Skip to main content
Log in

Increased risk of purge system malfunction after Impella 5.0 replacement: a case series

  • Case Report
  • Artificial Heart (Clinical)
  • Published:
Journal of Artificial Organs Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The Impella 5.0 is an axial-flow percutaneous ventricular assist device used in patients with cardiogenic shock. Although the recommended period of use is 10 days or less, weaning can be delayed because of ongoing hemodynamic instability. In clinical practice, this device sometimes malfunctions during long-term management with heparin and must be replaced; however, the relationship between the duration of support with the initial and replacement Impella 5.0 and the changes in value of the purge system has not been fully elucidated. From July 2018 to May 2021, Impella 5.0 was implanted and used for more than 10 days in 11 patients at our institution. Four patients required Impella replacement because of device malfunction and the second Impella had purge system malfunction in all cases. The second Impella was used for a significantly shorter time than the first Impella (p = 0016). We calculated the ratio of purge pressure to purge flow rate and found that the ratio exceeded 50 mm Hg/mL/h in all cases with purge system malfunction. In conclusion, it is important to construct a treatment strategy considering the duration of use, because the risk of purge system malfunction is high after replaced Impella 5.0.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Batsides G, Massaro J, Cheung A, Soltesz E, Ramzy D, Anderson MB. Outcomes of Impella 5.0 in cardiogenic shock: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Innovations (Phila). 2018;13:254–60.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Schibilsky D, Lausberg H, Haller C, Lenglinger M, Woernle B, Haeberle H, Rosenberger P, Walker T, Schlensak C. Impella 5.0 support in INTERMACS II cardiogenic shock patients using right and left axillary artery access. Artif Organs. 2015;39:660–3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Tarabichi S, Ikegami H, Russo MJ, Lee LY, Lemaire A. The role of the axillary Impella 5.0 device on patients with acute cardiogenic shock. J Cardiothorac Surg. 2020;15:1–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Bertoglio L, Katsarou M, Scandroglio M, Bertoldi L, Chiesa R, Pappalardo F. Surgical transaxillary placement of the Impella 5.0 ventricular assist device. J Card Surg. 2019;34:92–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Nelson DW, Sundararajan S, Klein E, Joyce LD, Durham LA, Joyce DL, Mohammed AA. Sustained use of the Impella 5.0 heart pump enables bridge to clinical decisions in 34 patients. Texas Hear Inst J. 2021;48:1–8.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Mastroianni C, Bouabdallaoui N, Leprince P, Lebreton G. Short-term mechanical circulatory support with the Impella 5.0 device for cardiogenic shock at La Pitié-Salpêtrière. Eur Hear J Acute Cardiovasc Care. 2017;6:87–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Lima B, Kale P, Gonzalez-Stawinski GV, Kuiper JJ, Carey S, Hall SA. Effectiveness and safety of the impella 5.0 as a bridge to cardiac transplantation or durable left ventricular assist device. Am J Cardiol. 2016;117:1622–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Arnett DM, Lee JC, Harms MA, Kearney KE, Ramos M, Smith BM, Anderson EC, Tayal R, McCabe JM. Caliber and fitness of the axillary artery as a conduit for large-bore cardiovascular procedures. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2018;91:150–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Said A, Sayed L. Percutaneous thrombectomy of Impella-associated iliac artery thrombosis using the FlowTriever system. Clin Case Rep. 2020;8:2645–9.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ryota Morimoto.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of interest

To received lecture fees from Ono Yakuhin, Novartis, Otsuka, and Astrazeneca, and research grants from Ono Yakuhin, Amgen Astellas, Pfizer, Alnylam, and Alexion (not in connection with the submitted work). T.M. received lecture fees and unrestricted research grants from Bayer, Daiichi-Sankyo, Dainippon Sumitomo, Kowa, MSD, Mitsubishi Tanabe, Boehringer Ingelheim, Novartis, Pfizer, Sanofi-Aventis, Takeda, Astellas, Otsuka, and Teijin.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Oishi, H., Morimoto, R., Ito, R. et al. Increased risk of purge system malfunction after Impella 5.0 replacement: a case series. J Artif Organs 26, 79–83 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10047-022-01337-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10047-022-01337-0

Keywords

Navigation