Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Growth and viability of Streptococcus mutans in sucrose with different concentrations of Stevia rebaudiana Bertoni

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Clinical Oral Investigations Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

To evaluate total absorbance, planktonic growth, biofilm formation, viability, metabolic activity, and pH of Streptococcus mutans UA159 cultures when different dilutions of Stevia rebaudiana Bertoni were applied and to determine the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) and the minimum biofilm inhibitory concentration (MBIC) of Stevia on S. mutans.

Materials and methods

The effects of different dilutions of Stevia (0–400 mg/ml) on S. mutans total growth, planktonic growth, biofilm formation, viability, metabolic activity, and pH during a 72-h growth period were evaluated in this in vitro study. A stock solution was prepared by mixing 10 ml of tryptic soy broth (TSB) supplemented with 1% sucrose (TSBS) and 4 g of Stevia.

Results

S. mutans total growth and biofilm formation decreased with reduced concentrations of Stevia. Furthermore, the MIC was 25 mg/ml and the MBIC was 6.25 mg/ml. Complete eradication of S. mutans was not observed with any of the Stevia concentrations. Planktonic growth of S. mutans was not repressed by high concentrations of Stevia and most of the Stevia concentrations generated an increased pH.

Conclusion

Because Stevia reduces biofilm and acid production, Stevia can be considered a non-cariogenic sweetener.

Clinical relevance

This study confirms the anticariogenic effect of Stevia, like it has been previously reported, but more studies on the most effective concentration are needed, and in the present study, the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) and the minimum biofilm inhibitory concentration (MBIC) was determined in the presence of sucrose. Additionally, this is the first study to evaluate the effect of Stevia on S. mutans metabolic activity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ojeada Garcés J, Oviedo García E, Salas L (2013) Streptococcus mutans and dental caries. Rev CES Odont 26(1):44–56 http://www.scielo.org.co/pdf/ceso/v26n1/v26n1a05.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  2. Selwitz R, Ismail A, Pitts N (2007) Dental caries. Lancet 369:51–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(07)60031-2

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Gupta P, Gupta N, Singh H (2014) Prevalence of dental caries in relation to body mass index, daily sugar intake and oral hygiene status in 12-year-old school children in Mathura City: a pilot study. Int J Pediatr 2014 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3945027/

  4. Do T, Devine D, Marsh P (2013) Oral biofilms: molecular analysis, challenges and future prospects in dental diagnostics. Clin Cosmet Investig Dent 5:11–19 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3652372/

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Gamboa F, Chaves M (2012) Antimicrobial potential of extracts from Stevia Rebaudiana leaves against bacteria of importance in dental caries. Acta Odontol Latinoam 25(2):171–175 http://www.scielo.org.ar/pdf/aol/v25n2/v25n2a03.pdf

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Jiang S, Gao X, Jin L, Lo E (2016) Salivary microbiome diversity in caries free and caries affected children. Int J Mol Sci 17(12) https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5187778/pdf/ijms-17-01978.pdf

  7. Takahashi N, Nyvad B (2011) The role of bacteria in the caries process: ecological perspectives. J Dent Res 90(3):294–303 https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/0022034510379602?rfr_dat=cr_pub%3Dpubmed&url_ver=Z39.882003&rfr_id=ori%3Arid%3Acrossref.org&journalCode=jdrb

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Pedro Núñez D, García Bacallao L (2010) Biochemistry of dental caries. Revista Habanera de Ciencias Médicas 9(2):156–166 http://scielo.sld.cu/pdf/rhcm/v9n2/rhcm04210.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  9. Kidd E (2011) The implications of the new paradigm of dental caries. J Dent 39(Suppl 2):S3–S8 https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0300571211002739?via%3Dihub

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Huang R, Li M, Gregory R (2011) Bacterial interactions in dental biofilm. Virulence 2(5):435–444 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3322631/pdf/viru0205_0435.pdf

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Martignon S, Gomez J, Tellez M, Ruiz J, Marin L, Rangel M (2013) Current cariology education in dental schools in Spanish speaking Latin American countries. J Dent Educ 77(10):1330–1337 http://www.jdentaled.org/content/jde/77/10/1330.full.pdf

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Minsalud (2012) Cuarto Estudio Nacional de Salud Bucal (ENSAB IV). https://www.minsalud.gov.co/sites/rid/Lists/BibliotecaDigital/RIDE/VS/PP/ENSAB-IV-Metodologia.pdf

  13. Brambilla E, Cagetti M, Lonescu A, Campus G, Lingstrom P (2014) An in vitro and in vivo comparison of the effect of Stevia Rebaudiana extracts on different caries related variables: a randomized controlled trial pilot study. Caries Res 48(1):19–23 https://www.karger.com/Article/Abstract/351650

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Thomas J, Glade M (2010) Stevia: it’s not just about calories. Open Obes J 2:101–109 https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/fd0b/5df46a776069b89244000885d65f0277318b.pdf

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Contreras S (2013) Anticariogenic properties and effects on periodontal structures of Stevia rebaudiana Bertoni. Narrative review. J Oral Res 2(3):158–166 https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=4995308

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Salvador Reyes R, Sotelo Herrera M, Paucar Menacho L (2014) Study of Stevia (Stevia rebaudiana Bertoni) as a natural sweetener and its use in benefit of the health. Scientia Agropecuaria 5:157–163 https://es.scribd.com/document/362512646/stevia-pdf

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Fambrizio Ferrazzano G, Cantile T, Alcidi B, Coda M, Ingenito A, Zarrelli A, Di Fabio G, Pollio A (2016) Is Stevia rebaudiana Bertoni a non-cariogenic sweetener? A review. Molecules 21(1):E38 https://www.mdpi.com/1420-3049/21/1/38

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Giacaman R, Campos P, Muñoz Sandoval C, Castro R (2013) Cariogenic potential of commercial sweeteners in an experimental biofilm caries model on enamel. Arch Oral Biol 58(9):1116–1122 https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0003996913000782?via%3Dihub

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Blauth de Slavutzky S (2010) Stevia and sucrose effect on plaque formation. J FÜR VERBRAUCHERSCHUTZ Leb 5(2):213–216 https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs00003-010-0555-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Grembecka M (2015) Natural sweeteners in a human diet. Rocz Panstw Zakl Hig 66(3):195–202 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26400114

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Pierce CG, Uppuluri P, Tristan AR, Wormley FL, Mowat E, Ramage G, Lopez Ribot JL (2008) A simple and reproducible 96-well plate based method for the formation of fungal biofilms and its application to antifungal susceptibility testing. Nat Protoc 3(9):1494–1500 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2741160/pdf/nihms127871.pdf

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Huang R, Li M, Gregory RL (2012) Effect of nicotine on growth and tabolism of Streptococcus mutans. Eur J Oral Sci 120(4):319–325 https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/j.1600-0722.2012.00971.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Das S, Das AK, Murphy RA, Punwani IC, Nasution MP, Kinghorn AD (1992) Evaluation of the cariogenic potential of the intense natural sweeteners stevioside and rebaudioside A. Caries Res 26(5):363–366 https://www.karger.com/Article/Abstract/261469

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Special thanks to Dr. Ru Zhang for all the support and guidance throughout the study; to the Oral Health Research Institute of Indiana University; to Luis Gonzalo Alvarez for his professional help in statistics; and to Dr. Emery Alvarez for making this possible.

Funding

This investigation was fully funded by the Research and Innovation Department, CES University. The funding source had no involvement in data collection, analysis interpretation, or in the decision to submit the article for publication.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to E. Escobar.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Informed consent

Not required.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Escobar, E., Piedrahita, M. & Gregory, R.L. Growth and viability of Streptococcus mutans in sucrose with different concentrations of Stevia rebaudiana Bertoni. Clin Oral Invest 24, 3237–3242 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-020-03197-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-020-03197-5

Keywords

Navigation