Skip to main content
Log in

Spinal cord injury: a review of the most-cited publications

  • Review Article
  • Published:
European Spine Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

The objective of this study was to identify and review the most-cited articles on spinal cord injury (SCI). Citation analyses showcase the relative influence of individual articles in a given field. In addition to distinguishing publications of particular quality and impact and well-developed areas of the literature, citation analyses allow for an understanding of the direction in which a field of research is headed.

Methods

A multi-disciplinary bibliographic index was used to identify the 50 SCI articles with the most lifetime citations, and the 50 SCI articles with the highest annual citation rates. Studies were categorized into one of six categories based on their primary focus: treatment, pathology/natural history, predictor of outcome, methods, epidemiology, or assessment measure.

Results

We report that 40.0 and 56.0 % of SCI papers with the most lifetime citations and highest annual citation rates, respectively, were systematic reviews or meta-analyses, indicating that some of the most referenced papers in SCI are not primary publications. Further, there appears to be a greater international presence in SCI research. In the highest annual citation rate cohort, 14.0 % of papers were a product of international collaboration, 50.0 % were published by outside of the United States, and the average year of publication was 2005 ± 5.4; the comparable numbers for papers that comprised the highest lifetime citation cohort were, respectively, 8.0, 28.0 %, and 1998 ± 9.2. Treatment and pathology/natural history of SCI were a common research focus in both citation cohorts, consistent with ongoing efforts to better understand and manage this injury.

Conclusions

This comprehensive review provides a cross-sectional summary and bibliometric analysis of some of the most influential literature in SCI, and compliments existing systematic reviews and meta-analysis in the field by establishing which areas of the literature are growing and which have been well developed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ma VY, Chan L, Carruthers KJ (2014) Incidence, prevalence, costs, and impact on disability of common conditions requiring rehabilitation in the United States: stroke, spinal cord injury, traumatic brain injury, multiple sclerosis, osteoarthritis, rheumatoid arthritis, limb loss, and back pain. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 95(5):986–995

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Hammell KW (2013) Spinal cord injury rehabilitation. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  3. World Health O (2003) Spinal cord injury: as many as 500 000 people suffer each year. 2003/12/02/undefined

  4. Post M, Van Leeuwen C (2012) Psychosocial issues in spinal cord injury: a review. Spinal Cord 50(5):382–389

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Cao Y, Chen Y, DeVivo M (2011) Lifetime direct costs after spinal cord injury. Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil 16(4):10–16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Pershouse KJ, Barker RN, Kendall MB, Buettner PG, Kuipers P, Schuurs SB, Amsters DI (2012) Investigating changes in quality of life and function along the lifespan for people with spinal cord injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 93(3):413–419

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Middleton J, Dayton A, Walsh J, Rutkowski S, Leong G, Duong S (2012) Life expectancy after spinal cord injury: a 50-year study. Spinal Cord 50(11):803–811

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Cripps R, Lee B, Wing P, Weerts E, Mackay J, Brown D (2011) A global map for traumatic spinal cord injury epidemiology: towards a living data repository for injury prevention. Spinal Cord 49(4):493–501

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Domingo A, Al-Yahya AA, Asiri Y, Eng JJ, Lam, Spinal Cord Injury Rehabilitation Evidence Research Team T (2012) A systematic review of the effects of pharmacological agents on walking function in people with spinal cord injury. J Neurotrauma 29(5):865–879

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Tetzlaff W, Okon EB, Karimi-Abdolrezaee S, Hill CE, Sparling JS, Plemel JR, Plunet WT, Tsai EC, Baptiste D, Smithson LJ (2011) A systematic review of cellular transplantation therapies for spinal cord injury. J Neurotrauma 28(8):1611–1682

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Patsopoulos NA, Analatos AA, Ioannidis JP (2005) Relative citation impact of various study designs in the health sciences. JAMA 293(19):2362–2366

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Ponce FA, Lozano AM (2010) Highly cited works in neurosurgery. Part I: the 100 top-cited papers in neurosurgical journals: a review. J Neurosurg 112(2):223–232

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Sharma B, Lawrence DW (2014) Top-cited articles in traumatic brain injury. Front Hum Neurosci 8:879–893

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Harzing A-W (2007) Publish or Perish. 4.17.0 edn. Tarma Software Research Melbourne, Australia

    Google Scholar 

  15. Harzing A-W (2010) Citation analysis across disciplines: the impact of different data sources and citation metrics. Harzing. http://www.harzing.com/publications/white-papers/citation-analysis-across-disciplines. Accessed May 30 2016

  16. Haley SM, Osberg JS (1989) Kappa coefficient calculation using multiple ratings per subject: a special communication. Phys Ther 69(11):970–974. doi:10.1097/01241398-199205000-00054

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. StataCorp (2003) Stata statistical software: release 11. StataCorp LP, College Station

    Google Scholar 

  18. Kwon BK, Okon E, Hillyer J, Mann C, Baptiste D, Weaver LC, Fehlings MG, Tetzlaff W (2011) A systematic review of non-invasive pharmacologic neuroprotective treatments for acute spinal cord injury. J Neurotrauma 28(8):1545–1588

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Gomes-Osman J, Cortes M, Guest J, Pascual-Leone A (2016) A systematic review of experimental strategies aimed at improving motor function after acute and chronic spinal cord injury. J Neurotrauma 33(5):425–438

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Bornmann L, Mutz R, Daniel HD (2008) Are there better indices for evaluation purposes than the h index? A comparison of nine different variants of the h index using data from biomedicine. J Assoc Inf Sci Technol 59(5):830–837

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Behdin Nowrouzi.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

None to declare.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Nowrouzi, B., Assan-Lebbe, A., Sharma, B. et al. Spinal cord injury: a review of the most-cited publications. Eur Spine J 26, 28–39 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-016-4669-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-016-4669-z

Keywords

Navigation