Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Impact of continuous regional arterial infusion in the treatment of acute necrotizing pancreatitis: analysis of a national administrative database

  • Original Article—Liver, Pancreas, and Biliary Tract
  • Published:
Journal of Gastroenterology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Although continuous regional arterial infusion (CRAI) of protease inhibitors and broad antibiotics has been suggested as one of the therapeutic option for patients with acute necrotic pancreatitis (ANP), the effectiveness has not been well-corroborated in clinical studies.

Methods

We conducted a retrospective cohort study using a Japanese national administrative database. Severe acute pancreatitis patients with a poorly enhanced pancreas region (i.e., definitive or clinically suspected ANP) were identified and dichotomized according to whether CRAI was performed. We compared the outcomes of in-hospital mortality, surgical interventions, hospital-free days, and healthcare costs between groups adjusted by the well-validated case-mix adjustment model using a multivariate mixed-effect regression analysis and a propensity score matching analysis.

Results

Of 243,312 acute pancreatitis patients, 702 eligible patients were identified, of these 339 patients underwent CRAI. The case-mix adjustment model established had good predictability for in-hospital mortality with an area under the receiver operating characteristics curve of 0.87. CRAI was significantly associated with reduced in-hospital mortality [14.5% in the CRAI group vs. 18.2% in the non-CRAI group, adjusted odds ratio (95% confidence interval; CI) = 0.60 (0.36–0.97)]. Significant associations were not observed for the frequency of surgical interventions and mean hospital-free days; however, significantly higher healthcare costs were observed in the CRAI group. Results of the propensity score matching analysis did not alter these results.

Conclusions

Analysis of a nationwide large-scale database suggested that CRAI was significantly associated with reduced in-hospital mortality for patients with ANP. Further randomized controlled trials are warranted.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

ANP:

Acute necrotizing pancreatitis

AUROC:

Area under the receiver operating curve

CI:

Confidence interval

CRAI:

Continuous regional arterial infusion

CT:

Computed tomography

DPC:

Diagnosis procedure combination

ICD-10:

International Classification of Diseases, 10th revision

ICU:

Intensive care unit

RCT:

Randomized controlled trial

SAP:

Severe acute pancreatitis

SD:

Standard deviation

VIF:

Variance inflation factor

References

  1. Hamada S, Masamune A, Kikuta K, Research Committee of Intractable Diseases of the Pancreas, et al. Nationwide epidemiological survey of acute pancreatitis in Japan. Pancreas. 2014;43:1244–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Baron TH, Morgan DE. Acute necrotizing pancreatitis. N Engl J Med. 1999;340:1412–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Balthazar EJ, Robinson DL, Megibow AJ, et al. Acute pancreatitis: value of CT in establishing prognosis. Radiology. 1990;174:331–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Wall I, Badalov N, Baradarian R, et al. Decreased mortality in acute pancreatitis related to early aggressive hydration. Pancreas. 2011;40:547–50.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Al-Omran M, Albalawi ZH, Tashkandi MF, et al. Enteral versus parenteral nutrition for acute pancreatitis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010; 1:CD002837.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Wu BU, Banks PA. Clinical management of patients with acute pancreatitis. Gastroenterology. 2013;144:1272–81.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Greenberg JA, Hsu J, Bawazeer M, et al. Clinical practice guideline: management of acute pancreatitis. Can J Surg. 2016;59:128–40.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Takeda K, Matsuno S, Sunamura M, et al. Continuous regional arterial infusion of protease inhibitor and antibiotics in acute necrotizing pancreatitis. Am J Surg. 1996;171:394–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Piaścik M, Rydzewska G, Milewski J, et al. The results of severe acute pancreatitis treatment with continuous regional arterial infusion of protease inhibitor and antibiotic: a randomized controlled study. Pancreas. 2010;39:863–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Hamada T, Yasunaga H, Nakai Y, et al. Continuous regional arterial infusion for acute pancreatitis: a propensity score analysis using a nationwide administrative database. Crit Care. 2013;17:R214.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Horibe M, Sasaki M, Sanui M, et al. Continuous regional arterial infusion of protease inhibitors has no efficacy in the treatment of severe acute pancreatitis: a retrospective multicenter cohort study. Pancreas. 2017;46:510–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Inoue K, Hirota M, Beppu T, et al. Angiographic features in acute pancreatitis: the severity of abdominal vessel ischemic change reflect the severity of acute pancreatitis. JOP. 2013;4:207–13.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Takeda K, Yokoe M, Takada T, et al. Assessment of severity of acute pancreatitis according to new prognostic factors and CT grading. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2013;17:37–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Yasunaga H, Matsui H, Horiguchi H, et al. Clinical epidemiology and health services research using the diagnosis procedure combination database in Japan. Asian Pac J Dis Manage. 2013;7:19–24.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Charlson ME, Pompei P, Ales KL, et al. A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation. J Chronic Dis. 1987;40:373–83.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Quan H, Sundararajan V, Halfon P, et al. Coding algorithms for defining comorbidities in ICD-9-CM and ICD-10 administrative data. Med Care. 2005;43:1130–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Takeda K, Yamauchi J, Shibuya K, et al. Benefit of continuous regional arterial infusion of protease inhibitor and antibiotic in the management of acute necrotizing pancreatitis. Pancreatology. 2001;1:668–73.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Young P, Hodgson C, Dulhunty J, et al. End points for phase II trials in intensive care: recommendations from the Australian and New Zealand Clinical Trials Group consensus panel meeting. Crit Care Resusc. 2012;14:211–5.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Liang KY, Zeger SL. Longitudinal data analysis using generalized linear models. Biometrika. 1986;73:13–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. D’Agostino RB Jr. Propensity score methods for bias reduction in the comparison of a treatment to a non-randomized control group. Stat Med. 1998;17:2265–81.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Mourad MM, Evans R, Kalidindi V, et al. Prophylactic antibiotics in acute pancreatitis: endless debate. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2017;99:107–12.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Sainio V, Kemppainen E, Puolakkainen P, et al. Early antibiotic treatment in acute necrotising pancreatitis. Lancet. 1995;346:663–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Luiten EJ, Hop WC, Lange JF, et al. Controlled clinical trial of selective decontamination for the treatment of severe acute pancreatitis. Ann Surg. 1995;222:57–65.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Villatoro E, Mulla M, Larvin M. Antibiotic therapy for prophylaxis against infection of pancreatic necrosis in acute pancreatitis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010; 5:CD002941.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Takeda K. Antiproteases in the treatment of acute necrotizing pancreatitis: continuous regional arterial infusion. JOP. 2007;8:526–32.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Chen HM, Chen JC, Hwang TL, et al. Prospective and randomized study of gabexate mesilate for the treatment of severe acute pancreatitis with organ dysfunction. Hepatogastroenterology. 2000;47:1147–50.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Yang CY, Chang-Chien CS, Liaw YF. Controlled trial of protease inhibitor gabexelate mesilate (FOY) in the treatment of acute pancreatitis. Pancreas. 1987;2:698–700.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Büchler M, Malfertheiner P, Uhl W, German Pancreatitis Study Group, et al. Gabexate mesilate in human acute pancreatitis. Gastroenterology. 1993;104:1165–70.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Büchler M, Malfertheiner P, Friess H, et al. Human pancreatic tissue concentration of bactericidal antibiotics. Gastroenterology. 1992;103:1902–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Yamauchi J, Takeda K, Shibuya K, et al. Continuous regional application of protease inhibitor in the treatment of acute pancreatitis. An experimental study using closed duodenal obstruction model in dogs. Pancreatology. 2001;1:662–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Mikami Y, Takeda K, Matsuda K, et al. Rat experimental model of continuous regional arterial infusion of protease inhibitor and its effects on severe acute pancreatitis. Pancreas. 2005;30:248–53.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Horibe M, Egi M, Sasaki M, et al. Continuous regional arterial infusion of protease inhibitors for treatment of severe acute pancreatitis: systematic review and meta-analysis. Pancreas. 2015;44:1017–23.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Colantuoni E, Scharfstein DO, Wang C, et al. Statistical methods to compare functional outcomes in randomized controlled trials with high mortality. BMJ. 2018;360:j5748.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Besselink MG, Verwer TJ, Schoenmaeckers EJ, et al. Timing of surgical intervention in necrotizing pancreatitis. Arch Surg. 2007;142:1194–201.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Mier J, Leon EL, Castillo A, et al. Early versus late necrosectomy in severe necrotizing pancreatitis. Am J Surg. 1997;173:71–5.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

AE received the Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research (#17K17045) from Japan Society for the Promotion of Science. KF received a Grant-in-Aid for Research on Policy Planning and Evaluation (#H28-Seisaku-Shitei-009) from the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare, Japan. Remaining authors received no funding. The authors thank Editage (http://www.editage.jp) for English language editing.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Akira Endo.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 78 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Endo, A., Shiraishi, A., Fushimi, K. et al. Impact of continuous regional arterial infusion in the treatment of acute necrotizing pancreatitis: analysis of a national administrative database. J Gastroenterol 53, 1098–1106 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00535-018-1452-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00535-018-1452-4

Keywords

Navigation