Skip to main content
Log in

Characterisation of folic acid by mass balance versus quantitative NMR

  • General Paper
  • Published:
Accreditation and Quality Assurance Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Two approaches were used to determine the mass fraction of a sample of folic acid, one indirect (mass balance) where the components other than folic acid were measured, and one direct, using quantitative nuclear magnetic resonance (qNMR). The procedures used for the mass balance were essentially those described in the European Pharmacopoeia monograph for folic acid. qNMR is a technique for quantifying the main component within an organic compound (Quantitative NMR (qNMR)—BIPM in https://www.bipm.org/en/bipm/chemistry/organic-analysis/qnmr/, Santosh and Raja in Trends Anal Chem 35:5–26, 2012), whereas mass balance quantifies its minor components. The results obtained with the two approaches are independent. In this study, their joint application generated information that was used in a more than complementary fashion. The mass balance characterisation, in particular the results obtained by liquid chromatography with ultraviolet detection (LC–UV), allowed to improve the accuracy of the qNMR result by subtracting the interfering contribution of a related structure impurity. On the other hand, qNMR enabled concluding that the non-uniform response of UV detection at a single wavelength was not critically biasing the LC–UV results. In the end, the mass fractions obtained by mass balance and qNMR were not that different. It is concluded that mass balance and qNMR may be not only complementary but also synergistic. It was also observed that access to monographs of the European Pharmacopoeia, when available, gives skilled analysts an important tool for improved substance characterisation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Quantitative NMR (qNMR)—BIPM. https://www.bipm.org/en/bipm/chemistry/organic-analysis/qnmr/. Last Consulted 20 Feb 2018

  2. Santosh KB, Raja R (2012) Quantitative 1H NMR spectroscopy. Trends Anal Chem 35:5–26

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. BIPM CCQM Working Group on Organic Analysis (OAWG). https://www.bipm.org/en/committees/cc/wg/oawg.html. Last Consulted 09 Feb 2018

  4. Ph. Eur. Reference Standard FOLIC ACID CRS batch 8, information leaflet. https://crs.edqm.eu/db/4DCGI/View=F0300000. Last Consulted 06 Dec 2017

  5. Ph. Int. Reference Standard FOLIC ACID ICRS batch 3, information leaflet. https://crs.edqm.eu/db/4DCGI/View=ICRS0316. Last Consulted 6 Dec 2017

  6. Council of Europe (2016) Folic acid. In: European Pharmacopoeia, 9th edn. Strasbourg, France, pp 2524–2526

  7. Council of Europe (2015) Folic acid dihydrate, Draft monograph. In: Pharmeuropa, vol 27, issue 4. Strasbourg, France, pp 91–96

  8. Council of Europe (2016) Semi-micro determination of water (chapter 2.5.12). In: European Pharmacopoeia, 9th edn. Strasbourg, France, p 165

  9. Council of Europe (2016) Thermal analysis (chapter 2.2.34). In: European Pharmacopoeia, 9th edn. Strasbourg, France, pp 57–59

  10. Council of Europe (2016) Water micro-determination (chapter 2.5.32). In: European Pharmacopoeia, 9th edn. Strasbourg, France, p 172

  11. Council of Europe (2016) Reagents (4.1.1). In: European Pharmacopoeia, 9th edn. Strasbourg, France, pp 441–559

  12. Council of Europe (2016) Identification and control of residual solvents (2.4.24). In: European Pharmacopoeia, 9th edn. Strasbourg, France, pp 146–150

  13. Council of Europe (2016) Sulfated ash (2.4.14). In: European Pharmacopoeia, 9th edn. Strasbourg, France, p 136

  14. Davies S, Jones K, Goldys A et al (2015) Purity assessment of organic calibration standards using a combination of quantitative NMR and mass balance. Anal Bioanal Chem 407:3115–3123

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Council of Europe (2016) Chromatographic separation techniques (chapter 2.2.46). In: European Pharmacopoeia, 9th edn. Strasbourg, France, pp 74–81

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors wish to thank Dr S. Westwood (BIPM) for giving the EDQM Laboratory the opportunity to participate in the pilot study. The authors are also thankful to Dr M. Weber and Ms S. Moneret (EDQM Laboratory) for the scientific advice provided.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Andrea Lodi.

Additional information

Disclaimer: The name and make of commercial equipment, instruments and materials used in this study are indicated at the request of the Editor. No particular commercial equipment, instruments, or materials cited in this paper are recommended or endorsed by the European Directorate for the Quality of Medicines and Healthcare (EDQM).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lodi, A., Nap, CJ., Metzger-Maurer, S. et al. Characterisation of folic acid by mass balance versus quantitative NMR. Accred Qual Assur 23, 211–218 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00769-018-1327-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00769-018-1327-7

Keywords

Navigation