Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Vertebral bone marrow edema in magnetic resonance imaging correlates with bone healing histomorphometry in (sub)acute osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture

  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Spine Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

BME on MRI has become the gold standard for the diagnosis of acute/subacute OVCF, but the correlation between the quantitative model of BME and histopathological manifestations of OVCF is rarely discussed in the literature.

Objectives

This study aimed to retrospectively investigate the relationship between bone marrow edema (BME) in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and bone healing histomorphometry in (sub)acute osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture.

Methods

According to the period since fracture, 125 patients were divided into four stages: stage I (0 to 15 days), stage II (16 to 30 days), stage III (31 to 60 days) and stage IV (61 to 90 days). Bone marrow edema was evaluated by the signal changes and intensity patterns on MRI sagittal images. Decalcified biopsy specimens were obtained from the cancellous bone core in the fractured vertebral body. The histomorphometry study results were analyzed by light microscopy using grid analysis and defined using bone histomorphometry criteria.

Results

There were 70 (56%) patients in stage I, 29 (23.2%) in stage II, 12 (9.6%) in stage III and 14 (11.2%) in stage IV. BME and histomorphometry characteristics differentiated from each other stage: The BME percentage had a significantly negative correlation with the ratio of osteoid volume/bone volume (r =  − 0.539, p = 0.001) and the ratio of woven bone volume/tissue volume (r =  − 0.584, p = 0.001). There was also a positive correlation between the BME percentage and the ratio of fibrous tissue volume/tissue volume (r = 0.488, p = 0.001).

Conclusions

Bone marrow edema significantly correlates with bone morphology parameters after vertebral fracture. The characteristics of histomorphological changes during fracture healing process can be preliminarily determined by observing the edema signal.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Wilson AJ (1988) Transient osteoporosis. transient bone marrow edema? Radiology 167:757–760. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiology.167.3.3363136 (PMID: 3363136)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Jung HS, Jee WH, McCauley TR, Ha KY, Choi KH (2003) Discrimination of metastatic from acute osteoporotic compression spinal fractures with MR imaging. Radiographics 23(1):179–187. https://doi.org/10.1148/rg.231025043 (PMID: 12533652)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Piazzolla A, Solarino G, Lamartina C, Giorgi SD, Bizzoca D, Berjano P (2015) Vertebral bone marrow edema (VBME) in conservatively treated acute vertebral compression fractures (VCFs): evolution and clinical correlations. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 40:E842–E848. https://doi.org/10.1097/brs.0000000000000973 (PMID:25946722)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Aspenberg P, Sandberg O (2013) Distal radial fractures heal by direct woven bone formation. Acta Orthop 84(3):297–300. https://doi.org/10.3109/17453674.2013.792769 (PMID: 23570338)

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Diamond TH, Clark WA, Kumar SV (2007) Histomorphometric analysis of fracture healing cascade in acute osteoporotic vertebral body fractures. Bone 40:775–780. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bone.2006.10.009 (PMID: 17141596)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Kazawa N (2012) T2WI MRI and MRI-MDCT correlations of the osteoporotic vertebral compressive fractures. Eur J Radiol 81:1630–1636. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2011.04.052 (PMID: 21636232)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Voormolen MHJ, Rooij WJV, Graaf YVD, Lohle PNM, Sluzewski M (2006) Bone marrow edema in osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures after percutaneous vertebroplasty and relation with clinical outcome. Ajnr Am J Neuroradiol 27:983–988. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.11.053 (PMID: 16687528)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Gerstenfeld LC, Wronski TJ, Hollinger JO, Einhorn TA (2005) Application of histomorphometric methods to the study of bone repair. J Bone Miner Res 20:1715–1722. https://doi.org/10.1359/JBMR.050702 (PMID: 16160729)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Einhorn TA (1998) The cell and molecular biology of fracture healing. Clin Orthop Relat R 355S(355):S7-21. https://doi.org/10.1097/00003086-199810001-00003 (PMID: 9917622)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Lee JM, Lee YS, Kim YB, Park SW, Kang DH, Lee SH (2017) What effects does necrotic area of contrast-enhanced MRI in osteoporotic vertebral fracture have on further compression and clinical outcome? J Korean Neurosurgs 60:181–188. https://doi.org/10.3340/jkns.2016.0707.015 (PMID: 28264238)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Taljanovic MS, Graham AR, Benjamin JB, Gmitro AF, Krupinski EA, Schwartz SA, Hunter TB, Resnick DL (2008) Bone marrow edema pattern in advanced hip osteoarthritis: quantitative assessment with magnetic resonance imaging and correlation with clinical examination, radiographic findings, and histopathology. Skeletal Radiol 37(5):423–431. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00256-008-0446-3 (PMID: 18274742)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Phillips FM, Ho E, Campbell-Hupp M, McNally T, Todd Wetzel F, Gupta P (2003) Early radiographic and clinical results of balloon kyphoplasty for the treatment of osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 28:2260–2265. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.brs.0000085092.84097.7b (PMID:14520041)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Takahashi S, Hoshino M, Takayama K, Iseki K, Sasaoka R, Tsujio T, Yasuda H, Sasaki T, Kanematsu F, Kono H, Toyoda H, Nakamura H (2017) Time course of osteoporotic vertebral fractures by magnetic resonance imaging using a simple classification: a multicenter prospective cohort study. Osteoporos Int 28(2):473–482. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-016-3737-x (PMID: 27577726)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Takahara K, Kamimura M, Nakagawa H, Hashidate H, Uchiyama S (2007) Radiographic evaluation of vertebral fractures in osteoporotic patients. J Clin Neurosci 14(2):122–126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jocn.2005.11.050 (PMID: 17161286)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Mukherjee S, Thakur B, Bhagawati D, Bhagawati D, Akmal S, Arzoglou V (2014) Utility of routine biopsy at vertebroplasty in the management of vertebral compression fractures: a tertiary center experience. J Neurosurg Spine 21(5):687–697. https://doi.org/10.3171/2014.7.spine121015 (PMID: 25127432)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Vernon-Roberts B, Pirie CJ (1973) Healing trabecular microfractures in the bodies of lumbar vertebrae. Ann Rheum Dis 32:406–412. https://doi.org/10.1136/ard.32.5.406 (PMID: 4270883)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Bogoch E, Gschwend N, Rahn B, Moran E, Perren S (1993) Healing of cancellous bone osteotomy in rabbits–part II: local reversal of arthritis-induced osteopenia after osteotomy. J Orthop Res 11(2):292–298. https://doi.org/10.1002/jor.1100110217 (PMID: 8483042)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Braun W, Ruter A (1996) Fracture healing. morphologic and physiologic aspects. Unfallchirurg 99:59–67 (PMID: 8850081)

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Remedios A (1999) Bone and bone healing. Vet Clin N Am-Small 29:1029–1044. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0195-5616(99)50101-0 (PMID: 10503283)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Greenbaum MA, Kanat IO (1993) Current concepts in bone healing. J Am Podiat Med Assn 83:123–129 (PMID: 11344980)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Yang H, Liang C, Zheng Z, Yin G, Zou J (2017) Therapeutic effects analysis of percutaneous kyphoplasty for osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures: a multicentre study. J Orthop Transl 11:73–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jot.2017.04.003 (PMID: 29662771)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Venmans A, Klazen CA, Lohle PN, Mali WP, van Rooij WJ (2012) Natural history of pain in patients with conservatively treated osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures: results from VERTOS II. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 33:519–521. https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.a2817 (PMID: 22116114)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Jing Z, Sun Q, Dong J, Meng F, Nan F (2017) Is it beneficial to reuse the balloon in percutaneous kyphoplasty for the treatment of non-neoplastic vertebral compression fractures? Med Sci Monit 23:5907–5915. https://doi.org/10.12659/MSM.905161 (PMID: 29236682)

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank Xiaoyang Liu for his help in professional linguistic correction.

Funding

This article did not receive any funding and grants from agencies.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

YZ, HQ, JS and JW contributed to conceptualization. JX and HQ were involved in data curation. JX, YZ and HQ contributed to formal analysis, investigation and methodology. YZ and HQ were involved in software. JS contributed to supervision. JS and JW were involved in validation. YZ, HQ and JS contributed to visualization. YZ, HQ, JX and JS were involved in writing—original draft. YZ, JX and JS contributed to writing—review and editing.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jingcai Xue.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

We declare that this article has not been published before in any language, is not being considered for publication elsewhere and has been read and approved by all authors. Each author contributed significantly to one or more aspects of the study. The authors received no specific funding for this work. There are no conflicts of interest around this study. The authors have full control of all primary data and agree to allow the journal to review their data if requested.

Ethical approval

The study was approved by the Hospital Institutional Review Board, and informed consent was obtained from all patients. The informed consent provided by participants was written, and they consented to the use of their medical information for research purposes. Prior to access, all patient data were completely anonymous.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhang, Y., Qi, H., Zhang, Y. et al. Vertebral bone marrow edema in magnetic resonance imaging correlates with bone healing histomorphometry in (sub)acute osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture. Eur Spine J 30, 2708–2717 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-021-06814-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-021-06814-3

Keywords

Navigation