Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

cDNA microarray analysis of human keratinocytes cells of patients submitted to chemoradiotherapy and oral photobiomodulation therapy: pilot study

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Lasers in Medical Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Oral mucositis is an acute toxicity that occurs in patients submitted to chemoradiotherapy to treat head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. In this study, we evaluated differences in gene expression in the keratinocytes of the oral mucosa of patients treated with photobiomodulation therapy and tried to associate the molecular mechanisms with clinical findings. From June 2009 to December 2010, 27 patients were included in a randomized double-blind pilot study. Buccal smears from 13 patients were obtained at days 1 and 10 of chemoradiotherapy, and overall gene expression of samples from both dates were analyzed by complementary DNA (cDNA) microarray. In addition, samples from other 14 patients were also collected at D1 and D10 of chemoradiotherapy for subsequent validation of cDNA microarray findings by qPCR. The expression array analysis identified 105 upregulated and 60 downregulated genes in our post-treatment samples when compared with controls. Among the upregulated genes with the highest fold change, it was interesting to observe the presence of genes related to keratinocyte differentiation. Among downregulated genes were observed genes related to cytotoxicity and immune response. The results indicate that genes known to be induced during differentiation of human epidermal keratinocytes were upregulated while genes associated with cytotoxicity and immune response were downregulated in the laser group. These results support previous clinical findings indicating that the lower incidence of oral mucositis associated with photobiomodulation therapy might be correlated to the activation of genes involved in keratinocyte differentiation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Adelstein DJ, Li Y, Adams GL et al (2003) An intergroup phase III comparison of standard radiation therapy and two schedules of concurrent chemoradiotherapy in patients with unresectable squamous cell head and neck cancer. J Clin Oncol 21(1):92–98

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Trotti A, Bellm LA, Epstein JB et al (2003) Mucositis incidence, severity and associated outcomes in patients with head and neck cancer receiving radiotherapy with or without chemotherapy: a systematic literature review. Radiother Oncol 66(3):253–262

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Sonis ST (2004) The pathobiology of mucositis. Nat Rev Cancer 4:277–284

  4. Sonis S, Peterson R, Edwards L (2003) Defining mechanisms of action of interleukin-11 on the progression of radiation-induced mucositis in hamsters. Oral Oncol 6:393–381

    Google Scholar 

  5. Xanthinaki A, Nicolatou-Galitis O, Athanassiadou P et al (2008) Apoptotic and inflammation markers in oral mucositis in head and neck cancer patients receiving radiotherapy: preliminary report. Support Care Cancer 16(9):1025–1033

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Barasch A, Peterson DE, Tanzer JM et al (1995) Helium-neon laser effects on conditioning-induced oral mucositis in bone marrow transplantation patients. Cancer 76:2550–2556

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Cowen D, Tardieu C, Schubert M et al (1997) Low energy helium–neon laser in the prevention of oral mucositis in patients undergoing bone marrow transplantation: results of a double blind randomized trial. Int. J. Radiation Oncology Biol. Phys 38:697–703

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Antunes HS, Azevedo AM, Bouzas LFS et al (2007) Low power laser in the prevention of induced oral mucositis in bone marrow transplantation patients: a randomized trial. Blood 109:2250–2255

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Schubert MM, Eduardo FP, Guthrie KA et al (2007) A phase III randomized double-blind placebo-controlled clinical trial to determine the efficacy of low level laser therapy for the prevention of oral mucositis in patients undergoing hematopoietic cell transplantation. Support Care Cancer 15:1145–1154

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Silva GBL, Mendonça EF, Bariani C, Antunes HS, Silva MAG (2011) The prevention of induced oral mucositis with low-level laser therapy in bone marrow transplantation patients: a randomized clinical trial. Photomed Laser Surg 29:27–31

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Bensadoun RJ, Franquin JC, Ciais G et al (1999) Low-energy he/ne laser in the prevention of radiation-induced mucositis: a multicenter phase III randomized study in patients with head and neck cancer. Suport Care Cancer 7:244–252

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Maiya GA, Sagar MS, Fernandes D (2006) Effect of low helium neon (He-Ne) laser therapy in the prevention and treatment of radiation-induced mucositis in head and neck cancer patients. Indian J Med Res 124:399–402

    Google Scholar 

  13. Arora H, Pai KM, Maiya GA, Vidyasagar MS, Rajeev A (2008) Efficacy of He-Ne laser in the prevention and treatment of radiotherapy-induced oral mucositis in oral cancer patients. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Oral Endod 105:180–186

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Gouveia de Lima A, Villar RG, Castro JRG et al (2012) Oral mucositis prevention by low-level laser therapy in head and neck cancer patients undergoing concurrent chemoradiotherapy: a phase III randomized study. Int J Radiation Oncology Biol Phys 82:270–275

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Carvalho PA, Jaguar GC, Pellizzon AC et al (2011) Evaluation of low-level laser therapy in the prevention and treatment of radiation-induced mucositis: a double-blind randomized studyin head and neck cancer patients. Oral Oncol 47:1176–1181

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Gautam AP, Fernandes DJ, Vidyasagar MS, Maiya AG (2012) Low level helium neon laser therapy for chemoradiotherapy induced oral mucositis in oral cancer patients—a randomized controlled trial. Oral Oncol 48(9):893–897

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Gautam AP, Fernandes DJ, Vidyasagar MS, Maiya AG, Vadhiraja BM (2012) Low level laser therapy for concurrent chemoradiotherapy induced oral mucositis in head and neck cancer patients. A triple blinded randomized controlled trial. Radiother Oncol 104(3):349

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Antunes HS, Herchenhorn D, Small I et al (2013) Phase III trial of low-level laser therapy to prevent oral mucositis in head and neck cancer patients treated with concurrent chemoradiation. Radiother Oncol 109:297–302

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Yu H-S, Chang K-L, Yu C-L (1996) Low-energy hellion neon laser irradiation stimulates interleukin-1alfa and interleukin-8 release from cultured human keratinocytes. The Journal of Investigate Dermatology 107(4):593–596

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Karu T (1989) Photobiology of low-power laser effects. Health Phys 56(5):691–704

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Karu T (1999) Primary and secondary mechanisms of action of visible-to-near irradiation on cells. J Photochem Photobiol B 49(1):1–17

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Karu T, Afanasyeva NI, Kolyakov SF, Pyatibrat LV, Welser L (2001) Changes in absorvance of monolayer of living cells induced by laser radiation at 633,670, and 820 nm. Quantum Eletronic 7(6):982–988

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Karu TI, Pyatibrat LV, Afanasyeva NI (2004) A novel mitochondrial signaling pathway activated by visible-to-near infrared radiation. Photochem Photobiol 80(2):366–372

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Karu TI, Pyatibrat LV, Kolyakov SF, Afanasyeva NI (2008) Absorption measurements of cell monolayers relevant to mechanisms of laser phototherapy: reduction or oxidation of cytochrome c oxidase under laser radiation at 632.8 nm. Photomed Laser Surg 26(6):593–599

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Alexandratou E, Yova D, Handris P, Kletsas D, Loukas S (2002) Human fibroblast alterations induced by low power laser irradiation at the single cell level using confocal microscopy. Photochem PhotobiolSci 1(8):547–552

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Zhang Y, Song S, Fong CC, Tsang CH, Yang Z, Yang M (2003) cDNA microarray analisis of gene expression profiles in human fibroblast cells irradiated with red light. J Invest Dermatol 120(5):849–857

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Safavi SM, Kazemi B, Esmaeili M, Fallah A, Modarresi A, Mir M (2008) Effects of low-level He–Ne laser irradiation on the gene expression of IL-1β, TNF-α, IFN-γ, TGF-β, bFGF, and PDGF in rat’s gingiva. Lasers Med Sci 23(3):331–335

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Saygun I, Karacay S, Serdar M et al (2008) Effects of laser irradiation on the release of basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF), insulin like growth factor-1 (IGF-1), and receptor of IGF-1 (IGFBP3) from gingival fibroblasts. Lasers Med Sci 23(2):211–215

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Mvula B, Moore TJ, Abrahamse H (2010) Effect of low-level laser irradiation and epidermal growthfactor on adult human adipose-derived stem cells. Lasers Med Sci 25(1):33–39

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. WHO (1979) Handbook for reporting results of cancer treatment. WHO Offset Publication No. 48. World Health Organization, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  31. Sonis ST, Eilers JP, Epstein JB et al (1999) Validation of a new scoring system for the assessment of clinical trial research of oral mucositis induced by radiation or chemotherapy. Cancer 85:2103–2113

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. R Core Team (2017) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Available from http://www.r-project.org/

  33. Reimers M, Carey VJ (2006) Bioconductor: an open source framework for bioinformatics and computational biology. Methods Enzymol 411:119–134

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Zhang J (2017). tkWidgets: R based tk widgets. R package

  35. Irizarry RA, Hobbs B, Collin F et al (2003) Exploration, normalization, and summaries of high density oligonucleotide array probe level data. Biostatistics 4(2):249–264

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Gautier L, Cope L, Bolstad BM, Irizarry RA (2004) Affy-analysis of Affymetrix GeneChip data at the probe level. Bioinformatics 20(3):307–315

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Gentleman R, Carey V, Huber W and Hahne F. Genefilter: genefilter: methods for filtering genes from high-throughput experiments. R package version 1.50.0

  38. Smyth GK (2005) Limma: linear models for microarray data. In: Gentleman R, Carey V, Dudoit S, Irizarry R, Huber W (eds) Bioinformatics and computational biology solutions using R and bioconductor. Springer, New York, pp 397–420

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  39. Benjamini Y, Hochberg Y (1995) Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing (PDF). J R Stat Soc Ser B 57(1):289–300

    Google Scholar 

  40. Young MD, Wakefield MJ, Smyth GK, Oshlack A (2010) Gene ontology analysis for RNA-Seq: accounting for selection bias. Genome Biol 11(2):R14 [Internet]. Accessed 2 Jan 2015. Available from: http://genomebiology.com/2010/11/2/R14

  41. Ashburner M, Ball CA, Blake JA et al (2000) Gene ontology: tool for the unification of biology. The gene ontology consortium. Nat Genet 25(1):25–29

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. Morse DL, Carroll D, Weberg L et al (2005) Determining suitable internal standards for mRNA quantification of increasing cancer progression in human breast cells by real-time reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction. Anal Biochem 342(1):69–77

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Livak KJ, Schmittgen TD (2001) Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2(−Delta Delta C (T)) method. Methods 25(4):402–408

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Tsai CA, Wang SJ, Chen DT, Chen JJ (2005) Sample size for gene expression microarray experiments. Bioinformatics 21(8):1502–1508

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Gibbs S, Fijneman R, Wiegant J et al (1993) Molecular characterization and evolution of the SPRR family of keratinocyte differentiation markers encoding small proline-rich proteins. Genomics 16(3):630–637 [Internet]. Accessed 13 Jan 2015. Available from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8325635

  46. Antunes HS, Ferreira EMS, Mattos VD, Pinheiro CT, Ferreira CG (2008) The impact of low power laser in the treatment of conditioning-induced oral mucositis: a report of 11 clinical cases and their review. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal 13(3):E189–E192

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the National Cancer Institute, Brazil. The authors would like to thank the National Tumor Bank-INCA (BNT) for their support during the first stage of this work. F.P. is supported by the Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (FAPERJ) and the Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq). N.A.N.J and G.W. are supported by the Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES).

Role of funding source

No outside funding was received for this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Heliton S. Antunes.

Ethics declarations

The research protocol was initially submitted and approved by the Ethics Committee from the National Cancer Institute of Brazil (Protocol 17/07).

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Electronic supplementary material

Table S1

(DOCX 14 kb)

Table S2

(DOCX 14 kb)

Table S3

(DOCX 14 kb)

Table S4

(DOCX 13 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Antunes, H.S., Wajnberg, G., Pinho, M.B. et al. cDNA microarray analysis of human keratinocytes cells of patients submitted to chemoradiotherapy and oral photobiomodulation therapy: pilot study. Lasers Med Sci 33, 11–18 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10103-017-2313-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10103-017-2313-8

Keywords

Navigation