Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Use of residual neural network for the detection of ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament on plain cervical radiography

  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Spine Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL) causes serious problems, such as myelopathy and acute spinal cord injury. The early and accurate diagnosis of OPLL would hence prevent the miserable prognoses. Plain lateral radiography is an essential method for the evaluation of OPLL. Therefore, minimizing the diagnostic errors of OPLL on radiography is crucial. Image identification based on a residual neural network (RNN) has been recognized to be potentially effective as a diagnostic strategy for orthopedic diseases; however, the accuracy of detecting OPLL using RNN has remained unclear. An RNN was trained with plain lateral cervical radiography images of 2,318 images from 672 patients (535 images from 304 patients with OPLL and 1,773 images from 368 patients of Negative). The accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, false positive rate, and false negative rate of diagnosis of the RNN were calculated. The mean accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, false positive rate, and false negative rate of the model were 98.9%, 97.0%, 99.4%, 2.2%, and 1.0%, respectively. The model achieved an overall area under the curve of 0.99 (95% confidence interval, 0.97–1.00) in which AUC in each fold estimated was 0.99, 0.99, 0.98, 0.98, and 0.99, respectively. An algorithm trained by an RNN could make binary classification of OPLL on cervical lateral X-ray images. RNN may hence be useful as a screening tool to assist physicians in identifying patients with OPLL in future setting. To achieve accurate identification of OPLL patients clinically, RNN has to be trained with other cause of myelopathy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Shin J, Choi J, Kim Y, Chang J, Yoon S (2019) Quantification of Risk Factors for Cervical Ossification of the Posterior Longitudinal Ligament in Korean Populations. Spine (Phila Pa) 44(16):E957–E964

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Iwaski M, Yonenobu K. (2011) Ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament. In: Herkowitz H, Garfin S, Eismont F, et al. Rothman-Simeone The Spine. 6th ed. 896–912.

  3. Resnick D, Guerra J Jr, Robinson CA et al (1978) Association of diffuse idiopathic skeletal hyperotosis (DISH) and calcification and ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament. AJR Am J Roentgenol 131:1049–1053

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Matsunaga S, Nakamura K, Seichi A et al (2008) Radiographic predictors for the development of myelopathy in patients with ossification of the posteriro longitudinal ligament: a multicenter cohort study. Spine (Phila Pa) 33:2648–2650

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Koyanagi I, Imamura H, Fujimoto S et al (2004) Spinal canal size in ossification of the longitudinal ligament of the cervical spine. Surg Neurol 62:286–291

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Matsunaga S, sakou T, Taketomi E, et al. (2004) Clinical cource of patients with ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament: a minimum 10-year cohort study. J Neurosurg 100(3 suppl Spine):245–8.

  7. Endo S, Shimamura T, Nakae H et al (1994) Cervical spinal cord injury associated with ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 113:213–221

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Koyanagi I, Iwasaki Y, Hida K et al (2003) Acute cervical cord injury associated with ossification of the posteriro longitudinal ligament. Neurosurg 53:887–891

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Kwon SY, Shin JJ, Lee JH, Cho WH (2015) Prognostic factors for surgical outcome in spinlal cord injury associated with ossification of the postrior longitudinal ligament (OPLL). J Orthop Surg Res 10:94

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Katoh S, el Masry WS, Jaffery D et al (1996) Neurologic outcome in consevatively treated patients with incomplete closed traumatic cervical spinal cord injuries. Spine (Phila Pa) 21:2345–2351

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Chen LF, Tu TH, Chen YC et al (2016) Risk of spinal cord injury in patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy and ossification of posterior longitudinal ligament: a national cohort study. Neurosurg Focus 40:E4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Koyanagi I, Iwasaki Y, Hida K et al (2000) Acute cervical cord injury without fracture or dislocation of the spinal column. J Nuerosurg 93:15–20

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Wu JC, Chen YC, Liu L et al (2012) Conservatively treated ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament increases the risk of spinal cor injury: a nation-wide cohort study. J Neurotrauma 29:462–468

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Onishi E, Sakamoto A, Murata S, Matushita M (2012) Risk factors for acute cervical spinal cord injury associated with ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament. Spine (Phila Pa) 37:660–666

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Chikuda H, Seichi A, Takeshita K et al (2011) Acute cervical spinal cord injury complicated by preexisting ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament: a multicenter study. Spine (Phila Pa) 36:1453–1458

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Gu Y, Chen L, Dong RB et al (2014) Laminoplasty versus conservative treatment for acute cervical spinal cord injury caused by ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament after minor trauma. Spine J 14:344–352

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Matsunaga S, Sakou T, Hayashi K et al (2002) Trauma-induced myelopathy in patients with ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament. J Neurosurg 97:172–175

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Kang MS, Lee JW, Zhang HY et al (2012) Diagnosis of Cervical OPLL in Lateral Radiograph and MRI: Is It Reliable? Korean J Spine 9(3):205–208

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Romero LG, Cable W, Lesniak A, Tseytlin E, McHugh J, Parwani A, et al. (20139) Digital pathology consultations-a new era in digital imaging, challenges and practical applications. J Digit Imaging 26(4):668–77.

  20. Peng L, Lin L, Hu H et al (2019) Classification and Quantification of Emphysema Using a Multi-Scale Residual Network. IEEE J Biomed Health Inform 23(6):2526–2536

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Maki S, Furuya T, Horikoshi T, et al. (2020) A Deep Convolutional Neural Network With Performance Comparable to Radiologists for Differentiating Between Spinal Schwannoma and Meningioma. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 45(10):694–700.

  22. Murata K, Endo K, Aihara T, et al. (2020) Artificial intelligence for the detection of vertebral fractures on plain spinal radiography. Sci Rep [ePub ahead of print].

  23. Ioffe S, Szegedy C. (2015) Batch normalization: Accelerating deep network training by reducing internal covariate shift", ICML 37.

  24. Kang MS, Lee JW, Zhang HY et al (2012) Diagnosis of cervical OPLL in lateral radiograph and MRI: is it reliable? Korean J Spine 9:205–208

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. He K, ZhangX, Ren S, et al. (2016) Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognition. IEEE 770–8.

  26. Banzato T, Cherubini GB, Atzori M, Zotti A (2018) Development of a deep convolutional neural network to predict grading of canine meningiomas from magnetic resonance images. Vet J 235:90–92

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Banzato T, Bernardini M, Cherubini G, Zotti A (2018) A Methodological Approach for Deep Learning to Distinguish Between Meningiomas and Gliomas on Canine MR-images. BMC Vet Res 14(1):317

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Chiba K, Kato Y, Tsuzuki N et al (2005) Computer-assisted measurement of the size of ossification in patients with ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament in the cervical spine. J Orthop Sci 10(5):451–456

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Doi T, Sakamoto R, Horii C, et al. (2020) Risk factors for progression of ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament in asymptomatic subjects. J Neurosurg Spine 8:1–7.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kazuma Murata.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest in any form received from a commercial party associated directly or indirectly with this study.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Murata, K., Endo, K., Aihara, T. et al. Use of residual neural network for the detection of ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament on plain cervical radiography. Eur Spine J 30, 2185–2190 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-021-06914-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-021-06914-0

Keywords

Navigation