Skip to main content
Log in

Robot-assisted and traditional intensive rehabilitation therapy in the treatment of post-acute stroke patient: the experience of a standard rehabilitation ward

  • Letter to the Editor
  • Published:
Neurological Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

A Correction to this article was published on 21 April 2022

This article has been updated

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Change history

References

  1. Mehrholz J, Elsner B, Werner C, Kugler J, Pohl M (2013) Electromechanical-assisted training for walking after stroke. Cochrane Database System Rev 2013(7), CD006185. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD006185.pub3

  2. Chang WH, Kim YH (2013) Robot-assisted therapy in stroke rehabilitation. J Stroke 15(3):174–181. https://doi.org/10.5853/jos.2013.15.3.174

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Moore, J. L., Nordvik, J. E., Erichsen, A., Rosseland, I., Bø, E., Hornby, T. G., & FIRST-Oslo Team (2020) Implementation of high-intensity stepping training during inpatient stroke rehabilitation improves functional outcomes. Stroke 51(2):563–570. https://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.119.027450

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Calabrò RS, Sorrentino G, Cassio A, Mazzoli D, Andrenelli E, Bizzarini E et al; Italian Consensus Conference on Robotics in Neurorehabilitation (CICERONE) (2021). Robotic-assisted gait rehabilitation following stroke: a systematic review of current guidelines and practical clinical recommendations. Eur J Physical Rehabil Med 57(3):460–471. https://doi.org/10.23736/S1973-9087.21.06887-8

  5. Bruni MF, Melegari C, De Cola MC, Bramanti A, Bramanti P, Calabrò RS (2018) What does best evidence tell us about robotic gait rehabilitation in stroke patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Clin Neurosci : official journal of the Neurosurgical Society of Australasia 48:11–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jocn.2017.10.048

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Hesse S, Waldner A, Tomelleri C (2010) Innovative gait robot for the repetitive practice of floor walking and stair climbing up and down in stroke patients. J Neuroeng Rehabil 7:30. https://doi.org/10.1186/1743-0003-7-30

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Esquenazi A, Talaty M (2019) Robotics for lower limb rehabilitation. Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am 30(2):385–397. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmr.2018.12.012

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Molteni F, Gasperini G, Cannaviello G, Guanziroli E (2018) Exoskeleton and end-effector robots for upper and lower limbs rehabilitation: narrative review. PM R 10(9 Suppl 2):S174–S188. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmrj.2018.06.005

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Calabrò RS, Filoni S, Billeri L, Balletta T, Cannavò A, Militi A, Milardi D, Pignolo L, Naro A (2021) Robotic rehabilitation in spinal cord injury: a pilot study on end-effectors and neurophysiological outcomes. Ann Biomed Eng 49(2):732–745. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10439-020-02611-z

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors acknowledge the Department of Neurosciences, Rehabilitation, Ophthalmology, Genetic and Maternal Infantile Sciences (DINOGMI), MIUR Department of Excellence, for general support to the present work and Prof. Gianluigi Mancardi for critically revising the manuscript. We also thank Sestri Levante Hospital—S.C. Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine, ASL4, Liguria, Italy, for valuable collaboration on this article. The authors acknowledge Alexander Salerno for language editing.

Funding

The authors report no involvement in the research by the sponsor that could have influenced the outcome of this work.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

MH and author VP have given substantial contributions to the conception and data interpretation of the manuscript. PT provided clinical support, and VL and AS contributed to the scientific revision of the manuscript. All authors have participated to drafting the manuscript, and author AS revised it critically. The authors read and approved the final version of the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mehrnaz Hamedani.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval

This Letter to the Editor was conducted retrospectively from data obtained for clinical purposes and our study did not need ethical approval.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Informed consent

This is a retrospective study of hospitalized patients. Generally for all patients, informed consent is provided at the time of admission to the hospital.

Additional information

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

The original online version of this article was revised: The online version contains a layout error in Table 1. All Table 1 entries should be flash left.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hamedani, M., Prada, V., Tognetti, P. et al. Robot-assisted and traditional intensive rehabilitation therapy in the treatment of post-acute stroke patient: the experience of a standard rehabilitation ward. Neurol Sci 43, 3999–4001 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10072-022-06041-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10072-022-06041-8

Navigation