Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Is there an advantage to laparoscopy over open repair of primary umbilical hernias in obese patients? An analysis of the Americas Hernia Society Quality Collaborative (AHSQC)

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Hernia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

The most common techniques used to repair umbilical hernias are open and laparoscopic. As the obesity epidemic in the United States is growing, it is essential to understand how this morbidity affects umbilical hernia repairs. This study compares laparoscopic versus open umbilical hernia repairs in obese patients.

Methods

All patients with body mass index (BMI) ≥ 30 kg/m2 who underwent elective, open or laparoscopic repair of a primary umbilical hernia with mesh were identified from the Americas Hernia Society Quality Collaborative (AHSQC). A retrospective review of the prospectively collected data was conducted. Outcomes of interest included surgical site infections (SSI), surgical site occurrences requiring procedural intervention (SSOPI), hernia-related quality-of-life survey (HerQles), and long-term recurrence. A logistic regression model was used to generate propensity scores.

Results

Of 1507 patients who met the inclusion criteria, 322 were laparoscopic, and 1185 were open cases. The laparoscopic group had higher mean BMI (37 ± 6 vs. 35 ± 5 kg/m2 , P < 0.001 ) and mean hernia width (3 cm ± 1 vs. 2 cm ± 2, P < 0.001). Using a propensity score model, we controlled for several clinically relevant covariates. Propensity score adjustment showed no differences in the 30-day HerQles score (OR 0.93, 95% CI 0.58–1.49), SSI (OR 1.57, 95% CI 0.52–4.77), SSOPI (OR 2.85, 95% CI 0.84–9.62) or hernia recurrence (hazard ratio 0.86, 95% CI 0.50–1.49).

Conclusion

In obese patients with primary umbilical hernias, there is likely no benefit to laparoscopy over open umbilical hernia repair with mesh with regard to wound morbidity. Although, the long-term recurrence also showed no difference between these two approaches, overall follow up was lacking.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Rutkow IM (2003) Demographic and socioeconomic aspects of hernia repair in the United States in 2003. Surg Clin N Am 83:1045–1051. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0039-6109(03)00132-4(v–vi)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Hajibandeh S, Hajibandeh S, Sreh A, Khan A, Subar D, Jones L (2017) Laparoscopic versus open umbilical or paraumbilical hernia repair: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Hernia 21:905–916. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-017-1683-y

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Colon MJ, Kitamura R, Telem DA, Nguyen S, Divino CM (2013) Laparoscopic umbilical hernia repair is the preferred approach in obese patients. Am J Surg 205:231–236. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2012.02.022

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Tastaldi L, Krpata DM, Prabhu AS, Petro CC, Rosenblatt S, Haskins IN et al (2019) The effect of increasing body mass index on wound complications in open ventral hernia repair with mesh. Am J Surg 218:560–566. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2019.01.022

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Bamgbade OA, Rutter TW, Nafiu OO, Dorje P (2007) Postoperative complications in obese and nonobese patients. World J Surg 31:556–560. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-006-0305-0

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Cassie S, Okrainec A, Saleh F, Quereshy FS, Jackson TD (2014) Laparoscopic versus open elective repair of primary umbilical hernias: short-term outcomes from the American College of Surgeons National Surgery Quality Improvement Program. Surg Endosc 28:741–746. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-013-3252-5

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Shankar DA, Itani KMF, O’Brien WJ, Sanchez VM (2017) Factors associated with long-term outcomes of umbilical hernia repair. JAMA Surg 152:461–466. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamasurg.2016.5052

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Williams KN, Hussain L, Fellner AN, Meister KM (2019) Updated outcomes of laparoscopic versus open umbilical hernia repair in patients with obesity based on a National Surgical Quality Improvement Program review. Surg Endosc. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-019-07129-7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Poulose BK, Roll S, Murphy JW, Matthews BD, Todd Heniford B, Voeller G et al (2016) Design and implementation of the Americas Hernia Society Quality Collaborative (AHSQC): improving value in hernia care. Hernia 20:177–189. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-016-1477-7

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. CDC. Surgical Site Infection (SSI) Event n.d. https://www.cdc.gov/nhsn/pdfs/pscmanual/9pscssicurrent.pdf. Accessed 14 May 2019

  11. Krpata DM, Schmotzer BJ, Flocke S, Jin J, Blatnik JA, Ermlich B et al (2012) Design and initial implementation of HerQLes: a hernia-related quality-of-life survey to assess abdominal wall function. J Am Coll Surg 215:635–642. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2012.06.412

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Criss CN, Petro CC, Krpata DM, Seafler CM, Lai N, Fiutem J et al (2014) Functional abdominal wall reconstruction improves core physiology and quality-of-life. Surgery 156:176–182. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surg.2014.04.010

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Kaoutzanis C, Leichtle SW, Mouawad NJ, Welch KB, Lampman RM, Wahl WL et al (2015) Risk factors for postoperative wound infections and prolonged hospitalization after ventral/incisional hernia repair. Hernia 19:113–123. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-013-1155-y

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Holihan JL, Alawadi Z, Martindale RG, Roth JS, Wray CJ, Ko TC et al (2015) Adverse events after ventral hernia repair: the vicious cycle of complications. J Am Coll Surg 221:478–485. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2015.04.026

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Plymale MA, Ragulojan R, Davenport DL, Roth JS (2017) Ventral and incisional hernia: the cost of comorbidities and complications. Surg Endosc 31:341–351. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-016-4977-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Funk LM, Perry KA, Narula VK, Mikami DJ, Melvin WS (2013) Current national practice patterns for inpatient management of ventral abdominal wall hernia in the United States. Surg Endosc 27:4104–4112. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-013-3075-4

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Helgstrand F, Rosenberg J, Kehlet H, Jorgensen LN, Bisgaard T (2013) Nationwide prospective study of outcomes after elective incisional hernia repair. J Am Coll Surg 216:217–228. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2012.10.013

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Cobb WS, Warren JA, Ewing JA, Burnikel A, Merchant M, Carbonell AM (2015) Open retromuscular mesh repair of complex incisional hernia: predictors of wound events and recurrence. J Am Coll Surg 220:606–613. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2014.12.055

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Tubre DJ, Schroeder AD, Estes J, Eisenga J, Fitzgibbons RJ (2018) Surgical site infection: the “Achilles Heel” of all types of abdominal wall hernia reconstruction. Hernia 22:1003–1013. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-018-1826-9

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Donovan K, Denham M, Kuchta K, Denham W, Linn JG, Haggerty SP et al (2019) Predictors for recurrence after open umbilical hernia repair in 979 patients. Surg (United States) 166:615–622. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surg.2019.04.040

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Lo ME, Hinojosa M, Carbonell A, Krpata D, Carter J, Rogers AM (2018) American Society for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery and American Hernia Society consensus guideline on bariatric surgery and hernia surgery. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 14:1221–1232. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soard.2018.07.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Eid GM, Wikiel KJ, Entabi F, Saleem M (2013) Ventral hernias in morbidly obese patients: a suggested algorithm for operative repair. Obes Surg 23:703–709. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-013-0883-5

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This project was not funded.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Center for Abdominal Core Health, Digestive Disease and Surgery Institute, The Cleveland Clinic Foundation, 9500 Euclid Avenue, A-100, Cleveland, OH, 44195, USA

    A. Fafaj, L. Tastaldi, H. Alkhatib, S. Tish, R. AlMarzooqi, C, Petro, D. Krpata, M. Rosen & A. Prabhu

  2. Department of Healthcare Policy and Research, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA

    M. A. Olson

  3. Department of Biostatistics, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA

    T. G. Stewart

Authors
  1. A. Fafaj
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. L. Tastaldi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. H. Alkhatib
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. S. Tish
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. R. AlMarzooqi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. M. A. Olson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. T. G. Stewart
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. C, Petro
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. D. Krpata
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. M. Rosen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  11. A. Prabhu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. Fafaj.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

Ajita Prabhu reported receiving honoraria for speaking and a research grant paid to her institution from Intuitive Surgical, serving on an advisory board and receiving honoraria from Medtronic and from BD. Michael Rosen reported receiving salary support for his role as Medical Director of the Americas Hernia Society Quality Collaborative and grant support paid to his institution from Pacira. No other disclosures were reported. David Krpata reports education grants from W.L. Gore.

Research involving human participants and/or animals

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Ethical approval

This project was approved by the IRB.

Informed consent

For this type of study, formal consent was not required.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Fafaj, A., Tastaldi, L., Alkhatib, H. et al. Is there an advantage to laparoscopy over open repair of primary umbilical hernias in obese patients? An analysis of the Americas Hernia Society Quality Collaborative (AHSQC). Hernia 25, 579–585 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-020-02218-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-020-02218-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation