Correction to: Microchimica Acta

https://doi.org/10.1007/s00604-018-2968-2

The published version of this article, unfortunately, contained error. The authors are re-writing to express their sincere apology for a mistake that a mark “10-5, 10-4, 10-3, 10-2, 10-1 CFU•mL-1” in the legend of Fig. 2 was not corrected as “105, 104, 103, 102, 101 CFU•mL-1”. Given in this article is the corrected figure.

Fig 2
figure 1

The linear relationship between the peak intensity changes and the log concentrations of target E. coli O157:H7 (A), and Salmonella sp. (B) from 10 to 105 CFU·mL−1. The experiments were performed in a 0.1 mM pH 6.5 buffer with 6 μL MBs; the concentration of hCG − nanoflowers was 4 μL. The color intensity in the T-line was determined after a 3 min incubation with the pregnancy test strips. The error bars represent the standard deviation of three measurements