Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Variations in pulp volume between normotensive and hypertensive individuals on CBCT imaging

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Clinical Oral Investigations Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objectives

To compare the pulp volume of individuals with altered and normal systemic blood pressure (BP) in order to verify if high BP promotes dimensional modifications in the pulp space.

Materials and methods

Cone beam computed tomography scans of 91 patients (49 females and 42 males, mean age 31.7 ± 6.38 years) who had a healthy maxillary canine were selected. Values of arterial BP measured at two dental visits were used to classify the sample as normal BP (< 130 × 80 mmHg) and altered BP (≥ 130 × 80 mmHg); 49 patients had normal BP and 42 had altered BP. One oral radiologist evaluated each patient’s pulp and tooth volumes, using semi-automatic segmentation, and the tooth length. Data were submitted to Student’s t test and logistic regression, with a significance level of 5% (p < 0.05).

Results

Pulp volume (p = 0.0027), pulp volume/tooth volume (p = 0.0013), and pulp volume/tooth length (p = 0.0007) ratios were greater in the altered BP group. Conversely, there was no difference in tooth volume between the groups (p = 0.0697). A logistic regression model (p = 0.0002) using pulp volume and age enabled the development of a formula for predicting altered BP, with 68% accuracy.

Conclusions

Individuals with altered systemic BP have greater pulp volumes than those with normal BP. The formula developed in this study may indicate the presence of altered BP.

Clinical relevance

As arterial hypertension is a silent disease that produces no warning signs or symptoms, identification of modifications in the pulp volume in cone beam computed tomography scans may be an adjuvant sign of the diagnosis of this disease.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bell K, Twiggs J, Olin BR (2015) Hypertension : the silent killer : updated JNC-8 guideline recommendations. Alabama Pharmacy Association p.8. Report N° 0178-0000-15-104-H01-P

  2. Johnson HM, Warner RC, Bartels CM, LaMantia JN (2017) “They’re younger… it’s harder.” Primary providers’ perspectives on hypertension management in young adults: a multicenter qualitative study. BMC Res Notes 10:9. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13104-016-2332-8

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Mills KT, Bundy JD, Kelly TN, Reed JE, Kearney PM, Reynolds K, Chen J, He J (2016) Global disparities of hypertension prevalence and control: a systematic analysis of population-based studies from 90 countries. Circulation 134:441–450. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.115.018912

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Whelton PK, Carey RM, Aronow WS, Casey D Jr, Collins KJ, Dennison Himmelfarb C, DePalma S, Gidding S, Jamerson KA, Jones DW, MacLaughlin E, Muntner P, Ovbiagele B, Smith SC Jr, Spencer CC, Stafford RS, Taler SJ, Thomas RJ, Williams KA Sr, Williamson JD, Wright JT Jr (2018) 2017 ACC/AHA/AAPA/ABC/ACPM/AGS/APhA/ASH/ASPC/NMA/PCNA guideline for the prevention, detection, evaluation, and management of high blood pressure in adults: executive summary: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on clinical practice guidelines. Hypertension 71:1269–1324. https://doi.org/10.1161/HYP.0000000000000066

  5. Jung F, Pindur G, Ohlmann P, Spitzer G, Sternitzky R, Franke RP, Leithäuser B, Wolf S, Park JW (2013) Microcirculation in hypertensive patients. Biorheology 50:241–255. https://doi.org/10.3233/BIR-130645

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Triantafyllou A, Anyfanti P, Pyrpasopoulou A, Triantafyllou G, Aslanidis S, Douma S (2015) Capillary rarefaction as an index for the microvascular assessment of hypertensive patients. Curr Hypertens Rep 17:33. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11906-015-0543-3

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Kanoore Edul VS, Ince C, Estenssoro E, Ferrara G, Arzani Y, Salvatori C, Dubin A (2015) The effects of arterial hypertension and age on the sublingual microcirculation of healthy volunteers and outpatients with cardiovascular risk factors. Microcirculation 22:485–492. https://doi.org/10.1111/micc.12219

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Sasano T, Kuriwada S, Sanjo D (1989) Arterial blood pressure regulation of pulpal blood flow as determined by laser Doppler. J Dent Res 68:791–795. https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345890680050701

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Kim D, Park SH (2016) Effects of age, sex, and blood pressure on the blood flow velocity in dental pulp measured by Doppler ultrasound technique. Microcirculation 23:523–529. https://doi.org/10.1111/micc.12302

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Matthews B, Andrew D (1995) Microvascular architecture and exchange in teeth. Microcirculation 2:305–313

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Tønder KJH (1980) Blood flow and vascular pressure in the dental pulp. Acta Odontol Scand 38:135–144. https://doi.org/10.3109/00016358009004712

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Lukko K, Kettunen P, Fristad I, Berggreen E (2011) Structure and function of the dentin-pulp complex. In: Hargreaves KM, Cohen S (eds) Conhen's pathways of the pulp, 10th edn. Mosby Elsevier, St Louis, pp 483–489

    Google Scholar 

  13. Ajcharanukul O, Chunhacheevachaloke E, Vorachart P, Chidchuangchai W (2013) The postural autonomic regulation of pulpal blood flow. J Dent Res 92:156–160. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022034512469025

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Hargreaves KM, Cohen S, Berman LH (2011) Cohen’s pathways of the pulp. Mosby Elsevier, St. Louis

    Google Scholar 

  15. Berggreen E, Bletsa A, Heyeraas KJ (2010) Circulation in normal and inflamed dental pulp. Endod Top 17:2–11. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1601-1546.2010.00249.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Liang X, Jacobs R, Hassan B, Li L, Pauwels R, Corpas L, Souza PC, Martens W, Shahbazian M, Alonso A, Lambrichts I (2010) A comparative evaluation of cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) and multi-slice CT (MSCT) part I. On subjective image quality. Eur J Radiol 75:265–269. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2009.03.042

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Scarfe WC, Farman AG (2008) What is cone-beam CT and how does it work? Dent Clin N Am 52:707–730. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cden.2008.05.005

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Weissheimer A, Menezes LM, Sameshima GT et al (2012) Imaging software accuracy for 3-dimensional analysis of the upper airway. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 142:801–813. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2012.07.015

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Nejaim Y, Aps JKM, Groppo FC, Haiter Neto F (2018) Evaluation of pharyngeal space and its correlation with mandible and hyoid bone in patients with different skeletal classes and facial types. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 153:825–833. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2017.09.018

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Farias Gomes A, de Oliveira GT, Yamasaki MC et al (2018) Development and validation of a formula based on maxillary sinus measurements as a tool for sex estimation: a cone beam computed tomography study. Int J Legal Med 133:1241–1249. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00414-018-1869-6

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Shaheen E, Khalil W, Ezeldeen M, van de Casteele E, Sun Y, Politis C, Jacobs R (2017) Accuracy of segmentation of tooth structures using 3 different CBCT machines. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol 123:123–128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oooo.2016.09.005

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Ge ZP, Yang P, Li G, Zhang JZ, Ma XC (2016) Age estimation based on pulp cavity/chamber volume of 13 types of tooth from cone beam computed tomography images. Int J Legal Med 130:1159–1167. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00414-016-1384-6

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Andrade VM, Fontenele RC, de Souza AC et al (2019) Age and sex estimation based on pulp cavity volume using cone beam computed tomography: development and validation of formulas in a Brazilian sample. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 48:20190053. https://doi.org/10.1259/dmfr.20190053

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Cicchetti DV (1994) Guidelines, criteria, and rules of thumb for evaluating normed and standardized assessment instrument in psychology. Psychol Assess 6:284–290

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Fuss Z, Tsesis I, Lin S (2003) Root resorption - diagnosis, classification and treatment choices based on stimulation factors. Dent Traumatol 19:175–182. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-9657.2003.00192.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Patel S, Ricucci D, Durak C, Tay F (2010) Internal root resorption: a review. J Endod 36:1107–1121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2010.03.014

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Martins CM, Sasaki H, Hirai K et al (2016) Relationship between hypertension and periapical lesion: an in vitro and in vivo study. Braz Oral Res 30:e78. https://doi.org/10.1590/1807-3107BOR-2016.vol30.0078

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Shimizu H, Nakagami H, Osako MK, Hanayama R, Kunugiza Y, Kizawa T, Tomita T, Yoshikawa H, Ogihara T, Morishita R (2008) Angiotensin II accelerates osteoporosis by activating osteoclasts. FASEB J 22:2465–2475. https://doi.org/10.1096/fj.07-098954

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Williams B, Mancia G, Spiering W, Agabiti Rosei E, Azizi M, Burnier M, Clement DL, Coca A, de Simone G, Dominiczak A, Kahan T, Mahfoud F, Redon J, Ruilope L, Zanchetti A, Kerins M, Kjeldsen SE, Kreutz R, Laurent S, Lip GYH, McManus R, Narkiewicz K, Ruschitzka F, Schmieder RE, Shlyakhto E, Tsioufis C, Aboyans V, Desormais I, ESC Scientific Document Group, de Backer G, Heagerty AM, Agewall S, Bochud M, Borghi C, Boutouyrie P, Brguljan J, Bueno H, Caiani EG, Carlberg B, Chapman N, Cífková R, Cleland JGF, Collet JP, Coman IM, de Leeuw PW, Delgado V, Dendale P, Diener HC, Dorobantu M, Fagard R, Farsang C, Ferrini M, Graham IM, Grassi G, Haller H, Hobbs FDR, Jelakovic B, Jennings C, Katus HA, Kroon AA, Leclercq C, Lovic D, Lurbe E, Manolis AJ, McDonagh TA, Messerli F, Muiesan ML, Nixdorff U, Olsen MH, Parati G, Perk J, Piepoli MF, Polonia J, Ponikowski P, Richter DJ, Rimoldi SF, Roffi M, Sattar N, Seferovic PM, Simpson IA, Sousa-Uva M, Stanton AV, van de Borne P, Vardas P, Volpe M, Wassmann S, Windecker S, Zamorano JL, Windecker S, Aboyans V, Agewall S, Barbato E, Bueno H, Coca A, Collet JP, Coman IM, Dean V, Delgado V, Fitzsimons D, Gaemperli O, Hindricks G, Iung B, Jüni P, Katus HA, Knuuti J, Lancellotti P, Leclercq C, McDonagh TA, Piepoli MF, Ponikowski P, Richter DJ, Roffi M, Shlyakhto E, Simpson IA, Sousa-Uva M, Zamorano JL, Tsioufis C, Lurbe E, Kreutz R, Bochud M, Rosei EA, Jelakovic B, Azizi M, Januszewics A, Kahan T, Polonia J, van de Borne P, Williams B, Borghi C, Mancia G, Parati G, Clement DL, Coca A, Manolis A, Lovic D, Benkhedda S, Zelveian P, Siostrzonek P, Najafov R, Pavlova O, de Pauw M, Dizdarevic-Hudic L, Raev D, Karpettas N, Linhart A, Olsen MH, Shaker AF, Viigimaa M, Metsärinne K, Vavlukis M, Halimi JM, Pagava Z, Schunkert H, Thomopoulos C, Páll D, Andersen K, Shechter M, Mercuro G, Bajraktari G, Romanova T, Trušinskis K, Saade GA, Sakalyte G, Noppe S, DeMarco DC, Caraus A, Wittekoek J, Aksnes TA, Jankowski P, Polonia J, Vinereanu D, Baranova EI, Foscoli M, Dikic AD, Filipova S, Fras Z, Bertomeu-Martínez V, Carlberg B, Burkard T, Sdiri W, Aydogdu S, Sirenko Y, Brady A, Weber T, Lazareva I, Backer TD, Sokolovic S, Jelakovic B, Widimsky J, Viigimaa M, Pörsti I, Denolle T, Krämer BK, Stergiou GS, Parati G, Trušinskis K, Miglinas M, Gerdts E, Tykarski A, de Carvalho Rodrigues M, Dorobantu M, Chazova I, Lovic D, Filipova S, Brguljan J, Segura J, Gottsäter A, Pechère-Bertschi A, Erdine S, Sirenko Y, Brady A (2018) 2018 ESC/ESH guidelines for the management of arterial hypertension. Eur Heart J 39(33):3021–3104. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehy339

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Tardivo D, Sastre J, Ruquet M, Thollon L, Adalian P, Leonetti G, Foti B (2011) Three-dimensional modeling of the various volumes of canines to determine age and sex: a preliminary study. J Forensic Sci 56:766–770. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1556-4029.2011.01720.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Gulsahi A, Kulah CK, Bakirarar B, Gulen O, Kamburoglu K (2018) Age estimation based on pulp/tooth volume ratio measured on cone-beam CT images. Dentomaxillofacial Radiol 47:20170239. https://doi.org/10.1259/dmfr.20170239

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Gomes AF, Brasil DM, Silva AIV, Freitas DQ, Haiter-Neto F, Groppo FC (2019) Accuracy of ITK-SNAP software for 3D analysis of a non-regular topography structure. Oral Radiol 36:183–189. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11282-019-00397-y

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This research was financed in part by the Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES) – Finance Code 001.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Amanda Farias Gomes.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in this study were conducted in accordance with the ethical standards of the local Institutional Review Board (IRB #201810768), and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed consent

For this type of study, formal consent is not required.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Farias Gomes, A., Sousa Melo, S.L., Nejaim, Y. et al. Variations in pulp volume between normotensive and hypertensive individuals on CBCT imaging. Clin Oral Invest 24, 4069–4076 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-020-03279-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-020-03279-4

Keywords

Navigation