Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Surgical treatment of scoliosis in Marfan syndrome: outcomes and complications

  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Spine Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

To investigate surgical outcomes and complications of scoliosis associated with Marfan syndrome.

Methods

Inclusion criteria were patients who were 10–20 years of age, had a diagnosis of Marfan syndrome by the Ghent nosology, had scoliosis and had undergone spinal fusion, and had at least 2 years of postoperative follow-up. The medical records of all patients were reviewed for age at the time of surgery, surgical procedures performed, instrumentation type, estimated blood loss (EBL) during surgery, operation time and complications related to surgery. Health-related quality-of-life measures (obtained with the SRS-22 Questionnaire before operation and at the last clinical follow-up) were also recorded. Patients were analyzed as two different groups, Group 1 and Group 2, according to the different approaches employed. Patients receiving combined anterior and posterior surgery were assigned to Group 1 and those who received posterior-only surgery to Group 2.

Results

Group 1 consisted of 30 patients (14 males, 16 females) with a mean age at surgery of 16.8 years (range: 10–20 years). Complications in Group 1 included two cases of instrumentation loosening with one removed, one case of instrumentation breakage and one case of chylothorax and hemothorax during video assisted thoracoscopic release. 66 patients (28 males, 38 females) with a mean age at surgery of years 16.4 years (range: 10–20 years) were included in Group 2. Complications in Group 2 included six cases of cerebro-spinal fluid leak, one case of deep wound infection secondary to cerebro-spinal fluid leak, one case of leg weakness and one case of pleural rupture cause by misplacement of pedicle screw. There is no difference of age at surgery, preoperative Cobb angles, and SRS-22 total scores (3.0 vs. 3.1) between the two groups (P > 0.05). Group 1 yielded larger correction rate than Group 2 for both thoracic (62.5 % vs. 56.2 %) and lumbar scoliosis (68.3 % vs. 62.7 %). Loss of correction was similar between the two groups for both thoracic (4.1° vs. 3.6°) and lumbar (4.2° vs. 4.6°) curves (P > 0.05). EBL (1972 ml vs. 1530) and operation time (669 min vs. 419 min) were significantly increased in Group 1 than in Group 2 (P < 0.05). No difference was noted for SRS-22 total scores in the last follow-up between the two groups (3.7 vs. 3.8, P > 0.05).

Conclusion

In conclusion, as compared to anterior release combined with posterior spinal fusion, posterior-only spinal fusion could yield comparable clinical outcomes for scoliosis associated with Marfan syndrome with lower EBL, and operation time. However, longer follow-up is needed to verify these findings.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Biery NJ, Eldadah ZA, Moore CS et al (1999) Revised genomic organization of FBN1 and significance for regulated gene expression. Genomics 107:216–224

    Google Scholar 

  2. El-Aleem AA, Karch M, Haverich A et al (1999) Identification of 9 novel FBN1 mutation in German patients with Marfan syndrome. Hum Mutat 14:181

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Judge DP, Dietz HC (2005) Marfan syndrome. Lancet 366:1965–1976

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. De Paepe A, Devereux RB, Dietz HC et al (1996) Revised diagnostic criteria for Marfan syndrome. Am J Med Genet 62:417–426

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Robins PR, Moe JH, Winter RB (1975) Scoliosis in Marfan’s syndrome. Its characteristics and results of treatment in 35 patients. J Bone Joint Surg 57:358–368

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Glard Y, Launay F, Edgard-Rosa G et al (2008) Scoliotic curve patterns in patients with Marfan syndrome. J Child Orthop 2:211–216

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Taneja DK, Manning CW (1977) Scoliosis in Marfan syndrome and arachnodactyly. In: Zorab PA (ed) Scoliosis. Academic Press, London, pp 261–281

    Google Scholar 

  8. Donaldson DH, Brown CW (1996) Marfan’s spinal pathology. In: Bridwell KH, DeWald RL (eds) Textbook of Spinal Surgery. Lippincott-Raven, Philadelphia, pp 299–306

    Google Scholar 

  9. Sponseller PD, Bhimani M, Solacoff D et al (2000) Results of brace treatment of scoliosis in Marfan syndrome. Spine 25:2350–2354

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Silvestre MD, Greggi T, Giacomini S et al (2005) Surgical treatment for scoliosis in Marfan syndrome. Spine 30:E597–E604

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Li ZC, Liu ZD, Dai LY (2011) Surgical treatment of scoliosis associated with Marfan syndrome by using posterior-only instrumentation. J Pediatr Orthop B 20:63–66

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Weinstein SL, Dolan LA, Cheng JC et al (2008) adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Lancet 371:1527–1537

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Sponseller PD, Hobbs W, Riley LH III et al (1995) The thoracolumbar spine in Marfan syndrome. J Bone Joint Surg Am 7:867–876

    Google Scholar 

  14. Garreau de Loubresse C, Mullins MM, Moura B et al (2006) Spinal and pelvic parameters in Marfan’s syndrome and their relevance to surgical planning. J Bone Joint Surg Br 88:515–519

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Gjolaj JP, Sponseller PD, Shah SA et al (2012) Spinal deformity correction in marfan syndrome versus adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 37:1558–1565

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Demetracopoulos CA, Sponseller PD (2007) Spinal deformities in Marfan syndrome. Orthop Clin North Am 38:563–572

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Zhou C, Liu L, Song Y et al (2015) Anterior release posterior internal distraction and subsequent posterior spinal fusion for the treatment of severe kyphoscoliosis. Eur Spine J 24:1560–1567

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Newton PO, White KK, Faro F et al (2005) The success of throacoscopic anterior fusion in a consecutive series of 112 pediatric spinal deformity cases. Spine 30:392–398

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Lehman RA Jr, Lenke LG, Keeler KA et al (2008) Operative treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis with posterior pedicle screw-only constructs: minimum three-year follow-up of 114 cases. Spine 33:1598–1604

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Suk SI, Kim JH, Cho KJ et al (2007) Is anterior release necessary in severe scoliosis treated by posterior segmental pedicle screw fixation? Eur Spine J 16:1359–1365

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Levy BJ, Schulz JF, Fornari ED et al (2015) Complications associated with surgical repair of syndromic scoliosis. Scoliosis 23(10):14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Pyeritz RE, Fishman EK, Bernhardt BA et al (1988) Dural ectasia is a common feature of the Marfan syndrome. Am J Hum Genet 43:726–732

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Jones KB, Erkula G, Sponseller PD et al (2002) Spine deformity correction in Marfan syndrome. Spine 27:2003–2012

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (2015M570440) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (81501932) and Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province (BK20150107).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Spine Surgery, The Affiliated Drum Tower Hospital of Nanjing University Medical School, Zhongshan Road 321, Nanjing, 210008, China

    Jun Qiao, Leilei Xu, Zhen Liu, Feng Zhu, Bangping Qian, Xu Sun, Zezhang Zhu & Yong Qiu

  2. Department of Orthopedics, The Affiliated Drum Tower Hospital of Nanjing University Medical School, Zhongshan Road 321, Nanjing, 210008, China

    Qing Jiang

Authors
  1. Jun Qiao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Leilei Xu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Zhen Liu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Feng Zhu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Bangping Qian
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Xu Sun
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Zezhang Zhu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Yong Qiu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Qing Jiang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zezhang Zhu.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

None.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Qiao, J., Xu, L., Liu, Z. et al. Surgical treatment of scoliosis in Marfan syndrome: outcomes and complications. Eur Spine J 25, 3288–3293 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-016-4579-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-016-4579-0

Keywords

Search

Navigation