Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Early versus delayed reduction of cervical spine dislocation with complete motor paralysis: a multicenter study

  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Spine Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Reduction of cervical facet dislocation should be performed as soon as possible to depressurize neuron cells although some randomized control studies defined early reduction as over 24 h after trauma. The purpose of this study was to define the actual time limit for early reduction in patients with complete motor paralysis.

Methods

Cervical spine dislocation patients with complete motor paralysis admitted between April 2007 and December 2014 were analyzed as retrospective cohort study. We separated the patients into three groups according to the number of hours lapsed between the trauma and reduction, within 4 h (very early group), >4–6 h (early group), and >6 h (delayed group). We compared the neurological outcomes, patient injury patterns, the arrival time at the hospital, and the injury severity score (ISS).

Results

Of 30 patients who enrolled, 8 (27%) were recovered to American Spinal Injury Association Impairment Scale Grades C-E. The delayed group had poorer neurological outcomes than the very early group and early group, although no significant differences were noted in the recovery rate between the very early group and early groups. The injury pattern, arrival time, and ISS were not found to be associated with the neurological outcome.

Conclusion

Our data suggest that early (<6 h) reduction of cervical spine dislocation is associated with favorable neurological outcome as compared with those performed after 6 h.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Mahale YJ, Silver JR (1992) Progressive paralysis after bilateral facet dislocation of the cervical spine. J Bone Joint Surg Br 74:219–223

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Newton D, England M, Doll H, Gardner BP (2011) The case for early treatment of dislocations of the cervical spine with cord involvement sustained playing rugby. J Bone Joint Surg 93:1646–1652. doi:10.1302/0301-620X.93B12.27048

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Walters BC, Hadley MN, Hurlbert RJ, Aarabi B, Dhall SS, Gelb DE, Harrigan MR, Rozelle CJ, Ryken TC, Theodore N, American Association of Neurological Surgeons; Congress of Neurological Surgeons (2013) Guidelines for the management of acute cervical spine and spinal cord injuries: 2013 update. Neurosurgery 60:82–91. doi:10.1227/01.neu.0000430319.32247.7f

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Lebl DR, Bono CM, Velmahos G, Metkar U, Nguyen J, Harris MB (2013) Vertebral artery injury associated with blunt cervical spine trauma: a multivariate regression analysis. Spine 38:1352–1361. doi:10.1097/BRS.0b013e318294bacb

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Mahale YJ, Silver JR, Henderson NJ (1993) Neurological complications of the reduction of cervical spine dislocation. J Bone Joint Surg Br 75:403–409

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Vaccaro VAR, Daugherty RJ, Sheehan TP, Dante SJ, Cotler JM, Balderston RA, Herbison GJ, Northrup BE (1997) Neurologic outcome of early versus late surgery for cervical spinal cord injury. Spine 22:2609–2613

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Fehlings MG, Vaccaro A, Wilson JR, Singh A, W Cadotte D, Harrop JS, Aarabi B, Shaffrey C, Dvorak M, Fisher C, Arnold P, Massicotte EM, Lewis S, Rampersaud R (2012) Early versus delayed decompression for traumatic cervical spinal cord injury: results of the Surgical Timing in Acute Spinal Cord Injury Study (STASCIS). PLoS One 7:e32037. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0032037

  8. Aebi M, Mohler J, Zäch GA, Morscher E (1986) Indication, surgical technique, and results of 100 surgically-treated fractures and fracture-dislocations of the cervical spine. Clin Orthop 57:244–257

    Google Scholar 

  9. Smith JS, Anderson R, Pham T, Bhatia N, Steward O, Gupta R (2010) Role of early surgical decompression of the intradural space after cervical spinal cord injury in an animal model. J Bone Joint Surg Am 92:1206–1214. doi:10.2106/JBJS.I.00740

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Grant GA, Mirza SK, Chapman JR, Winn HR, Newell DW, Jones DT, Grady MS (1999) Risk of early closed reduction in cervical spine subluxation injuries. J Neurosurg 90:13–18

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Yisheng W, Fuying Z, Limin W, Junwei L, Guofu P, Weidong W (2007) First aid and treatment for cervical spinal cord injury with fracture and dislocation. Indian J Orthop 41:300–304. doi:10.4103/0019-5413.36991

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Marino RJ, Ditunno JF Jr, Donovan WH, Maynard F Jr (1999) Neurologic recovery after traumatic spinal cord injury: data from the Model Spinal Cord Injury Systems. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 80:1391–1396

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Eranki V, Koul K, Mendz G, Dillon D (2016) Traumatic facet joint dislocation in Western Australia. Eur Spine J 25:1109–1116. doi:10.1007/s00586-014-3627-x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Hacke W, Donnan G, Fieschi C, Kaste M, von Kummer R, Broderick JP, Brott T, Frankel M, Grotta JC, Haley EC Jr, Kwiatkowski T, Levine SR, Lewandowski C, Lu M, Lyden P, Marler JR, Patel S, Tilley BC, Albers G, Bluhmki E, Wilhelm M, Hamilton S; ATLANTIS Trials Investigators; ECASS Trials Investigators; NINDS rt-PA Study Group Investigators (2004) Association of outcome with early stroke treatment: pooled analysis of ATLANTIS, ECASS, and NINDS rt-PA stroke trials. Lancet 363:768–774

  15. Rowland JW, Hawryluk GW, Kwon B, Fehlings MG (2008) Current status of acute spinal cord injury pathophysiology and emerging therapies: promise on the horizon. Neurosurg Focus 25:E2. doi:10.3171/FOC.2008.25.11.E2

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Lins CC, Prado DT, Joaquim AF (2016) Arq Neuropsiquiatr 74:745–749. doi:10.1590/0004-282X20160078

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Fassett DR, Dailey AT, Vaccaro AR (2008) Vertebral artery injuries associated with cervical spine injuries: a review of the literature. J Spinal Disord Tech 21:252–258. doi:10.1097/BSD.0b013e3180cab162

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Desouza RM, Crocker MJ, Haliasos N, Rennie A, Saxena A (2011) Blunt traumatic vertebral artery injury: a clinical review. Eur Spine J 20:1405–1416. doi:10.1007/s00586-011-1862-y

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Taneichi H, Suda K, Kajino T, Kaneda K (2005) Traumatically induced vertebral artery occlusion associated with cervical spine injuries: prospective study using magnetic resonance angiography. Spine 30:1955–1962

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Zhang Z, Wang H, Mu Z (2016) Vertebral artery occlusion and recanalization after cervical facet dislocation 95:190–196. doi:10.1016/j.wneu.2016.08.002

    Google Scholar 

  21. Inamasu J, Guiot BH (2006) Vertebral artery injury after blunt cervical trauma: an update. Surg Neurol 65:238–245

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Ko HY, Ditunno JF Jr, Graziani V, Little JW (1999) The pattern of reflex recovery during spinal shock. Spinal Cord J 37:402–409

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kosei Nagata.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

No benefits in any form have been or will be received from a commercial party related directly or indirectly to the subject of this manuscript.

No funds were received in support of this work. Our study was approved by the institutional review board.

Additional information

The manuscript submitted does not contain information about medical device (s)/drug (s).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Nagata, K., Inokuchi, K., Chikuda, H. et al. Early versus delayed reduction of cervical spine dislocation with complete motor paralysis: a multicenter study. Eur Spine J 26, 1272–1276 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-017-5004-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-017-5004-z

Keywords

Navigation