Abstract
Purpose
The practice of giving certain authors equal credit in scientific publications has become increasingly common in some medical specialties. However, whether this trend also exists in major spine journals remains unclear. This study aimed to investigate the prevalence and characteristics of the practice of giving authors equal credit in major spine journals.
Methods
Manual searches were performed to identify original research articles with equally credited authors (ECA) published between January 1, 2004 and December 31, 2013 in three major spine journals: Spine, European Spine Journal, and The Spine Journal. The number of authors with ECA and their positions in the byline, total number of authors, year of publication, and country of origin were analysed.
Results
The practice of ECA was found in all three journals. Articles with ECA comprised a greater proportion of the total number of publications in each journal in 2013 versus 2004 (Spine, 7.2 vs. 0.2 %; European Spine Journal, 7.5 vs. 0.0 %; and The Spine Journal, 6.2 vs. 0.0 %). There was a statistically significant increasing trend in the annual proportion of papers with ECA for all three spine journals (p < 0.0001). The practice of ECA was applied in nearly every position in the byline, and the first two authors received equal credit in most cases. Articles with ECA were published by authors from various countries and regions around the world. However, none of the three spine journals provided specific guidance on this practice in their author instructions.
Conclusions
The practice of ECA in original research articles is increasingly common in major spine journals. A guideline for authors regarding when and how to designate equal credit is warranted in the future.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (1997) Uniform requirements for manuscripts submitted to biomedical journals. N Engl J Med 336(4):309–315
Bhandari M, Guyatt GH, Kulkarni AV, Devereaux PJ, Leece P, Bajammal S, Heels-Ansdell D, Busse JW (2014) Perceptions of authors’ contributions are influenced by both byline order and designation of corresponding author. J Clin Epidemiol 67(9):1049–1054
Wren JD, Kozak KZ, Johnson KR, Deakyne SJ, Schilling LM, Dellavalle RP (2007) The write position. A survey of perceived contributions to papers based on byline position and number of authors. EMBO Rep 8(11):988–991
Moulopoulos SD, Sideris DA, Georgilis KA (1983) For debate:individual contributions to multiauthor papers. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) 287(6405):1608–1610
Dotson B (2013) Equal contributions and credit assigned to authors in pharmacy journals. Am J Pharm Educ 77(2):39
Wang F, Tang L, Bo L, Li J, Deng X (2012) Equal contributions and credit given to authors in critical care medicine journals during a 10-year period*. Crit Care Med 40(3):967–969
Li Z, Sun YM, Wu FX, Yang LQ, Lu ZJ, Yu WF (2013) Equal contributions and credit: an emerging trend in the characterization of authorship in major anaesthesia journals during a 10-year period. PLoS One 8(8):e71430
Akhabue E, Lautenbach E (2010) “Equal” contributions and credit: an emerging trend in the characterization of authorship. Ann Epidemiol 20(11):868–871
Malicki M, Jeroncic A, Marusic M, Marusic A (2012) Why do you think you should be the author on this manuscript? Analysis of open-ended responses of authors in a general medical journal. BMC Med Res Methodol 12:189
Marusic A, Bosnjak L, Jeroncic A (2011) A systematic review of research on the meaning, ethics and practices of authorship across scholarly disciplines. PLoS One 6(9):e23477
Shapiro DW, Wenger NS, Shapiro MF (1994) The contributions of authors to multiauthored biomedical research papers. JAMA 271(6):438–442
Dulhunty JM, Boots RJ, Paratz JD, Lipman J (2011) Determining authorship in multicenter trials: a systematic review. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 55(9):1037–1043
Serwint JR, Feigelman S, Dumont-Driscoll M (2003) Listing contributions of investigators in research groups. JAMA 289(17):2212
Baerlocher MO, Gautam T, Newton M, Tomlinson G (2009) Changing author counts in five major general medicine journals: effect of author contribution forms. J Clin Epidemiol 62(8):875–877
Flanagin A, Carey LA, Fontanarosa PB, Phillips SG, Pace BP, Lundberg GD, Rennie D (1998) Prevalence of articles with honorary authors and ghost authors in peer-reviewed medical journals. JAMA 280(3):222–224
Yank V, Rennie D (1999) Disclosure of researcher contributions: a study of original research articles in The Lancet. Ann Intern Med 130(8):661–670
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
None of the authors has any potential conflict of interest.
Source of funding
No funds were received in support of this study.
Additional information
All authors contributed equally to this study.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Jia, Z., Wu, Y., Tang, Y. et al. Equal contributions and credit: an emerging trend in the characterization of authorship in major spine journals during a 10-year period. Eur Spine J 25, 913–917 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-015-4314-2
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-015-4314-2