Skip to main content
Log in

Proficiency testing to evaluate the effectiveness of laboratories analyzing active ingredient in formulation samples

  • General paper
  • Published:
Accreditation and Quality Assurance Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper describes the organization and evaluation of the proficiency tests (PTs) organized by the Italian National Institute of Health (ISS) during 2018 and 2019. The aim of the PTs was to determine the quantity of active ingredient in various formulations of plant protection products (PPPs). In 2018, the Italian National Institute of Health (ISS) had organized PTs for the determination of Cymoxanyl, Oxamyl, and Methomyl in three different plant protection product (PPP) formulations. This is the first PT in Italy that uses a commercially available plant protection product in a different formulation, such as a wettable powder (WP), granule (GR), and soluble liquid (SL). In 2019, the ISS organized proficiency testing for the determination of Amisulbron, Dimethomorph, Pirimiphos-methyl, and Propiconazole in four different formulations of PPPs. For this proficiency testing, the commercial PPPs was obtained from the market in the formulation, as wettable dispersible granules (WDG), wettable powder (WP), liquid (L), or emulsifiable concentrate (EC). In 2018, all laboratories obtained data with acceptable values of z-score within limits, except for three of them that returned z-score values higher than 3.5 for the active substances Cymoxanil and Methomyl. In 2019, all laboratories obtained data with acceptable values of z-score within limits, except for three laboratories that returned z-score values higher than 3.5 for the active substances. The performance of the laboratories expressed in terms of modified z-score was satisfactory by almost all participants for all substances.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Regulation (EC) (2009) No 1107/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council of the 21 October 2009 concerning the placing of plant protection products on the market and repealing Council Directive 79/117/EEC and 91/414/EEC. Official Journal of the European Union L309 24.11.2009

  2. Regulation (EU) (2017) 2017/625 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 March 2017 on official controls and other official activities performed to ensure the application of food and feed law, rules on animal health and welfare, plant health and plant protection products, amending Regulations (EC) No 999/2001, (EC) No 396/2005, (EC) No 1069/2009, (EC) No 1107/2009, (EU) No 1151/2012, (EU) No 652/2014, (EU) 2016/429 and (EU) 2016/2031 of the European Parliament and of the Council, Council Regulations (EC) No 1/2005 and (EC) No 1099/2009 and Council Directives 98/58/EC, 1999/74/EC, 2007/43/EC, 2008/119/EC and 2008/120/EC, and repealing Regulations (EC) No 854/2004 and (EC) No 882/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council, Council Directives 89/608/EEC, 89/662/EEC, 90/425/EEC, 91/496/EEC, 96/23/EC, 96/93/EC and 97/78/ EC and Council Decision 92/438/EEC (Official Controls Regulation)

  3. Regulation (EC) (2004) 882/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2004 on official controls on official controls performed to ensure the verification of compliance with feed and food law, animal health and animal welfare rules. Official Journal of the European Union L165 30.04.2004

  4. EN ISO/IEC 17025 (2018) General requirements for the competence of testing and calibration laboratories (ISO), Geneva, Switzerland

  5. Mann I, Brookman B (eds) (2011) Eurachem Guide: selection, use and interpretation of proficiency testing (PT) scheme by laboratories, 2nd edn. Berlin, Germany. Available from www.eurachem.org

  6. CIPAC Handbook Volume O Analysis of technical and formulated pesticides. Amisulbron CIPAC Method MT 789, 129–140. Editors MCC de Oliveira and J Garvey assisted by B Patrian member of the Publication Committee of CIPAC. Published by CIPAC LTD, 2017

  7. CIPAC Handbook Volume J Analysis of technical and formulated pesticides. Cymoxanyl CIPAC Method MT 419, 22–28. Editors W Dobrat and A Martijn assisted by M J Gillespie member of the Publication Committee of CIPAC. Published by CIPAC LTD, 2000

  8. CIPAC Handbook Volume G Analysis of technical and formulated pesticides. Dimethomorph CIPAC Method MT 483, 39–46. Editors W Dobrat and A Martijn. Published by CIPAC LTD, 1995

  9. CIPAC Handbook Volume H Analysis of technical and formulated pesticides. Methomyl CIPAC Method MT 264, 199–203. Editors W Dobrat and A Martijn assisted by A. R. C. Hill member of the Publication Committee of CIPAC. Published by CIPAC LTD, 1998

  10. CIPAC Handbook Volume M Analysis of technical and formulated pesticides. Oxamyl CIPAC Method MT 342, 129–140. Editors W Dobrat and A Martijn assisted by M. D. Muller and B Patrian member of the Publication Committee of CIPAC. Published by CIPAC LTD, 2009

  11. CIPAC Handbook Volume O Analysis of technical and formulated pesticides. Pirimiphos-methyl CIPAC Method MT 239, 113–133. Editors MCC de Oliveira and J Garvey assisted by B Patrian member of the Publication Committee of CIPAC. Published by CIPAC LTD, 2017

  12. CIPAC Handbook Volume G Analysis of technical and formulated pesticides. Propiconazole CIPAC Method MT 408, 129–136. Editors W Dobrat and A Martijn. Published by CIPAC LTD, 1995

  13. Feinberg M, Bugner E, Theiller G, Honba V, Kadjik F (1995) Expression of the reference value for proficiency tests. J Chemom 9:197–209

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Hund E, Massart DL, Verbeke JS (2000) Inter-laboratory studies in analytical chemistry. Anal Chem Acta 423:145–165

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. ISO 13528 (2015) Statistical methods for use in proficiency testing by interlaboratory comparison (ISO) Geneva, Switzerland

  16. Association of American Pesticide Control Officials (2016) Pesticide formulations check sample program West Lafayette USA

  17. Rivera CP, Rodríguez RD, Pimentel SH (2011) Horwitz equation as quality benchmark in ISO/IEC 17025 testing laboratory. In: Conference proceedings

  18. Thompson M, Ellison SLR, Wood R (2006) The International Harmonized Protocol for the proficiency testing of analytical chemistry laboratories (IUPAC Technical Report). Pure Appl Chem 78(1):145–96

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Horwitz W, Albert R (2006) The Horwitz ratio (HorRat): a useful index of method performance with respect to precision. J AOAC Int 89(4):1095–1109

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We acknowledge the financial support provided by the Italian Health Ministry to perform the work in the framework of the collaboration Italian National Institute of Health and Italian Health Ministry, during the years 2018 and 2019.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Angela Santilio.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Santilio, A., Pompili, C. & Cammarata, R. Proficiency testing to evaluate the effectiveness of laboratories analyzing active ingredient in formulation samples. Accred Qual Assur 26, 217–227 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00769-021-01478-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00769-021-01478-4

Keywords

Navigation