Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

A Spatial Clustering Approach for Stochastic Fracture Network Modelling

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Fracture network modelling plays an important role in many application areas in which the behaviour of a rock mass is of interest. These areas include mining, civil, petroleum, water and environmental engineering and geothermal systems modelling. The aim is to model the fractured rock to assess fluid flow or the stability of rock blocks. One important step in fracture network modelling is to estimate the number of fractures and the properties of individual fractures such as their size and orientation. Due to the lack of data and the complexity of the problem, there are significant uncertainties associated with fracture network modelling in practice. Our primary interest is the modelling of fracture networks in geothermal systems and, in this paper, we propose a general stochastic approach to fracture network modelling for this application. We focus on using the seismic point cloud detected during the fracture stimulation of a hot dry rock reservoir to create an enhanced geothermal system; these seismic points are the conditioning data in the modelling process. The seismic points can be used to estimate the geographical extent of the reservoir, the amount of fracturing and the detailed geometries of fractures within the reservoir. The objective is to determine a fracture model from the conditioning data by minimizing the sum of the distances of the points from the fitted fracture model. Fractures are represented as line segments connecting two points in two-dimensional applications or as ellipses in three-dimensional (3D) cases. The novelty of our model is twofold: (1) it comprises a comprehensive fracture modification scheme based on simulated annealing and (2) it introduces new spatial approaches, a goodness-of-fit measure for the fitted fracture model, a measure for fracture similarity and a clustering technique for proposing a locally optimal solution for  fracture parameters. We use a simulated dataset to demonstrate the application of the proposed approach followed by a real 3D case study of the Habanero reservoir in the Cooper Basin, Australia.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Baisch S, Weidler R, Vörös R, Wyborn D, de Graaf L  (2006) Induced seismicity during the stimulation of a geothermal HFR reservoir in the Cooper Basin, Australia. Bull Seismol Soc Am 96(6):2242–2256

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Billaux D, Chiles JP, Hestir K, Long J (1989) Three-dimensional statistical modelling of a fractured rock mass—an example from the Fanay-Augères mine. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci Geomech Abstr 26(3/4):281–299

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chilès JP, Delfiner P (1999) Geostatistics: modeling spatial uncertainty. Wiley, New York, p 695

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Dershowitz WS, Einstein HH (1988) Characterizing rock joint geometry with joint system models. Rock Mech Rock Eng 21:21–51

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dowd PA, Xu C, Mardia KV, Fowell RJ (2007) A comparison of methods for the simulation of rock fractures. Math Geol 39:697–714

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eisner L, Williams-Stroud S, Hill A, Duncan P, Thornton M (2010) Beyond the dots in the box: microseismicity-constrained fracture models for reservoir simulation. Lead Edge 29(3):326–333. doi:10.1190/1.3353730

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gringarten E (1997) 3D geometric description of fractured reservoirs. In: Baafi EY, Schofield NA (eds) Geostatistics Wollongong’96, vol 1. Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht, pp 424–432

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirkpatrick S, Gelatt CD, Vecchi MP (1983) Optimization by simulated annealing. Science 220:671–680

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kulatilake PHSW, Wathugala DN, Stephansson O (1993) Joint network modelling with a validation exercise in Stripa Mine, Sweden. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 30:503–526

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lantuéjoul C (2002) Geostatistical simulation, models and algorithms. Springer, Berlin

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lee JS, Veneziano D, Einstein HH (1990) Hierarchical fracture trace model. In: Hustrulid W, Johnson GA (eds) Rock contributions and challenges, proceeding. 31st US Rock Mechanics Symposium, Balkema, Rotterdam, pp 261–268

  • Mardia KV, Nyirongo VB, Walder AN, Xu C, Dowd PA, Fowell RJ, Kent JT (2007a) Markov chain Monte Carlo implementation of rock fracture modelling. Math Geol 39:355–381

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mardia KV, Walder AN, Xu C, Dowd PA, Fowell RJ, Nyirongo VB, Kent JT (2007b) A line finding assignment problem and rock fracture modelling. In: Upadhaya SK, Singh U, Dey DK (eds) Bayesian statistics and its applications. Anamaya Pubs, New Delhi, pp 319–330

    Google Scholar 

  • Metropolis N, Rosenbluth AW, Rosenbluth MN, Teller AH, Teller E (1953) Equation of state calculations by fast computing machines. J Chem Phys 21(6):1087

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer T, Einstein HH (2002) Geologic stochastic modeling and connectivity assessment of fracture systems in the Boston area. Rock Mech Rock Eng 35(1):23–44

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oda M, Hatsuyama Y, Ohnishi Y (1987) Numerical experiments on permeability tensor and its application to jointed granite at Stripa mine, Sweden. J Geophys Res 92:8037–8048

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rawnsley K, Wei L (2001) Evaluation of a new method to build geological models of fractured reservoirs calibrated to production data. Pet Geosci 7:23–33

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sausse J, Dezayes C, Dorbath L, Genter A, Place J (2010) 3D model of fracture zones at Soultz-sous-Forêts based on geological data, image logs, induced microseismicity and vertical seismic profiles. Comptes Rendus Geosci 342:531–545

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stoyan D, Kendall W, Mecke J (1995) Stochastic geometry and its applications, 2nd edn. Wiley, Chichester

    Google Scholar 

  • Wen R, Sinding-Larsen R (1997) Stochastic modelling and simulation of small faults by marked point processes and kriging. In: Baafi EY, Schofield NA (eds) Geostatistics Wollongong’96, vol 1. Kluwer Acad, Dordrecht, p 643

    Google Scholar 

  • Xu C, Dowd PA, Mardia KV, Fowell RJ, Taylor CC (2007) Simulating correlated marked point processes. J Appl Statistics 34:1125–1134

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xu C, Dowd PA, Wyborn D (2013) Optimization of a stochastic rock fracture model using Markov chain Monte Carlo simulation, Mining Technology (in press). doi:10.1179/1743286312Y.0000000023

Download references

Acknowledgments

The work reported in this paper was funded by Australian Research Council (ARC Discovery Project) Research Grant Number: DP110104766.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Civil, Environmental and Mining Engineering, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, 5005, Australia

    S. Seifollahi, P. A. Dowd, C. Xu & A. Y. Fadakar

Authors
  1. S. Seifollahi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. P. A. Dowd
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. C. Xu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. A. Y. Fadakar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to P. A. Dowd.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Seifollahi, S., Dowd, P.A., Xu, C. et al. A Spatial Clustering Approach for Stochastic Fracture Network Modelling. Rock Mech Rock Eng 47, 1225–1235 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00603-013-0456-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00603-013-0456-x

Keywords

Search

Navigation