Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Toward clean environment: evaluation of solar electric power technologies using fuzzy logic

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The rapid expansion of the use of solar energy power plants worldwide is a subject that is being followed with interest. Fuzzy logic methodology is used for evaluating the solar thermal power technology, it compresses huge amount of data into smaller sets, and it has the ability to decide between different solar technologies on the basis of their benefits and costs. The most often considered solar technologies were parabolic trough, central receiver, dish sterling engine, compact linear Fresnel reflector (CLFR), solar chimney, photovoltaic (PV), and solar pond. The aim of our research is to provide the needed information to make a judgment or a decision of adopting the most preferred solar technology in terms of installation and development using fuzzy set methodology. The criteria of the evaluation were based on different parameters, i.e., power capacity, efficiency, availability, capacity factor, storage capability, cost, maturity, water usage, land usage, and safety. The key barriers and features for each technology on the basis of benefit-to-cost ratios are addressed. The results showed that CLFR was found to be the best choice in terms of research, development, and implementation, followed by parabolic trough technology, then the central receiver technology, dish sterling engine, solar chimney, PV, and solar pond, according to the order of preference.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aabakken J (2006) Power technologies energy data book, report no. NREL/TP-620–39728. US Department of Energy Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy by Midwest Research Institute, Colorado

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Al-Rawajfeh AE, Mamlook R (2008) Fuzzy set implementation for controlling and evaluation of factors affecting melting, crystallinity and interaction in polymer blends. Int J Energy Convers Manag 49(11):3405–3408

    Google Scholar 

  • Badran O (2001) Study in industrial applications of solar energy and the range of its utilization in Jordan. Renew Energy 24(3–4):485–490

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Badran O, Eck M (2006) The application of parabolic trough technology under Jordanian climate. Renew Energy 31(6):791–802

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Badran O, Abdulhsdi E, Mamlook R (2009) Evaluation of solar electric power technologies in Jordan using fuzzy logic. 2008 Proceedings of the 2nd international conference on energy sustainability, ES 2008 2:443–448

  • Berenguel M, Rubio F, Valverde A, Lara P, Arahal M, Camacho E, López M (2004) An artificial vision-based control system for automatic heliostat positioning offset correction in a central receiver solar power plant. Sol Energy 76(5):563–575

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blair N, Mehos M, Short W, Heimiller D (2006) Concentrating solar deployment system (CSDS)—a new model for estimating US concentrating solar power (CSP) market potential. Solar Conference, Cole Boulevard Golden, Colorado, National Renewable Energy Laboratory, NREL/CP-620-39682

  • Brakmann G, Aringhoff R, Tseke S (2005) Concentrated solar thermal power. Report no. 90-73361-82-6, the Netherlands

  • Braun G, Skinner D (2007) Experience scaling-up manufacturing of emerging photovoltaic technologies, report no. NREL/SR-640-39165. US Department of Energy Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy by Midwest Research Institute, Colorado

  • Carl-Jochen (1991) Winter. High-temperature solar energy utilization after 15 years R&D: kick-off for the third generation of technologies. Solar energy materials 24(1–4):26–39

  • Dersch J, Geyer M, Herrmann U, Jones SA, Kelly B, Kistner R, Ortmanns W, Pitz-Paal R, Price H (2004) Trough integration into power plants—a study on the performance and economy of integrated solar combined cycle systems. Energy 29(5–6):947–959

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Groenendaal B (2002) Solar thermal power technologies. Report no. ECN-C–02-062 Monograph in the framework of the VLEEM Project. Petten, the Netherlands, ECN Beleidsstudies, July 2002, p 39

  • Jaber JO, Mamlook R, Awad W (2005) Evaluation of energy conservation programs in residential sector using fuzzy logic methodology. Energy Policy 33(10):1329–1338

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khalil R, Jubran B, Faqir N (1997) Optimization of solar pond electrical power generation system. Energy Convers Manag 38(8):787–798

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lovegrove K (2003) A Zawadski and J Coventy. Paraboloidal dish solar concentrators for multi-megawatt power generation. ISES Solar World Conference, Goteborg

    Google Scholar 

  • Mamlook R (2006) Fuzzy set methodology for evaluating alternatives to compare between different power production systems. J Appl Sci 6(9):1686–1691

    Google Scholar 

  • Mamlook R, Al-Jayyousi O (2003) Fuzzy sets analysis for leak detection in infrastructure systems: a proposed methodology. Clean Technol Environ Policy 6(1):26–31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mamlook R, Al-Rawajfeh AE (2008) Fuzzy set implementation for controlling and evaluation of factors affecting multiple-effect distillers. Desalination 222:552–558

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mamlook R, Badran O (2006) Fuzzy sets implementation for the evaluation of factors affecting solar still production. Desalination 203(1–3):394–402

    Google Scholar 

  • Mamlook R, Tao C, Thompson WE (1998) An advanced fuzzy controller. Int J Fuzzy Sets Syst 103(3):541–545

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mamlook R, Akash BA, Nijmeh S (2001) Fuzzy sets programming to perform evaluation of solar systems in Jordan. Int J Energy Convers Manag 42(14):1717–1726

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mamlook R, Badran O, Abdulhsdi E (2009) A fuzzy inference model for short-term load forecasting. Energy Policy 37:1239–1248

    Google Scholar 

  • Mills D (2004) Advances in solar thermal electricity technology. Sol Energy 76(1–3):19–31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mills D, Morrison G (1999) Modelling study for compact Fresnel reflector power plant. Journal de physique 9(3):159–165

    Google Scholar 

  • Mills D, Morrison G (2000) Compact linear Fresnel reflector solar thermal power plants. Sol Energy 68(3):263–283

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mills D, Morrison G, Le Lievre P (2002) Project proposal for a compact linear Fresnel reflector Solar thermal plant in the Hunter Valley. Paper 1b5, ANZSES Annual Conference—Solar harvest, Newcastle

  • Mills D, Morrison G, Lièvre P (2004) Design of a 240 MW e solar thermal power plant Proc. Eurosun Conference, Freiburg

  • Mills D, Morrison G, Lièvre P (2006) Multi-tower line focus Fresnel array project. J Sol Energy Eng 128(1):118–120

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mukund R (1999) Wind and solar power systems. CRC press, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Negnevitsky M (2005) Artificial intelligence. Pearson Education, England

    Google Scholar 

  • NEPCO (2007) Annual report. Amman

  • Oder C, Haasis HD, Renlz O (1993) Analysis of the Lithuanian final energy consumption using fuzzy sets. Int J Energy Res 17:35–44

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Onyango N, Ochieng M (2006) The potential of solar chimney for application in rural areas of developing countries. Fuel 85(17–18):2561–2566

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Porta F (2005) Technical and economical analysis of future perspectives of solar thermal power plants. Master thesis, University of Stuttgart, 1–86

  • Price H, Kearney D (2003) Reducing the cost of energy from parabolic trough solar power plants. ISES International Solar Energy Conference, Hawaii Island, Hawaii National Renewable Energy Laboratory No. NREL/CP-550-33208

  • Quaschning V (2003) Technology fundamentals—solar thermal power plants. Renew Energy World 6(1):109–113

    Google Scholar 

  • Schlaich J, Schiel W (2001) Solar chimneys, encyclopedia of physical science and technology, 3rd edn. Academic Press, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Schott A (2006) Schott memorandum on solar thermal power plant technology. Report no. 0141 e 02053.0 ac/sk, Germany

  • Shinnar R, Citro F (2007) Solar thermal energy: the forgotten energy source. Technol Soc 29(3):261–270

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trieb F et al. (2005) CSP for the Mediterranean region. German Aerospace Center (DLR), Institute of Technical Thermodynamics Section Systems Analysis and Technology Assessment. http://www.dlr.de/tt/med-csp

  • Wibberley L, Cottrell A, Palfreyman D, Scaife P, Brown P (2006) Techno-economic assessment of power generation options for Australia technology assessment report 52: CRC for coal in Sustainable development

  • Zadeh L (1965) Fuzzy sets. Infect Control 8:338–853

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zumerchik J (2001) Macmillan encyclopedia of energy. Macmillian Reference, USA

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rustom Mamlook.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Badran, O., Mamlook, R. & Abdulhadi, E. Toward clean environment: evaluation of solar electric power technologies using fuzzy logic. Clean Techn Environ Policy 14, 357–367 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10098-011-0407-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10098-011-0407-8

Keywords

Navigation