Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Biological evaluation of indirect restorations in endodontically treated posterior teeth with deeply located proximal margins following deep margin elevation versus surgical crown lengthening: a randomized controlled trial

  • Research
  • Published:
Clinical Oral Investigations Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

The current clinical trial was conducted to evaluate the effect of proximal indirect restorations in endodontically treated posterior teeth with deeply located margins following deep margin elevation compared to surgical crown lengthening.

Material and methods

Deep proximal cavities in endodontically treated posterior teeth were randomly assigned into two groups; deep margin elevation (DME) or crown lengthening (CL). The clinical attachment level (CAL), probing depth (PD), bleeding on probing (BOP), crestal bone level (CBL), and secondary caries were evaluated at the baseline, 1, 3, 6, 9, and 12 months.

Results

A total of 20 proximal cavities were included in the study; there was no significant difference between the two groups regarding mean CAL values at the baseline and 1 month, while there was a significant difference between the two groups in all other periods. Regarding the PD, there was no statistical significance between the two groups except at 9 and 12 months, where CL showed higher mean PD values than DME. There was no statistically significant difference in BOP or CBL between the two groups.

Conclusions

DME and CL are considered clinically successful with favorable biologic responses.

Clinical relevance

The deep margin elevation approach could provide a more conservative solution when relocating deeply seated cervical margins in a more coronal position. DME reduced the number of visits and time needed for the restoration of endodontically treated teeth. Surgical crown lengthening remains a gold standard procedure in the re-establishment of the supracrestal tissue attachment, especially in cases where cervical margins are beyond the elevation capacity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

The data that support the findings of this study are not openly available due to reasons of sensitivity and are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

References

  1. Krejci I, Duc O, Dietschi D, de Campos E (2003) Marginal adaptation, retention and fracture resistance of adhesive composite restorations on devital teeth with and without posts. Oper Dent 28:127–135

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Yamada Y, Tsubota Y, Fukushima S (2004) Effect of restoration method on fracture resistance of endodontically treated maxillary premolars. Int J Prosthodont 17:94–98

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Dablanca-Blanco AB, Blanco-Carrión J, Martín-Biedma B, Varela-Patiño P, Bello-Castro A, Castelo-Baz P (2017) Management of large class II lesions in molars: how to restore and when to perform surgical crown lengthening? Restor Dent Endod 42:240–252

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Magne P, Spreafico RC (2012) Deep margin elevation: a paradigm shift. Am J Esthet Dent 2:86–96

    Google Scholar 

  5. Pontoriero R, Carnevale G (2001) Surgical crown lengthening: a 12-month clinical wound healing study. J Periodontol 72:841–848

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Dietschi D, Spreafico R (1998) Current clinical concepts for adhesive cementation of tooth-colored posterior restorations. Pract Periodontics Aesthet Dent 10:47–54; quiz 56

  7. Mugri MH, Sayed ME, Nedumgottil BM, Bhandi S, Raj AT, Testarelli L, Khurshid Z, Jain S, Patil S (2021) Treatment prognosis of restored teeth with crown lengthening vs. deep margin elevation: a systematic review. Materials (Basel) 14:6733

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Samartzi TK, Papalexopoulos D, Ntovas P, Rahiotis C, Blatz MB (2022) Deep margin elevation: a literature review. Dent J 10:48

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Günay H, Seeger A, Tschernitschek H, Geurtsen W (2000) Placement of the preparation line and periodontal health-a prospective. Dent 20:173–181

    Google Scholar 

  10. Ganji KK, Patil VA, John J (2012) A comparative evaluation for biologic width following surgical crown lengthening using gingivectomy and ostectomy procedure. Int J Dent 2012:479241

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Deas DE, Moritz AJ, McDonnell HT, Powell CA, Mealey BL (2004) Osseous surgery for crown lengthening: a 6-month clinical study. J Periodontol 75:1288–1294

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Ainamo J, Bay I (1975) Problems and proposals for recording gingivitis and plaque. Int Dent J 25:229–235

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Caton J, Bouwsma O, Polson A, Espeland M (1989) Effects of personal oral hygiene and subgingival scaling on bleeding interdental gingiva. J Periodontol 60:84–90

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Ingber F, Rose LF, Coslet JG (1977) The “biologic width”: a concept in periodontics and restorative dentistry. Alpha Omegan 70:62–65

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Lanning SK, Waldrop TC, Gunsolley JC, Maynard JG (2003) Surgical crown lengthening: evaluation of the biological width. J Periodontol 74:468–474

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Diniz DE, Okuda KM, Fonseca CR, Gonzalez MKS, Greghi SLA, do Valle AL, Lauris JRP (2007) Surgical crown lengthening: a 12-month study - radiographic results. J Appl Oral Sci 15:280–284

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Venturini AB, Prochnow C, Pereira GKR, Segala RD, Kleverlaan CJ, Valandro LF (2019) Fatigue performance of adhesively cemented glass-, hybrid- and resin-ceramic materials for CAD/CAM monolithic restorations. Dent Mater 35:534–542

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Fasbinder DJ, Neiva GF, Heys D, Heys R (2020) Clinical evaluation of chairside computer assisted design/computer assisted machining nano-ceramic restorations: five-year status. J Esthet Restor Dent 32:193–203

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Bresser RA, van de Geer L, Gerdolle D, Schepke U, Cune MS, Gresnigt MMM (2020) Influence of deep margin elevation and preparation design on the fracture strength of indirectly restored molars. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 110:103950

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Costa VLS, Tribst JPM, Borges ALS (2017) Influence of the occlusal contacts in formation of abfraction lesions in the upper premolar. Braz Dent Sci 20:115–123

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Fathy H, Hamama HH, El-Wassefy N, Mahmoud SH (2022) Clinical performance of resin-matrix ceramic partial coverage restorations: a systematic review. Clin Oral Investig 26:3807–3822

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Günay H, Seeger A, Tschernitschek H, Geurtsen W (2000) Placement of the preparation line and periodontal health–a prospective 2-year clinical study. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 20:171–181

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Oppermann RV, Gomes SC, Cavagni J, Cayana EG, Conceição EN (2016) Response to proximal restorations placed either subgingivally or following crown lengthening in patients with no history of periodontal disease. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 36:117–124

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Frese C, Wolff D, Staehle HJ (2014) Proximal box elevation with resin composite and the dogma of biological width: clinical R2-technique and critical review. Oper Dent 39:22–31

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Martins TM, Bosco AF, Nóbrega FJO, Nagata MJH, Garcia VG, Fucini SE (2007) Periodontal tissue response to coverage of root cavities restored with resin materials: a histomorphometric study in dogs. J Periodontol 78:1075–1082

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Novak MJ, Albather HM, Close JM (2008) Redefining the biologicwidth in severe, generalised, chronic periodontitis: implications for therapy. J Periodontol 79:1864–1869

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Schmidt JC, Sahrmann P, Weiger R, Schmidlin PR, Walter C (2013) biologic width dimensions–a systematic review. J Clin Periodontol 40:493–504

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Arora R, Narula SC, Sharma RK, Tewari S (2013) Evaluation of supracrestal gingival tissue after surgical crown lengthening: a 6-month clinical study. J Periodontol 84:934–940

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Ghezzi C, Brambilla G, Conti A, Dosoli R, Ceroni F, Ferrantino L (2019) Cervical margin relocation: case series and new classification system. Int J Esthet Dent 14:272–284

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Carnevale G, Sterrantino SF, Di Febo G (1983) Soft and hard tissue wound healing following tooth preparation to the alveolar crest. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 3:36–53

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Oakley E, Rhyu IC, Karatzas S, Gandini-Santiago L, Nevins M, Caton J (1999) Formation of the biologic width following crown lengthening in nonhuman primates. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 19:529–541

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

A T: performed all the restorative clinical steps, Conceptualization, Writing original draft.

A.K: performed all periodontal clinical steps.

O.H. Methodology,supervision.

O.F. editing and reviewing, validation.

H. N. methodology,Writing original draft.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hani ElNahass.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

All the study participants were informed about all the details of the study, and all of them signed a written consent; furthermore, they all agreed on the use of the data for publication. Ethical approval was obtained by the Ethics Committee (CREC) of the Faculty of Dentistry Cairo University.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Farouk, A.T., Hassanein, O.E.S., Fahmy, O.I. et al. Biological evaluation of indirect restorations in endodontically treated posterior teeth with deeply located proximal margins following deep margin elevation versus surgical crown lengthening: a randomized controlled trial. Clin Oral Invest 28, 24 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-023-05434-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-023-05434-z

Keywords

Navigation