Abstract
Purpose
Surgery of adult scoliosis was based upon coronal plane radiographical analysis using Cobb angle measurements, but recently it has been demonstrated that sagittal spinopelvic alignment plays a critical role in determining the final outcome. The aim of this paper is to compare the clinical and radiological results of 81 patients affected by adult scoliosis, treated with short or long fusions, and followed for 2–5 year follow-up.
Materials and methods
81 patients affected by degenerative lumbar scoliosis managed by posterior-only surgery were retrospectively evaluated. Fifty-seven patients underwent to a short fusion procedure, while 24 had a long fusion. Clinical and radiographic coronal and sagittal spinopelvic parameters were compared between the two groups.
Results
Coronal Cobb angle was 24° preoperatively and passed to 12° in the short fusion group, while changed from 45° to 10° in the long fusion group. Lumbar lordosis was 45° preoperatively and 60° at final follow-up in the short fusion group passed from 24° to 55° in the long fusion group. Sacral slope passed from 25° to 45° in the short fusion group, while from 10° to 40° in the long fusion group. Pelvic tilt passed from 24° to 13° in the short fusion group, and from 28° to 23° in the long fusion group.
Conclusion
Surgical treatment of degenerative lumbar scoliosis improved balance and alignment of the spine, and also the coronal plane in terms of Cobb angle. These results were associated to a consistent clinical improvement and an acceptable rate of complications.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aebi M (2005) The adult scoliosis. Eur Spine J 14:925–948. doi:10.1007/s00586-005-1053-9
Daffner SD, Vaccaro AR (2003) Adult degenerative lumbar scoliosis. Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ) 32:77–82 (discussion 82)
Ploumis A, Transfeldt EE, Gilbert TJ et al (2006) Degenerative lumbar scoliosis: radiographic correlation of lateral rotatory olisthesis with neural canal dimensions. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 31:2353–2358. doi:10.1097/01.brs.0000240206.00747.cb
Freedman BA, Horton WC, Rhee JM et al (2009) Reliability analysis for manual radiographic measures of rotatory subluxation or lateral listhesis in adult scoliosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 34:603–608. doi:10.1097/BRS.0b013e31819a841e
Urrutia J, Espinosa J, Diaz-Ledezma C, Cabello C (2011) The impact of lumbar scoliosis on pain, function and health-related quality of life in postmenopausal women. Eur Spine J 20:2223–2227. doi:10.1007/s00586-011-1829-z
Kilshaw M, Baker RP, Gardner R et al (2011) Abnormalities of the lumbar spine in the coronal plane on plain abdominal radiographs. Eur Spine J 20:429–433. doi:10.1007/s00586-010-1610-8
Ploumis A, Transfledt EE, Denis F (2007) Degenerative lumbar scoliosis associated with spinal stenosis. Spine J 7:428–436. doi:10.1016/j.spinee.2006.07.015
Tribus CB (2003) Degenerative lumbar scoliosis: evaluation and management. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 11:174–183
Pritchett JW, Bortel DT (1993) Degenerative symptomatic lumbar scoliosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 18:700–703. doi:10.1097/00007632-199305000-00004
Wang Y, Zhang XS, Zhang YG et al (2005) Characteristics of nerve root compression caused by degenerative lumbar stenosis with scoliosis. Zhongguo Yi Xue Ke Xue Yuan Xue Bao 27:170–173. doi:10.1016/j.spinee.2003.07.006
Wu C-H, Wong C-B, Chen L-H et al (2008) Instrumented posterior lumbar interbody fusion for patients with degenerative lumbar scoliosis. J Spinal Disord Tech 21:310–315. doi:10.1097/BSD.0b013e318148b256
Glassman SD, Carreon LY, Djurasovic M et al (2009) Lumbar fusion outcomes stratified by specific diagnostic indication. Spine J 9:13–21. doi:10.1016/j.spinee.2008.08.011
Wang G, Hu J, Liu X, Cao Y (2015) Surgical treatments for degenerative lumbar scoliosis: a meta analysis. Eur Spine J 24:1792–1799. doi:10.1007/s00586-015-3942-x
Bridwell KH, Berven S, Edwards C et al (2007) The problems and limitations of applying evidence-based medicine to primary surgical treatment of adult spinal deformity. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 32:S135–S139. doi:10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181453e22
Kleinstueck FS, Fekete TF, Jeszenszky D et al (2014) Adult degenerative scoliosis: comparison of patient-rated outcome after three different surgical treatments. Eur Spine J. doi:10.1007/s00586-014-3484-7
Birknes JK, Harrop JS, White AP et al (2008) Adult degenerative scoliosis: A review. Neurosurgery. doi:10.1227/01.NEU.0000325485.49323.B2
Padua R, Padua L, Ceccarelli E et al (2002) Italian version of the Roland Disability Questionnaire, specific for low back pain: cross-cultural adaptation and validation. Eur Spine J 11:126–129. doi:10.1007/s005860100262
Lafage V, Schwab F, Vira S et al (2011) Spino-pelvic parameters after surgery can be predicted: a preliminary formula and validation of standing alignment. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 36:1037–1045. doi:10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181eb9469
Cho K-J, Suk S-I, Park S-R et al (2007) Complications in posterior fusion and instrumentation for degenerative lumbar scoliosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 32:2232–2237. doi:10.1097/BRS.0b013e31814b2d3c
Faldini C, Di Martino A, De Fine M et al (2013) Current classification systems for adult degenerative scoliosis. Musculoskelet Surg 97:1–8. doi:10.1007/s12306-013-0245-4
Koller H, Pfanz C, Meier O et al (2015) Factors influencing radiographic and clinical outcomes in adult scoliosis surgery: a study of 448 European patients. Eur Spine J. doi:10.1007/s00586-015-3898-x
Schwab FJ, Blondel B, Bess S et al (2013) Radiographical spinopelvic parameters and disability in the setting of adult spinal deformity: a prospective multicenter analysis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 38:E803–E812. doi:10.1097/BRS.0b013e318292b7b9
Berjano P, Langella F, Ismael M-F et al (2014) Successful correction of sagittal imbalance can be calculated on the basis of pelvic incidence and age. Eur Spine J 23(Suppl 6):587–596. doi:10.1007/s00586-014-3556-8
Cho KJ, Il Suk S, Park SR et al (2008) Short fusion versus long fusion for degenerative lumbar scoliosis. Eur Spine J 17:650–656. doi:10.1007/s00586-008-0615-z
Crandall DG, Revella J (2009) Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion versus anterior lumbar interbody fusion as an adjunct to posterior instrumented correction of degenerative lumbar scoliosis: three year clinical and radiographic outcomes. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 34:2126–2133. doi:10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181b612db
Zimmerman RM, Mohamed AS, Skolasky RL et al (2010) Functional outcomes and complications after primary spinal surgery for scoliosis in adults aged forty years or older: a prospective study with minimum two-year follow-up. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 35:1861–1866. doi:10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181e57827
Wang MY (2011) PLIF for the treatment of adult spinal deformity. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 153:557. doi:10.1007/s00701-010-0910-4
Tsai T-H, Huang T-Y, Lieu A-S et al (2011) Functional outcome analysis: instrumented posterior lumbar interbody fusion for degenerative lumbar scoliosis. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 153:547–555. doi:10.1007/s00701-010-0909-x
La Grone MO (1988) Loss of lumbar lordosis. A complication of spinal fusion for scoliosis. Orthop Clin North Am 19:383–393
Hassanzadeh H, Jain A, El Dafrawy MH et al (2013) Three-column osteotomies in the treatment of spinal deformity in adult patients 60 years old and older: outcome and complications. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 38:726–731. doi:10.1097/BRS.0b013e31827c2415
Heary RF, Karimi RJ (2010) Correction of lumbar coronal plane deformity using unilateral cage placement. Neurosurg Focus 28:E10. doi:10.3171/2009.12.FOCUS09281
Bridwell KH, Baldus C, Berven S et al (2010) Changes in radiographic and clinical outcomes with primary treatment adult spinal deformity surgeries from two years to three- to five-years follow-up. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 35:1849–1854. doi:10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181efa06a
Smith JS, Shaffrey CI, Glassman SD et al (2013) Clinical and radiographic parameters that distinguish between the best and worst outcomes of scoliosis surgery for adults. Eur Spine J 22:402–410. doi:10.1007/s00586-012-2547-x
Pichelmann MA, Lenke LG, Bridwell KH et al (2010) Revision rates following primary adult spinal deformity surgery: six hundred forty-three consecutive patients followed-up to twenty-two years postoperative. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 35:219–226. doi:10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181c91180
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
None.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Faldini, C., Di Martino, A., Borghi, R. et al. Long vs. short fusions for adult lumbar degenerative scoliosis: does balance matters?. Eur Spine J 24 (Suppl 7), 887–892 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-015-4266-6
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-015-4266-6