Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Pain and quality of life after endodontic surgery with or without advanced platelet-rich fibrin membrane application: a randomized clinical trial

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Clinical Oral Investigations Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Clinical evidence of the autologous platelet concentrates effects on the patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) after endodontic surgery is still limited.

Objectives

To investigate the effect of the advanced platelet-rich fibrin (A-PRF+) membrane application upon patient postoperative pain, and quality of life in endodontic surgery.

Materials and methods

A two-parallel-arm randomized clinical trial was made comparing endodontic surgery with or without A-PRF+ as adjunctive treatment. Fifty individuals comprehending 50 apical lesions (second premolar to the second premolar) of upper maxilla were included. Pain perception and quality of life (functional limitations and other symptoms) were assessed 1 week after surgery using a visual analog scale and a Likert scale-based questionnaire. Descriptive analysis was done using χ2 and t test. Binary logistic regression, ANOVA-type statistic, and GEE analysis were used for inferential analysis.

Results

Pain perception was mild in both groups [A-PRF+ 12.7 ± 8.5] versus [no A-PRF+ 20.7 ± 16.3]; it proved less variable during the first 4 days in test group, showing lower extreme pain values (p = 0.096). Analgesic use was similar in both groups. Controls reported significantly worse sleep and speech functions (p < 0.05). Bleeding and bad taste/breath were the most discriminative symptoms.

Conclusions

Postoperative pain perception was mild in endodontic surgery of the upper anterior maxilla. Differences in pain perception were not statistically significant. The use of A-PRF+ afforded less variable pain perception than in the controls. Altered quality of life parameters were more prevalent in the control group and prove significant for speech and sleep functions.

Clinical relevance

Patient-related outcomes are of utmost importance in clinical practice. The use of A-PRF+ provides an affordable and safe alternative to improve postoperative quality of life in endodontic surgery.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Zarbock A, Singbartl K, Ley K (2006) Complete reversal of acid-induced acute lung injury by blocking of platelet-neutrophil aggregation. J Clin Invest 116:3211–3219. https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI29499

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Suo J, Linke B, Meyer dos Santos S, Pierre S, Stegner D, Zhang DD, Denis CV, Geisslinger G, Nieswandt B, Scholich K (2014) Neutrophils mediate edema formation but not mechanical allodynia during zymosan-induced inflammation. J Leukoc Biol 96:133–142. https://doi.org/10.1189/jlb.3A1213-628R

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Angerame D, De Biasi M, Kastrioti I, Franco V, Castaldo A, Maglione M (2015) Application of platelet-rich fibrin in endodontic surgery: a pilot study. G Ital Endod 29:51–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gien.2015.08.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Del Fabbro M, Ceresoli V, Lolato A, Taschieri S (2012) Effect of platelet concentrate on quality of life after periradicular surgery: a randomized clinical study. J Endod 38:733–739. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2012.02.022

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Del Fabbro M, Corbella S, Sequeira-Byron P, Tsesis I, Rosen E, Lolato A, Taschieri S (2016) Endodontic procedures for retreatment of periapical lesions. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2016:75–76. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD005511.pub3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Castro AB, Meschi N, Temmerman A, Pinto N, Lambrechts P, Teughels W, Quirynen M (2017) Regenerative potential of leucocyte- and platelet-rich fibrin. Part A: intra-bony defects, furcation defects and periodontal plastic surgery. A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Clin Periodontol 44:67–82. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpe.12643

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. He Y, Chen J, Huang Y, Pan Q, Nie M (2017) Local application of platelet-rich fibrin during lower third molar extraction improves treatment outcomes. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 75:2497–2506. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2017.05.034

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Dragonas P, Katsaros T, Avila-Ortiz G, Chambrone L, Schiavo JH, Palaiologou A (2019) Effects of leukocyte–platelet-rich fibrin (L-PRF) in different intraoral bone grafting procedures: a systematic review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 48:250–262. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijom.2018.06.003

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Jung JY, Woo SM, Choi NK, Kim WJ, Kim SM, Jung JY (2017) Effect of platelet-rich fibrin on odontoblastic differentiation in human dental pulp cells exposed to lipopolysaccharide. J Endod 43:433–438. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2016.11.002

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Dohan Ehrenfest DM, Del Corso M, Diss A, Mouhyi J, Charrier J-B (2010) Three-dimensional architecture and cell composition of a Choukroun’s platelet-rich fibrin clot and membrane. J Periodontol 81:546–555. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2009.090531

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Choukroun J, Diss A, Simonpieri A, Girard MO, Schoeffler C, Dohan SL, Dohan AJJ, Mouhyi J, Dohan DM (2006) Platelet-rich fibrin (PRF): a second-generation platelet concentrate. Part IV: clinical effects on tissue healing. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 101:56–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tripleo.2005.07.011

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Perut F, Filardo G, Mariani E, Cenacchi A, Pratelli L, Devescovi V, Kon E, Marcacci M, Facchini A, Baldini N, Granchi D (2013) Preparation method and growth factor content of platelet concentrate influence the osteogenic differentiation of bone marrow stromal cells. Cytotherapy 15:830–839. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcyt.2013.01.220

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Ekström K, Omar O, Granéli C, Wang X, Vazirisani F, Thomsen P (2013) Monocyte exosomes stimulate the osteogenic gene expression of mesenchymal stem cells. PLoS One 8:e75227. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0075227

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Linke B, Schreiber Y, Picard-Willems B, Slattery P, Nüsing RM, Harder S, Geisslinger G, Scholich K (2017) Activated platelets induce an anti-inflammatory response of monocytes/macrophages through cross-regulation of PGE2 and cytokines. Mediat Inflamm 2017:1–14. https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/1463216

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Passacquale G, Vamadevan P, Pereira L, Hamid C, Corrigall V, Ferro A (2011) Monocyte-platelet interaction induces a pro-inflammatory phenotype in circulating monocytes. PLoS One 6:e25595. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0025595

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Neumann FJ, Marx N, Gawaz M, Brand K, Ott I, Rokitta C, Sticherling C, Meinl C, May A, Schömig A (1997) Induction of cytokine expression in leukocytes by binding of thrombin-stimulated platelets. Circulation 95:2387–2394

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Kral JB, Schrottmaier WC, Salzmann M, Assinger A (2016) Platelet interaction with innate immune cells. Transfus Med Hemother 43:78–88. https://doi.org/10.1159/000444807

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Kobayashi E, Flückiger L, Fujioka-Kobayashi M, Sawada K, Sculean A, Schaller B, Miron RJ (2016) Comparative release of growth factors from PRP, PRF, and advanced-PRF. Clin Oral Investig 20:2353–2360. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-016-1719-1

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Dohan DM, Choukroun J, Diss A, Dohan SL, Dohan AJJ, Mouhyi J, Gogly B (2006) Platelet-rich fibrin (PRF): a second-generation platelet concentrate. Part I: technological concepts and evolution. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 101:e37–e44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tripleo.2005.07.008

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. El Bagdadi K, Kubesch A, Yu X, Al-Maawi S, Orlowska A, Dias A, Booms P, Dohle E, Sader R, Kirkpatrick CJ, Choukroun J, Ghanaati S (2017) Reduction of relative centrifugal forces increases growth factor release within solid platelet-rich-fibrin (PRF)-based matrices: a proof of concept of LSCC (low speed centrifugation concept). Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00068-017-0785-7

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Ghanaati S, Booms P, Orlowska A, Kubesch A, Lorenz J, Rutkowski J, Landes C, Sader R, Kirkpatrick C, Choukroun J (2014) Advanced platelet-rich fibrin: a new concept for cell-based tissue engineering by means of inflammatory cells. J Oral Implantol 40:679–689. https://doi.org/10.1563/aaid-joi-D-14-00138

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Choukroun J, Ghanaati S (2018) Reduction of relative centrifugation force within injectable platelet-rich-fibrin (PRF) concentrates advances patients’ own inflammatory cells, platelets and growth factors: the first introduction to the low speed centrifugation concept. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg 44:87–95. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00068-017-0767-9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Fujioka-Kobayashi M, Miron RJ, Hernandez M, Kandalam U, Zhang Y, Choukroun J (2017) Optimized platelet-rich fibrin with the low-speed concept: growth factor release, biocompatibility, and cellular response. J Periodontol 88:112–121. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2016.160443

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Kubesch A, Barbeck M, Al-Maawi S, Orlowska A, Booms PF, Sader RA, Miron RJ, Kirkpatrick CJ, Choukroun J, Ghanaati S (2019) A low-speed centrifugation concept leads to cell accumulation and vascularization of solid platelet-rich fibrin: an experimental study in vivo. Platelets 30:329–340. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537104.2018.1445835

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Moher D, Hopewell S, Schulz KF, Montori V, Gøtzsche PC, Devereaux PJ, Elbourne D, Egger M, Altman DG (2010) CONSORT 2010 explanation and elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials. J Clin Epidemiol 63:e1–e37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.03.004

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Hurwitz EE, Simon M, Vinta SR, Zehm CF, Shabot SM, Minhajuddin A, Abouleish AE (2017) Adding examples to the ASA-physical status classification improves correct assignment to patients. Anesthesiology 126:614–622. https://doi.org/10.1097/ALN.0000000000001541

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Meschi N, Fieuws S, Vanhoenacker A, Strijbos O, Van der Veken D, Politis C, Lambrechts P (2018) Root-end surgery with leucocyte- and platelet-rich fibrin and an occlusive membrane: a randomized controlled clinical trial on patients’ quality of life. Clin Oral Investig 22:2401–2411. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-018-2343-z

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Penarrocha M, Garcia B, Marti E, Balaguer J (2006) Pain and inflammation after periapical surgery in 60 patients. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 64:429–433. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2005.11.014

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Peñarrocha-Oltra D, Soto-Peñaloza D, Peñarrocha-Diago M, Cervera-Ballester J, von Arx T, Peñarrocha-Diago M (2019) Hemostatic agents in endodontic surgery: a randomized controlled pilot study of polytetrafluoroethylene strips as an adjunct to epinephrine impregnated gauze versus aluminum chloride. J Endod. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2019.04.011

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Brunner E, Domhof S, Langer F (2002) Nonparametric analysis of longitudinal data in factorial experiments. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  31. Christiansen R, Kirkevang LL, Hørsted-Bindslev P, Wenzel A (2008) Patient discomfort following periapical surgery. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 105:245–250. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tripleo.2007.08.023

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Matras H (1985) Fibrin seal: the state of the art. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 43:605–611

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Ihara N, Suzuki K, Tanaka H, Nakamura Y, Tanabe J, Fukuda A, Fujii C, Kohama A, Hamanaka T, Tani T (1984) Application of fibrin glue to burns. Its haemostatic and skin transplant fixation effects in the excised wound. Burns Incl Therm Inj 10:396–404

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. de Almeida Barros Mourão CF, Calasans-Maia MD, de Mello Machado RC, de Brito Resende RF, Alves GG (2018) The use of platelet-rich fibrin as a hemostatic material in oral soft tissues. Oral Maxillofac Surg 22:329–333. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10006-018-0708-8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Ignotz RA, Heino J, Massagué J (1989) Regulation of cell adhesion receptors by transforming growth factor-beta. Regulation of vitronectin receptor and LFA-1. J Biol Chem 264:389–392

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Dohan Ehrenfest DM, Diss A, Odin G, Doglioli P, Hippolyte MP, Charrier JB (2009) In vitro effects of Choukroun’s PRF (platelet-rich fibrin) on human gingival fibroblasts, dermal prekeratinocytes, preadipocytes, and maxillofacial osteoblasts in primary cultures. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 108:341–352. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tripleo.2009.04.020

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Gassling V, Hedderich J, Açil Y, Purcz N, Wiltfang J, Douglas T (2013) Comparison of platelet rich fibrin and collagen as osteoblast-seeded scaffolds for bone tissue engineering applications. Clin Oral Implants Res 24:320–328. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2011.02333.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Schar MO, Diaz-Romero J, Kohl S, Zumstein MA, Nesic D (2015) Platelet-rich concentrates differentially release growth factors and induce cell migration in vitro. Clin Orthop Relat Res 473:1635–1643. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-015-4192-2

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Rothamel D, Schwarz F, Fienitz T, Smeets R, Dreiseidler T, Ritter L, Happe A, Zöller J (2012) Biocompatibility and biodegradation of a native porcine pericardium membrane: results of in vitro and in vivo examinations. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 27:146–154

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Rothamel D, Schwarz F, Sager M, Herten M, Sculean A, Becker J (2005) Biodegradation of differently cross-linked collagen membranes: an experimental study in the rat. Clin Oral Implants Res 16:369–378. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2005.01108.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Luttikhuizen DT, Harmsen MC, Van Luyn MJA (2006) Cellular and molecular dynamics in the foreign body reaction. Tissue Eng 12:1955–1970. https://doi.org/10.1089/ten.2006.12.1955

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Anderson JM, Rodriguez A, Chang DT (2008) Foreign body reaction to biomaterials. Semin Immunol 20:86–100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.smim.2007.11.004

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Ali HT, Mosleh MI, Shawky M (2018) Variables predictive of the intensity of postoperative pain following mandibular third molar surgery: a prospective study. Minerva Stomatol 67:111–116. https://doi.org/10.23736/S0026-4970.18.04125-0

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Kuroi R, Minakuchi H, Hara ES, Kawakami A, Maekawa K, Okada H, Kuboki T (2015) A risk factor analysis of accumulated postoperative pain and swelling sensation after dental implant surgery using a cellular phone-based real-time assessment. J Prosthodont Res 59:194–198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpor.2015.05.003

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Wood L, Egger M, Gluud LL, Schulz KF, Jüni P, Altman DG, Gluud C, Martin RM, Wood AJG, Sterne JAC (2008) Empirical evidence of bias in treatment effect estimates in controlled trials with different interventions and outcomes: meta-epidemiological study. BMJ 336:601–605. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.39465.451748.AD

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  46. McCambridge J, Witton J, Elbourne DR (2014) Systematic review of the Hawthorne effect: new concepts are needed to study research participation effects. J Clin Epidemiol 67:267–277. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2013.08.015

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. Finniss DG, Kaptchuk TJ, Miller F, Benedetti F (2010) Biological, clinical, and ethical advances of placebo effects. Lancet 375:686–695. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(09)61706-2

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  48. Howick J, Friedemann C, Tsakok M, Watson R, Tsakok T, Thomas J, Perera R, Fleming S, Heneghan C (2016) Correction: are treatments more effective than placebos? A systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One 11:e0147354. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0147354

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  49. Nunn R (2009) It’s time to put the placebo out of our misery. BMJ 338:b1568–b1568. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.b1568

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Probst P, Grummich K, Harnoss JC, Hüttner FJ, Jensen K, Braun S, Kieser M, Ulrich A, Büchler MW, Diener MK (2016) Placebo-controlled trials in surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Medicine (Baltimore) 95:e3516. https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000003516

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Horng S, Miller FG (2003) Ethical framework for the use of sham procedures in clinical trials. Crit Care Med 31:S126–S130. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.CCM.0000054906.49187.67

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

The present study was conducted with the resources of the University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to María Peñarrocha-Diago.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The present study was partially supported by the company Process for PRF™ (Nice, France), which provided a full Duo centrifuge kit. The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Ethical approval

The present study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain (Protocol ref.: H1524989327425).

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individuals before its inclusion in the study.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Soto-Peñaloza, D., Peñarrocha-Diago, M., Cervera-Ballester, J. et al. Pain and quality of life after endodontic surgery with or without advanced platelet-rich fibrin membrane application: a randomized clinical trial. Clin Oral Invest 24, 1727–1738 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-019-03033-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-019-03033-5

Keywords

Navigation