Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Cervical compressive myelopathy: flow analysis of cerebrospinal fluid using phase-contrast magnetic resonance imaging

  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Spine Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

To evaluate cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) flow in cervical compressive myelopathy (CCM), by both quantitative and qualitative analyses, using 3T cine phase-contrast magnetic resonance imaging (cine MRI).

Methods

From September, 2014 to June, 2015, we enrolled 45 subjects (18 women and 27 men, mean age, 61.7 ± 13.4 years) to undergo cervical cine MRI. The subjects were divided into three groups: no stenosis and cervical stenosis with and without intramedullary T2 hyperintensity. We measured maximal CSF velocity, and 12 CSF velocity waveforms were plotted per subject. Two readers independently assessed the CSF waveform shape (0 absent; 1 serrated; 2 bi-directional with small amplitude; and 3 normal bi-directional waveform) and the CSF motion pattern (0 absent; 1 interrupted; and 2 intact). The numbers of 12 waveform shapes were summed to yield a CSF waveform score. Linear mixed model and ROC curve analyses were used for statistical analyses.

Results

Maximal CSF velocity was significantly lower in CCM (marginal mean, 2.72 cm/s) than in stenosis without intramedullary T2 hyperintensity (3.27 cm/s, p = 0.027) and no stenosis (3.80 cm/s, p < 0.001). Bi-phasic CSF motion was lost in cervical stenosis. CSF waveform scores of 17 (area under curve (AUC), 0.797; p = 0.003) and 16.5 (AUC, 0.790; p = 0.004) could predict Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) score corresponding to CCM.

Conclusions

Maximal CSF velocity and CSF waveform score on cine MRI decreased in CCM and was correlated with the JOA score. Thus, both quantitative and qualitative analyses using cine MRI could effectively demonstrate CSF flow alterations in CCM.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kalsi-Ryan S, Karadimas SK, Fehlings MG (2013) Cervical spondylotic myelopathy the clinical phenomenon and the current pathobiology of an increasingly prevalent and devastating disorder. Neuroscientist 19:409–421

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Nouri A, Tetreault L, Singh A, Karadimas SK, Fehlings MG (2015) Degenerative cervical myelopathy: epidemiology, genetics and pathogenesis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 40:E675–E693

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Yoshizawa H (2002) Presidential address: pathomechanism of myelopathy and radiculopathy from the viewpoint of blood flow and cerebrospinal fluid flow including a short historical review. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 27:1255–1263

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Shibuya R, Yonenobu K, Koizumi T, Kato Y, Mitta M, Yoshikawa H (2002) Pulsatile cerebrospinal fluid flow measurement using phase-contrast magnetic resonance imaging in patients with cervical myelopathy. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 27:1087–1093

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Tominaga T, Watabe N, Takahashi T, Shimizu H, Yoshimoto T (2002) Quantitative assessment of surgical decompression of the cervical spine with cine phase contrast magnetic resonance imaging. Neurosurgery 50:791–796

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Martin AR, Aleksanderek I, Cohen-Adad J et al (2016) Translating state-of-the-art spinal cord MRI techniques to clinical use: a systemic review of clinical studies utilizing DTI, MT, MWF, MRS, and fMRI. Neuroimage Clin 10:192–238

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Nouri A, Martin AR, Kikulis D, Fehlings MG (2016) Magnetic resonance imaging assessment of degenerative cervical myelopathy: a review of structural changes and measurement techniques. Neurosurg Focus 40:E5

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Tetreault LA, Dettori JR, Wilson JR et al (2013) Systematic review of magnetic resonance imaging characteristics that affect treatment decision making and predict clinical outcome in patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 38:S89–S110

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Enzmann D, Pelc N (1991) Normal flow patterns of intracranial and spinal cerebrospinal fluid defined with phase-contrast cine MR imaging. Radiology 178:467–474

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Levy LM, Di Chiro G (1990) MR phase imaging and cerebrospinal fluid flow in the head and spine. Neuroradiology 32:399–406

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Nitz WR, Bradley WG Jr, Watanabe AS et al (1992) Flow dynamics of cerebrospinal fluid: assessment with phase-contrast velocity MR imaging performed with retrospective cardiac gating. Radiology 183:395–405

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Quencer RM, Post MJ, Hinks RS (1990) Cine MR in the evaluation of normal and abnormal CSF flow: intracranial and intraspinal studies. Neuroradiology 32:371–391

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Bhadelia RA, Bogdan AR, Kaplan RF, Wolpert SM (1997) Cerebrospinal fluid pulsation amplitude and its quantitative relationship to cerebral blood flow pulsations: a phase-contrast MR flow imaging study. Neuroradiology 39:258–264

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Vavasour IM, Meyers SM, MacMillan EL et al (2014) Increased spinal cord movements in cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Spine J 14:2344–2354

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Watabe N, Tominaga T, Shimizu H, Koshu K, Yoshimoto T (1999) Quantitative analysis of cerebrospinal fluid flow in patients with cervical spondylosis using cine phase-contrast magnetic resonance imaging. Neurosurgery 44:779–784

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Chen CJ, Lyu RK, Lee ST, Wong YC, Wang LJ (2001) Intramedullary high signal intensity on T2-weighted MR images in cervical spondylotic myelopathy: prediction of prognosis with type of intensity. Radiology 221:789–794

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Yukawa Y, Kato F, Yoshihara H, Yanase M, Ito K (2007) MR T2 image classification in cervical compression myelopathy: predictor of surgical outcomes. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2:1675–1678

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Fernández de Rota JJ, Meschian S, Fernández de Rota A, Urbano V, Baron M (2007) Cervical spondylotic myelopathy due to chronic compression: the role of signal intensity changes in magnetic resonance images. J Neurosurg Spine 6:17–22

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Yonenobu K, Abumi K, Nagata K, Taketomi E, Ueyama K (2001) Interobserver and intraobserver reliability of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association scoring system for evaluation of cervical compression myelopathy. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 26:1890–1894

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Kang Y, Lee JW, Koh YH et al (2011) New MRI grading system for the cervical canal stenosis. AJR Am J Roentgenol 197:W134–W140

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Nakashima H, Yukawa Y, Suda K, Yamagata M, Ueta T, Kato F (2016) Narrow cervical canal in 1211 asymptomatic healthy subjects: the relationship with spinal cord compression on MRI. Eur Spine J 25:2149–2154

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank the Medical Research Collaborating Center at Seoul National University Bundang Hospital for performing the statistical analyses. Funding was provided by National Research Foundation of Korea (Grant No. NRF-2013R1A1A2006851).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Joon Woo Lee.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

None

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bae, Y.J., Lee, J.W., Lee, E. et al. Cervical compressive myelopathy: flow analysis of cerebrospinal fluid using phase-contrast magnetic resonance imaging. Eur Spine J 26, 40–48 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-016-4874-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-016-4874-9

Keywords

Navigation