Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Reply to the letter to the editor of L. Russo et al. concerning “Relationship between sagittal spinal curves geometry and isokinetic trunk muscle strength in adults” by W. Elsayed, A. Farrag, Q. Muaidi, N. Almulhim (2018) Eur Spine J 27:2014–2022

  • Author's Reply
  • Published:
European Spine Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Elsayed W, Farrag A, Muaidi Q, Almulhim N (2018) Relationship between sagittal spinal curves geometry and isokinetic trunk muscle strength in adults. Eur Spine J 27:2014–2022

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Kleinerman RA (2006) Cancer risks following diagnostic and therapeutic radiation exposure in children. Pediatr Radiol 36(Suppl 2):121–125

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Ronckers CM, Land CE, Miller JS, Stovall M, Lonstein JE, Doody MM (2010) Cancer mortality among women frequently exposed to radiographic examinations for spinal disorders. Radiat Res 174:83–90

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Drerup B, Hierholzer E (1994) Back shape measurement using video rasterstereography and three-dimensional reconstruction of spinal shape. Clin Biomech 9:28–36

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Hackenberg L, Hierholzer E, Potzl W, Gotze C, Liljenqvist U (2003) Rasterstereographic back shape analysis in idiopathic scoliosis after anterior correction and fusion. Clin Biomech 18:1–8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Mohokum M, Mendoza S, Udo W, Sitter H, Paletta JR, Skwara A (2010) Reproducibility of rasterstereography for kyphotic and lordotic angles, trunk length, and trunk inclination: a reliability study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 35:1353–1358

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Frerich JM, Hertzler K, Knott P, Mardjetko S (2012) Comparison of radiographic and surface topography measurements in adolescents with idiopathic scoliosis. Open Orthop J 6:261–265

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Mangone M, Raimondi P, Paoloni M, Pellanera S, Di Michele A, Di Renzo S, Vanadia M, Dimaggio M, Murgia M, Santilli V (2013) Vertebral rotation in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis calculated by radiograph and back surface analysis-based methods: correlation between the Raimondi method and rasterstereography. Eur Spine J 22:367–371

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Schulein S, Mendoza S, Malzkorn R, Harms J, Skwara A (2013) Rasterstereographic evaluation of interobserver and intraobserver reliability in postsurgical adolescent idiopathic scoliosis patients. J Spinal Disord Tech 26:E143–E149

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Guidetti L, Bonavolonta V, Tito A, Reis VM, Gallotta MC, Baldari C (2013) Intra- and interday reliability of spine rasterstereography. Biomed Res Int 2013:745480

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Schroeder J, Reer R, Braumann KM (2015) Video raster stereography back shape reconstruction: a reliability study for sagittal, frontal, and transversal plane parameters. Eur Spine J 24:262–269

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. He JW, Yan ZH, Liu J, Yu ZK, Wang XY, Bai GH, Ye XJ, Zhang X (2009) Accuracy and repeatability of a new method for measuring scoliosis curvature. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 34:E323–E329

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Parent EC, Damaraju S, Hill DL, Lou E, Smetaniuk D (2010) Identifying the best surface topography parameters for detecting idiopathic scoliosis curve progression. Stud Health Technol Inform 158:78–82

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Physical Therapy, College of Applied Medical Sciences, Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University, Dammam, Saudi Arabia

    Walaa Hamdy Elsayed, Qassim Ibrahim Muaidi & Nora Ahmed Almulhim

  2. Prince Sultan College of Health Sciences, Dhahran, Saudi Arabia

    Ahmed Taha Farrag

  3. Basic Science Department, Faculty of Physical Therapy, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt

    Ahmed Taha Farrag

Authors
  1. Walaa Hamdy Elsayed
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Ahmed Taha Farrag
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Qassim Ibrahim Muaidi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Nora Ahmed Almulhim
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Walaa Hamdy Elsayed.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Elsayed, W.H., Farrag, A.T., Muaidi, Q.I. et al. Reply to the letter to the editor of L. Russo et al. concerning “Relationship between sagittal spinal curves geometry and isokinetic trunk muscle strength in adults” by W. Elsayed, A. Farrag, Q. Muaidi, N. Almulhim (2018) Eur Spine J 27:2014–2022. Eur Spine J 28, 193–194 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-018-5829-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-018-5829-0

Search

Navigation