Skip to main content
Log in

Guppies, Poecilia reticulata, perceive a reversed Delboeuf illusion

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Animal Cognition Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Animals are often required to estimate object sizes during several fitness-related activities, such as choosing mates, foraging, and competing for resources. Some species are susceptible to size illusions, i.e. the misperception of the size of an object based on the surrounding context, but other species are not. This interspecific variation might be adaptive, reflecting species-specific selective pressures; according to this hypothesis, it is important to test species in which size discrimination has a notable ecological relevance. We tested susceptibility to a size illusion in the guppy, Poecilia reticulata, a fish species required to accurately estimate sizes during mate choice, foraging, and antipredator behaviours. We focussed on the Delboeuf illusion, in which an object is typically perceived to be larger when surrounded by a smaller object. In experiment 1, we trained guppies to select the larger of two circles to obtain a food reward and then tested them using stimuli arranged in a Delboeuf-like pattern. In experiment 2, we tested guppies in a spontaneous food choice task to determine whether the subjective size perception of food items is affected by the surrounding context. Jointly, our experiments indicated that guppies perceived the Delboeuf illusion, but in a reverse direction relative to humans: guppies estimated as larger the stimulus that human perceived as smaller. Our results indicated susceptibility to size illusions also in a species required to perform accurate size discrimination and support previous evidence of variability in illusion susceptibility across vertebrates.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Agrillo C, Miletto Petrazzini ME (2012) The importance of replication in comparative psychology: the lesson of elephant quantity judgments. Front Psychol 3:181

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Bánszegi O, Urrutia A, Szenczi P, Hudson R (2016) More or less: spontaneous quantity discrimination in the domestic cat. Anim Cogn 19:879–888

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Basolo AL (1990) Female preference for male sword length in the green swordtail, Xiphophorus helleri (Pisces: Poeciliidae). Anim Behav 40:332–338

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Birk MA, White JW (2014) Experimental determination of the spatial scale of a prey patch from the predator’s perspective. Oecologia 174:723–729

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bischoff RJ, Gould JL, Rubenstein DI (1985) Tail size and female choice in the guppy (Poecilia reticulata). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 17:253–255

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Byosiere SE, Feng LC, Woodhead JK, Rutter NJ, Chouinard PA, Howell TJ, Bennett PC (2017) Visual perception in domestic dogs: susceptibility to the Ebbinghaus–Titchener and Delboeuf illusions. Anim Cogn 20:435–448

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cattelan S, Lucon-Xiccato T, Pilastro A, Griggio M (2017) Is the mirror test a valid measure of fish sociability? Anim Behav 127:109–116

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cavoto KK, Cook RG (2001) Cognitive precedence for local information in hierarchical stimulus processing by pigeons. J Exp Psychol-Anim Behav Proces 27:3–16

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Croft DP, Darden SK, Ruxton GD (2009) Predation risk as a driving force for phenotypic assortment: a cross-population comparison. Proc R Soc B Biol Sci 276:1899–1904

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dadda M, Agrillo C, Bisazza A, Brown C (2015) Laterality enhances numerical skills in the guppy, Poecilia reticulata. Front Behav Neurosci 9:285

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Devigili A, Kelley JL, Pilastro A, Evans JP (2012) Expression of pre-and postcopulatory traits under different dietary conditions in guppies. Behav Ecol 24:740–749

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dowds BM, Elwood RW (1983) Shell wars: assessment strategies and the timing of decisions in hermit crab shell fights. Behaviour 85:1–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Etheredge RI, Avenas C, Armstrong MJ, Cummings ME (2018) Sex-specific cognitive–behavioural profiles emerging from individual variation in numerosity discrimination in Gambusia affinis. Anim Cogn 21:37–53

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Evans JP, Kelley JL, Bisazza A, Finazzo E, Pilastro A (2004) Sire attractiveness influences offspring performance in guppies. Proc R Soc B Biol Sci 271:2035–2042

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feng LC, Chouinard PA, Howell TJ, Bennett PC (2017) Why do animals differ in their susceptibility to geometrical illusions? Psychon Bull Rev 24:262–276

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fujita K, Matsuzawa T (1990) Delayed figure reconstruction by a chimpanzee (Pan troglodytes) and humans (Homo sapiens). J Comp Psychol 104:345–351

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fuss T, Schluessel V (2017) The Ebbinghaus illusion in the gray bamboo shark (Chiloscyllium griseum) in comparison to the teleost damselfish (Chromis chromis). Zoology 123:16–29

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gasparini C, Serena G, Pilastro A (2013) Do unattractive friends make you look better? Context-dependent male mating preferences in the guppy. Proc R Soc B Biol Sci 280:20123072

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gatto E, Lucon-Xiccato T, Savaşçı BB, Dadda M, Bisazza A (2017) Experimental setting affects the performance of guppies in a numerical discrimination task. Anim Cogn 20:187–198

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hopkins WD (1997) Hemispheric specialization for local and global processing of hierarchical visual stimuli in chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes). Neuropsychol 35:343–348

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Houde AE (1997) Sex, color, and mate choice in guppies. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunt E, Frost N, Lunneborg C (1973) Individual differences in cognition: a new approach to intelligence. Psychol Learn Motiv 7:87–122

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karino K, Shinjo S (2004) Female mate preference based on male orange spot patterns in the feral guppy Poecilia reticulata in Japan. Ichthyol Res 51:316–320

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kelley LA, Kelley JL (2014) Animal visual illusion and confusion: the importance of a perceptual perspective. Behav Ecol 25:450–463

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • King DL (1988) Assimilation is due to one perceived whole and contrast is due to two perceived wholes. New Ideas Psychol 6:277–288

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lucon-Xiccato T, Bisazza A (2014) Discrimination reversal learning reveals greater female behavioural flexibility in guppies. Biol Lett 10:20140206

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Lucon-Xiccato T, Bisazza A (2017) Individual differences in cognition among teleost fishes. Behav Proc 141:184–195

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lucon-Xiccato T, Dadda M (2017a) Individual guppies differ in quantity discrimination performance across antipredator and foraging contexts. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 71:13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lucon-Xiccato T, Dadda M (2017b) Personality and cognition: sociability negatively predicts shoal size discrimination performance in guppies. Front Psychol 8:1118

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Lucon-Xiccato T, Miletto Petrazzini ME, Agrillo C, Bisazza A (2015) Guppies discriminate between two quantities of food items but prioritize item size over total amount. Anim Behav 107:183–191

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Magurran AE (2005) Evolutionary ecology: the Trinidadian guppy. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • McNamara JM, Houston AI, Collins EJ (2001) Optimality models in behavioral biology. SIAM Rev 43:413–466

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miletto Petrazzini ME, Agrillo C (2016) Turning to the larger shoal: are there individual differences in small-and large-quantity discrimination of guppies? Ethol Ecol Evol 28:211–220

    Google Scholar 

  • Miletto Petrazzini ME, Bisazza A, Agrillo C (2017) Do domestic dogs (Canis lupus familiaris) perceive the Delboeuf illusion? Anim Cogn 20:427–434

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Miletto Petrazzini ME, Parrish AE, Beran MJ, Agrillo C (2018) Exploring the solitaire illusion in guppies (Poecilia reticulata). J Comp Psychol 132:48–57

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Murayama T, Usui A, Takeda E, Kato K, Maejima K (2012) Relative size discrimination and perception of the Ebbinghaus illusion in a bottlenose dolphin (Tursiops truncatus). Aquat Mamm 38:333–342

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nakamura N, Watanabe S, Fujita K (2008) Pigeons perceive the Ebbinghaus–Titchener circles as an assimilation illusion. J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process 34:375–387

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nakamura N, Watanabe S, Fujita K (2014) A reversed Ebbinghaus–Titchener illusion in bantams (Gallus gallus domesticus). Anim Cogn 17:471–481

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Parrish AE, Beran MJ (2014) When less is more: like humans, chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) misperceive food amounts based on plate size. Anim Cogn 17:427–434

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Parrish AE, Brosnan SF, Beran MJ (2015) Do you see what I see? A comparative investigation of the Delboeuf illusion in humans (Homo sapiens), rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta), and capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella). J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn 41:395–405

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Parron C, Fagot J (2007) Comparison of grouping abilities in humans (Homo sapiens) and baboons (Papio papio) with the Ebbinghaus illusion. J Comp Psychol 121:405–411

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pitteri E, Mongillo P, Carnier P, Marinelli L (2014) Hierarchical stimulus processing by dogs (Canis familiaris). Anim Cogn 17:869–877

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Prétôt L, Bshary R, Brosnan SF (2016a) Factors influencing the different performance of fish and primates on a dichotomous choice task. Anim Behav 119:189–199

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prétôt L, Bshary R, Brosnan SF (2016b) Comparing species decisions in a dichotomous choice task: adjusting task parameters improves performance in monkeys. Anim Cogn 19:819–834

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rahman MM, Kelley JL, Evans JP (2013) Condition-dependent expression of pre-and postcopulatory sexual traits in guppies. Ecol Evol 3:2197–2213

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Rodd FH, Hughes KA, Grether GF, Baril CT (2002) A possible non-sexual origin of mate preference: are male guppies mimicking fruit? Proc R Soc B Biol Sci 269:475–481

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosa Salva O, Rugani R, Cavazzana A, Regolin L, Vallortigara G (2013) Perception of the Ebbinghaus illusion in 4-day-old domestic chicks (Gallus gallus). Anim Cogn 16:895–906

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Santacà M, Regaiolli B, Miletto Petrazzini ME, Spiezio C, Agrillo C (2017) Preliminary study to investigate the Delboeuf illusion in ring-tailed lemurs (Lemur catta): methodological challenges. Anim Behav Cogn 4:365–377

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sovrano VA, Albertazzi L, Rosa Salva O (2015) The Ebbinghaus illusion in a fish (Xenotoca eiseni). Anim Cogn 18:533–542

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Uller C, Lewis J (2009) Horses (Equus caballus) select the greater of two quantities in small numerical contrasts. Anim Cogn 12:733–738

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ward C, Smuts BB (2007) Quantity-based judgments in the domestic dog (Canis lupus familiaris). Anim Cogn 10:71–80

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Watanabe S, Nakamura N, Fujita K (2011) Pigeons perceive a reversed Zöllner illusion. Cognition 119:137–141

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Watanabe S, Nakamura N, Fujita K (2013) Bantams (Gallus gallus domesticus) also perceive a reversed Zöllner illusion. Anim Cogn 16:109–115

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank the undergraduate students who helped in the project. We have no competing interests. Funding was provided by STARS 2017 Grant (Prot. 19215) and PRIN 2015 Grant (Prot. 2015FFATB7) from University of Padova.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tyrone Lucon-Xiccato.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

We have no conflicts of interest.

Ethical approval

We followed all applicable international, national, and/or institutional guidelines for the care and use of animals (Italy, D.L. 4 Marzo 2014, n. 26). All procedures performed in studies involving animals were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institution or practice at which the studies were conducted (Protocol n. 13/2018).

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lucon-Xiccato, T., Santacà, M., Miletto Petrazzini, M.E. et al. Guppies, Poecilia reticulata, perceive a reversed Delboeuf illusion. Anim Cogn 22, 291–303 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10071-019-01237-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10071-019-01237-6

Keywords

Navigation