Abstract
Solar photovoltaic (PV) systems are a promising technology to reduce the environmental impacts of electricity production. Several locations in the USA are favorable for solar PV deployment due to having a high solar potential. This study evaluates the environmental impact payback time (PBTI) for installing multi-crystalline silicon PV systems in multiple US cities, Seattle, Miami, Los Angeles, Phoenix and Indianapolis, with varying electricity mixes and solar potential, using life cycle inventory data and the Tool for the Reduction and Assessment of Chemicals and other environmental impacts as the impact assessment method. China, USA and European manufacturing scenarios were analyzed to compare the effect of the electricity mix used during manufacturing on PBTI. The results show that the PBTI ranges between < 1 year and 3000 + years across all impact categories. A Chinese manufacturing scenario increased the PBTI in some impact categories (i.e., global warming) compared to the USA and Europe manufacturing, but had no effect for others. The PBTI is within the solar panel life span for the impact categories of global warming, acidification and fossil fuel depletion, but is longer than the lifespan for other impact categories (i.e., eutrophication and ozone depletion). According to the global warming PBTI, policies should incentivize solar panels in the following order: Phoenix, Indianapolis, Miami, Los Angeles, Seattle. This work provides guidance to policy makers and manufacturers on the PBTI when the manufacturing location, solar potential and electricity mix are known.
Graphic abstract
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Azusa Light and Power (2017) Power content label. https://www.ci.azusa.ca.us/DocumentCenter/View/39303/Azusa-2018-Power-Content-Label-081919?bidId. Accessed 5 June 2019
Bare JC (2011) TRACI 2.0—the tool for the reduction and assessment of chemical and other environmental impacts. Clean Technol Environ 13:687–696. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10098-010-0338-9
Berger W, Simon F, Weimann K, Alsema E (2010) A novel approach for the recycling of thin film photovoltaic modules. Resour Conserv Recycl 54:711–718. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2009.12.001
Bhandari K, Collier J, Ellingson R, Apul D (2015) Energy payback time (EPBT) and energy return on energy invested (EROI) of solar photovoltaic systems: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 47:133–141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2015.02.057
Burbank Water and Power (2017) Power content label. https://www.burbankwaterandpower.com/electric-1/supply-and-quality/power-content-information. Accessed 5 June 2019
Carvalho M, Menezes V, Gomes K, Pinheiro R (2019) Carbon footprint associated with a mono-Si cell photovoltaic ceramic roof tile system. Environ Prog Sustain 1:1–7. https://doi.org/10.1002/ep.13120
Chen W, Hong J, Yuan X, Liu J (2016) Environmental impact assessment of monocrystalline silicon solar photovoltaic cell production: a case study in China. J Clean Prod 112:1025–1032. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.08.024
City of Cerritos (2017) Power content label. https://ww2.energy.ca.gov/pcl/labels/2017_labels/Cerritos_2017_PCL.pdf. Accessed 5 June 2019
Connors S, Kern E, Adams M, Martin K, Asiamah-Adjei B (2004) National assessment of the emission reduction of photovoltaic (PV) power systems. http://web.mit.edu/agrea/docs/MIT-LFEE_2004-003a_ES.pdf. Accessed 9 Oct 2019
Cucchiella F, D’Adamo I (2012) Estimation of the energetic and environmental impacts of a roof-mounted building-integrated photovoltaic systems. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 16:5245–5259. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2012.04.034
Denholm P, Margolis R, Milford J (2009) Quantifying avoided fuel use and emissions from solar photovoltaic generation in the western United States. Environ Sci Technol 43:226–232. https://doi.org/10.1021/es801216y
Ecoinvent database (2019) https://www.ecoinvent.org/home.html. Accessed 9 Oct 2019
Energy Information Administration (2009) Solar photovoltaic cell/module manufacturing activities. https://www.eia.gov/renewable/annual/solar_photo/archive/2009/. Accessed 9 October 2019
Energy Information Administration (2017) Today in energy. https://www.eia.gov/todayinenergy/detail.php?id=33092. Accessed 13 June 2019
Energy Information Administration (2019) US States: state profiles and energy estimates. https://www.eia.gov/state/. Accessed 8 Mar 2019
EnergySage (2019) How long do solar panels last. https://news.energysage.com/how-long-do-solar-panels-last/. Accessed 10 Mar 2019
EnergySage (2019) U.S. solar panel manufacturers: a list of American-made solar panels. https://news.energysage.com/u-s-solar-panel-manufacturers-list-american-made-solar-panels/. Accessed 22 May 2019
European Commission (2019) European life cycle database. https://eplca.jrc.ec.europa.eu/ELCD3/. Accessed 9 Oct 2019
Feldman D, Hoskins J, Margolis R (2018) Q4 2017/Q1 2018 Solar industry update. National Renewable Energy Lab. https://www.nrel.gov/docs/fy18osti/71493.pdf. Accessed 9 Oct 2019
Filho G, Rosa C, Barros R, Santos I, da Silva F (2016) Study of the energy balance and environmental liabilities associated with the manufacture of crystalline Si photovoltaic modules and deployment in different regions. Sol Energy Mater Sol C 144:383–394. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solmat.2015.09.023
Florida Power and Light (2018) Energy news. https://www.fpl.com/news/2018/energy-news-q4-2018.pdf. Accessed 11 Oct 2019
Fthenakis V, Kim H, Alsema E (2008) Emissions from photovoltaic life cycles. Environ Sci Technol 42:2168–2174. https://doi.org/10.1021/es071763q
Fu Y, Liu X, Yuan Z (2015) Life-cycle assessment of multi-crystalline photovoltaic (PV) systems in China. J Clean Prod 86:180–190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.07.057
Garcia-Valverde R, Miguel C, Martinez-Bejar R, Urbina A (2009) Life cycle assessment study of a 4.2 kWp stand-alone photovoltaic system. Sol Energy 83:1434–1445. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2009.03.012
Gazbour N, Razongles G, Monnier E, Joanny M, Charbuillet C, Burgun F, Schaeffer C (2018) A path to reduce variability of the environmental footprint results of photovoltaic systems. J Clean Prod 197:1607–1618. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.06.276
Gerbinet S, Belboom S, Leonard A (2014) Life Cycle Analysis (LCA) of photovoltaic panels: a review. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 38:747–753. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2014.07.043
Glendale Water and Power (2017) Power content label. https://ww2.energy.ca.gov/pcl/labels/2017_labels/Glendale_2017_PCL.pdf. Accessed 5 June 2019
Goodrich A, Powell D, James T, Woodhouse M, Buonassisi T (2013) Assessing the drivers of regional trends in solar photovoltaic manufacturing. Energy Environ Sci 6:2811–2821. https://doi.org/10.1039/C3EE40701B
Guinee J (2002) Handbook on life cycle assessment operational guide to the ISO standards. Int J Life Cycle Assess 7(5):311–313. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-306-48055-7
Hegedus S, Luque A (2003) Status, trends, challenges, and the bright future of solar electricity from photovoltaics. Wiley, London
Hsu D, O’Donoughue P, Fthenakis V, Heath G, Sawyer P, Choi JK, Turney D (2012) Life cycle greenhouse gas emissions of crystalline silicon photovoltaic electricity generation. J Ind Ecol 16:S122–S135. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1530-9290.2011.00439.x
Hyoungseok K, Kyounghoon C, Fthenakis V, Parikhit S, Tak H (2014) Life cycle assessment of cadmium tellurium photovoltaic (CdTe PV) systems. Sol Energy 103:78–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2014.02.008
Illinois Sustainable Technology Center (2019) Solar PV https://www.istc.illinois.edu/research/resource_recovery/solarPV. Accessed 12 Mar 2019
International Organization for Standardization (2006) ISO 14044. https://www.iso.org/standard/38498.html. Accessed 9 Oct 2019
Kadro J, Hagfeldt A (2017) The End-of-Life of Perovskite PV. Joule 1:29–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joule.2017.07.013
Kim B, Lee J, Kim K, Hur T (2014) Evaluation of the environmental performance of sc-Si and mc-Si PV systems in Korea. Sol Energy 99:100–114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2013.10.038
Los Angeles Department of Water and Power (2017) Power content label. https://listserver.energy.ca.gov/pcl/labels/2017_labels/LADWP_2017_PCL.pdf. Accessed 5 June 2019
Marimuthu C, Kirubakaran V (2013) Carbon pay back period for solar and wind energy project installed in India: a critical review. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 23:80–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2013.02.045
Muller A, Wambach K, Alsema E (2005) Life cycle analysis of solar module recycling process. Mater Res Soc Symp Proc. https://doi.org/10.1557/PROC-0895-G03-07
National Renewable Energy Laboratory (2012a) Solar maps. https://www.nrel.gov/gis/solar.html. Accessed 10 Oct 2019
National Renewable Energy Laboratory (2012b) U.S. life cycle inventory database. https://www.lcacommons.gov/nrel/search. Accessed 10 October 2019
Pasadena Water and Power (2017) Power content label. https://ww2.energy.ca.gov/pcl/labels/2017_labels/Pasadena_2017_PCL.pdf. Retrieved 5 June 2019
SeaRates (2019) https://www.searates.com. Accessed 19 Jan 2018
Seattle City Light (2017) Power mix: how our electricity is generated. http://www.seattle.gov/light/FuelMix/. Accessed 8 Mar 2019
Sherwani AF (2010) Life cycle assessment of solar PV based electricity generation systems: a review. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 14:540–544. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2009.08.003
Sinovoltaics (2014) https://sinovoltaics.com/solar-basics/basics-of-solar-panel-packaging. Accessed 25 June 2019
Southern California Edison (2017) Power content label. https://www.sce.com/sites/default/files/inline-files/2017PCL_0.pdf. Accessed 5 June 2019
Stamford L, Azapagic A (2018) Environmental impacts of photovoltaics: the effects of technological improvements and transfer of manufacturing from Europe to China. Energy Technol 6:1148–1160. https://doi.org/10.1002/ente.201800037
Tao J, Yu S (2015) Review on feasible recycling pathways and technologies of solar photovoltaic modules. Sol Energy Mater Sol C 141:108–124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solmat.2015.05.005
Tripanagnostopoulos Y, Souliotis M, Battisti R, Corrado A (2005) Energy, cost and LCA results of PV and hybrid PV/T solar systems. Prog Photovolt Res Appl 13:235–250. https://doi.org/10.1002/pip.590
Union Pacific (2019) What can you ship by rail? https://www.up.com/customers/track-record/tr181120_what_can_ship.htm. Accessed 22 May 2019
Vernon Light and Power (2017) Power content label. https://listserver.energy.ca.gov/pcl/labels/2017_labels/Vernon_2017_PCL.pdf. Accessed 5 June 2019
Yao Y, Chang Y, Masanet E (2014) A hybrid life-cycle inventory for multi-crystalline silicon PV module manufacturing in China. Enviro Res Lett 9:1–11. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/9/11/114001
Yue D, You F, Darling S (2014) Domestic and overseas manufacturing scenarios of silicon-based photovoltaics: life cycle energy and environmental comparative analysis. Sol Energy 105:669–678. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2014.04.008
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by the Sustainable LA-UCLA Grand Challenges program. The data presented in this work are those of the authors and have not been formally reviewed by the funders. The authors would like to thank the anonymous reviewers who helped improve the manuscript.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Grant, C.A., Hicks, A.L. Effect of manufacturing and installation location on environmental impact payback time of solar power. Clean Techn Environ Policy 22, 187–196 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10098-019-01776-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10098-019-01776-z