Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Numerical Simulation Study on Pressure-Relief Effect of Protective Layer Mining in Coal Seams Prone to Rockburst Hazard

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Protective layer mining is an important regional measure to reduce pressure and prevent rockburst. Based on the engineering background of frequent mining earthquakes in the 203 working face below the upper protective layer of the Kuangou Coal Mine, PFC was used to simulate the mining process of the protective layer and protected layer, and many factors affecting the pressure relief effect of protective layers were analyzed in detail. The results indicate that the arch force chain structure of the high overlying rock transfers most of the load to the outside of the goaf, and the low-caving broken rock strata hinder the transmission of the remaining load, resulting in a decrease in stress below the protective layer. The uneven collapse of the overlying rock causes the stress relief zone and stress recovery zone under the protective layer. The distance between coal seams and interlayer rock mechanical strength led to rockburst beneath the protective layer. Increasing the mining height and range of the protective layer enhances the pressure-relief effect, while increasing the coal seam spacing and rock strength reduces the pressure-relief effect of the protective layer. This study enriches the theory of protective layer mining. It provides a basis for the evaluation of pressure-relief effect and safe mining of working face under similar mining and geological conditions.

Highlights

  • The PFC simulation method of protective layer mining is proposed.

  • The pressure-relief mechanism and corresponding rockburst causes of protective layer mining are studied.

  • The influencing factors are studied and corresponding explanations are given in pressure-relief effect of protective layer mining.

  • The principle of roadway layout in protected layer mining is given.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19
Fig. 20
Fig. 21
Fig. 22

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

Some or all data, models, or codes generated or used during the study are available from the corresponding author by request.

References

  • Arasteh H, Esmaeili K, Saeedi G et al (2022) Discontinuous modeling of roof strata caving in a mechanized longwall mine in Tabas coal mine. Int J Geomech 22:4022040

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheng YP, Wang L, Liu HY et al (2015) Definition, theory, methods, and applications of the safe and efficient simultaneous extraction of coal and gas. Int J Coal Sci Technol 2(1):14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40789-015-0062-5

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cheng GW, Yang TH, Liu HY et al (2020a) Characteristics of stratum movement induced by downward longwall mining activities in middle-distance multi-seam. Int J Rock Mech Min 136:104517

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheng X, Zhao GM, Li YM et al (2020b) Key technologies and engineering practices for soft-rock protective seam mining. Int J Min Sci Technol 30:889–899

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cheng X, Zhao GM, Li YM et al (2021) Mining-induced pressure-relief mechanism of coal-rock mass for different protective layer mining modes. Adv Mater Sci Eng 2021:1–15

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Eremin M, Esterhuizen G, Smolin I (2020) Numerical simulation of roof cavings in several Kuzbass mines using finite-difference continuum damage mechanics approach. Int J Min Sci Techno 30:157–166

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fang F, Shu C, Wang HT (2020) Physical simulation of upper protective coal layer mining with different coal seam inclinations. Energy Sci Eng 8:3103–3116

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • He ZL, Lu CP, Zhang XF et al (2022) Numerical and field investigations of rockburst mechanisms triggered by thick-hard roof fracturing. Rock Mech Rock Eng 55:6863–6886

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Itasca Consulting Group (2015) PFC 5.0 manual. Minneapolis, MN, USA

  • Jia TR, Zhang ZM, Tang CA et al (2013) Numerical simulation of stress-relief effects of protective layer extraction. Arch Min Sci 58:521–540

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jiang FX, Liu Y, Liu J et al (2019) Pressure-releasing mechanism of local protective layer in coal seam with rock burst. Chin J Geotech Eng 41:368–375 ((in Chinese))

    Google Scholar 

  • Jin K, Cheng YP, Wang W et al (2016) Evaluation of the remote lower protective seam mining for coal mine gas control: A typical case study from the Zhuxianzhuang Coal Mine, Huaibei Coalfield, China. J Nat Gas Sci Eng 33:44–55

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ju Y, Wang YL, Su CS et al (2019) Numerical analysis of the dynamic evolution of mining-induced stresses and fractures in multilayered rock strata using continuum-based discrete element methods. Int J Rock Mech Min 113:191–210

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kruyt NP (2016) On weak and strong contact force networks in granular materials. Int J Solids Struct 92–93:135–140

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lama RD, Bodziony J (1998) Management of outburst in underground coal mines. Int J Coal Geol 35:83–115

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lei WL, Chai J, Zhang YZ et al (2022) Study on pressure relief effect of upper protective coal seam mining based on distributed optical fiber sensing monitoring. Opt Fiber Technol 68:102830

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lei WL (2021) Study on the effect and mechanism of rock burst prevention by pressure relief of underlying coal and rock in protective coal seam mining. Xi'an University of Science and technology (in Chinese)

  • Li ZQ, Liu GF, Yan CG et al (2023) Study on the construction method of particle flow model of rock with primary hidden micro-fissures and the calibration method of micro-parameters. J Eng Geol ISSN 1004-9665, CN 11–3249/P (in Chinese)

  • Liang S, Li X, Mao Y et al (2013) Time-domain characteristics of overlying strata failure under condition of longwall ascending mining. Int J Min Sci Technol 23:207–211

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu F, Lin B, Zhai C et al (2011a) Research of real-time effects of horizontal protecting stratum mining based on similar simulation experiment. Procedia Eng 26:431–440

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu YK, Zhou FB, Lang L et al (2011b) An experimental and numerical investigation on the deformation of overlying coal seams above double-seam extraction for controlling coal mine methane emissions. Int J Coal Geol 87:139–149

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Liu C, Xue JH, Yu GF et al (2016) Fractal characterization for the mining crack evolution process of overlying strata based on microseismic monitoring technology. Int J Min Sci Technol 26(2):295–299

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Potyondy DO, Cundall PA (2004) A bonded-particle model for rock. Int J Rock Mech Min 41(8):1329–1364

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Suchowerska AM, Merifield RS, Carter JP (2013) Vertical stress changes in multi-seam mining under supercritical longwall panels. Int J Rock Mech Min 61:306–320

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Suchowerska AM, Carter JP, Merifield RS (2014) Horizontal stress under supercritical longwall panels. Int J Rock Mech Min 70:240–251

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tang JZ, Yang SQ, Yang K et al (2023) Discrete element modeling of thermally damaged sandstone containing two pre-existing flaws at high confining pressure. Sustainability 15(7):6318

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang K, Du F (2020) Coal-gas compound dynamic disasters in China: a review. Process Saf Environ 133:1–17

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wang C, Tannant DD, Lilly PA (2003) Numerical analysis of the stability of heavily jointed rock slopes using PFC2D. Int J Rock Mech Min 40:415–424

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang HF, Cheng YP, Yuan L (2013) Gas outburst disasters and the mining technology of key protective seam in coal seam group in the Huainan coalfield. Nat Hazards 67:763–782

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang CL, Zhang CS, Zhao XD et al (2018) Dynamic structural evolution of overlying strata during shallow coal seam longwall mining. Int J Rock Mech Min 103:20–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrmms.2018.01.014

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang C, Zhang C, Li ZC et al (2023) Using discrete element numerical simulation to determine effect of persistent fracture morphology on permeability stress sensitivity. Int J Numer Anal Met 47:570–584

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wei JB, Wang SM, Song SJ et al (2022) Experiment and numerical simulation of overburden and surface damage law in shallow coal seam mining under the gully. Bull Eng Geol Environ 81(5):207

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu XQ, Dou LM, Lv CG et al (2011) Research on pressure-relief effort of mining upper-protective seam on protected seam. Procedia Eng 26:1089–1096

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xu XL, Wu SC, Gao YT et al (2016) Effects of micro-structure and micro-parameters on Brazilian tensile strength using flat-joint model. Rock Mech Rock Eng 49(9):3575–3595

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xu YX, Wang GF, Li MZ et al (2019) Numerical simulation of longwall top-coal caving with extra-thick and hard coal seam based on bonded particle model. J China Coal Soc 44(11):3317–3328 ((in Chinese))

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang W, Lin BQ, Qu YA et al (2011) Mechanism of strata deformation under protective seam and its application for relieved methane control. Int J Coal Geol 85:300–306

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yang MM, Wang M, Wang YW et al (2022) Coal pore structure changes in upper protective seam after mining: Pingdingshan Shenma Group, Henan Province, China. J Pet Sci Eng 218:111045

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yin W, Miao XX, Zhang JX et al (2017) Mechanical analysis of effective pressure relief protection range of upper protective seam mining. Int J Min Sci Technol 27:537–543

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yuan BQ, Zhang YJ, Cao JJ et al (2013) Study on pressure relief scope of underlying coal rock with upper protective layer mining. Adv Mater Res 734–737:661–665

    Google Scholar 

  • Yuan AY, Wang P, Li Y (2020) Movement laws of overlying strata and prevention measures of dynamic disasters under deep adjacent coal seam group with high gas. Geomat Nat Hazards Risk 11:2340–2360

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang NB, Liu CY, Yang PJ (2016a) Flow of top coal and roof rock and loss of top coal in fully mechanized top coal caving mining of extra thick coal seams. Arab J Geosci 9:1–9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang ZT, Zhang R, Xie HP et al (2016b) Mining-induced coal permeability change under different mining layouts. Rock Mech Rock Eng 49:3753–3768

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang L, Nguyen NGH, Lambert S et al (2017) The role of force chains in granular materials: from statics to dynamics. Eur J Environ Civ Eng 21:874–895

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the National Key Research and Development Plan (No. 2022YFC3004603), and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (52174162).

Funding

This study is funded by Key Technologies Research and Development Program (2022YFC3004603) and Innovative Research Group Project of the National Natural Science Foundation of China (52174162).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Civil and Resources Engineering, University of Science and Technology Beijing, Beijing, 100083, China

    Anliang Lu, Dazhao Song, Zhenlei Li, Xueqiu He, Yarong Xue & Huakang Yang

  2. Zhong-an Academy of Safety Engineering, Beijing, 100083, China

    Xueqiu He

  3. School of Mines, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou, 221116, China

    Linming Dou

Authors
  1. Anliang Lu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Dazhao Song
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Zhenlei Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Xueqiu He
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Linming Dou
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Yarong Xue
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Huakang Yang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dazhao Song.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lu, A., Song, D., Li, Z. et al. Numerical Simulation Study on Pressure-Relief Effect of Protective Layer Mining in Coal Seams Prone to Rockburst Hazard. Rock Mech Rock Eng (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00603-024-03826-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00603-024-03826-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation