Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Use of prophylactic Saccharomyces boulardii to prevent Clostridium difficile infection in hospitalized patients: a controlled prospective intervention study

  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) is a common complication to antibiotic use. Saccharomyces boulardii has shown effect as a prophylactic agent. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy of S. boulardii in preventing CDI in unselected hospitalized patients treated with antibiotics. We conducted a 1 year controlled prospective intervention study aiming to prescribe Sacchaflor (S. boulardii 5 × 109, Pharmaforce ApS) twice daily to hospitalized patients treated with antibiotics. Comparable departments from three other hospitals in our region were included as controls. All occurrences of CDI in patients receiving antibiotics were reported and compared to a baseline period defined as 2 years prior to intervention. Results were analyzed using run chart tests for non-random variation in CDI rates. In addition, odds ratios for CDI were calculated. S. boulardii compliance reached 44% at the intervention hospital, and 1389 patients were treated with Sacchaflor. Monthly CDI rates dropped from a median of 3.6% in the baseline period to 1.5% in the intervention period. S. boulardii treatment was associated with a reduced risk of CDI at the intervention hospital: OR = 0.06 (95% CI 0.02–0.16). At two control hospitals, CDI rates did not change. At one control hospital, the median CDI rate dropped from 3.5 to 2.4%, possibly reflecting the effects of simultaneous multifaceted intervention against CDI at that hospital. The results from this controlled prospective interventional study indicate that S. boulardii is effective for the prevention of CDI in an unselected cohort of mainly elderly patients from departments of internal medicine.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. CDC. Biggest Threats | Antibiotic/Antimicrobial Resistance | CDC. CDC (2016). http://www.cdc.gov/drugresistance/biggest_threats.html

  2. Chiu Y-H, Lin S-L, Tsai J-J, Lin M-Y (2014) Probiotic actions on diseases: implications for therapeutic treatments. Food Funct 5(4):625–634. https://doi.org/10.1039/c3fo60600g

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Johnson S, Maziade P-J, McFarland LV et al (2012) Is primary prevention of Clostridium difficile infection possible with specific probiotics? Int J Infect Dis 16(11):e786–e792. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijid.2012.06.005

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. McFarland LV (2010) Systematic review and meta-analysis of saccharomyces boulardii in adult patients. World J Gastroenterol 16(18):2202–2222. https://doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v16.i18.2202

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Castagliuolo I, Riegler MF, Valenick L, LaMont JT, Pothoulakis C (1999) Saccharomyces boulardii protease inhibits the effects of Clostridium difficile toxins a and B in human colonic mucosa. Infect Immun 67(1):302–307

    PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Neut C, Mahieux S, Dubreuil LJ (2017) Antibiotic susceptibility of probiotic strains: is it reasonable to combine probiotics with antibiotics? Med Mal Infect 47(7):477–483. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.medmal.2017.07.001

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. McFarland LV (2015) Probiotics for the Primary and Secondary Prevention of C. difficile Infections: A Meta-analysis and Systematic Review. Antibiot (Basel, Switzerland) 4(2):160–178. https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics4020160

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Goldenberg JZ, Yap C, Lytvyn L et al (2017) Probiotics for the prevention of Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhea in adults and children. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 12:CD006095. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD006095.pub4

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Anhøj J, Olesen AV (2014) Run charts revisited: a simulation study of run chart rules for detection of non-random variation in health care processes. PLoS One 9(11):e113825. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0113825

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Anhøj J (2015) Diagnostic value of run chart analysis: using likelihood ratios to compare run chart rules on simulated data series. PLoS One 10(3):e0121349. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0121349

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. R Core Team (2017) R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing.

  12. Wickham H. (2017) Tidyverse: Easily Install and Load the “Tidyverse”. R package version 1.2.1.

  13. Anhøj J. (2017) qicharts2: Quality Improvement Charts, R package version 0.2.3.

  14. Ogrinc G, Davies L, Goodman D, Batalden P, Davidoff F, Stevens D (2015) SQUIRE 2.0 (standards for QUality improvement reporting excellence): revised publication guidelines from a detailed consensus process. Can J Diabetes 39(5):434–439. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcjd.2015.08.001

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Knudsen JD, Andersen SE (2014) Bispebjerg Intervention Group for the BI. A multidisciplinary intervention to reduce infections of ESBL- and AmpC-producing, gram-negative bacteria at a University Hospital. PLoS One 9(1):e86457. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0086457

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Power M, Wigglesworth N, Donaldson E, Chadwick P, Gillibrand S, Goldmann D (2010) Reducing Clostridium difficile infection in acute care by using an improvement collaborative. BMJ 341:c3359 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20659985

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Ehrhardt S, Guo N, Hinz R et al (2016) Saccharomyces boulardii to Prevent Antibiotic-Associated Diarrhea: A Randomized, Double-Masked, Placebo-Controlled Trial. Open forum Infect Dis 3(1):ofw011. https://doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofw011

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Szajewska H, Kołodziej M (2015) Systematic review with meta-analysis: Saccharomyces boulardii in the prevention of antibiotic-associated diarrhoea. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 42(7):793–801. https://doi.org/10.1111/apt.13344

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Ghantoji SS, Sail K, Lairson DR, Dupont HL, Garey KW (2010) Economic healthcare costs of Clostridium difficile infection: a systematic review. J Hosp Infect 74:309–318. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhin.2009.10.016

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

The study is financed by internal funding at Copenhagen University Hospital Hvidovre, Denmark.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Andreas Munk Petersen.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

All authors declare no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

The study was a non-randomized intervention study in departments with high frequency of CDI and approved by the hospital director and the hospital administration.

Informed consent

Informed consent by patients was given according to standard treatment procedure and according to Danish law.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Carstensen, J.W., Chehri, M., Schønning, K. et al. Use of prophylactic Saccharomyces boulardii to prevent Clostridium difficile infection in hospitalized patients: a controlled prospective intervention study. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 37, 1431–1439 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10096-018-3267-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10096-018-3267-x

Keywords

Navigation