Skip to main content
Log in

The relationship between nervus intermedius anatomy, ultrastructure, electrophysiology, and clinical function. Usefulness in cerebellopontine microsurgery

  • Clinical Article - Neurosurgical Anatomy
  • Published:
Acta Neurochirurgica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Although previous studies have described the clinical features of the nervus intermedius (NI), no attempt has yet been made to describe the relationship between the ultrastructural and electrophysiological characteristics of the nervus intermedius and its motor competence.

Objective

In this study, we analyzed the intraoperative electrophysiological response obtained during vestibular schwannoma surgery. The ultrastructure was studied using electron microscopy.

Materials and Methods

Thirty-six consecutive patients underwent microsurgery for vestibular schwannoma with cerebellopontine angle tumors. The patients were extensively monitored intraoperatively. Selective stimulation of the nervus intermedius was attempted in all cases. The patients were then examined postoperatively and followed for a minimum of 1 year. Forty-three isolated human brainstems were analyzed to collect the ultrastructural NI data.

Results

We found a correlation between the NI motor responses in the perinasal and perioral regions and the ultrastructure characteristics, with few (0.5 %) but large myelinated motor fibers (diameters >12 μm). Both characteristics are consistent with the clinical observation of transient weakness of the levator anguli oris muscle. These observations indicate a relationship between the intraoperative electrophysiological identification of the NI nervus intermedius and its clinical and ultrastructural characteristics.

Conclusions

Identifying the NI in the deformed anatomy of tumors could provide a fixed landmark during cerebellopontine surgery and help prevent damage of the facial nerve.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Alfieri A, Fleischhammer J, Peschke E, Strauss C (2012) The nervus intermedius as a variable landmark and critical structure in cerebellopontine angle surgery: an anatomical study and classification. Acta Neurochir 154(7):1263–1268

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Alfieri A, Fleischhammer J, Prell J (2011) The functions of the nervus intermedius. AJNR 32(7):E144

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Alfieri A, Strauss C, Prell J, Peschke E (2010) History of the nervus intermedius of Wrisberg. Ann Anat 192(3):139–144

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Ashram YA, Jackler RK, Pitts LH, Yingling CD (2005) Intraoperative electrophysiologic identification of the nervus intermedius. Otol Neurotol 26(2):274–279

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Irving RM, Viani L, Hardy DG, Baguley DM, Moffat DA (1995) Nervus intermedius function after vestibular schwannoma removal: clinical features and pathophysiological mechanisms. Laryngoscope 105(8 Pt 1):809–813

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Manzano GM, Giuliano LM, Nobrega JA (2008) A brief historical note on the classification of nerve fibers. Arq Neuropsiquiatr 66(1):117–119

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Myrseth E, Moller P, Pedersen PH, Lund-Johansen M (2009) Vestibular schwannoma: surgery or Gamma knife radiosurgery? A prospective, nonrandomized study. Neurosurgery 64(4):654–661

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Ozer FD, Duransoy YK, Camlar M (2009) Atypic geniculate neuralgia: atypic anatomic correlation of cranial nerve roots and AICA. Acta Neurochir 151(8):1003–1004

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Park SH, Lee KY, Hwang SK (2013) Nervus intermedius dysfunction following Gamma Knife surgery for vestibular schwannoma. J Neurosurg 118(3):566–570

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Prell J, Rampp S, Rachinger J, Scheller C, Naraghi R, Strauss C (2008) Spontaneous electromyographic activity during microvascular decompression in trigeminal neuralgia. J Clin Neurophysiol 25(4):225–232

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Prell J, Rachinger J, Scheller C, Alfieri A, Strauss C, Rampp S (2010) A real-time monitoring system for the facial nerve. Neurosurgery 66(6):1064–1073

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Prell J, Rampp S, Romstock J, Fahlbusch R, Strauss C (2007) Train time as a quantitative electromyographic parameter for facial nerve function in patients undergoing surgery for vestibular schwannoma. J Neurosurg 106(5):826–832

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Rampp S, Rachinger J, Scheller C, Alfieri A, Strauss C, Prell J (2012) How many electromyography channels do we need for facial nerve monitoring? J Clin Neurophysiol 29(3):226–229

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Rhoton AL Jr, Kobayashi S, Hollinshead WH (1968) Nervus intermedius. J Neurosurg 29(6):609–618

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Sachs E Jr (1968) The role of the nervus intermedius in facial neuralgia. Report of four cases with observations on the pathways for taste, lacrimation, and pain in the face. J Neurosurg 28(1):54–60

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Samii M, Gerganov VM, Samii A (2010) Functional outcome after complete surgical removal of giant vestibular schwannomas. J Neurosurg 112(4):860–867

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Scheller C, Rachinger J, Prell J, Kornhuber M, Strauss C (2008) Schwannoma of the intermediate nerve. J Neurosurg 109(1):144–148

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Stripf T, Braun K, Gouveris H, Stripf EA, Mann WJ, Amedee RG (2007) Influence of different approaches to the cerebellopontine angle on the function of the intermediate nerve. J Neurosurg 107(5):927–931

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Tubbs RS, Mosier KM, Cohen-Gadol AA (2012) Geniculate neuralgia: clinical, radiologic, and intraoperative correlates. World Neurosurg 79(5–6):763–767

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Drs. Alfieri and Rampp contributed equally to the study. We are grateful to Mr. Heine and Dr. Litvak for their remarkable contribution to this study. The patient authorized the publication of the images.

Conflicts of interest

None.

Funding

Wilhelm Roux Foundation, Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, Germany

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alex Alfieri.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Alfieri, A., Rampp, S., Strauss, C. et al. The relationship between nervus intermedius anatomy, ultrastructure, electrophysiology, and clinical function. Usefulness in cerebellopontine microsurgery. Acta Neurochir 156, 403–408 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-013-1952-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-013-1952-1

Keywords

Navigation