Abstract
Purpose
To evaluate the efficacy of locking stand-alone cage (LSC) compared with anterior plate construct (APC) in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF).
Methods
A comprehensive literature search was carried out in PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library to screen randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that directly compared LSC with APC in ACDF. The Cochrane Collaboration’s tool was used for assessment of study quality. Data were analyzed with the Review Manager 5.3 software.
Results
A total of seven RCTs were included. The results revealed no significant differences between LSC and APC in ACDF regarding the fusion rate, Japanese Orthopaedic Association score, visual analogue scale score, neck disability index score, hospital stay, subsidence rate, cervical lordosis, segmental Cobb angle, and disc height. However, LSC was associated with a significantly shorter operation time, less blood loss, lower overall incidence of dysphagia, and lower adjacent-level ossification (ALO) rate compared with APC.
Conclusion
In summary, LSC is not only a safe and effective device for ACDF but also has the advantages of significantly reduced operation time, blood loss, overall incidence of dysphagia, and ALO rate over APC. Therefore, LSC is a better alternative than APC for the patients undergoing ACDF procedures.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Smith GW, Robinson RA (1958) The treatment of certain cervical-spine disorders by anterior removal of the intervertebral disc and interbody fusion. J Bone Joint Surg Am 40-A:607–624
Pitzen TR, Chrobok J, Stulik J, Ruffing S, Drumm J, Sova L, Kucera R, Vyskocil T, Steudel WI (2009) Implant complications, fusion, loss of lordosis, and outcome after anterior cervical plating with dynamic or rigid plates: two-year results of a multi-centric, randomized, controlled study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 34:641–646
Song KJ, Taghavi CE, Lee KB, Song JH, Eun JP (2009) The efficacy of plate construct augmentation versus cage alone in anterior cervical fusion. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 34:2886–2892
Kaiser MG, Haid RW Jr, Subach BR, Barnes B, Rodts GE Jr (2002) Anterior cervical plating enhances arthrodesis after discectomy and fusion with cortical allograft. Neurosurgery 50:229–236 discussion 236–238
Yang L, Gu Y, Liang L, Gao R, Shi S, Shi J, Yuan W (2012) Stand-alone anchored spacer versus anterior plate for multilevel anterior cervical diskectomy and fusion. Orthopedics 35:e1503–e1510
Wu JC, Liu L, Wen-Cheng H, Chen YC, Ko CC, Wu CL, Chen TJ, Cheng H, Su TP (2012) The incidence of adjacent segment disease requiring surgery after anterior cervical diskectomy and fusion: estimation using an 11-year comprehensive nationwide database in Taiwan. Neurosurgery 70:594–601
Fountas KN, Kapsalaki EZ, Nikolakakos LG, Smisson HF, Johnston KW, Grigorian AA, Lee GP, Robinson JS Jr (2007) Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion associated complications. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 32:2310–2317
Scholz M, Schleicher P, Pabst S, Kandziora F (2015) A zero-profile anchored spacer in multilevel cervical anterior interbody fusion: biomechanical comparison to established fixation techniques. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 40:E375–E380
Nayak AN, Stein MI, James CR, Gaskins RB 3rd, Cabezas AF, Adu-Lartey M, Castellvi AE, Santoni BG (2014) Biomechanical analysis of an interbody cage with three integrated cancellous lag screws in a two-level cervical spine fusion construct: an in vitro study. Spine J 14:3002–3010
Stein MI, Nayak AN, Gaskins RB 3rd, Cabezas AF, Santoni BG, Castellvi AE (2014) Biomechanics of an integrated interbody device versus ACDF anterior locking plate in a single-level cervical spine fusion construct. Spine J 14:128–136
Scholz M, Reyes PM, Schleicher P, Sawa AG, Baek S, Kandziora F, Marciano FF, Crawford NR (2009) A new stand-alone cervical anterior interbody fusion device: biomechanical comparison with established anterior cervical fixation devices. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 34:156–160
He S, Feng H, Lan Z, Lai J, Sun Z, Wang Y, Wang J, Ren Z, Huang F, Xu F (2018) A randomized trial comparing clinical outcomes between zero-profile and traditional multilevel anterior cervical discectomy and fusion surgery for cervical myelopathy. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 43:E259–E266
Liu Y, Wang H, Li X, Chen J, Sun H, Wang G, Yang H, Jiang W (2016) Comparison of a zero-profile anchored spacer (ROI-C) and the polyetheretherketone (PEEK) cages with an anterior plate in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion for multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Eur Spine J 25:1881–1890
Wang Z, Jiang W, Li X, Wang H, Shi J, Chen J, Meng B, Yang H (2015) The application of zero-profile anchored spacer in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion. Eur Spine J 24:148–154
Chen Y, Chen H, Wu X, Wang X, Lin W, Yuan W (2016) Comparative analysis of clinical outcomes between zero-profile implant and cages with plate fixation in treating multilevel cervical spondilotic myelopathy: a three-year follow-up. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 144:72–76
Chen Y, Lü G, Wang B, Li L, Kuang L (2016) A comparison of anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) using self-locking stand-alone polyetheretherketone (PEEK) cage with ACDF using cage and plate in the treatment of three-level cervical degenerative spondylopathy: a retrospective study with 2-year follow-up. Eur Spine J 25:2255–2262
Lee YS, Kim YB, Park SW (2015) Does a zero-profile anchored cage offer additional stabilization as anterior cervical plate? Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 40:E563–E570
Vanek P, Bradac O, Delacy P, Lacman J, Benes V (2013) Anterior interbody fusion of the cervical spine with Zero-P spacer: prospective comparative study-clinical and radiological results at a minimum 2 years after surgery. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 38:E792–E797
Yang Z, Zhao Y, Luo J (2019) Incidence of dysphagia of zero-profile spacer versus cage-plate after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: a meta-analysis. Medicine (Baltimore) 98:e15767
Zhang D, Liu B, Zhu J, Li C, Wei F, Yuan Y, Zhu D (2019) Comparison of clinical and radiologic outcomes between self-locking stand-alone cage and cage with anterior plate for multilevel anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: a meta-analysis. World Neurosurg 125:e117–e131
Lu VM, Mobbs RJ, Fang B, Phan K (2019) Clinical outcomes of locking stand-alone cage versus anterior plate construct in two-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Spine J 28:199–208
Sun Z, Liu Z, Hu W, Yang Y, Xiao X, Wang X (2018) Zero-profile versus cage and plate in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with a minimum 2 years of follow-up: a meta-analysis. World Neurosurg 120:e551–e561
Nambiar M, Phan K, Cunningham JE, Yang Y, Turner PL, Mobbs R (2017) Locking stand-alone cages versus anterior plate constructs in single-level fusion for degenerative cervical disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Spine J 26:2258–2266
Tong MJ, Xiang GH, He ZL, Chen DH, Tang Q, Xu HZ, Tian NF (2017) Zero-profile spacer versus cage-plate construct in anterior cervical diskectomy and fusion for multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy: systematic review and meta-analysis. World Neurosurg 104:545–553
Xiao S, Liang Z, Wei W, Ning J (2017) Zero-profile anchored cage reduces risk of postoperative dysphagia compared with cage with plate fixation after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion. Eur Spine J 26:975–984
Duan Y, Yang Y, Wang Y, Liu H, Hong Y, Gong Q, Song Y (2016) Comparison of anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with the zero-profile device versus plate and cage in treating cervical degenerative disc disease: a meta-analysis. J Clin Neurosci 33:11–18
Yin M, Ma J, Huang Q, Xia Y, Shen Q, Zhao C, Tao J, Chen N, Yu Z, Ye J, Mo W, Xiao J (2016) The new Zero-P implant can effectively reduce the risk of postoperative dysphagia and complications compared with the traditional anterior cage and plate: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 17:430
Liu W, Hu L, Wang J, Liu M, Wang X (2015) Comparison of zero-profile anchored spacer versus plate-cage construct in treatment of cervical spondylosis with regard to clinical outcomes and incidence of major complications: a meta-analysis. Ther Clin Risk Manag 11:1437–1447
Shao H, Chen J, Ru B, Yan F, Zhang J, Xu S, Huang Y (2015) Zero-profile implant versus conventional cage-plate implant in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion for the treatment of degenerative cervical spondylosis: a meta-analysis. J Orthop Surg Res 10:148
Dong J, Lu M, Lu T, Liang B, Xu J, Zhou J, Lv H, Qin J, Cai X, Huang S, Li H, Wang D, He X (2015) Meta-analysis comparing zero-profile spacer and anterior plate in anterior cervical fusion. PLoS ONE 10:e130223
Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG (2009) Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS Med 6:e1000097
Higgins JP, Altman DG, Gøtzsche PC, Jüni P, Moher D, Oxman AD, Savovic J, Schulz KF, Weeks L, Sterne JA (2011) The Cochrane collaboration’s tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. BMJ 343:d5928
Panchal RR, Kim KD, Eastlack R, Lopez J, Clavenna A, Brooks DM, Joshua G (2017) A clinical comparison of anterior cervical plates versus stand-alone intervertebral fusion devices for single-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion procedures. World Neurosurg 99:630–637
Xiao Y, Shi Y, Li H, Xu K (2017) Application of Zero-P on anterior cervical decompression and bone fusion. Int J Clin Exp Med 10:7077–7083
Nemoto O, Kitada A, Naitou S, Tachibana A, Ito Y, Fujikawa A (2015) Stand-alone anchored cage versus cage with plating for single-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: a prospective, randomized, controlled study with a 2-year follow-up. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol 25(Suppl 1):S127–S134
Li Y, Hao D, He B, Wang X, Yan L (2015) The efficiency of zero-profile implant in anterior cervical discectomy fusion: a prospective controlled long-term follow-up study. J Spinal Disord Tech 28:398–403
Yan B, Nie L (2015) Clinical comparison of zero-profile interbody fusion device and anterior cervical plate interbody fusion in treating cervical spondylosis. Int J Clin Exp Med 8:13854–13858
Visocchi M, Della PG, Roselli R, La Rocca G, Conforti G, Spallone A, Barbagallo G (2014) Laminoplasty and laminectomy in cervical stenotic myelopathy: allies not enemies. J Neurosurg Sci 58:101–105
Visocchi M, Conforti G, Roselli R, La Rocca G, Spallone A (2015) From less to maximally invasiveness in cervical spine surgery: a “nightmare” case who deserve consideration. Int J Surg Case Rep 9:85–88
Barbagallo G, Certo F, Albanese V, Visocchi M (2014) The impact of complications following cervical spine surgery: a systematic review. J Neurosurg Sci 58:55–64
Marawar S, Girardi FP, Sama AA, Ma Y, Gaber-Baylis LK, Besculides MC, Memtsoudis SG (2010) National trends in anterior cervical fusion procedures. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 35:1454–1459
Spallone A, Marchione P, Li VP, Ferrante L, Visocchi M (2014) Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with “mini-invasive” harvesting of iliac crest graft versus polyetheretherketone (PEEK) cages: a retrospective outcome analysis. Int J Surg 12:1328–1332
Xia L, Liu MX, Zhong J, Zhu J, Dou NN, Visocchi M (2016) Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with a compressive staple of C-JAWS. Br J Neurosurg 30:649–653
Albanese V, Certo F, Visocchi M, Barbagallo G (2017) Multilevel anterior cervical diskectomy and fusion with zero-profile devices: analysis of safety and feasibility, with focus on sagittal alignment and impact on clinical outcome: single-institution experience and review of literature. World Neurosurg 106:724–735
Barbagallo G, Certo F, Princiotto S, Piccini M, Albanese V, Visocchi M (2014) Early postoperative extramedullary MRI signal changes after ACDF: misinterpretations can be dangerous and misleading. Case report and review of the literature. J Neurosurg Sci 58:123–128
Carreon LY, Smith CL, Dimar JR 2nd, Glassman SD (2016) Correlation of cervical sagittal alignment parameters on full-length spine radiographs compared with dedicated cervical radiographs. Scoliosis Spinal Disord 11:12
Iyer S, Nemani VM, Nguyen J, Elysee J, Burapachaisri A, Ames CP, Kim HJ (2016) Impact of cervical sagittal alignment parameters on neck disability. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 41:371–377
Katsuura A, Hukuda S, Saruhashi Y, Mori K (2001) Kyphotic malalignment after anterior cervical fusion is one of the factors promoting the degenerative process in adjacent intervertebral levels. Eur Spine J 10:320–324
Cho SK, Lu Y, Lee DH (2013) Dysphagia following anterior cervical spinal surgery: a systematic review. Bone Joint J 95-B:868–873
Nagoshi N, Tetreault L, Nakashima H, Arnold PM, Barbagallo G, Kopjar B, Fehlings MG (2017) Risk factors for and clinical outcomes of dysphagia after anterior cervical surgery for degenerative cervical myelopathy: results from the AOSpine International and North America studies. J Bone Joint Surg Am 99:1069–1077
Lee MJ, Bazaz R, Furey CG, Yoo J (2005) Influence of anterior cervical plate design on dysphagia: a 2-year prospective longitudinal follow-up study. J Spinal Disord Tech 18:406–409
Bazaz R, Lee MJ, Yoo JU (2002) Incidence of dysphagia after anterior cervical spine surgery: a prospective study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 27:2453–2458
Lee YS, Kim YB, Park SW (2014) Risk factors for postoperative subsidence of single-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: the significance of the preoperative cervical alignment. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 39:1280–1287
Wu WJ, Jiang LS, Liang Y, Dai LY (2012) Cage subsidence does not, but cervical lordosis improvement does affect the long-term results of anterior cervical fusion with stand-alone cage for degenerative cervical disc disease: a retrospective study. Eur Spine J 21:1374–1382
Karikari IO, Jain D, Owens TR, Gottfried O, Hodges TR, Nimjee SM, Bagley CA (2014) Impact of subsidence on clinical outcomes and radiographic fusion rates in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: a systematic review. J Spinal Disord Tech 27:1–10
Ahn SS, Paik HK, Chin DK, Kim SH, Kim DW, Ku MG (2016) The fate of adjacent segments after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: the influence of an anterior plate system. World Neurosurg 89:42–50
Barsa P, Suchomel P (2007) Factors affecting sagittal malalignment due to cage subsidence in standalone cage assisted anterior cervical fusion. Eur Spine J 16:1395–1400
Park JB, Watthanaaphisit T, Riew KD (2007) Timing of development of adjacent-level ossification after anterior cervical arthrodesis with plates. Spine J 7:633–636
Park JB, Cho YS, Riew KD (2005) Development of adjacent-level ossification in patients with an anterior cervical plate. J Bone Joint Surg Am 87:558–563
Park JH, Hyun SJ, Lee CH, Kim KJ, Yeom JS, Jahng TA, Kim HJ (2016) Efficacy of a short plate with an oblique screw trajectory for anterior cervical plating: a comparative study with a 2-year minimum follow-up. Clin Spine Surg 29:E43–E48
Yang H, Chen D, Wang X, Yang L, He H, Yuan W (2015) Zero-profile integrated plate and spacer device reduces rate of adjacent-level ossification development and dysphagia compared to ACDF with plating and cage system. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 135:781–787
Lee DH, Lee JS, Yi JS, Cho W, Zebala LP, Riew KD (2013) Anterior cervical plating technique to prevent adjacent-level ossification development. Spine J 13:823–829
Funding
No funds were received in support of this work.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declared that no conflicts of interest exist.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Zhao, Y., Yang, S., Huo, Y. et al. Locking stand-alone cage versus anterior plate construct in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: a systematic review and meta-analysis based on randomized controlled trials. Eur Spine J 29, 2734–2744 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-020-06561-x
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-020-06561-x