Abstract
The objective of this paper is to analyze the dynamic responses of Tension Leg Platform (TLP). Under the combined action of waves and currents, a tether model considering the coupled effects of transverse and axial responses is established. The finite difference method is used in the numerical algorithm of the tether vibration model. Three simulations are performed, including a first-order irregular wave, a second-order wave, and a freak wave impact against the platform. The dynamic response characteristics of the tension leg platform under the action of freak waves are calculated by using the superposition model to generate the time history of freak waves. The numerical simulation results show that the platform motions are significantly affected by the freak waves, especially in the focusing location. And the effects of second-order wave force and freak wave force on the platform responses, horizontal offset, and vertical subsidence are analyzed.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Malaeke H, Moeenfard H (2016) Analytical modeling of large amplitude free vibration of non-uniform beams carrying a both transversely and axially eccentric tip mass. J Sound Vib 366:211–229
Prescott J (1961) Applied elasticity. Dover Publications Inc, New York
Fox EN (1959) Applied mathematics for engineers and physicists. Phys Today 12(4):40–42
Goel RP (1973) Vibrations of a beam carrying a concentrated mass. J Appl Mech 40(3):821–821
Jefferys ER, Patel MH (1981) Dynamic analysis models of the tension leg platform. In: Offshore technology conference
Chucheepsakul S, Buncharoen S, Wang CM (1994) Large deflection of beams under moment gradient. J Eng Mech 120(9):1848–1860
Patel MH, Park HI (1995) Tensioned buoyant platform tether response to short duration tension loss. Mar Struct 8(5):543–553
Han SM, Benaroya H (2000) Non-linear coupled transverse and axial vibration of a compliant structure, part 1: formulation and free vibration. J Sound Vib 237(5):837–873
Han SM, Benaroya H (2000) Non-linear coupled transverse and axial vibration of a compliant structure, part 2: forced vibration. J Sound Vib 237(5):875–900
Han SM, Benaroya H (2002) Comparison of linear and nonlinear responses of a compliant tower to random wave forces. Chaos Solitons Fract 14(2):269–291
Yigit AS, Christoforou AP (1996) Coupled axial and transverse vibrations of oilwell drillstrings. J Sound Vib 195(4):617–627
Kim N, Kim CH (2003) Investigation of a dynamic property of draupner freak wave. Int J Offshore Polar Engineers 13(1):38–42
Deng Y et al (2016) Freak wave forces on a vertical cylinder—ScienceDirect. Coast Eng 114:9–18
Alagan-Chella M, Bihs H, Myrhaug D (2019) Wave impact pressure and kinematics due to breaking wave impingement on a monopile. J Fluids Struct 86:94–123
Fedele F (2008) Rogue waves in oceanic turbulence. Phys D 237(14–17):2127–2131
Kharif C, Pelinovsky E (2003) Physical mechanisms of the rogue wave phenomenon. Eur J Mech B Fluids 22(6):603–634
Fochesato C, Grilli S, Dias F (2007) Numerical modeling of extreme rogue waves generated by directional energy focusing. Wave Motion 44(5):395–416
Zhao X, Hu C (2012) Numerical and experimental study on a 2-D floating body under extreme wave conditions. Appl Ocean Res 35:1–13
Cheng L, Lin P (2018) The numerical modeling of coupled motions of a moored floating body in waves. Water 10:12
Wei Y et al (2016) Wave interaction with an oscillating wave surge converter. Part II: slamming. Ocean Eng 113(1):319–334
Rudman M, Cleary PW (2013) Rogue wave impact on a tension leg platform: The effect of wave incidence angle and mooring line tension. Ocean Eng 61(6):123–138
Rudman M, Cleary PW (2016) The influence of mooring system in rogue wave impact on an offshore platform. Ocean Eng 115:168–181
Chuang WL, Chang KA, Mercier R (2017) Impact pressure and void fraction due to plunging breaking wave impact on a 2D TLP structure. Exp Fluids 58:6
Abdussamie N et al (2017) Experimental investigation of extreme wave impacts on a rigid TLP model in cyclonic conditions. Ships Offshore Struct 12(1–2):153–170
Clauss G et al (1995) Offshore structures. Springer, Berlin, p 298
Chakrabarti S (2005) Handbook of offshore engineering. Springer, Berlin, pp 79–131
Morison JR, Johnson JW, Schaaf SA (1950) The force exerted by surface waves on piles. Petrol Trans A 189(5):149–154
Akhmediev N, Ankiewicz A, Sotocrespo JM (2009) Rogue waves and rational solutions of the nonlinear Schrödinger equation. Phys Rev E 80(2):026601
Peregrine DH (1983) Water waves, nonlinear Schrdinger equations and their solutions. ANZIAM J 25(1):16–43
Slunyaev A et al (2013) Super-rogue waves in simulations based on weakly nonlinear and fully nonlinear hydrodynamic equations. Phys Rev E 88(1):12909
Hu Z et al (2015) Numerical study of Rogue waves as nonlinear Schrdinger breather solutions under finite water depth. Wave Motion 52:81–90
Mei CC (1992) The applied dynamics of ocean surface waves. In: The applied dynamics of ocean surface waves
Pei YG, Zhang NC, Zhang YQ (2007) Efficient generation of freak waves in laboratory. China Ocean Eng 21(3):515–523
Tan SG, Boom WD (1981) the wave induced motions of a tension leg platform in deep water. In: Offshore Technology Conference
Wang J et al (2021) Numerical study of uncoupled and coupled TLP models. Polish Maritime Res 28(3):44–60
Masciola MD (2011) Dynamic analysis of a coupled and an uncoupled tension leg platform. McGill University, Canada
Wang J et al (2020) A method based on LS-SVM to estimate time-domain Green function. J Mar Sci Technol 5:1–13
Clément AH (1998) An ordinary differential equation for the Green function of time-domain free-surface hydrodynamics. J Eng Math 33(2):201–217
Angelus J, Bureau (2011) Bureau of ocean energy management, regulation and enforcement
Kara F (2000) Time domain hydrodynamics and hydroelastic analysis of floating bodies with forward speed. In: University of Strathclyde: Glasgow Scotland
Acknowledgements
This work was financially supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 52075469) and Shaanxi Key Laboratory of Hydraulic Technology Fund (Grant No.: YYJS2022KF15).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Appendices
Appendix A: the platform hydrodynamic coefficients
Under the action of waves, the platform hydrodynamic coefficients are determined by BEM. Since the platform is a slender structure, the effect of wave viscous on the slender structure cannot be ignored. Then, the drag force on floating structure is determined by Morison equation. Therefore, hydrodynamic coefficient of the platform is calculated by the methods of BEM and Morison equation.
1.1 Added mass and memory function
The added mass and memory function can be determined by calculating the radiation potential of the platform. The integral equation of the radiation potential is calculated by using the boundary element method. The expression [25, 26] is shown as follows:
where \(\Phi_{k}\) is the velocity potential which needs to be evaluated; the coordinates of field point \(p\) and source point \(q\) are \((x,y,z)\) and \((\xi ,\eta ,\zeta )\), respectively, with both lying in the water \((z \le 0)\); \(R = \sqrt {(x - \xi )^{2} + (y - \eta )^{2} }\); \(r = \sqrt {R^{2} + (z - \zeta )^{2} }\); \(r^{\prime} = \sqrt {R^{2} + (z + \zeta )^{2} }\) represent the horizontal or the three-dimensional distance between field point \(p\) and source point \(q\) or the \(q\)’s image about the still water surface; \(s_{b}\) is the wet surface of the floating structure; \({\mathbf{n}}_{q}\) is the unit normal vector of any source point on the wet surface; \(\tilde{G}\left( {p,t;q,\tau } \right)\) is the memory term of the corresponding time domain Green function. Its expression [37] is
where \(J_{0}\) is the Bessel function of the first kind with order 0.
The calculation method of Green function is based on Clement [38]. The memory of Green function is transformed into a fourth-order ordinary differential equation, and then the Runge–Kutta method is adopted to calculate the differential equation.
According to the method of Fual [39], Eq. (47) is decomposed into instantaneous part and memory part. The expressions of them are
Equations (49) and (50) are, respectively, numerical discrete. Wet surface of the 3-d object is used by a series of quadrilateral grid to approximate. In each quadrilateral grid, the velocity potential is taken as a constant, and then the algebraic equation sets of instantaneous part and memory part are
where \(M\) is the number of quadrilateral elements; \(N\) is the current time steps;\(\left( {\psi_{k} } \right)_{j}\) is the instantaneous part of the j element; \(\left[ {\chi_{k} \left( {t_{N} } \right)} \right]_{j}\) is the memory part of the j element in the time of \(t_{N}\); \(A_{ij}\), \(B_{i}\), and \(B\left( {t_{N} } \right)_{i}\) are the coefficient matrixes, and the expressions are
where \(\Delta t\) is the time step;\(t_{N} = N\Delta t\); \(t_{n} = n\Delta t\).
By the calculation of algebraic equation sets, the integral equations of added mass and memory function are
where\(\overline{K}_{jk} \left( t \right)\) is the memory function;\(A_{jk} \left( \omega \right)\) is the added mass;\(B_{jk} \left( \omega \right)\) is the damping coefficient.
1.2 The damping matrix
The damping matrix assumption is related to the mass matrix and the restoring force matrix, which can be expressed as follows:
where\(\Phi\) is the shape matrix, \(\omega_{i}\) is the structure natural frequency, K is the damping matrix, \(m_{i}\) is the modal mass, \(m_{i} = \Phi^{T} \left[ M \right]\Phi\), and \(\zeta_{i}\) is the dimensionless damping ratio of each mode, generally 0.05.
The solution of \(\Phi\) and \(\omega_{i}\):
For the undamped vibration:
The characteristic determinant is
The characteristic vector \(\left[ {\Phi_{1} ,\Phi_{2} \ldots \Phi_{n} } \right]\) and characteristic value \(\left[ {\begin{array}{*{20}c} {\lambda_{1} } & {} & {} & {} \\ {} & {\lambda_{2} } & {} & {} \\ {} & {} & \ddots & {} \\ {} & {} & {} & {\lambda_{n} } \\ \end{array} } \right]\) are obtained:
The modal mass is
The K matrix can be obtained by solving the following matrix equation:
Wave Force
2.1 Froude–Krylov force
Froude–Krylov force is caused by the incident potential, and its expression is
where \(F_{jI}\) is the Froude–Krylov force in the \(j\left( {j = 1,2, \ldots 6} \right)\) mode of motions. \(n_{j}\) is the unit surface normal vector.
The expression [40] of the dynamic pressure acting on the floating structure by the incident waves is
where \(\hat{p}\left( {p,t} \right)\) is the impulse response function of pressure. The expression is
When the incident wave is a regular wave per unit wavelength, \(\zeta_{0} \left( t \right) = e^{i\omega t}\).
2.2 Diffraction force
The diffraction force is mainly caused by the diffraction potential, and its expression is
where the impulse response function \(\hat{K}\left( {p,t} \right)\) is
The calculation method of diffraction potential is the same as that of radiation potential. By solving the integral equation of the diffraction potential, the expression of diffraction force is
2.3 Drag force
For slender columns, the influence of the drag force on the platform can be calculated by the Morison equation, and the drag force per unit length of column is
where \(D\) is the diameter of column;\(C_{{\text{D}}}\) is the coefficient of drag force;\(w_{x}\) is horizontal component of the velocity of the fluid particle;\(\dot{x}\) is the velocity of floating structure.
The determination method of drag force coefficient [36] is
where Re is the Reynolds number that is \({\text{Re}} = UD/\nu\). \(U\) is the relative velocity of fluid. D is characteristic length. In this paper, \(D\) is the diameter of column. \(\nu\) is the coefficient of kinematic viscosity, which is 1.346e−6 m2/s when the temperature of seawater is 10 °C.
The velocity of fluid particle is calculated by Airy linear wave theory. The velocity of water particle (x direction) is
The velocity of water particle (y direction) is
The velocity of water particle (z direction) is
where \(W_{{\text{H}}}\) is the wave height;\(W_{{\text{T}}}\) is the wave period; k is the wave number;\(\omega\) is the wave frequency; and d is the depth of water.
According to method of the coordinate transformation, transforms the particle velocity in the wave coordinate system \(O^{\prime}X^{\prime}Y^{\prime}Z^{\prime}\) to the static coordinate system OXYZ:
\(\alpha\) is the angle between the coordinate system \(O^{\prime}X^{\prime}Y^{\prime}Z^{\prime}\) and the static coordinate system OXYZ.
The relative velocity between water particle and floating structure in the static coordinate system OXYZ is
where \(\vec{\omega } \times \vec{r} = \left| {\begin{array}{*{20}c} {\vec{i}} & {\vec{j}} & {\vec{k}} \\ {\dot{x}_{4} } & {\dot{x}_{5} } & {\dot{x}_{6} } \\ {x_{1} } & {x_{2} } & {x_{3} } \\ \end{array} } \right|\), and substitute it into Eq. 78. Then the relative velocity is
The wet surface of the platform is separated into a series of differential rings, and the centers of the circles are taken as the discrete points. Based on the Morison equation, the drag force calculating formula in the case of the i discrete element is
The calculation formula of the drag forces of the platform in waves is
where N is the number of discrete elements on the platform.
The calculation formula of the drag moments of the platform in waves is
When the relative velocities are calculated, the velocities of the platform are required. Therefore, the formulas of wave drag forces are linked with the differential motion equations of the floating structure and the time iteration of the differential equations is carried out. Then the drag forces of waves on the platform can be calculated.
2.4 Second-order wave forces
The wave force on the platform includes not only the first-order wave force calculated above, but also the second-order wave force. The second-order wave forces consist mainly of the mean drift force, the sum frequency wave force, and the differential frequency wave force [20].
There are two methods of calculating the mean drift force, including the near-field method and the far-field method, respectively. The near-field method is based on the direct solution of the waterline surface and object area components to obtain the average drift force for the six degrees of freedom of the platform. The far-field method is achieved mainly through the law of conservation of energy, while the far-field method can only result in the calculation of the platform's component in the horizontal plane. The near-field and far-field formulations of the mean drift force are given separately [26].
Near-field equation for mean drift force.
Far-field equation for mean drift force.
As the near-field formulation of the mean drift force can calculate the motion of the platform in six degrees of freedom, while the far-field formulation can only calculate the surge, sway and yaw motions, this paper focuses on the effect of the mean drift force calculated by the near-field method on the motion response of the TLP.
The expression for the second-order force [26] can be expressed as
The above equation is bounded using second-order bypassing-radiation theory, and the standard form of the second-order force calculation equation
where\(f_{{\text{d}}}\) is the normalized mean drift force; \(f_{ + }^{\left( 2 \right)}\) is the second-order transfer function (QTF) of the normalized sum frequency force; \(f_{ - }^{\left( 2 \right)}\) is the second-order transfer function (QTF) of the normalized difference frequency force; \(\omega_{1}\) and are the \(\omega_{2}\) wave frequencies of the two incident waves; \(A_{1}\) and \(A_{2}\) are the wave amplitudes of the two incident waves, respectively.
In this paper, the frequency domain solution of the second-order force is calculated based on the HydroD module, including the average drift force \(f_{{\text{d}}}\) and the second-order transfer function (QTF) of the sum frequency force and differential frequency force, respectively, and embedded in the coupled TLP model compiled in this paper to obtain the TLP motion responses under the influence of the second-order wave forces.
About this article
Cite this article
Wang, J., Wang, Y., Guo, R. et al. Dynamic responses of TLP considering coupled transverse and axial effect of tether under second-order wave and freak wave. J Mar Sci Technol 27, 1084–1103 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00773-021-00871-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00773-021-00871-5