Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Practical assessment of preoperative functional mapping techniques: navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation and functional magnetic resonance imaging

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Neurological Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

An Erratum to this article was published on 01 May 2013

Abstract

Preoperative brain mapping is vital to improve the outcome of patients with tumors located in eloquent areas. While functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) remains the most commonly used preoperative mapping technique, navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation (nTMS) has recently been proposed as a new preoperative method for the clinical and surgical management of such patients. This study aims at evaluating the impact of nTMS as a routine examination and its ultimate contribution to patient outcome. We performed a preliminary prospective study on eight patients harboring a cerebral lesion in eloquent motor areas. Each patient underwent preoperative cortical brain mapping via both fMRI and nTMS; then, we assessed the reliability of both methods by comparing them with intraoperative mapping by direct cortical stimulation (DCS). This study suggests that nTMS was more accurate than fMRI in detecting the true cortical motor area when compared with DCS data, with a mean of deviation ± confidence interval (CI) of 8.47 ± 4.6 mm between nTMS and DCS and of 12.9 ± 5.7 mm between fMRI and DCS (p < 0.05). The results indicated that within the limits of our statistical sample, nTMS was found to be a useful, reliable, and non-invasive option for preoperative planning as well as for the identification of the motor strip; in addition, it usually has short processing times and is very well tolerated by patients, thereby increasing their compliance and possibly improving surgical outcome.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Piepmeier J, Christopher S, Spencer D (1996) Variations in the natural history and survival of patients with supratentorial low-grade astrocytomas. Neurosurgery 38:872–879

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Berger M, Deliganis A, Dobbins J, Keles G (1994) The effect of extent of resection on recurrence in patients with low grade cerebral hemisphere gliomas. Cancer 74(6):1784–1791

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Sanai N, Berger MS (2008) Glioma extent of resection and its impact on patient outcome. Neurosurgery 62(4):753–764

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Janny P, Cure H, Mohr M, Heldt N, Kwiatkowski F, Lemaire J et al (1994) Low grade supratentorial astrocytomas. Management and prognostic factors. Cancer 73(7):1937–1945

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. McGirt M, Chainchana K, Attenello F, Weingart J, Than K, Olivi A et al (2008) Extent of surgical resection is independently associated with survival in patients with Hemispheric infiltranting low-grade gliomas. Neurosurgery 63(4):700–708

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Philippon J, Clemenceau S, Fauchon F, Foncin J (1993) Supratentorial low grade astrocytomas in adults. Neurosurgery 32:554–559

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. National Comprehensive Cancer Network (2007) Central Nervous System Cancer Guidelines. NCCN Press, Jenkintown

    Google Scholar 

  8. Atlas S, Howard R, Maldjian J, Alsop D, Detre J, Listerud J et al (1996) Functional magnetic resonance imaging of regional brain activity in patients with intracerebral gliomas: findings and implications for clinical management. Neurosurgery 38:329–338

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Berger M, Ojemann G, Lettich E (1990) Neurophysiological monitoring during astrocytoma surgery. Neurosurg Clin N Am 1(1):65–80

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Duffau H, Lopes M, Arthius F (2005) Contribution of intraoperative electrical stimulations in surgery of low grade gliomas: a comparative study between two series without (1985–1996) and with (1996–2003) functional mapping in the same institution. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 76(6):845–851

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Kombos T, Suess O, Funk T, Kem B, Brock M (2000) Intra-operative mapping of the motor cortex during surgery in and around the motor cortex-. Acta Neurochir 142:263–266

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Neuloh G, Pechstein U, Cedzich C, Schramm J (2004) Motor evoked potential monitoring with supratentorial surgery. Neurosurgery 54(5):1061–1072

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Sanai N (2008) Mapping the horizon: techniques to optimize tumor resection before and during surgery. Clin Neurosurg 55:14–19

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Tharin S, Golby AJ (2007) Functional brain mapping and its applications to neurosurgery. Neurosurgery 60(4):185–201

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Roessler K, Donat M, Lanzenberger R, Novak K, Geissler A, Gartus A (2005) Evaluation of preoperative high magnetic field motor functional MRI (3 Tesla) in glioma patients by navigated electrocortical stimulation and postoperative outcome. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 76:1152–1157

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Kriegs T, Reinges M, Erberich S, Kemeny S, Rohde V, Spetzger U et al (2001) Functional MRI for presurgical planning: problems, artefacts, and solution strategies. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 70:749–776

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Rutten G, Ramsey N (2010) The role of functional magnetic resonance imaging in brain surgery. Neurosurg Focus 28(2):E4

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Picht T, Wachter D, Mularski S, Kuehn B, Brock M, Kombos T (2008) Functional magnetic resonance imaging and cortical mapping in motor cortex tumor surgery: complementary methods. Zentralbl Neurochir 69:1–6

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Roux F, Ibarrola D, Tremoulet M, Lazorthes Y, Henry P, Sol J et al (2001) Methodological and technical issues for integrating functional magnetic resonance imaging data in a neuronavigational system. Neurosurgery 49:1145–1150

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Kim M, Holodny A, Hou B, Peck K, Moskowitz C, Bogomolny D et al (2005) The effect of prior surgery on blood oxygen level-dependent functional MR imaging in the preoperative assessment of brain tumors. Am J Neuroradiol 26:1980–1985

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Bryan RN, Kraut M (1998) Functional magnetic resonance imaging: you get what you (Barely) see. Am J Neuroradiol 19(5):991–992

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Bizzi A, Blasi V, Falini A, Ferroli P, Cadioli M, Danesi U (2008) Presurgical functional MR imaging of language and motor functions: validation with intraoperative electrocortical mapping. Radiology 248:579–589

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Lehéricy S, Duffau H, Comu P, Capelle L, Pidoux B, Carpentier A (2000) Correspondence between functional magnetic resonance imaging somatotopy and individual brain anatomy of the central region: comparison with intraoperative stimulation in patients with brain tumors. J Neurosurg 92:589–598

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Holodny A, Schulder M, Liu W, Wolko J, Maldjian J, Kalnin A (2000) The effect of brain tumors on BOLD functional MR imaging activation in the adjacent motor cortex: implications for image-guided neurosurgery. Am J Neuroradiol 21:1415–1422

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Krieg S, Shiban E, Buchmann N, Gempt J, Foerschler A, Meyer B et al (2012) Utility of presurgical navigated transcranical magnetic brain stimulation for the resection of tumors in eloquent motor areas. J Neurosurg 116(5):994–1001

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Picht T, Schmidt S, Brandt S, Frey D, Hannula H, Neuvonen T et al (2011) Preoperative functional mapping for rolandic brain tumor surgery: comparison of navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation to direct cortical stimulation. Neurosurgery 69(3):581–588

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Picht T, Mularcki S, Kuehn B, Vajkoczy P, Suess O, Kombos T (2011) Navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation for preoperative functional diagnostics in brain tumor surgery. Neurosurgery 65:93–98

    Google Scholar 

  28. Forster M, Hattingen E, Senft C, Gasser T, Seifert V, Szelényi A (2011) Navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation and functional magnetic resonance imaging—advanced adjuncts in preoperative planning for central region tumors. Neurosurgery 68(5):1317–1324

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Barker A, Jalinous R, Freeston IL (1985) Non-invasive magnetic stimulation of human motor cortex. Lancet 1(8437):1106–1107

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Yousry T, Schmid U, Alkadhi H, Schmidt D, Peraud A, Buettner A et al (1997) Localization of the motor hand area to a knob on the precentral gyrus: a new landmark. Brain 120(1):141–157

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Szelényi A, Forster M, Hattingen E (2010) nTMS, DCS and fMRI: perioperative assessment in central region tumours. Abstract 1st international workshop on navigated brain stimulation in neurosurgery, University of Berlin, Germany

  32. Hou B, Bradbury M, Peck K, Petrovich N, Gutin P, Holodny A (2006) Effect of brain tumor neovasculature defined by rCBV on BOLD fMRI activation volume in the primary motor cortex. Neuroimage 32:489–497

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Ulmer J, Hacein-Bey L, Mathews V, Mueller W, DeYoe E, Prost R et al (2004) Lesion-induced pseudo-dominance at functional magnetic resonance imaging: implications for preoperative assessments. Neurosurgery 55:569–579

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Fandino J, Kollias S, Wieser H, Valavanis A, Yonekawa Y (1999) Intraoperative validation of functional magnetic resonance imaging and cortical reorganization patterns in patients with brain tumors involving the primary motor cortex. J Neurosurg 91(2):238–240

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Krings T, Buchbinder B, Butler W, Chiappa K, Jiang H, Rosen B (1997) Stereotactic transcranical magnetic stimulation: correlation with direct electrical cortical stimulation. Neurosurgery 41(6):93–98

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Nexstim (2010) NBS system 4.0: User manual. Nexstim, Helsinki

  37. Toga A, Mazziotta J (2001) Brain mapping: the methods. Elsevier, San Diego

    Google Scholar 

  38. Rothwell J, Thompson P, Day B, Boyd S, Marsden C (1991) Stimulation of the human motor cortex through the scalp. Exp Physiol 76:159–200

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Suess O, Suess S, Mularski S, Kuhn B, Picht T, Schonherr S et al (2007) Evaluation of a DC pulsed magnetic tracking system in neurosurgical navigation: technique, accuracies, and influencing factors. Biomed Tech 52(3):223–233

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Berger M, Ojemann G, Lettich E (1990) Neurophysiological monitoring during astrocytoma surgery. Neurosurg Clin N Am 1(1):65–80

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank the engineers at Tekmed Istruments SPA Milan for their professional assistance.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Francesco DiMeco.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mangraviti, A., Casali, C., Cordella, R. et al. Practical assessment of preoperative functional mapping techniques: navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation and functional magnetic resonance imaging. Neurol Sci 34, 1551–1557 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10072-012-1283-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10072-012-1283-7

Keywords

Navigation