Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Prognostic predictions based on pathological findings of peritoneal dissemination in patients with stage IV colorectal cancer without residual disease (R0 status)

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Surgery Today Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

This study aimed to clarify the prognosis of patients after resection of stage IV colorectal cancer and synchronous peritoneal metastasis (no residual disease: R0 status) based on histopathologic findings.

Methods

The subjects of this study were 26 patients who underwent radical resection of synchronous peritoneal metastases of stage IV colorectal cancer. Only patients with one synchronous peritoneal metastasis were included in this study. The peritoneal lesions were initially classified into two categories based on the presence or absence of adenocarcinoma on their surface: RM-negative or RM-positive. The lesions were subsequently classified as being of massive or diffuse type and of small (< 6 mm) or large (≥ 6 mm) type according to the maximum metastatic tumor dimension.

Results

Multivariate analysis revealed that massive type metastatic tumors were associated with a better disease-free survival (DFS; p = 0.047) and overall survival (OS; p = 0.033), than diffuse type tumors.

Conclusion

A detailed stratification of pathological findings could contribute remarkably to prognostic predictions for patients with synchronous peritoneal metastases.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Watanabe T, Muro K, Ajioka Y, Hashiguchi Y, Ito Y, Saito Y, et al. Japanese Society for Cancer of the Colon and Rectum (JSCCR) guidelines 2016 for the treatment of colorectal cancer. Int J Clin Oncol. 2018;23:1–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Aloysius MM, Zaitoun AM, Beckingham IJ, Neal KR, Aithal GP, Bessell EM, et al. The pathological response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy with FOLFOX-4 for colorectal liver metastases: a comparative study. Virchows Arch. 2007;451:943–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Sato H, Kotake K, Sugihara K, Takahashi H, Maeda K, Uyama I, et al. Clinicopathological factors associated with recurrence and prognosis after R0 resection for stage IV colorectal cancer with peritoneal metastasis. Dig Surg. 2016;33:382–91.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Sato H, Maeda K, Kotake K, Sugihara K, Takahashi H. Factors affecting recurrence and prognosis after R0 resection for colorectal cancer with peritoneal metastasis. J Gastroenterol. 2016;51:465–72.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Kobayashi H, Kotake K, Funahashi K, Hase K, Hirata K, Iiai T, et al. Clinical benefit of surgery for stage IV colorectal cancer with synchronous peritoneal metastasis. J Gastroenterol. 2014;49:646–54.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Kobayashi H, Kotake K, Sugihara K, Study Group for Peritoneal Metastasis from Colorectal Cancer by the Japanese Society for Cancer of the C, Rectum. Enhancing the objectivity of the Japanese classification of peritoneal metastases from colorectal cancer. Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2014;44:898–902.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Bosman FT, Carneiro F, Hruban RH, Theise ND. WHO classification of tumours of the digestive system. 4th Edn. WHO series on histological and genetic typing of human tumours, vol 3. IARC WHO Classification of Tumours, no 3.

  8. Japanese Research Society for Cancer of the Colon and Rectum. General rules for clinical and pathological studies on cancer of the colon, rectum and anus, 9th edn. Tokyo; 2019.

  9. Hamady ZZ, Cameron IC, Wyatt J, Prasad RK, Toogood GJ, Lodge JP. Resection margin in patients undergoing hepatectomy for colorectal liver metastasis: a critical appraisal of the 1 cm rule. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2006;32:557–63.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Cady B, McDermott WV. Major hepatic resection for metachronous metastases from colon cancer. Ann Surg. 1985;201:204–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Kuo IM, Huang SF, Chiang JM, Yeh CY, Chan KM, Chen JS, et al. Clinical features and prognosis in hepatectomy for colorectal cancer with centrally located liver metastasis. World J Surg Oncol. 2015;13:92.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Ozawa H, Kotake K, Kobayashi H, Kobayashi H, Sugihara K. Prognostic factors for peritoneal carcinomatosis originating from colorectal cancer: an analysis of 921 patients from a multi-institutional database. Surg Today. 2014;44:1643–50.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Kanemitsu Y, Kato T, Shimizu Y, Inaba Y, Shimada Y, Nakamura K, et al. A randomized phase II/III trial comparing hepatectomy followed by mFOLFOX6 with hepatectomy alone as treatment for liver metastasis from colorectal cancer: Japan Clinical Oncology Group Study JCOG0603. Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2009;39:406–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Koji Komori.

Ethics declarations

Ethical standards

This research project was approved by the Ethics Committee of our institution (2018-1-137) and conformed to the provisions of the Declaration of Helsinki.

Conflict of interest

We have no conflicts of interest to declare in relation to this study.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Komori, K., Kinoshita, T., Oshiro, T. et al. Prognostic predictions based on pathological findings of peritoneal dissemination in patients with stage IV colorectal cancer without residual disease (R0 status). Surg Today 49, 755–761 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00595-019-01800-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00595-019-01800-1

Keywords

Navigation