Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Changes in the oral health-related quality of life in adult patients with intellectual disabilities after dental treatment under general anesthesia

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Clinical Oral Investigations Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objectives

This study aimed to assess self- and proxy-rated changes in the oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL) in adult patients with intellectual disabilities after dental treatment in general anesthesia.

Methods

The OHRQoL in 52 adult patients with intellectual and developmental disabilities was assessed prior to dental treatment in general anesthesia (t0), 2 to 3 (t1) and 12 weeks (t2) postoperatively. Therefore, patients and primary cargivers were surveyed using either the 5-item short form of the Oral Health Impact Profile translated into easy language (OHIP-G5-easy, self-rating, n = 27) or the 14-item short form of the Oral Health Impact Profile (OHIP-G14, proxy-rating, n = 51), respectively. OHIP-G5-easy and OHIP-G14 summary scores were statistically analyzed with non-parametric mixed effects models and spearman correlation (p < 0.05). Additionally, the effect of demographic, anamnestic, oral health and treatment factors on QHRQoL or on changes of OHRQoL were analyzed using univariate and multivariate ordinal logistic regressions (p < 0.05).

Results

Self- (t0: 5.8 ± 4.6, t1: 4.3 ± 5.9, t2: 2.0 ± 3.9) and proxy-ratings (t0: 18.8 ± 11.6, t1: 10.1 ± 11.2, t2: 2.7 ± 5.3) revealed a significant improvement of OHRQoL after dental treatment in general anesthesia. Data showed a moderate correlation (p < 0.001, rSp = 0.43). OHRQoL at baseline was affected by the etiology of cognitive impairment and by the periodontal status (OHIP-G14). Improvement of OHRQoL was associated with the etiology of cognitive impairment (OHIP-G14) and the extent of dental treatment (OHIP-G5-easy).

Conclusion

Self- and proxy-ratings revealed a significant improvement of OHRQoL in patients with intellectual disabilities after dental treatment in general anesthesia.

Clinical relevance

Assessment of OHRQoL promotes patient-centred care of adults with intellectual disabilities.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Anders PL, Davis EL (2010) Oral health of patients with intellectual disabilities: a systematic review. Spec Care Dentist 30:110–117. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1754-4505.2010.00136.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Mallineni SK, Yiu CKY (2016) Dental treatment under general anesthesia for special-needs patients: analysis of the literature. J Investig Clin Dent 7:325–331. https://doi.org/10.1111/jicd.12174

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Chang J, Kim HY (2017) Prognostic factors of single-visit endodontic and restorative treatment under general anaesthesia for special needs patients. J Oral Rehabil 44:96–104. https://doi.org/10.1111/joor.12458

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Alsaleh I, Cousson PY, Nicolas E, Hennequin M (2012) Is endodontic treatment performed under general anaesthesia technically acceptable? Clin Oral Investig 16:1599–1160. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-011-0663-3

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Mallineni SK, Yiu CKY (2014) A retrospective review of outcomes of dental treatment performed for special needs patients under general Anaesthesia: 2-year follow-up. Sci World J 2014:1–6. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/748353

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Limeres Posse J, Lopez Jimenez J, Ruiz Villandiego JC, Cutando Soriano A, Fernandez Feijoo J, Linazasoro Elorza M, Diniz Frietas M, Diz Dios P (2016) Survival of dental implants in patients with down syndrome: a case series. J Prosthet Dent 116:880–884. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2016.04.015

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Couto P, Pereira PA, Nunes M, Mendes RA (2018) Oral health-related quality of life of Portuguese adults with mild intellectual disabilities. PLoS One 13:e0193953. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0193953

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Alves NS, Gavina VP, Cortellazzi KL, Antunes LAA, Silveira FM, Assaf AV (2016) Analysis of clinical, demographic, socioeconomic, and psychosocial determinants of quality of life of persons with intellectual disability: a cross-sectional study: determinants on quality of life of disabled persons. Spec Care Dentist 36:307–314. https://doi.org/10.1111/scd.12196

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Amaral Loureiro AC, Oliveira Costa F, Eustaquio da Costa J (2007) The impact of periodontal disease on the quality of life of individuals with down syndrome. Downs Syndr Res Pract 12:50–54. https://doi.org/10.3104/reports.1989

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Chang J, Patton LL, Kim HY (2014) Impact of dental treatment under general anesthesia on the oral health-related quality of life of adolescents and adults with special needs. Eur J Oral Sci 122:363–371. https://doi.org/10.1111/eos.12150

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Barbosa T, Gavião M (2008) Oral health-related quality of life in children: part III. Is there agreement between parents in rating their children’s oral health-related quality of life? A systematic review. Int J Dent Hyg 6:108–113. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1601-5037.2007.00271.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Meyle J, Jepsen S (2000) The periodontal screening-index (PSI). Parodontologie 11:17–21

    Google Scholar 

  13. World Health Organisation (2013) Oral health surveys: basic methods, 5th edn. Genf

  14. Eichner K (1955) Über eine Gruppeneinteilung der Lückengebisse für die Prothetik. Dtsch Zahnärztl Z 10:1831–1834

    Google Scholar 

  15. John MT, Miglioretti DL, LeResche L, Koepsell TD, Hujoel P, Micheelis W (2006) German short forms of the Oral health impact profile. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 34:277–288. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0528.2006.00279.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. John MT, Micheelis W, Biffar R (2004) Norming of abbreviated versions of the German Oral health impact profile. Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed 114:784–791

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Reissmann DR, Krautz M, Schierz O et al (2008) Was ist klinisch relevant bei Veränderungen der Mundgesundheit? Dtsch Zahnärztl Z 63:669–680

    Google Scholar 

  18. John M, Micheelis W, Biffar R (2004) Demographic factors, denture status and Oral health-related quality of life – validation of a short form of the Oral health impact profile (OHIP-G14). Dtsch Zahnärztl Z 59:328–333

    Google Scholar 

  19. Rolstad S, Adler J, Rydén A (2011) Response burden and questionnaire length: is shorter better? A review and meta-analysis. Value Health 14:1101–1108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jval.2011.06.003

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Robertson S, Cooper C, Hoe J, Hamilton O, Stringer A, Livingston G (2017) Proxy rated quality of life of care home residents with dementia: a systematic review. Int Psychogeriatr 29:569–581. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1041610216002167

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Clare L, Quinn C, Hoare Z, Whitaker R, Woods RT (2014) Care staff and family member perspectives on quality of life in people with very severe dementia in long-term care: a cross-sectional study. Health Qual Life Outcomes 12:175. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12955-014-0175-3

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Eiser C, Morse R (2001) Can parents rate their child’s health-related quality of life? Results of a systematic review. Qual Life Res 10:347–357

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Schulte AG, Freyer K, Bissar A (2013) Caries experience and treatment need in adults with intellectual disabilities in two German regions. Community Dent Health 30:39–44. https://doi.org/10.1922/CDH_2999Schulte06

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Ferreira MC, Dias-Pereira AC, Branco-de-Almeida LS, Martins CC, Paiva SM (2017) Impact of periodontal disease on quality of life: a systematic review. J Periodontal Res 52:651–666. https://doi.org/10.1111/jre.12436

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This study was funded by the institutions of the authors.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Annette Wiegand.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. The study was reviewed and approved by the local ethics committee (No.11/1/16).

Informed consent

Written informed consent was obtained from the legal guardians of the patients.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hillebrecht, AL., Hrasky, V., Anten, C. et al. Changes in the oral health-related quality of life in adult patients with intellectual disabilities after dental treatment under general anesthesia. Clin Oral Invest 23, 3895–3903 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-019-02820-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-019-02820-4

Keywords

Navigation