Abstract
One of the problems when conducting research in mathematical programming models for operations planning is having an adequate database of experiments that can be used to verify advances and developments with enough factors to understand different consequences. This paper presents a test bed generator and instances database for a rolling horizons analysis for multiechelon planning, multiproduct with alternatives processes, multistroke, multicapacity with different stochastic demand patterns to be used with a stroke-like bill of materials considering production costs, setup, storage and delays for operations management. From the analysis of the operations planning obtained from this test bed, it is concluded that a product structure with an alternative process obtains the lowest total cost and the highest service level. In addition, decreasing seasonal demand could present a lower total cost than constant demand, but would generate a worse service level. This test bed will allow researchers further investigation so as to verify improvements in forecast methods, rolling horizons parameters, employed software, etc.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Source: adapted from Sahin et al. (2013)
Source: the Authors based on Coronado-Hernández (2016) and own work
Source: the Authors according to Newman (2005)
Source: the Authors using Statgraphics Centurion XVII®
Source: the Authors using Statgraphics Centurion XVII®
Source: the Authors using Statgraphics Centurion XVII®
Source: the Authors using Statgraphics Centurion XVII®
Source: the Authors using Statgraphics Centurion XVII®
Source: the Authors
Source: the Authors with Statgraphics Centurion XVII®
Source: the Authors with the Statgraphics Centurion XVII®
Source: the Authors with Statgraphics Centurion XVII®
Source: the Authors with Statgraphics Centurion XVII®
Source: the Authors with Statgraphics Centurion XVII®
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
Twelve instances are carried out for each combination of factors, given the recommendation to perform between nine and fifteen, and that it is more important to validate the results than to increase the number of observations (Hair et al. 1999).
References
Araujo SA, Arenales MN, Clark A (2007) Joint rolling-horizon scheduling of materials processing and lot-sizing with sequence-dependent setups. J Heuristics 13(4):337–358. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10732-007-9011-9
ASIC (2018) Clúster de cálculo: Rigel. http://www.upv.es/entidades/ASIC/catalogo/857893normalc.html. Accessed date 22 July 2018
Baker KR (1977) An experimental study of the effectiveness of rolling schedules in production planning. Decis Sci 8(1):19–27. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5915.1977.tb01065.x
Barrett RT, LaForge RL (1991) A study of replanning frequencies in a material requirements planning system. Comput Oper Res 18(6):569–578. https://doi.org/10.1016/0305-0548(91)90062-V
Behnamian J, Fatemi Ghomi SMT (2014) A survey of multi-factory scheduling. J Intell Manuf 27:1–19. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10845-014-0890-y
Billington PJ, McClain JO, Thomas LJ (1983) Mathematical programming approaches to capacity-constrained MRP systems: review, formulation and problem reduction. Manag Sci 29(10):1126–1141. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.29.10.1126
Blackburn JD, Millen RA (1980) Heuristic lot-sizing performance in a rolling-schedule environment. Decis Sci 11(4):691–701. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5915.1980.tb01170.x
Cao Y (2015) Long-distance procurement planning in global sourcing. Ecole Centrale Paris. https://tel.archives-ouvertes.fr/tel-01154871/. Accessed 15 Dec 2017
Carlson RC, Beckman SL, Kropp DH (1982) The effectiveness o extending the horizon in rolling production scheduling. Decis Sci 13(1):129–146. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5915.1982.tb00136.x
Chand S, Hsu VN, Sethi S (2002) Forecast, solution, and rolling horizons in operations management problems: a classified bibliography. Manuf Serv Oper Manag 4(1):25–43. https://doi.org/10.1287/msom.4.1.25.287
Coronado-Hernández JR (2016) Análisis del efecto de algunos factores de complejidad e incertidumbre en el rendimiento de las Cadenas de Suministro. Propuesta de una herramienta de valoración basada en simulación. Universitat Politècnica de València, Valencia (Spain). https://doi.org/10.4995/Thesis/10251/61467
de Sampaio RJB, Wollmann RRG, Vieira PFG (2017) A flexible production planning for rolling-horizons. Int J Prod Econ 190:31–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2017.01.003
DeYong GD, Cattani KD (2016) Fenced in? Stochastic and deterministic planning models in a time-fenced, rolling-horizon scheduling system. Eur J Oper Res 251(1):85–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2015.11.006
Federgruen A, Tzur M (1994) Minimal forecast horizons and a new planning procedure for the general dynamic lot sizing model: nervousness revisited. Oper Res 42(3):456–468. https://doi.org/10.1287/opre.42.3.456
Fisher ML, Ramdas K, Zheng YS (2001) Ending inventory valuation in multiperiod production scheduling. Manag Sci 47(5):679–692. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.47.5.679.10485
Garcia-Sabater JP, Maheut J, Garcia-Sabater JJ (2009. A capacitated material requirements planning model considering delivery constraints: a case study from the automotive industry. In: 2009 international conference on computers and industrial engineering, IEEE, pp 378–383. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCIE.2009.5223806
Garcia-Sabater JP, Maheut J, Garcia-Sabater JJ (2012) A two-stage sequential planning scheme for integrated operations planning and scheduling system using MILP: the case of an engine assembler. Flex Serv Manuf J 24(2):171–209. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10696-011-9126-z
Garcia-Sabater JP, Maheut J, Marin-Garcia JA (2013) A new formulation technique to model materials and operations planning: the generic materials and operations planning (GMOP) problem. Eur J Ind Eng 7(2):119. https://doi.org/10.1504/EJIE.2013.052572
Hair JF, Prentice E, Cano D (1999) Análisis multivariante. Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River
Hozak K, Hill JA (2009) Issues and opportunities regarding replanning and rescheduling frequencies. Int J Prod Res 47(18):4955–4970. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207540802047106
Hsu CH, Yang HC (2017) Real-time near-optimal scheduling with rolling horizon for automatic manufacturing cell. IEEE Access 5:3369–3375. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2016.2616366
Jans R (2009) Solving lot-sizing problems on parallel identical machines using symmetry-breaking constraints. Inf J Comput 21(1):123–136. https://doi.org/10.1287/ijoc.1080.0283
Karimi B, Fatemi Ghomi SMT, Wilson JM (2003) The capacitated lot sizing problem: a review of models and algorithms. Omega 31(5):365–378. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0305-0483(03)00059-8
Kimms A (1997) Multi-level lot sizing and scheduling, vol 53. Physica-Verlag, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-50162-3
Kleindorfer P, Kunreuther H (1978) Stochastic horizons for the aggregate planning problem. Manag Sci 24(5):485–497. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.24.5.485
Kumar BK, Nagaraju D, Narayanan S (2016) Supply chain coordination models: a literature review. Indian J Sci Technol. https://doi.org/10.17485/ijst/2016/v9i38/86938
Lalami I, Frein Y, Gayon JP (2017) Production planning in automotive powertrain plants: a case study. Int J Prod Res 55(18):5378–5393. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2017.1315192
Lee HL, Padmanabhan V, Whang S (1997) The bullwhip effect in supply chains 1. Sloan Manag Rev Assoc 38(3):93–102. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.43.4.546
Lee DU, Villasenor JD, Luk W, Leong PHW (2006) A hardware Gaussian noise generator using the box-muller method and its error analysis. IEEE Trans Comput 55(6):659–671. https://doi.org/10.1109/TC.2006.81
Lv Y, Zhang J, Qin W (2017) A genetic regulatory network-based method for dynamic hybrid flow shop scheduling with uncertain processing times. Appl Sci 7(1):23. https://doi.org/10.3390/app7010023
Maheut J (2013) Modelos y Algoritmos Basados en el Concepto Stroke para la Planificación y Programación de Operaciones con Alternativas en Redes de Suministro. Universitat Politècnica de València, Valencia (Spain). https://doi.org/10.4995/Thesis/10251/29290
Maheut J, Garcia-Sabater JP (2011) La matriz de operaciones y materiales y la matriz de operaciones y recursos, un nuevo enfoque para resolver el problema GMOP basado en el concepto del stroke. Direccion y Organizacion 45:46–57
Maheut J, Garcia-sabater JP, Mula J (2012) A supply chain operations lot-sizing and scheduling model with alternative operations. In: Sethi SP, Bogataj M, Ros-McDonnell L (eds) Industrial engineering: innovative networks. Springer, London, pp 309–316. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-2321-7
Meindl B, Templ M (2012) Analysis of commercial and free and open source solvers for linear optimization problems. Common Tools and Harmonized Methodologies for SDC in the ESS, pp 1–13. http://neon.vb.cbs.nl/cascprivate/..%5Ccasc%5CESSNet2%5Cdeliverable_solverstudy.pdf. Accessed 15 Dec 2016
Meyr H (2002) Simultaneous lotsizing and scheduling on parallel machines. Eur J Oper Res 139(2):277–292. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-2217(01)00373-3
Narayanan A, Robinson P (2010) Evaluation of joint replenishment lot-sizing procedures in rolling horizon planning systems. Int J Prod Econ 127(1):85–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2010.04.038
Nedaei H, Mahlooji H (2014) Joint multi-objective master production scheduling and rolling horizon policy analysis in make-to-order supply chains. Int J Prod Res 52(9):2767–2787. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2014.884732
Newman M (2005) Power laws, Pareto distributions and Zipf’s law. Contemp Phys 46(5):323–351. https://doi.org/10.1080/00107510500052444
Omar MK, Bennell JA (2009) Revising the master production schedule in a HPP framework context. Int J Prod Res 47(20):5857–5878. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207540802130803
Pérez C (2002) Estadística práctica con Statgraphics®. PEARSON EDUCACIÓN, S. A, Madrid
Poler R, Mula J (2011) Forecasting model selection through out-of-sample rolling horizon weighted errors. Expert Syst Appl 38(12):14778–14785. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2011.05.072
Prasad PSS, Krishnaiah Chetty OV (2001) Multilevel lot sizing with a genetic algorithm under fixed and rolling horizons. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 18(7):520–527. https://doi.org/10.1007/s0017010180520
Rafiei R, Gaudreault J, Bouchard M, Santa-Eulalia L (2012) A reactive planning approach for demand-driven wood remanufacturing industry: a real-scale application, vol 71. CIRRELT, Montreal
Rafiei R, Nourelfath M, Gaudreault J, Santa-Eulalia LA, Bouchard M (2014) A periodic re-planning approach for demand-driven wood remanufacturing industry: a real-scale application. Int J Prod Res 52(14):4198–4215. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2013.869631
Ramezanian R, Fallah Sanami S, Shafiei Nikabadi M (2017) A simultaneous planning of production and scheduling operations in flexible flow shops: case study of tile industry. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 88(9–12):2389–2403. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-016-8955-z
Rodriguez MA, Montagna JM, Vecchietti A, Corsano G (2017) Generalized disjunctive programming model for the multi-period production planning optimization: an application in a polyurethane foam manufacturing plant. Comput Chem Eng 103:69–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compchemeng.2017.03.006
Sahin F, Narayanan A, Robinson EP (2013) Rolling horizon planning in supply chains: review, implications and directions for future research. Int J Prod Res 51(18):5413–5436. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2013.775523
Sethi S, Sorger G (1991) A theory of rolling horizon decision making. Ann Oper Res 29(1):387–415. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02283607
Simpson NC (2001) Questioning the relative virtues of dynamic lot sizing rules. Comput Oper Res 28(9):899–914. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0305-0548(00)00015-0
Stadtler H (2000) Improved rolling schedules for the dynamic single-level lot-sizing problem. Manag Sci 46(2):318–326. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.46.2.318.11924
Stadtler H (2003) Multilevel lot sizing with setup times and multiple constrained resources: internally rolling schedules with lot-sizing windows. Oper Res 51(3):487–502. https://doi.org/10.1287/opre.51.3.487.14949
Tiacci L, Saetta S (2012) Demand forecasting, lot sizing and scheduling on a rolling horizon basis. Int J Prod Econ 140:803–814. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2012.02.007
Trigeiro WW (1987) A dual-cost heuristic for the capacitated lot sizing problem. IIE Trans 19(1):67–72. https://doi.org/10.1080/07408178708975371
Wolsey LA (2002) Solving multi-item lot-sizing problems with an MIP solver using classification and reformulation. Manage Sci 48(12):1587–1602. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.48.12.1587.442
Xie J, Zhao X, Lee TS (2003) Freezing the master production schedule under single resource constraint and demand uncertainty. Int J Prod Econ 83(1):65–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0925-5273(02)00262-1
Yıldırım I, Tan B, Karaesmen F (2005) A multiperiod stochastic production planning and sourcing problem with service level constraints. OR Spectrum 27(2–3):471–489. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00291-005-0203-0
Zhao X, Xie J (1998) Multilevel lot-sizing heuristics and freezing the master production schedule in material requirements planning systems. Prod Plan Control 9(4):371–384. https://doi.org/10.1080/095372898234109
Zoller K, Robrade A (1988) Efficient heuristics for dynamic lot sizing. Int J Prod Res 26(2):249–265. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207548808947857
Zulkafli NI, Kopanos GM (2017) Integrated condition-based planning of production and utility systems under uncertainty. J Clean Prod 167:776–805. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.08.152
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Appendix: File structure of the instance test bed
Appendix: File structure of the instance test bed
Instances are created in text files with extension.csv. Each field in the file is separated by a semicolon or a line break.
Instances present data according to a uniform structure of:
-
The description of the parameters selected for the instance is between lines 1–6 of each file. An example is shown below:
-
Pareto;Par00.
-
Tipo_demanda;ST.
-
Incertidumbre;CV10.
-
BOM;P1.
-
Saturacion;R00.
-
-
The characteristics and calculation parameters proposed for the instance are between lines 7 and 16 of each file. An example is shown below:
-
Productos_padre;10.
-
Productos;50.
-
Periodos;8
-
Rodantes;52.
-
RodantesPrev;12.
-
Recursos;5
-
Strokes;50.
-
M;50,000.
-
Gap_Gurobi/100,000b;1000.
-
Lim_timp_Gurobi;3000.
-
-
The expected demand calculated for all the periods and final products is between lines 17–27 of each file.
-
The demands for all the 10 final products in all eight periods on each PH are between lines 28 and 731 of each file. The first period is confirmed demand and the other periods are the demand forecasts. A graph representation is seen in Fig. 16 of Par00_ST_CV10_P5_R30_5.
Fig. 16 
Source: the Authors
Demands of the 71 periods of the 64 PH of Par00_ST_CV10_P5_R30_5.
-
The initial stock of each product of the instance are between lines 732 and 733 of each file.
-
The storage costs for each product and in all eight periods are between lines 734 and 742 of each file.
-
The setup costs of each stroke in all eight periods are between lines 743 and 751 of each file.
-
The costs of each stroke in all eight periods are between lines 752 and 760 of each file.
-
The available capacity of each resources is between lines 761 and 762 of each file.
-
Delivery times or those necessary to perform each operation are between lines 763 and 764 of each file.
-
The matrix of products resulting from each strokes is between lines 765 and 815 of each file.
-
The matrix of products consumed by each strokes is between lines 816 and 866 of each file.
-
The matrix of the resources required for the setup of each strokes is between the lines 867 and 872 of each file.
-
The matrix of the resources required to perform each strokes is between lines 873 and 878 of each file.
-
The matrix of the cost of delay of each products during each period is between lines 879 and 887 of each file.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Rius-Sorolla, G., Maheut, J., Estellés-Miguel, S. et al. Operations planning test bed under rolling horizons, multiproduct, multiechelon, multiprocess for capacitated production planning modelling with strokes. Cent Eur J Oper Res 29, 1289–1315 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10100-020-00687-5
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10100-020-00687-5