Abstract
In recent decades, increases in mental health problems in adolescents have been reported from several large population-based surveys. This raises questions about changes in underlying risk and protective factors that can inform future intervention strategies. Population data were collected from 1995 to 2019 in three waves of the Young-HUNT studies in Norway to map decennial trends in the prevalence of established risk factors for, and their associations with, adolescent mental health problems. All adolescents (aged 13–19 years) attending lower and upper secondary school in the county of Trøndelag were invited, representing three historical cohorts of 25,245 unique adolescents. Mental health problems (HSCL-5) and established mental health risk factors were self-reported. Using a generalized linear model and linear regression, we calculated changes in relative and absolute differences between risk factors and mental health problems. Overall, the prevalence of established risk factors for mental health problems in adolescence increased markedly between 1995 and 2019, especially in girls. Prominent increases were observed for fatigue, bullying, musculoskeletal pain and migraine, loneliness, and overweight. Furthermore, with the exception of excess alcohol use and family economy, associations between each risk factor and adolescent mental health problems strengthened over the same time span in girls, but less among boys. Our findings suggest that several modifiable risk factors for poor mental health in adolescence are increasing, especially among girls, and should be targeted in community, school, and in clinical settings.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
There has been a striking increase in self-reported symptoms of anxiety and depression in Norwegian adolescents over the last 2 decades [1]. Similar trends have been reported elsewhere, supported by European [2], Asian [3], American [4, 5], and Australian findings [6]. This represents a global public health concern [7] as mental health problems are associated with numerous adverse psychosocial and individual outcomes throughout life, including education and unemployment [8], psychosomatic health complaints, and a lowered threshold for relapse of anxiety disorders and major depression [9].
Prevalence estimates of both mental health problems and disorders vary considerably (0.2–24% for depressive and anxiety disorders and 9–22% for psychological distress) across studies and study settings [7, 10,11,12,13]. Worldwide, it has been estimated that 10% to 20% of adolescents live with a diagnosed mental health condition [14], and that they account for approximately 13% of the global burden of disease and injury in 10–19 years old [15]. Mental health problems arise from interaction between risk and protective factors [16], some of which are (relatively) constant, yet others may be modifiable, and may vary greatly through the teenage years. Literature indicates that bullying and loneliness represent strong and established predictors for mental health problems [17,18,19], while following recommendations regarding healthy sleep, increased physical activity and reduced sedentary behaviours have shown strong and favourable associations with mental health benefits in adolescence. Apart from age, gender, SES, and, to some extent, adverse life events (ALEs), most known determinants/risk factors are considered modifiable in either societal, familial, or individual environments. However, less is known regarding the time trends in the risk factors for mental health problems in adolescence during recent decades.
The rapid rise in self-reported mental health problems, self-harm, and suicidal behaviours in young people implies possible changes in the underlying risk and protective factors. Typically, mental health problems emerge and often peak in adolescence and early adulthood [20], making adolescence a critical opportunity for early preventive interventions through educational system and through early treatment in primary and specialized care.
The aim of this study is to present decennial trends in risk factors potentially driving the increasing levels of anxiety and depression symptoms in Norwegian adolescents. We use a serial entry design, measuring individual, relational, and contextual data in three different population-based adolescent cohorts from 1995 to 2019 to examine (1) change in the prevalence of risk factors for mental health over time, and (2) changes in the relative and absolute differences between these risk factors and symptoms of anxiety and depression in girls and boys between 1995 and 2019.
Methods
Data and study population
Data were obtained from more than 25,000 participants aged 13–19 years in three waves of the Young-HUNT (YH) study, Norway: YH1 in 1995–97 (n = 9140, 89.6% response rate); YH3 in 2006–08 (n = 8203, 78.4% response rate); and YH4 in 2017–19 (n = 8124, 75% response rate). The surveys included self-reported questionnaires covering a wide range of aspects of physical and mental health, quality of life, lifestyle, and behavioural factors. All detailed instruments, variables, and response options are on the webpage for the HUNT Research Centre (https://www.ntnu.edu/hunt).
Measurements
Dependent variable (anxiety and depression symptoms)
Psychological distress was assessed using a Norwegian validated and reliable short version of the Hopkins Symptom Checklist (HSCL-5), in all three waves of YH [21]. HSCL-5 is a feasible and succinct screening tool for anxiety and depression symptoms in large populations. Short versions of HSCL have shown good psychometric properties across adolescent and adult populations [22, 23] compared to longer versions, and have therefore been widely used in Norwegian population studies [24,25,26]. Questions about anxiety and depression symptoms in the previous 2 weeks were asked (feeling tense, anxious, hopeless, sad, and worried). Responses were scored from ‘not at all bothered’ (1 point) to ‘extremely bothered’ (4 points) on a Likert-scale, with item mean scores based on all five questions. Missing data ranged from 2.6 to 6.7% in the YH waves.
Independent variables (risk factors for anxiety and depression)
Individual factors
Self-perceived health was assessed by a single item in all three waves: the responses were dichotomized into: “Poor” and “Good” [27]. Missing data ranged from 0.9 to 1.7% across all waves.
Fatigue was assessed by one item from The Subjective Well-Being Scale in YH1 and 3 [28], and one item from the Chalder Fatigue Scale (CFS) [29] in YH4. We dichotomized the response options into “Strong/fit” and “Tired/worn out”. Missing data ranged from 1.0 to 2.8%.
Excess alcohol use was measured with a single item originating from Health Behaviour in School-aged Children (HBSC) [30]. We dichotomized the response options into “Excessive alcohol intoxication” (drunk > 10 times) and “ < 10 times” [31]. Missing ranged from 2.6 to 5.3%.
Chronic pain was assessed by asking two questions about how often participants have experienced musculoskeletal pain and whether they had migraine diagnosed by a doctor. Both questions were merged and responses were dichotomized into “Frequently/often” and “Seldom/never [32]. Missing ranged from 0.6 to 1.4%.
Physical activity level was assessed by a validated questionnaire in which participants reported their weekly frequency of physical activity [33]. The responses were dichotomized into “physically inactive” and “physically active”, based on international (WHO) recommendations [34]. Missing ranged from 1.2 to 1.8%.
Sleep problems evening was assessed by one question in all three YH waves. The responses were dichotomized into “Never/seldom” and “Sometimes/frequently” [35]. Missing ranged from 1.3 to 5.3%.
BMI was measured using a standard definition for adolescent overweight and obesity, adjusted for age and sex (ISO-BMI). “Overweight” and “Obese” categories were defined using the International Obesity Task Force cut-off values (International Organization for Standardization BMI) for children and adolescents [36].
Relational factors
Being bullied was assessed by one question in YH1 and 3, and one near identical item from the Strength and Difficulties questionnaire [37] in YH4. The responses were dichotomized into “Yes” and “No” [38]. Missing ranged from 1.9 to 10.0%.
Loneliness was assessed by the same question in all three YH studies. The responses were dichotomized into “Often/very often” and “Never/rarely/sometimes” [39]. Missing ranged from 1.1 to 8.4%.
Family cohesion was assessed by 3 items from the Resilience Scale for Adolescents (READ) [40], available in both YH3 and 4. READ has been validated across different cultural samples and settings, and demonstrates sound psychometric properties [41]. Responses were merged and dichotomized into “High family cohesion” and “Low family cohesion”. Missing ranged from 4.5 to 6.9%.
General practitioner (GP) visits last 12 months were assessed by a single question in all three YH waves, and dichotomized into “ ≥ 1 time” and “ < 1”. Missing ranged from 3.3 to 10.7%.
Contextual factors
Sex and age were obtained from the Norwegian National Registry and further included in the HUNT studies. Family financial situation was measured by one question in YH3 and 4. The responses were dichotomized into “Worse” and “Same or better”, compared to other families (27). Missing ranged from 1.2 to 8.5%.
Traumatic events/adverse life events (ALE’s) were measured by 9 adapted items from the UCLA PTSD Reaction Index [42] available in YH3 and 4. The response options were merged and the total score were dichotomized into “Yes, one time or more” and “Never”. Missing ranged from 5.6 to 8.4%.
A detailed variable overview and missing values are found in supplementary Table 4.
Statistical analysis
We calculated descriptive statistics as frequencies, percentages, and averages. We specified two types of regression models to study associations between the exposures and HSCL-5.
First, linear regression models (OLS) were used to estimate absolute differences (beta coefficients, B) in (standardized) mean HSCL-5 between exposure categories, and we report 95% confidence intervals based on 2000 bootstrapped samples. Second, generalized linear models (GLMs) with a gamma distribution and a log-link function were used to estimate differences in (log of) means in HSCL-5 between exposure categories. Coefficients were exponentiated and is interpreted as a relative measure of difference (relative risk, RR). Estimates are reported with 95 percent confidence intervals (95% CI). The RR represents the ratio between means, whereas the beta coefficients represent the difference between standardized mean HSCL across exposure categories. To test for linear trends across survey waves, interaction terms between exposures and survey waves were specified. Analyses were conducted for each sex separately and we adjusted for continuous age centred at age 16 in each wave. Exposures that showed statistically significant changes (1995–2019) for both absolute and relative differences were included in the Discussion. All data management and analyses were conducted using Stata version 17 (Statacorp, 2021).
Results
Table 1 presents descriptive characteristics, changes in mean HSCL-5 scores (symptoms of anxiety and depression) and prevalence of established risk factors for mental health problems in three historical adolescent cohorts (13–19 years) 1995–2019. Mean HSCL-5 scores increased from 1.35 to 1.44 in boys and from 1.65 to 1.95 in girls from YH 1 to YH4.
Trends in established risk factors for mental health problems 1995–2019
Overall, we found an increasing trend of several well-known risk factors from YH1 to YH4. For girls, the most prominent were fatigue (50.6–64.8%), bullying (1.9–6.7%), loneliness (7.8–14.3%), musculoskeletal pain and migraine (32.2–58.5%), overweight/obesity (20.3–28.6%), and GP visits (57.9% to 73.9%). In contrast, we observe a decrease in physical inactivity (77.7–67.6%) and excess alcohol use (27.2–17.1%).
For boys, the largest increases from YH1 to YH4 were found in bullying (2.2–8.4%), musculoskeletal pain and migraine (19.4–41.1%), overweight/obesity (22.0–34.1%), and GP visits (45.2–62.2%). As in girls, a decrease in excess alcohol use was also observed in boys (30.8–19.0%).
In contrast, self-report of poor self-perceived health, perceived family economy, low family cohesion, Adverse Life Events, and sleep problems remained relatively stable from YH1 to YH4, in both boys and girls.
Decennial trends in absolute differences (beta coefficients) in risk factors for mental health problems
Table 2 shows absolute differences (beta coefficients) in HSCL-5 for individual, relational, and contextual risk factors adjusted for age. For girls, the absolute difference in standardized HSCL between those reporting poor self-rated health compared with those reporting good self-rated health was 0.58 in YH1 which increased to 1.11 in YH4. Differences according to self-reported fatigue (0.58–1.05), musculoskeletal pain/migraine (0.42–0.76), physical inactivity (0.05–0.38), sleep problems (0.49–0.79), overweight/obesity (0.01–0.09), bullying (0.70–1.03), loneliness (1.18–1.59), GP visits (0.10–0.36), low family cohesion (0.64–0.75), and Adverse Life Events (0.32–0.47) were also increased.
For boys, we found evidence for small changes in absolute differences for fatigue (0.47–0.64), musculoskeletal pain/migraine (0.37–0.48), physical inactivity (0.05–0.14), sleep problems (0.39–0.54), GP visits (0.12–0.27), and low family cohesion (0.37–0.49). In contrast to other risk factors, we observed decreasing differences according to bullying and mental health problems from YH1 to YH4 (0.84–0.41).
The absolute differences were higher in all waves for all risk factors in girls, except for overweight/obesity, bullying, and GP visits in YH1. Differences were generally higher for all risk factors in all YH waves for girls, except for bullying, GP visits, physical inactivity, and loneliness in YH1.
Decennial trends in relative differences (relative risk, RR) in risk factors for mental health problems
Results for the relative differences (Relative Risk, RR) are displayed in supplementary Table 3. For girls, those reporting poor self-rated health had 1.23 times higher HSCL than those reporting good self-rated health in YH1. In YH4, the relative risk increased to 1.36. Similarly, we observed increased relative differences in HSCL from YH1 to YH4 in fatigue (1.25–1.41), musculoskeletal pain (1.17–1.27), physical inactivity (1.02–1.13), sleep problems (1.21–1.29), and GP visits (1.04–1.12).
For boys, smaller increases from YH1 to YH4 was observed for fatigue (1.23–1.30), physical inactivity (1.02–1.13), sleep problems (1.19–1.25), and GP visit(s) (1.06–1.12) were observed. On the contrary, reported bullying declined (1.38–1.18).
Loneliness showed the highest relative risk in all YH waves for both sexes, but remained stable across waves for both girls (1.47–1.52) and boys (1.53–1.60).
Discussion
The substantial increase in adolescent mental health problems in the Young-HUNT studies, particularly for girls, is consistent with global findings (2–7). Here, we demonstrate a trend over 2 decades in both the prevalence of key risk factors for poor mental health as well as the strength of association between these factors and mental health problems. After standardization of the HSCL-5, the most prevalent risk factors in 2019 were loneliness, poor self-perceived health, fatigue, and bullying, while they also showed the largest absolute increase from 1995–2019.
Trends in established risk factors for mental health problems from 1995 to 2019
As proposed by Geoffrey Rose [43], even relatively small increases in the prevalence of risk factors can lead to substantial effects on the population risk factor distributions, particularly distributional changes that increase the prevalence of high-risk groups—making them of population health importance.
Individual factors
In keeping with other international studies [44, 45], we observe similar prevalences and gender differences in poor self-perceived health (10–20%) Further, our data indicate that, among girls, self-rated health is also more strongly associated with psychological distress in YH4 compared to YH1.
Fatigue and tiredness are commonly reported in the U.S and Europe [46, 47], and affect between 7 and 45% of the adolescent population [48]. Our results along with an Australian study [49] indicate an even higher prevalence of fatigue. The increase in fatigue, and the strength of association between fatigue and mental health problems, is more prominent in girls than boys, consistent with other studies [48, 50].
Musculoskeletal pain (MSP)/migraine are relatively common in adolescence and particularly in girls [51, 52]. We observe similar increases in MSP in both genders, yet a stronger association with mental health problem in girls compared to boys from 1995 to 2019.
Problems initiating sleep affect about one in four adolescents in Europe and Canada [53], and are more problematic among girls than boys [53, 54]. Further, in contrast to many European and Scandinavian countries [55, 56], our findings show a relatively stable prevalence of sleep problems over 2 decades in both sexes. Nevertheless, associations between sleep and mental health problems increased over time in our study.
Relational factors
In contrast to several European countries [57], our study indicates an increase in bullying in both sexes. However, bullying was relatively infrequent overall, and more prevalent in boys than girls [57, 58]. However, being bullied was increasingly related to symptoms of anxiety and depression from 1997 to 2019 in girls, while these associations decreased in boys.
Feeling of loneliness is now considered a public health problem [59], and prevalences range between 9 and 14% worldwide [60]. Some Scandinavian studies also suggest an increase in adolescent loneliness the last decades [61, 62], particularly in girls [63, 64], consistent with our findings. Further, we observe an increasing association between loneliness and mental health problems over time in both boys and girls.
Parallel to the increases in psychological distress, more adolescents had visited their GP from YH1 to YH4 in our study. Similar estimates have been reported in Australian and Irish adolescents [65, 66], and underlines worsening self-perceived health [67]. Although variations are expected due to differences in health care systems, a Canadian cross-sectional study found similar prevalence rates, but a decrease over time in GP visits and an increase over time for MHP (mental health professionals) visits [68]. Finally, according to our data, GP visits show stronger associations with anxiety and depression symptoms over time.
In sum, prominent risk factors are associated with trends in adolescent mental health, particularly in girls, and represent a cluster of modifiable individual, relational, and contextual health characteristics and behaviours.
Methodological considerations: strengths and limitations
Several methodological issues in our study are worth considering [69]. When it comes to selection bias, all three HUNT studies used similar designs and sampling, and were collected 10–12 years apart, and showed high participation rates, which improve the generalisability of these findings. Although the HUNT catchment area is confined to small towns and rural areas, it is fairly representative of Norway [70].
Measurement bias is also worth mentioning when investigating cross-sectional studies over time. The HSCL-5 (outcome) has been used in all three HUNT studies. However, over 20 years, societal and cultural changes may have influenced awareness surrounding mental health, and, in turn, responses to mental health questions. These changes influence willingness to report and therefore could lead to inflated estimates over time. This may also apply to adolescents’ responses to exposure variables. Missing values were low (< 5%) for near all variables in all three YH waves, with higher missing rates among boys (e.g., 6.9% for boys compared to 4.8% for girls on HSCL-5 in YH4). Higher missing values (5–10%) were observed for more sensitive variables in both genders (e.g., bullying and trauma). While many of the questions/variables originate from well-known instruments and scales, such as Health Behaviour in School-aged Children (HBSC), Interpersonal violence, brief lifetime trauma screen, and HSCL-5, this study also used some less well-validated questions. Although the latter were repeated across YH1-4, they often make direct comparison to other studies difficult. Further, the YH questionnaires were developed and adapted over 3 decades; therefore, there are some minor differences in some of the scales and response options on the exposure variables/covariates used from 1995 to 2019. This was considered carefully during the operationalization and categorization of the variables. Unfortunately, we did not have comparable data/instruments from all three YH studies for school-level variables, social media/online gaming, and behaviour/externalizing problems—factors of great interest and linked to mental health problems in adolescents.
To the best of our knowledge, this is one of the largest studies to study decennial trends in correlates and risk factors for adolescent mental health problems. Finally, in an exploratory study of many possible risk factors for anxiety and depression, it is not feasible to thoroughly describe trends for each factor. We argue that well-designed qualitative studies of changes in mental health stigma and awareness, and semantic issues related to mental health, are needed to further understand these phenomena.
Conclusions
Our findings suggest that adolescent self-reported health, loneliness, fatigue, bullying victimization, sleep problems, musculoskeletal pain, and GP visits are increasing and represent increasing and modifiable risk factors for poor mental health in adolescents. Efforts to prevent mental health problems will most likely require different intervention components, including families, schools, neighborhoods, voluntary organizations, as well as primary and specialized care settings.
Data availability
The variables generated and analysed during the current study are available upon request. Requests for access to the datasets should be directed to Morten Krokstad. E-mail: Morten.Krokstad@nord.no.
References
Krokstad S, Weiss DA, Krokstad MA, Rangul V, Kvaløy K, Ingul JM et al (2022) Divergent decennial trends in mental health according to age reveal poorer mental health for young people: repeated cross-sectional population-based surveys from the HUNT study, Norway. BMJ Open 12(5):e057654
Collishaw S (2015) Annual research review: secular trends in child and adolescent mental health. J Child Psychol Psychiatry 56(3):370–393
Su Q, Liu G (2020) Depression in Chinese adolescents from 1989 to 2018: an increasing trend and its relationship with social environments. Curr Psychol 41(10):6966–6977
Keyes KM, Gary D, O’Malley PM, Hamilton A, Schulenberg J (2019) Recent increases in depressive symptoms among US adolescents: trends from 1991 to 2018. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol 54(8):987–996
Wiens K, Bhattarai A, Pedram P, Dores A, Williams J, Bulloch A, Patten S (2020) A growing need for youth mental health services in Canada: examining trends in youth mental health from 2011 to 2018. Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci 29:e115
Statistics ABo (2022) National study of mental health and wellbeing
Bor W, Dean AJ, Najman J, Hayatbakhsh R (2014) Are child and adolescent mental health problems increasing in the 21st century? a systematic review. Aust N Z J Psychiatry 48(7):606–616
Fergusson DM, Boden JM, Horwood LJ (2007) Recurrence of major depression in adolescence and early adulthood, and later mental health, educational and economic outcomes. Br J Psychiatry 191(4):335–342
Johnson D, Dupuis G, Piche J, Clayborne Z, Colman I (2018) Adult mental health outcomes of adolescent depression: a systematic review. Depress Anxiety 35(8):700–716
Silva SA, Silva SU, Ronca DB, Gonçalves VSS, Dutra ES, Carvalho KMB (2020) Common mental disorders prevalence in adolescents: a systematic review and meta-analyses. PLoS One 15(4):e0232007
Merikangas KR, Nakamura EF, Kessler RC (2009) Epidemiology of mental disorders in children and adolescents. Dialogues Clin Neurosci 11(1):7–20
Patalay P, Fitzsimons E (2021) Psychological distress, self-harm and attempted suicide in UK 17-year olds: prevalence and sociodemographic inequalities. Br J Psychiatry 219(2):437–439
Patalay P, Gage SH (2019) Changes in millennial adolescent mental health and health-related behaviours over 10 years: a population cohort comparison study. Int J Epidemiol 48(5):1650–1664
Kieling C, Baker-Henningham H, Belfer M, Conti G, Ertem I, Omigbodun O et al (2011) Child and adolescent mental health worldwide: evidence for action. Lancet 378(9801):1515–1525
World Health Organization. (2021). Adolescent mental health. Retrieved April 2021 from: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/adolescent-mental-health.
Michaud P-A, Fombonne E (2005) Common mental health problems. BMJ (Clin Res Ed) 330(7495):835–838
Ringdal R, Bjørnsen HN, Espnes GA, Bradley Eilertsen M-E, Moksnes UK (2021) Bullying, social support and adolescents’ mental health: results from a follow-up study. Scan J Public Health 49(3):309–316
Cook CR, Williams KR, Guerra NG, Kim TE, Sadek S (2010) Predictors of bullying and victimization in childhood and adolescence: a meta-analytic investigation. Sch Psychol Q 25(2):65–83
Hards E, Loades ME, Higson-Sweeney N, Shafran R, Serafimova T, Brigden A et al (2022) Loneliness and mental health in children and adolescents with pre-existing mental health problems: a rapid systematic review. Br J Clin Psychol 61(2):313–334
Solmi M, Radua J, Olivola M, Croce E, Soardo L, Salazar de Pablo G et al (2022) Age at onset of mental disorders worldwide: large-scale meta-analysis of epidemiological studies. Mol Psychiatry 27(1):281–295
Strand BH, Dalgard OS, Tambs K, Rognerud M (2003) Measuring the mental health status of the Norwegian population: a comparison of the instruments SCL-25, SCL-10, SCL-5 and MHI-5 (SF-36). Nord J Psychiatry 57(2):113–118
Schmalbach B, Zenger M, Tibubos AN, Kliem S, Petrowski K, Brähler E (2021) Psychometric properties of two brief versions of the Hopkins symptom checklist: HSCL-5 and HSCL-10. Assessment 28(2):617–631
Müller JM, Postert C, Beyer T, Furniss T, Achtergarde S (2010) Comparison of eleven short versions of the symptom checklist 90-revised (SCL-90-R) for use in the assessment of general psychopathology. J Psychopathol Behav Assess 32(2):246–254
Pape K, Bjørngaard JH, Holmen TL, Krokstad S (2012) The welfare burden of adolescent anxiety and depression: a prospective study of 7500 young Norwegians and their families: the HUNT study. BMJ Open 2(6):e001942
Skrove M, Romundstad P, Indredavik MS (2015) Chronic multisite pain in adolescent girls and boys with emotional and behavioral problems: the young-HUNT study. Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry 24(5):503–515
Opdal IM, Morseth B, Handegård BH, Lillevoll KR, Nilsen W, Nielsen C et al (2020) Is change in mental distress among adolescents predicted by sedentary behaviour or screen time? results from the longitudinal population study the tromsø study: fit futures. BMJ Open 10(2):e035549
Hansen E, Sund E, Knudtsen MS, Krokstad S, Holmen TL (2015) Cultural activity participation and associations with self-perceived health, life-satisfaction and mental health: the young HUNT study, Norway. BMC Public Health 15(1):544
Moum T, Naess S, Sørensen T, Tambs K, Holmen J (1990) Hypertension labelling, life events and psychological well-being. Psychol Med 20(3):635–646
Chalder T, Berelowitz G, Pawlikowska T, Watts L, Wessely S, Wright D, Wallace EP (1993) Development of a fatigue scale. J Psychosom Res 37(2):147–153
Roberts C, Freeman J, Samdal O, Schnohr CW, de Looze ME, Nic Gabhainn S et al (2009) The health behaviour in school-aged children (HBSC) study: methodological developments and current tensions. Int J Public Health 54(Suppl 2):140–150
Strandheim A, Holmen TL, Coombes L, Bentzen N (2009) Alcohol intoxication and mental health among adolescents—a population review of 8983 young people, 13–19 years in North-Trøndelag, Norway: the young-HUNT study. Child Adolesc Psychiatry Ment Health 3(1):18
Jahre H, Grotle M, Småstuen M, Guddal MH, Smedbråten K, Richardsen KR et al (2021) Risk factors and risk profiles for neck pain in young adults: prospective analyses from adolescence to young adulthood-the North-Trøndelag health study. PLoS One 16(8):e0256006
Rangul V, Holmen TL, Kurtze N, Cuypers K, Midthjell K (2008) Reliability and validity of two frequently used self-administered physical activity questionnaires in adolescents. BMC Med Res Methodol 8(1):47
Chaput J-P, Willumsen J, Bull F, Chou R, Ekelund U, Firth J et al (2020) 2020 WHO guidelines on physical activity and sedentary behaviour for children and adolescents aged 5–17 years: summary of the evidence. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act 17(1):141
Junker A, Bjørngaard JH, Gunnell D, Bjerkeset O (2014) Sleep problems and hospitalization for self-harm: a 15-year follow-up of 9000 Norwegian adolescents. Young HUNT Study Sleep 37(3):579–585
Cole TJ, Bellizzi MC, Flegal KM, Dietz WH (2000) Establishing a standard definition for child overweight and obesity worldwide: international survey. BMJ 320(7244):1240–1243
Essau CA, Olaya B, Anastassiou-Hadjicharalambous X, Pauli G, Gilvarry C, Bray D et al (2012) Psychometric properties of the strength and difficulties questionnaire from five European countries. Int J Methods Psych Res 21(3):232–245
Junker A, Bjørngaard JH, Bjerkeset O (2017) Adolescent health and subsequent risk of self-harm hospitalisation: a 15-year follow-up of the young-HUNT cohort. Child Adolesc Psychiatry Ment Health 11(1):25
Jeppesen E, Bjelland I, Fosså SD, Loge JH, Dahl AA (2013) Psychosocial problems of teenagers who have a parent with cancer: a population-based case-control study (young-HUNT study). J Clin Oncol 31(32):4099–4104
Hjemdal O, Friborg O, Stiles TC, Martinussen M, Rosenvinge JH (2006) A new scale for adolescent resilience: grasping the central protective resources behind healthy development. Meas Eval Couns Dev 39(2):84–96
von Soest T, Mossige S, Stefansen K, Hjemdal O (2010) A validation study of the resilience scale for adolescents (READ). J Psychopathol Behav Assess 32(2):215–225
Kaplow JB, Rolon-Arroyo B, Layne CM, Rooney E, Oosterhoff B, Hill R et al (2020) Validation of the UCLA PTSD reaction Index for DSM-5: a developmentally informed assessment tool for youth. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 59(1):186–194
Rose G (2001) Sick individuals and sick populations. Int J Epidemiol 30(3):427–432
Ravens-Sieberer U, Torsheim T, Hetland J, Vollebergh W, Cavallo F, Jericek H et al (2009) Subjective health, symptom load and quality of life of children and adolescents in Europe. Int J Public Health 54(2):151–159
Gong WJ, Fong DYT, Wang MP, Lam TH, Chung TWH, Ho SY (2022) Worsening trends in self-rated health and correlates in Chinese adolescents in Hong Kong: a population-based panel study from 1999/2000 to 2014/15. BMJ Open 12(2):e055842
Rhee H, Miles MS, Halpern CT, Holditch-Davis D (2005) Prevalence of recurrent physical symptoms in U.S. adolescents. Pediatric Nurs 31(4):314–319
Ghandour RM, Overpeck MD, Huang ZJ, Kogan MD, Scheidt PC (2004) Headache, stomachache, backache, and morning fatigue among adolescent girls in the United States: associations with behavioral, sociodemographic, and environmental factors. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 158(8):797–803
Collishaw S, Maughan B, Natarajan L, Pickles A (2010) Trends in adolescent emotional problems in England: a comparison of two national cohorts twenty years apart. J Child Psychol Psychiatry 51(8):885–894
Short MA, Gradisar M, Lack LC, Wright HR, Dohnt H (2013) The sleep patterns and well-being of Australian adolescents. J Adolesc 36(1):103–110
ter Wolbeek M, van Doornen LJP, Kavelaars A, Heijnen CJ (2006) Severe fatigue in adolescents: a common phenomenon? Pediatrics 117(6):e1078–e1086
Ben Ayed H, Yaich S, Trigui M, Ben Hmida M, Ben Jemaa M, Ammar A et al (2019) Prevalence, Risk Factors and Outcomes of Neck, Shoulders and Low-Back Pain in Secondary-School Children. J Res Health Sci. 19(1):e00440-e
Gobina I, Villberg J, Välimaa R, Tynjälä J, Whitehead R, Cosma A et al (2019) Prevalence of self-reported chronic pain among adolescents: evidence from 42 countries and regions. Eur J Pain 23(2):316–326
Inchley JC, Currie D, Budisavljevic S, Torsheim T, Jåstad A, Cosma A et al (2020) Spotlight on adolescent health and well-being. Findings from the 2017/2018 Health Behaviour in School-aged Children (HBSC) survey in Europe and Canada. International report. Volume 1, 20-21. Key findings. WHO, Copenhagen, Denmark
Ohida T, Osaki Y, Doi Y, Tanihata T, Minowa M, Suzuki K et al (2004) An epidemiologic study of self-reported sleep problems among japanese adolescents. Sleep 27(5):978–985
Ghekiere A, Van Cauwenberg J, Vandendriessche A, Inchley J, Gaspar de Matos M, Borraccino A et al (2019) Trends in sleeping difficulties among European adolescents: are these associated with physical inactivity and excessive screen time. Int J Public Health 64(4):487–498
Thorsteinsson Einar B, Potrebny T, Arnarsson Ársaell M, Tynjälä J, Välimaa R, Eriksson C (2019) Trends in sleeping difficulty among adolescents in five Nordic countries 2002–2014. Nordisk välfärdsforskning | Nordic Welf Res 4(2):77–87
Chester KL, Callaghan M, Cosma A, Donnelly P, Craig W, Walsh S, Molcho M (2015) Cross-national time trends in bullying victimization in 33 countries among children aged 11, 13 and 15 from 2002 to 2010. Eur J Public Health 25(suppl_2):61–64
Arnarsson A, Nygren J, Nyholm M, Torsheim T, Augustine L, Bjereld Y et al (2020) Cyberbullying and traditional bullying among Nordic adolescents and their impact on life satisfaction. Scandinavian J Public Health 48(5):502–510
Cacioppo JT, Cacioppo S (2018) The growing problem of loneliness. Lancet 391(10119):426
Surkalim DL, Luo M, Eres R, Gebel K, van Buskirk J, Bauman A, Ding D (2022) The prevalence of loneliness across 113 countries: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ 376:e067068
Madsen KR, Holstein BE, Damsgaard MT, Rayce SB, Jespersen LN, Due P (2019) Trends in social inequality in loneliness among adolescents 1991–2014. J Public Health (Oxf) 41(2):e133–e140
Myhr A, Anthun KS, Lillefjell M, Sund ER (2020) Trends in socioeconomic inequalities in Norwegian adolescents’ mental health from 2014 to 2018: a repeated cross-sectional study. Front Psychol. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01472
Lyyra N, Thorsteinsson EB, Eriksson C, Madsen KR, Tolvanen A, Löfstedt P, Välimaa R (2021) The association between loneliness, mental well-being, and self-esteem among adolescents in four Nordic countries. Int J Environ Res Public Health 18(14):7405
Twenge JM, Haidt J, Blake AB, McAllister C, Lemon H, Le Roy A (2021) Worldwide increases in adolescent loneliness. J Adolesc 93:257–269
Kang M, Robards F, Luscombe G, Sanci L, Usherwood T (2020) The relationship between having a regular general practitioner (GP) and the experience of healthcare barriers: a cross-sectional study among young people in NSW, Australia, with oversampling from marginalised groups. BMC Fam Pract 21(1):220
Ann K, Murphy A (2022) Would universal general practitioner care impact Irish adolescents’ utilisation? Health Policy 126(7):652–660
Rytter D, Rask CU, Vestergaard CH, Nybo Andersen A-M, Bech BH (2020) Non-specific health complaints and self-rated health in pre-adolescents; impact on primary health care use. Sci Rep 10(1):3292
Kwak K (2020) Secular trends in adolescents’ diagnosed health status and healthcare consultation: examinations of Canadian national surveys from 2007 to 2016. Public Health 187:177–185
Bann D, Wright L, Goisis A, Hardy R, Johnson W, Maddock J, O’Neill D (2021) Investigating change across time in prevalence or association using observational data: guidance on utility, methodology, and interpretation. https://doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/tf7vg
Holmen TL, Bratberg G, Krokstad S, Langhammer A, Hveem K, Midthjell K et al (2014) Cohort profile of the young-HUNT study, Norway: a population-based study of adolescents. Int J Epidemiol 43(2):536–544
Acknowledgements
First of all, we are grateful to all participants in Young-HUNT that made this study possible. The Trøndelag Health Study (HUNT) is a collaboration between HUNT Research Centre (Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Norwegian University of Science and Technology NTNU), Trøndelag County Council, Central Norway Regional Health Authority, and the Norwegian Institute of Public Health.
Funding
Open access funding provided by Nord University.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
M.K. and O.B. wrote the main manuscript text E.S. helped with aims, objectives and prepared and worked with the statistics and analysis V.R. helped with aims, objectives and data material/variables A.B. helped with text, statistics/methods and overall feedback C.O. helped with text, statistics/methods and overall feedback. All authors reviewed the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Ethical approval
All procedures in the present study were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutions and faculties involved. The study was approved by the Regional Committee for Medical and Health Research Ethics (REC) in Northern Norway (2019/84445/REK North) and Norwegian Agency for Shared Services in Education and Research (SIKT), previously NSD (659425).
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Krokstad, M.A., Sund, E., Rangul, V. et al. Secular trends in risk factors for adolescent anxiety and depression symptoms: the Young-HUNT studies 1995–2019, Norway. Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00787-024-02373-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00787-024-02373-2