Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Risk factors for subsequent vertebral fracture after acute osteoporotic vertebral fractures

  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Spine Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

To investigate the incidence and characteristics of subsequent vertebral fracture after osteoporotic vertebral fractures (OVFs) and identify risk factors for subsequent vertebral fractures.

Methods

This post-hoc analysis from a prospective randomized multicenter trial included 225 patients with a 48-week follow-up period. Differences between the subsequent and non-subsequent fracture groups were analyzed.

Results

Of the 225 patients, 15 (6.7%) had a subsequent fracture during the 48-week follow-up. The annual incidence of subsequent vertebral fracture after fresh OVFs in women aged 65–85 years was 68.8 per 1000 person-years. Most patients (73.3%) experienced subsequent vertebral fractures within 6 months. At 48 weeks, European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions, the Japanese Orthopedic Association Back Pain Evaluation Questionnaire pain-related disorder, walking ability, social life function, and lumbar function scores were significantly lower, while the visual analog scale (VAS) for low back pain was higher in patients with subsequent fracture. Cox proportional hazards analysis showed that a VAS score ≥ 70 at 0 weeks was an independent predictor of subsequent vertebral fracture. After adjustment for history of previous fracture, there was a ~ 67% reduction in the risk of subsequent vertebral fracture at the rigid-brace treatment.

Conclusion

Women with a fresh OVF were at higher risk for subsequent vertebral fracture within the next year. Severe low back pain and use of soft braces were associated with higher risk of subsequent vertebral fractures. Therefore, when treating patients after OVFs with these risk factors, more attention may be needed for the occurrence of subsequent vertebral fractures.

Level of evidence

III

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Balasubramanian A, Zhang J, Chen L, Wenkert D, Daigle SG, Grauer A, Curtis JR (2019) Risk of subsequent fracture after prior fracture among older women. Osteoporos Int 30:79–92. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-018-4732-1

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Banefelt J, Akesson KE, Spangeus A, Ljunggren O, Karlsson L, Strom O, Ortsater G, Libanati C, Toth E (2019) Risk of imminent fracture following a previous fracture in a Swedish database study. Osteoporosis Int 30:601–609. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-019-04852-8

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. van Geel TA, van Helden S, Geusens PP, Winkens B, Dinant GJ (2009) Clinical subsequent fractures cluster in time after first fractures. Ann Rheum Dis 68:99–102. https://doi.org/10.1136/ard.2008.092775

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Jinbayashi H, Aoyagi K, Ross PD, Ito M, Shindo H, Takemoto T (2002) Prevalence of vertebral deformity and its associations with physical impairment among Japanese women: the Hizen-Oshima Study. Osteoporosis Int 13:723–730. https://doi.org/10.1007/s001980200099

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Bliuc D, Alarkawi D, Nguyen TV, Eisman JA, Center JR (2015) Risk of subsequent fractures and mortality in elderly women and men with fragility fractures with and without osteoporotic bone density: the Dubbo Osteoporosis epidemiology study. J Bone Miner Res 30:637–646. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbmr.2393

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. van Staa TP, Dennison EM, Leufkens HG, Cooper C (2001) Epidemiology of fractures in England and Wales. Bone 29:517–522. https://doi.org/10.1016/s8756-3282(01)00614-7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Lindsay R, Silverman SL, Cooper C, Hanley DA, Barton I, Broy SB, Licata A, Benhamou L, Geusens P, Flowers K, Stracke H, Seeman E (2001) Risk of new vertebral fracture in the year following a fracture. JAMA 285:320–323. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.285.3.320

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Kato T, Inose H, Ichimura S, Tokuhashi Y, Nakamura H, Hoshino M, Togawa D, Hirano T, Haro H, Ohba T, Tsuji T, Sato K, Sasao Y, Takahata M, Otani K, Momoshima S, Tateishi U, Tomita M, Takemasa R, Yuasa M, Hirai T, Yoshii T, Okawa A (2019) Comparison of rigid and soft-brace treatments for acute osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture: a prospective, randomized. Multicenter Study J Clin Med. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm8020198

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. (1990) EuroQol--a new facility for the measurement of health-related quality of life. Health Policy 16:199–208. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/0168-8510(90)90421-9

  10. McCormack HM, Horne DJ, Sheather S (1988) Clinical applications of visual analogue scales: a critical review. Psychol Med 18:1007–1019. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0033291700009934

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Fukui M, Chiba K, Kawakami M, Kikuchi S, Konno S, Miyamoto M, Seichi A, Shimamura T, Shirado O, Taguchi T, Takahashi K, Takeshita K, Tani T, Toyama Y, Yonenobu K, Wada E, Tanaka T, Hirota Y (2009) JOA back pain evaluation questionnaire (JOABPEQ)/JOA cervical myelopathy evaluation questionnaire (JOACMEQ). The report on the development of revised versions. April 16, 2007. The subcommittee of the clinical outcome committee of the Japanese orthopaedic association on low back pain and cervical myelopathy evaluation. J Orthop Sci 14:348–365. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00776-009-1337-8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Keynan O, Fisher CG, Vaccaro A, Fehlings MG, Oner FC, Dietz J, Kwon B, Rampersaud R, Bono C, France J, Dvorak M (2006) Radiographic measurement parameters in thoracolumbar fractures: a systematic review and consensus statement of the spine trauma study group. Spine 31:E156-165. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.brs.0000201261.94907.0d

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Genant HK, Jergas M, Palermo L, Nevitt M, Valentin RS, Black D, Cummings SR (1996) Comparison of semiquantitative visual and quantitative morphometric assessment of prevalent and incident vertebral fractures in osteoporosis. The study of osteoporotic fractures research group. J Bone Miner Res 11:984–996. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbmr.5650110716

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Fujiwara S, Kasagi F, Masunari N, Naito K, Suzuki G, Fukunaga M (2003) Fracture prediction from bone mineral density in Japanese men and women. J Bone Miner Res 18:1547–1553. https://doi.org/10.1359/jbmr.2003.18.8.1547

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Aubrun F, Langeron O, Quesnel C, Coriat P, Riou B (2003) Relationships between measurement of pain using visual analog score and morphine requirements during postoperative intravenous morphine titration. Anesthesiology 98:1415–1421. https://doi.org/10.1097/00000542-200306000-00017

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Kelly A (2001) The minimum clinically significant difference in visual analogue scale pain score does not differ with severity of pain. Emerg Med J EMJ 18:205–207. https://doi.org/10.1136/emj.18.3.205

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Ohtori S, Ito T, Yamashita M, Murata Y, Morinaga T, Hirayama J, Kinoshita T, Ataka H, Koshi T, Sekikawa T, Miyagi M, Tanno T, Suzuki M, Aoki Y, Aihara T, Nakamura S, Yamaguchi K, Tauchi T, Hatakeyama K, Takata K, Sameda H, Ozawa T, Hanaoka E, Suzuki H, Akazawa T, Suseki K, Arai H, Kurokawa M, Eguchi Y, Suzuki M, Okamoto Y, Miyagi J, Yamagata M, Toyone T, Takahashi K (2010) Evaluation of low back pain using the Japanese Orthopaedic Association Back Pain Evaluation Questionnaire for lumbar spinal disease in a multicenter study: differences in scores based on age, sex, and type of disease. Journal of Orthop Sci 15:86–91. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00776-009-1426-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. M. Versteegh M, M. Vermeulen K, M. A. A. Evers S, de Wit GA, Prenger R, A. Stolk E, (2016) Dutch tariff for the five-level version of EQ-5D. Value Health 19:343–352. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jval.2016.01.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Kanda Y (2013) Investigation of the freely available easy-to-use software “EZR” for medical statistics. Bone Marrow Transplant 48:452–458. https://doi.org/10.1038/bmt.2012.244

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Ihaka R, Gentleman R (1996) R: A language for data analysis and graphics. J Comput Gr Stat 5:299–314. https://doi.org/10.1080/10618600.1996.10474713

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Molvik H, Khan W (2015) Bisphosphonates and their influence on fracture healing: a systematic review. Osteopor Int 26:1251–1260. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-014-3007-8

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Tsuchie H, Miyakoshi N, Kasukawa Y, Nishi T, Abe H, Segawa T, Shimada Y (2016) The effect of teriparatide to alleviate pain and to prevent vertebral collapse after fresh osteoporotic vertebral fracture. J Bone Miner Metab 34:86–91. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00774-014-0646-y

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Black DM, Thompson DE, Bauer DC, Ensrud K, Musliner T, Hochberg MC, Nevitt MC, Suryawanshi S, Cummings SR (2000) Fracture risk reduction with alendronate in women with osteoporosis: the Fracture Intervention Trial. FIT research group. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 85:4118–4124. https://doi.org/10.1210/jcem.85.11.6953

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Black DM, Delmas PD, Eastell R, Reid IR, Boonen S, Cauley JA, Cosman F, Lakatos P, Leung PC, Man Z, Mautalen C, Mesenbrink P, Hu H, Caminis J, Tong K, Rosario-Jansen T, Krasnow J, Hue TF, Sellmeyer D, Eriksen EF, Cummings SR (2007) Once-yearly zoledronic acid for treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis. New England J Med 356:1809–1822. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa067312

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Cummings SR, San Martin J, McClung MR, Siris ES, Eastell R, Reid IR, Delmas P, Zoog HB, Austin M, Wang A, Kutilek S, Adami S, Zanchetta J, Libanati C, Siddhanti S, Christiansen C (2009) Denosumab for prevention of fractures in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis. New England J Med 361:756–765. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa0809493

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Cosman F, Crittenden DB, Adachi JD, Binkley N, Czerwinski E, Ferrari S, Hofbauer LC, Lau E, Lewiecki EM, Miyauchi A, Zerbini CA, Milmont CE, Chen L, Maddox J, Meisner PD, Libanati C, Grauer A (2016) Romosozumab Treatment in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis. New England J Med 375:1532–1543. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1607948

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Neer RM, Arnaud CD, Zanchetta JR, Prince R, Gaich GA, Reginster JY, Hodsman AB, Eriksen EF, Ish-Shalom S, Genant HK, Wang O, Mitlak BH (2001) Effect of parathyroid hormone (1–34) on fractures and bone mineral density in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis. New England J Med 344:1434–1441. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejm200105103441904

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Briggs AM, Wrigley TV, van Dieën JH, Phillips B, Lo SK, Greig AM, Bennell KL (2006) The effect of osteoporotic vertebral fracture on predicted spinal loads in vivo. Eur Spine J 15:1785–1795. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-006-0158-0

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Keller TS, Harrison DE, Colloca CJ, Harrison DD, Janik TJ (2003) Prediction of osteoporotic spinal deformity. Spine 28:455–462. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.Brs.0000048651.92777.30

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Spector ER, Smith SM, Sibonga JD (2009) Skeletal effects of long-duration head-down bed rest. Aviat Space Environ Med 80:A23-28. https://doi.org/10.3357/asem.br02.2009

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Yamauchi K, Adachi A, Kameyama M, Murakami M, Sato Y, Kato C, Kato T (2020) A risk factor associated with subsequent new vertebral compression fracture after conservative therapy for patients with vertebral compression fracture: a retrospective observational study. Arch Osteop 15:9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11657-019-0679-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Lyritis GP, Mayasis B, Tsakalakos N, Lambropoulos A, Gazi S, Karachalios T, Tsekoura M, Yiatzides A (1989) The natural history of the osteoporotic vertebral fracture. Clin Rheumatol 8(Suppl 2):66–69. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02207237

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Buchalter D, Kahanovitz N, Viola K, Dorsky S, Nordin M (1988) Three-dimensional spinal motion measurements. Part 2: A noninvasive assessment of lumbar brace immobilization of the spine. J Spinal Disord 1:284–286. https://doi.org/10.1097/00002517-198800140-00001

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Lantz SA, Schultz AB (1986) Lumbar spine orthosis wearing. I Restriction of gross body motions. Spine 11:834–837. https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-198610000-00019

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Roux C, Briot K (2017) Imminent fracture risk. Osteopor Int 28:1765–1769. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-017-3976-5

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Kanis JA, Johnell O, De Laet C, Johansson H, Oden A, Delmas P, Eisman J, Fujiwara S, Garnero P, Kroger H, McCloskey EV, Mellstrom D, Melton LJ, Pols H, Reeve J, Silman A, Tenenhouse A (2004) A meta-analysis of previous fracture and subsequent fracture risk. Bone 35:375–382. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bone.2004.03.024

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Santiago FR, Muñoz PT, Sánchez EM, Paniza MR, Martínez AM, Abela ALP (2016) Classifying thoracolumbar fractures: role of quantitative imaging. Quant Imaging Med Surg 6:772–784. https://doi.org/10.21037/qims.2016.12.04

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Harris ST, Watts NB, Genant HK, McKeever CD, Hangartner T, Keller M, Chesnut CH 3rd, Brown J, Eriksen EF, Hoseyni MS, Axelrod DW, Miller PD (1999) Effects of risedronate treatment on vertebral and nonvertebral fractures in women with postmenopausal osteoporosis: a randomized controlled trial. Vertebral Efficacy with Risedronate Therapy (VERT) study group. JAMA 282:1344–1352. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.282.14.1344

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank Tomoko Nakajima for her help with data collection, Dr. Makoto Tomita for his help with the statistical analysis, and Dr. Ukihide Tateishi for his help with the radiological analysis.

Funding

None declared.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Hiroyuki Inose, Tsuyoshi Kato, Shoichi Ichimura, Hiroaki Nakamura, Masatoshi Hoshino, Daisuke Togawa, Toru Hirano, Yasuaki Tokuhashi, Tetsuro Ohba, Hirotaka Haro, Takashi Tsuji, Kimiaki Sato, Yutaka Sasao, Masahiko Takahata, Koji Otani, Suketaka Momoshima, Kunihiko Takahashi, Masato Yuasa, Takashi Hirai, Toshitaka Yoshii, and Atsushi Okawa (1) provided substantial contributions to the conception or design of the study or the acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data; (2) drafted the paper or revised it critically for important intellectual content, (3) provided final approval of the version to be published; and (4) agreed to be accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hiroyuki Inose.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

This study was approved by the institutional review board at the Tokyo Medical and Dental University and was compliant with the Declaration of Helsinki.

Availability of data and material

Not applicable.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Inose, H., Kato, T., Ichimura, S. et al. Risk factors for subsequent vertebral fracture after acute osteoporotic vertebral fractures. Eur Spine J 30, 2698–2707 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-021-06741-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-021-06741-3

Keywords

Navigation