Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Does an intraoperative finding of an intact dural sac help to prognosticate neurological recovery in cauda equinal and epiconal injuries in thoracolumbar fractures? An analysis of 31 patients

  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Spine Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

To evaluate the effect of integrity of dural sac in determining motor neurological recovery in patients with cauda equinal and epiconal injuries in vertebral fractures at thoracolumbar junction.

Methods

Thirty-one patients with single-level vertebra fracture over T12–L2 with cauda equinal or epiconal injuries that underwent posterior spinal decompression and stabilization were evaluated in the period between 2006 and 2012. All patients included had motor incomplete ASIA C in neurology and were either Type B or C (AO/Magerl classification) of fracture morphology. Radiologist opinion to confirm the level of conus in MRI was done preoperatively. Intraoperative findings with respect to intactness of dura was noted. All MRI images were postoperatively evaluated by an independent, blinded radiologist for evidence of dural breach caused by the trauma. All participants provided basic demographic data, ambulatory status, and current neurology and received neurologic examination at intervals. The differences in neurologic injury sites and functional walkers in patients with different levels of vertebral injury were analyzed. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was used to define the cut-off value of lower extremities motor score (LEMS) in functional walkers and non-walkers. All patients were seen at a postoperative follow-up of minimum 18 months.

Results

Data of the 31 patients were analyzed. Seventeen patients (55 %) had epiconus and lumbar roots lesions and 14 (45 %) had cauda equina lesions. The injury was at the T12 vertebra in 9 patients (29 %), L1 in 12 (39 %) and in L2 in 10 patients (32 %). Mean LEMS for patients with T12, L1, and L2 fractures were calculated. Fourteen patients had intraoperative findings of intact dura as against 17 patients with dural breach. MRI images when revisited by an independent radiologist by keeping him blind about the intraoperative surgeons findings showed statistically very good interobserver agreement (κ = 0.618) with regard to integrity of the dural sac. Postoperative neurological assessment at minimum 18 months follow-up showed that four out of the 14 patients with intact dura were walkers (28 %) whereas of the 17 patients with dural breach, 13 were walkers (82 %).

Conclusion

Neurological recovery in cauda equinal and epiconal injuries in thoracolumbar fractures is significantly less likely in an intact dural sac, probably because the dural breach prevents the roots to take as much impact as compared to an intact dural sac.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Scher AT (1983) Radiological assessment of thoracolumbar spinal injuries. S Afr Med J 64:384–387

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Levine AM (1998) Classification of spinal injury. In: Levine AM, Eismont FJ, Garfin SR, Zigler JE (eds) Spine trauma. W.B. Saunders, Philadelphia, pp 113–132

    Google Scholar 

  3. Saifuddin A, Burnett SJD, White J (1998) The variation of position of the conus medullaris in an adult population. Spine 23:1452–1456. doi:10.1097/00007632-199807010-00005

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Soleiman J, Demaerel P, Rocher S, Maes F, Marchal G (2005) Magnetic resonance imaging study of the level of termination of the conus medullaris and the thecal sac: influence of age and gender. Spine 30:1875–1880. doi:10.1097/01.brs.0000174116.74775.2e

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Doherty JG, Burn AS, O’Ferrall DM, Ditunno JF Jr (2002) Prevalence of upper motor neuron vs lower motor neuron lesions in complete lower thoracic and lumbar spinal cord injuries. J Spinal Cord Med 25:289–292

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Kingwell SP, Noonan VK, Fisher CG, Graeb DA, Keynan O, Zhang H, Dvorak MF (2010) Relationship of neural axis level of injury to motor recovery and health-related quality of life in patients with a thoracolumbar spinal injury. J Bone Joint Surg Am 92(7):1591–1599. doi:10.2106/JBJS.I.00512

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Zörner B, Blanckenhorn WU, Dietz V, EM-SCI study group, Curt A (2010) Clinical algorithm for improved prediction of ambulation and patient stratification after incomplete spinal cord injury. J Neurotrauma 27(1):241–252. doi:10.1089/neu.2009.0901

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Reinhold M, Knop C, Biese R, Audige L, Kandizora F, Pizanis A, Pranzl R, Gercek E, Schultheiss M, Weckbach A, Buhren V, Blauth M (2010) Operative treatment of 733 patients with acute thoracolumbar spinal injuries: comprehensive results from the second, prospective, internet-based multicenter study of the spine study group of the German association of trauma surgery. Eur Spine J 19(10):1657–1676

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Sie I, Waters RL (2003) Outcomes following spinal cord injury. In: Lin VW et al (eds) Spinal cord medicine: principles and practice. Demos Publishing, New York, pp 87–103

    Google Scholar 

  10. Ditunno PL, Patrick M, Stineman M, Ditunno JF (2008) Who wants to walk? Preferences for recovery after SCI: a longitudinal and cross-sectional study. Spinal Cord 46:500–506. doi:10.1038/sj.sc.3102172

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Scivoletto G, Di Donna V (2009) Prediction of walking recovery after spinal cord injury. Brain Res Bull 78:43–51. doi:10.1016/j.brainresbull.2008.06.002

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Kirshblum S, Donovan W (2002) Neurological assessment and classification of traumatic spinal cord injury. In: Kirshblum S (ed) Spinal cord medicine. Lippincott Williams and Wilkins, Philadelphia, pp 82–95

    Google Scholar 

  13. Willems J, Chappel R (1997) The epiconus syndrome presenting radicular-type neurological features. Spinal Cord 35:709–710. doi:10.1038/sj.sc.3100511

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Kingwell SP, Curt A, Dvorak MF (2008) Factors affecting neurological outcome in traumatic conus medullaris and cauda equina injuries. Neurosurg Focus 25(5):E7. doi:10.3171/FOC.2008.25.11.E7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Dhatt S, Tahasildar N, Tripathy SK, Bahadur R, Dhillon M (2011) Outcome of spinal decompression in Cauda Equina syndrome presenting late in developing countries: case series of 50 cases. Eur Spine J 20(12):2235–2239

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Cammisa FP, Eizmont FJ, Green BA (1989) Dural laceration occurring with burst fractures and associated laminar fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Am 71(7):1044–1052

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Ayoub MA (2012) Displaced spinopelvic dissociation with sacral cauda equina syndrome: outcome of surgical decompression with a preliminary management algorithm. Eur Spine J 21(9):1815–1825

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. White AA, Punjabi MM Clinical biomechanics of the spine. Physical properties and functional biomechanics of the spine pages, pp 68–71

  19. Waters RL, Yakura JS, Adkins R, Barnes G (1989) Determinants of gait performance following spinal cord injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 70:811–818

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Waters RL, Adkins R, Yakura J, Vigil D (1994) Prediction of ambulatory performance based on motor scores derived from standards of the American spinal injury association. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 75:756–760. doi:10.1016/0003-9993(94)90034-5

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

I would like to acknowledge the valuable inputs from my mentor Dr Shekhar Bhojraj and my statistician Mr Mahesh Deshmukh.

Conflict of interest

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. L H Hiranandani Hospital, Powai, Mumbai, India

    Raghuprasad Varma

  2. Fortis Group of Hospitals In Mumbai and Navi Mumbai, Mumbai, India

    Raghuprasad Varma

Authors
  1. Raghuprasad Varma
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Raghuprasad Varma.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Varma, R. Does an intraoperative finding of an intact dural sac help to prognosticate neurological recovery in cauda equinal and epiconal injuries in thoracolumbar fractures? An analysis of 31 patients. Eur Spine J 25, 1117–1122 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-014-3575-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-014-3575-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation