Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Risk factors for postoperative anastomotic leakage after repair of esophageal atresia: a retrospective nationwide database study

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Surgery Today Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Postoperative anastomotic leakage is the most frequent short-term complication of esophageal atresia repair in neonates. We conducted this study using a nationwide surgical database in Japan to identify the risk factors for anastomotic leakage in neonates undergoing esophageal atresia repair.

Methods

Neonates diagnosed with esophageal atresia between 2015 and 2019 were identified in the National Clinical Database. Postoperative anastomotic leakage was compared among patients to identify the potential risk factors, using univariate analysis. Multivariable logistic regression analysis included sex, gestational age, thoracoscopic repair, staged repair, and procedure time as independent variables.

Results

We identified 667 patients, with an overall leakage incidence of 7.8% (n = 52). Anastomotic leakage was more likely in patients who underwent staged repairs than in those who did not (21.2% vs. 5.2%, respectively) and in patients with a procedure time > 3.5 h than in those with a procedure time < 3.5 h (12.6% vs. 3.0%, respectively; p < 0.001). Multivariable logistic regression analysis identified staged repair (odds ratio [OR] 4.89, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.22–10.16, p < 0.001) and a longer procedure time (OR 4.65, 95% CI 2.38–9.95, p < 0.001) as risk factors associated with postoperative leakage.

Conclusion

Staged procedures and long operative times are associated with postoperative anastomotic leakage, suggesting that leakage is more likely after complex esophageal atresia repair and that such patients require refined treatment strategies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The data that support the findings of this study are not openly available due to reasons of sensitivity and are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

References

  1. Spitz L, Kiely EM, Morecroft JA, Drake DP. Oesophageal atresia: at-risk groups for the 1990s. J Pediatr Surg. 1994;29:723–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Choudhury SR, Ashcraft KW, Sharp RJ, Murphy JP, Snyder CL, Sigalet DL. Survival of patients with esophageal atresia: influence of birth weight, cardiac anomaly, and late respiratory complications. J Pediatr Surg. 1999;34:70–3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Spitz L. Esophageal atresia: past, present, and future. J Pediatr Surg. 1996;31:19–25.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Lobe TE, Rothenberg S, Waldschmidt J. Thoracoscopic reapair of esophageal atresia in an infant: a surgical first. Ped Endosurg Innov Techniques. 1999;3:141–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Way C, Wayne C, Grandpierre V, Harrison BJ, Travis N, Nasr A. Thoracoscopy vs. thoracotomy for the repair of esophageal atresia and tracheoesophageal fistula: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Pediatr Surg Int. 2019;35:1167–84.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Wu Y, Kuang H, Lv T, Wu C. Comparison of clinical outcomes between open and thoracoscopic repair for esophageal atresia with tracheoesophageal fistula: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Pediatr Surg Int. 2017;33:1147–57.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Gotoh M, Miyata H, Hashimoto H, Wakabayashi G, Konno H, Miyakawa S, et al. National Clinical Database feedback implementation for quality improvement of cancer treatment in Japan: from good to great through transparency. Surg Today. 2016;46:38–47.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Lal DR, Gadepalli SK, Downard CD, Ostlie DJ, Minneci PC, Swedler RM, et al. Challenging surgical dogma in the management of proximal esophageal atresia with distal tracheoesophageal fistula: outcomes from the midwest pediatric surgery consortium. J Pediatr Surg. 2018;53:1267–72.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Holcomb GW 3rd, Rothenberg SS, Bax KM, Martinez-Ferro M, Albanese CT, Ostlie DJ, et al. Thoracoscopic repair of esophageal atresia and tracheoesophageal fistula: a multi-institutional analysis. Ann Surg. 2005;242:422–8.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Koivusalo A, Mutanen A, Suominen J, Pakarinen M. Anastomotic stricture in end-to-end anastomosis-risk factors in a series of 261 patients with esophageal atresia. Eur J Pediatr Surg. 2022;32:56–60.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Ishimaru T, Fujiogi M, Michihata N, Matsui H, Fushimi K, Kawashima H, et al. Impact of congenital heart disease on outcomes after primary repair of esophageal atresia: a retrospective observational study using a nationwide database in Japan. Pediatr Surg Int. 2019;35:1077–83.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Huang JX, Hong SM, Chen Q, Wang ZC, Wu DM, Hong JJ, et al. Risk factors for anastomotic complications after one-stage anastomosis for oesophageal atresia. J Cardiothorac Surg. 2021;16:176.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Tanaka Y, Tainaka T, Sumida W, Shirota C, Murase N, Oshima K, et al. Comparison of outcomes of thoracoscopic primary repair of gross type C esophageal atresia performed by qualified and non-qualified surgeons. Pediatr Surg Int. 2017;33:1081–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Oztan MO, Soyer T, Oztorun CI, Firinci B, Durakbasa CU, Dokumcu Z, et al. Outcome of very low and low birth weight infants with esophageal atresia: results of the turkish esophageal atresia registRY. Eur J Pediatr Surg. 2021;31:226–35.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Lawrence AE, Minneci PC, Deans KJ, Kelley-Quon LI, Cooper JN. Relationships between hospital and surgeon operative volumes and outcomes of esophageal atresia/tracheoesophageal fistula repair. J Pediatr Surg. 2019;54:44–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Hasegawa H, Takahashi A, Kanaji S, Kakeji Y, Marubashi S, Konno H, et al. Validation of data quality in a nationwide gastroenterological surgical database: the National Clinical Database site-visit and remote audits, 2016–2018. Ann Gastroenterol Surg. 2021;5:296–303.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by a Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (C) from the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science, and Technology, Japan (No. 21K08609).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors contributed to the conception and design of the study. Tetsuya Ishimaru, Shinjo Daisuke, Michimasa Fujiogi, and Nobuaki Michihata prepared the material, collected the data, and conducted the analysis. Tetsuya Ishimaru wrote the first draft of the manuscript and all authors commented on the previous versions of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tetsuya Ishimaru.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

We have no conflict of interest to declare that are relevant to the content of this article.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ishimaru, T., Shinjo, D., Fujiogi, M. et al. Risk factors for postoperative anastomotic leakage after repair of esophageal atresia: a retrospective nationwide database study. Surg Today 53, 1269–1274 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00595-023-02682-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00595-023-02682-0

Keywords

Navigation