Abstract
Objective
The current clinical trial was conducted to evaluate the effect of proximal indirect restorations in endodontically treated posterior teeth with deeply located margins following deep margin elevation compared to surgical crown lengthening.
Material and methods
Deep proximal cavities in endodontically treated posterior teeth were randomly assigned into two groups; deep margin elevation (DME) or crown lengthening (CL). The clinical attachment level (CAL), probing depth (PD), bleeding on probing (BOP), crestal bone level (CBL), and secondary caries were evaluated at the baseline, 1, 3, 6, 9, and 12 months.
Results
A total of 20 proximal cavities were included in the study; there was no significant difference between the two groups regarding mean CAL values at the baseline and 1 month, while there was a significant difference between the two groups in all other periods. Regarding the PD, there was no statistical significance between the two groups except at 9 and 12 months, where CL showed higher mean PD values than DME. There was no statistically significant difference in BOP or CBL between the two groups.
Conclusions
DME and CL are considered clinically successful with favorable biologic responses.
Clinical relevance
The deep margin elevation approach could provide a more conservative solution when relocating deeply seated cervical margins in a more coronal position. DME reduced the number of visits and time needed for the restoration of endodontically treated teeth. Surgical crown lengthening remains a gold standard procedure in the re-establishment of the supracrestal tissue attachment, especially in cases where cervical margins are beyond the elevation capacity.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data Availability
The data that support the findings of this study are not openly available due to reasons of sensitivity and are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
References
Krejci I, Duc O, Dietschi D, de Campos E (2003) Marginal adaptation, retention and fracture resistance of adhesive composite restorations on devital teeth with and without posts. Oper Dent 28:127–135
Yamada Y, Tsubota Y, Fukushima S (2004) Effect of restoration method on fracture resistance of endodontically treated maxillary premolars. Int J Prosthodont 17:94–98
Dablanca-Blanco AB, Blanco-Carrión J, Martín-Biedma B, Varela-Patiño P, Bello-Castro A, Castelo-Baz P (2017) Management of large class II lesions in molars: how to restore and when to perform surgical crown lengthening? Restor Dent Endod 42:240–252
Magne P, Spreafico RC (2012) Deep margin elevation: a paradigm shift. Am J Esthet Dent 2:86–96
Pontoriero R, Carnevale G (2001) Surgical crown lengthening: a 12-month clinical wound healing study. J Periodontol 72:841–848
Dietschi D, Spreafico R (1998) Current clinical concepts for adhesive cementation of tooth-colored posterior restorations. Pract Periodontics Aesthet Dent 10:47–54; quiz 56
Mugri MH, Sayed ME, Nedumgottil BM, Bhandi S, Raj AT, Testarelli L, Khurshid Z, Jain S, Patil S (2021) Treatment prognosis of restored teeth with crown lengthening vs. deep margin elevation: a systematic review. Materials (Basel) 14:6733
Samartzi TK, Papalexopoulos D, Ntovas P, Rahiotis C, Blatz MB (2022) Deep margin elevation: a literature review. Dent J 10:48
Günay H, Seeger A, Tschernitschek H, Geurtsen W (2000) Placement of the preparation line and periodontal health-a prospective. Dent 20:173–181
Ganji KK, Patil VA, John J (2012) A comparative evaluation for biologic width following surgical crown lengthening using gingivectomy and ostectomy procedure. Int J Dent 2012:479241
Deas DE, Moritz AJ, McDonnell HT, Powell CA, Mealey BL (2004) Osseous surgery for crown lengthening: a 6-month clinical study. J Periodontol 75:1288–1294
Ainamo J, Bay I (1975) Problems and proposals for recording gingivitis and plaque. Int Dent J 25:229–235
Caton J, Bouwsma O, Polson A, Espeland M (1989) Effects of personal oral hygiene and subgingival scaling on bleeding interdental gingiva. J Periodontol 60:84–90
Ingber F, Rose LF, Coslet JG (1977) The “biologic width”: a concept in periodontics and restorative dentistry. Alpha Omegan 70:62–65
Lanning SK, Waldrop TC, Gunsolley JC, Maynard JG (2003) Surgical crown lengthening: evaluation of the biological width. J Periodontol 74:468–474
Diniz DE, Okuda KM, Fonseca CR, Gonzalez MKS, Greghi SLA, do Valle AL, Lauris JRP (2007) Surgical crown lengthening: a 12-month study - radiographic results. J Appl Oral Sci 15:280–284
Venturini AB, Prochnow C, Pereira GKR, Segala RD, Kleverlaan CJ, Valandro LF (2019) Fatigue performance of adhesively cemented glass-, hybrid- and resin-ceramic materials for CAD/CAM monolithic restorations. Dent Mater 35:534–542
Fasbinder DJ, Neiva GF, Heys D, Heys R (2020) Clinical evaluation of chairside computer assisted design/computer assisted machining nano-ceramic restorations: five-year status. J Esthet Restor Dent 32:193–203
Bresser RA, van de Geer L, Gerdolle D, Schepke U, Cune MS, Gresnigt MMM (2020) Influence of deep margin elevation and preparation design on the fracture strength of indirectly restored molars. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 110:103950
Costa VLS, Tribst JPM, Borges ALS (2017) Influence of the occlusal contacts in formation of abfraction lesions in the upper premolar. Braz Dent Sci 20:115–123
Fathy H, Hamama HH, El-Wassefy N, Mahmoud SH (2022) Clinical performance of resin-matrix ceramic partial coverage restorations: a systematic review. Clin Oral Investig 26:3807–3822
Günay H, Seeger A, Tschernitschek H, Geurtsen W (2000) Placement of the preparation line and periodontal health–a prospective 2-year clinical study. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 20:171–181
Oppermann RV, Gomes SC, Cavagni J, Cayana EG, Conceição EN (2016) Response to proximal restorations placed either subgingivally or following crown lengthening in patients with no history of periodontal disease. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 36:117–124
Frese C, Wolff D, Staehle HJ (2014) Proximal box elevation with resin composite and the dogma of biological width: clinical R2-technique and critical review. Oper Dent 39:22–31
Martins TM, Bosco AF, Nóbrega FJO, Nagata MJH, Garcia VG, Fucini SE (2007) Periodontal tissue response to coverage of root cavities restored with resin materials: a histomorphometric study in dogs. J Periodontol 78:1075–1082
Novak MJ, Albather HM, Close JM (2008) Redefining the biologicwidth in severe, generalised, chronic periodontitis: implications for therapy. J Periodontol 79:1864–1869
Schmidt JC, Sahrmann P, Weiger R, Schmidlin PR, Walter C (2013) biologic width dimensions–a systematic review. J Clin Periodontol 40:493–504
Arora R, Narula SC, Sharma RK, Tewari S (2013) Evaluation of supracrestal gingival tissue after surgical crown lengthening: a 6-month clinical study. J Periodontol 84:934–940
Ghezzi C, Brambilla G, Conti A, Dosoli R, Ceroni F, Ferrantino L (2019) Cervical margin relocation: case series and new classification system. Int J Esthet Dent 14:272–284
Carnevale G, Sterrantino SF, Di Febo G (1983) Soft and hard tissue wound healing following tooth preparation to the alveolar crest. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 3:36–53
Oakley E, Rhyu IC, Karatzas S, Gandini-Santiago L, Nevins M, Caton J (1999) Formation of the biologic width following crown lengthening in nonhuman primates. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 19:529–541
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
A T: performed all the restorative clinical steps, Conceptualization, Writing original draft.
A.K: performed all periodontal clinical steps.
O.H. Methodology,supervision.
O.F. editing and reviewing, validation.
H. N. methodology,Writing original draft.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethics approval and consent to participate
All the study participants were informed about all the details of the study, and all of them signed a written consent; furthermore, they all agreed on the use of the data for publication. Ethical approval was obtained by the Ethics Committee (CREC) of the Faculty of Dentistry Cairo University.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Farouk, A.T., Hassanein, O.E.S., Fahmy, O.I. et al. Biological evaluation of indirect restorations in endodontically treated posterior teeth with deeply located proximal margins following deep margin elevation versus surgical crown lengthening: a randomized controlled trial. Clin Oral Invest 28, 24 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-023-05434-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-023-05434-z