedi SM, Asadi Z, Azari-Marhabi S, Maleki A (2016) A comparison of the antibacterial activity of the two methods of photodynamic therapy (using diode laser 810 nm and LED lamp 630 nm) against Enterococcus faecalis in extracted human anterior teeth. Photodiagnosis Photodyn Ther 13:233–237. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pdpdt.2015.07.171

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Soares JA, Santos Soares SMC, Santos César CA, de Carvalho MAR, Brito-Júnior M, de Sousa GR (2016) Monitoring the effectiveness of photodynamic therapy with periodic renewal of the photosensitizer on intracanal Enterococcus faecalis biofilms. Photodiagnosis Photodyn Ther 13:123–127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pdpdt.2016.01.002

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Rabello DGD, Corazza BJM, Ferreira LL, Santamaria MP, Gomes APM, Martinho FC (2017) Does supplemental photodynamic therapy optimize the disinfection of bacteria and endotoxins in one-visit and two-visit root canal therapy? A randomized clinical trial. Photodiagnosis Photodyn Ther 19:205–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pdpdt.2017.06.005

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Ahangari Z, Mojtahed Bidabadi M, Asnaashari M, Rahmati A, Tabatabaei FS (2017) Comparison of the antimicrobial efficacy of calcium hydroxide and photodynamic therapy against enterococcus Faecalis and candida Albicans in teeth with periapical lesions; an in vivo study. J Lasers Med Sci 8:72–78. https://doi.org/10.15171/jlms.2017.13

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Asnaashari M, Ashraf H, Rahmati A, Amini N (2017) A comparison between effect of photodynamic therapy by LED and calcium hydroxide therapy for root canal disinfection against Enterococcus faecalis: A randomized controlled trial. Photodiagnosis Photodyn Ther 17:226–232. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pdpdt.2016.12.009

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Pourhajibagher M, Bahador A (2019) Adjunctive antimicrobial photodynamic therapy to conventional chemo-mechanical debridement of infected root canal systems: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Photodiagnosis Photodyn Ther 26:19–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pdpdt.2019.02.009

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Chrepa V, Kotsakis GA, Pagonis TC, Hargreaves KM (2014) The effect of photodynamic therapy in root canal disinfection: a systematic review. J Endod 40:891–898. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2014.03.005

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, Boutron I, Hoffmann TC, Mulrow CD et al (2021) The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ 29:n71. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Schulz KF, Altman DG, Moher D, CONSORT Group (2010) CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials. BMC Med 24:18. https://doi.org/10.1186/1741-7015-8-18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Des Jarlais DC, Lyles C, Crepaz N, TREND Group (2004) Improving the reporting quality of nonrandomized evaluations of behavioral and public health interventions: the TREND statement. Am J Public Health 94:361–6. https://doi.org/10.2105/ajph.94.3.361

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Sterne JAC, Savović J, Page MJ, Elbers RG, Blencowe NS, Boutron I et al (2019) RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. BMJ 28:l4898. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.l4898

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Sterne JA, Hernán MA, Reeves BC, Savović J, Berkman ND, Viswanathan M et al (2016) ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions. BMJ 12:i4919. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.i4919

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Brozek JL, Canelo-Aybar C, Akl EA, Bowen JM, Bucher J, Chiu WA et al (2021) GRADE Guidelines 30: the GRADE approach to assessing the certainty of modeled evidence-An overview in the context of health decision-making. J Clin Epidemiol 129:138–150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2020.09.018

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Schünemann HBJ, Guyatt G, Oxman A (2013) GRADE Handbook. Available from: https://gdt.gradepro.org/app/handbook/handbook.html#h.svwngs6pm0f2

  28. Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Vist GE, Kunz R, Falck-Ytter Y, Alonso-Coello P et al (2008) GRADE: an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. BMJ 26:924–926. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.39489.470347.AD

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Higgins JP, White IR, Anzures-Cabrera J (2008) Meta-analysis of skewed data: combining results reported on log-transformed or raw scales. Stat Med 20:6072–6092. https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.3427

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Garcez AS, Núñez SC, Hamblin MR, Ribeiro MS, editors (2008) Antimicrobial comparison on effectiveness of endodontic therapy and endodontic therapy combined with photo-disinfection on patients with periapical lesion: A 6 month follow-up. Prog Biomed Opt Imaging – Proc SPIE.https://doi.org/10.1117/12.763705

  31. Morsy DA, Negm M, Diab A, Ahmed G (2018) Postoperative pain and antibacterial effect of 980 nm diode laser versus conventional endodontic treatment in necrotic teeth with chronic periapical lesions: A randomized control trial. F1000Res 15:1795. https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.16794.1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Zorita-García M, Alonso-Ezpeleta LÓ, Cobo M, Del Campo R, Rico-Romano C, Mena-Álvarez J et al (2019) Photodynamic therapy in endodontic root canal treatment significantly increases bacterial clearance, preventing apical periodontitis. Quintessence Int 50:782–789. https://doi.org/10.3290/j.qi.a43249

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Di Taranto V, Libonati A, Montemurro E, Gallusi G, Campanella V (2022) Antimicrobial effects of Photodynamic and high-power laser endodontic therapy on patients with necrotic pulp and periapical lesion. J Biol Regul Homeost Agents 36:41–48. https://doi.org/10.23812/j.biol.regul.homeost.agents.202236.2S1.5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Garcez AS, Nuñez SC, Hamblin MR, Ribeiro MS (2008) Antimicrobial effects of photodynamic therapy on patients with necrotic pulps and periapical lesion. J Endod 34:138–142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2007.10.020

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Fehrenbach J, Isolan CP, Münchow EA (2021) Is the presence of 10-MDP associated to higher bonding performance for self-etching adhesive systems? A meta-analysis of in vitro studies. Dent Mater 37:1463–1485. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2021.08.014

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Razumova SN, Brago AS, Barakat HB, Kozlova YS, Velichko EV, Vasiliev YL (2019) Microbiological study of the effectiveness of root canal treatment with an erbium laser. Biomedical Photonics 8:11–16. https://doi.org/10.24931/2413-9432-2019-8-4-11-16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Lindström MG, Wolf E, Fransson H (2017) The antibacterial effect of Nd:YAG laser treatment of teeth with apical periodontitis: A randomized controlled trial. J Endod 43:857–863. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2017.01.013

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Mohammadi Z, Dummer PM (2011) Properties and applications of calcium hydroxide in endodontics and dental traumatology. Int Endod J 44:697–730. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2591.2011.01886.x

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Tanomaru JM, Leonardo MR, Tanomaru Filho M, Bonetti Filho I, Silva LA (2003) Effect of different irrigation solutions and calcium hydroxide on bacterial LPS. Int Endod J 36:733–739. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2591.2003.00717.x

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Couto ACF, de Carvalho RVH, Brancini GTP, Martins FG, Sorgi CA, da Silva RAB et al (2021) Photosensitizers attenuate LPS-induced inflammation: implications in dentistry and general health. Lasers Med Sci 36:913–926. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10103-020-03180-2

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Nagata JY, Hioka N, Kimura E, Batistela VR, Terada RS, Graciano AX et al (2012) Antibacterial photodynamic therapy for dental caries: evaluation of the photosensitizers used and light source properties. Photodiagnosis Photodyn Ther 9:122–131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pdpdt.2011.11.006

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Siqueira JF Jr, Rôças IN (2022) Present status and future directions: Microbiology of endodontic infections. Int Endod J 55:512–530. https://doi.org/10.1111/iej.13677

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Neelakantan P, Romero M, Vera J, Daood U, Khan AU, Yan A et al (2017) Biofilms in endodontics-current status and future directions. Int J Mol Sci 11:1748. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms18081748

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Sakamoto M, Siqueira JF Jr, Rôças IN, Benno Y (2009) Diversity of spirochetes in endodontic infections. J Clin Microbiol 47:1352–1357. https://doi.org/10.1128/JCM.02016-08

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. Siqueira JF Jr, Rôças IN (2008) Clinical implications and microbiology of bacterial persistence after treatment procedures. J Endod 34:1291-1301.e3. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2008.07.028

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Siqueira JF (2001) Aetiology of root canal treatment failure: why well-treated teeth can fail: Aetiology of endodontic failure. Int Endod J 34:1–10

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Sjögren U, Figdor D, Persson S, Sundqvist G (1997) Influence of infection at the time of root filling on the outcome of endodontic treatment of teeth with apical periodontitis. Int Endod J 30:297–306. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2591.1997.00092.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Silva LABD, Lopes ZMS, Sá RC, Novaes Júnior AB, Romualdo PC, Lucisano MP et al (2019) Comparison of apical periodontitis repair in endodontic treatment with calcium hydroxide-dressing and aPDT. Braz Oral Res 26:e092. https://doi.org/10.1590/1807-3107bor-2019.vol33.0092

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Borsatto MC, Correa-Afonso AM, Lucisano MP, Bezerra da Silva RA, Paula-Silva FW, Nelson-Filho P et al (2016) One-session root canal treatment with antimicrobial photodynamic therapy (aPDT): an in vivo study. Int Endod J 49:511–518. https://doi.org/10.1111/iej.12486

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

No funding was obtained for this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Ramiro Martins Quintana: Data curation, Formal analysis, Writing—original draft; Roberta Kochenborger Scarparo: Conceptualization, Formal analysis, Writing review & editing; Eliseu Aldrighi Münchow: Formal analysis, Writing review & editing; Lucas Siqueira Pinheiro: Data curation, Writing—original draft Cauana Oliva Tavares: Writing review & editing; Patrícia Maria Poli Kopper: Conceptualization, Formal analysis, supervision, Writing—review & editing.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Patricia Maria Poli Kopper.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval

No ethical approval was required as this manuscript is a review article with no original research data.

Consent

Not applied.

Conflict of interest

The authors have no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose.

Materials and Method

This systematic review was reported according to the PRISMA Statement and was registered with the PROSPERO under the number CRD42020181783.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 26 KB)

Supplementary file2 (DOCX 34 KB)

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Quintana, R.M., Scarparo, R.K., Münchow, E.A. et al. Does aPDT reduce bacterial load in endodontic infected teeth? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Lasers Med Sci 38, 268 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10103-023-03938-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10103-023-03938-4

Keywords

Navigation