Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Poorer baseline performance status is associated with increased thromboembolism risk in metastatic cancer patients treated with immunotherapy

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Supportive Care in Cancer Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a significant cause of morbidity and mortality in cancer patients. However, the association of VTE with immunotherapy remains poorly defined. We therefore evaluated the frequency of VTE in patients receiving immunotherapy and tried to determine predisposing factors.

Methods

A total of 133 adult metastatic cancer patients treated with immunotherapy for any cancer between were included. Baseline demographics, ECOG performance status, type of tumors, and baseline blood count parameters were recorded. Possible predisposing factors were evaluated with univariate and multivariate analyses.

Results

The median age was 60 (interquartile range (IQR) 48–66) years, and the median follow-up was 10.1 (IQR 5.8–18.5) months. Renal cell carcinoma (26.3%) and melanoma (24.1%) were most common diagnoses. Fifteen patients (11.3%) had an episode of VTE. Most of the VTEs were diagnosed as pulmonary emboli (10/15; 67%). Eighty percent (12/15) of these VTE cases were detected incidentally. Patients with a baseline ECOG performance status of 1 or more (29.3% of patients) had a significantly increased risk of venous thrombosis (ECOG ≥1 vs. 0, HR: 3.023, 95% CI: 1.011–9.039, p=0.048). Other factors, including patient age, tumor type, body mass index, baseline thrombocyte, neutrophil, and lactate dehydrogenase levels were not significantly associated with VTE risk.

Conclusions

In this study, we observed VTE development in more than 10% of immunotherapy-treated patients and increased VTE risk in patients with poorer ECOG status. With the asymptomatic nature of VTEs in most cases, a high index of suspicion level for VTE is required in patients treated with immunotherapy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The data was not reposited in the data repositories.

References

  1. Kruger S, Ilmer M, Kobold S, Cadilha BL, Endres S et al (2019) Advances in cancer immunotherapy 2019 – latest trends. J Exp Clin Cancer Res 38:268. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13046-019-1266-0

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Herbst RS, Baas P, Kim D-W, Felip E, Pérez-Gracia JL et al. (2016) Pembrolizumab versus docetaxel for previously treated, PD-L1-positive, advanced non-small-celllung cancer (KEYNOTE-010): a randomised controlled trial. The Lancet 387:1540–1550. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(15)01281-7

  3. Rittmeyer A, Barlesi F, Waterkamp D, Park K, Ciardiello F et al (2017) Atezolizumab versus docetaxel in patients with previously treated non-small-cell lung cancer (OAK): a phase 3, open-label, multicentre randomised controlled trial. Lancet 389:255–265. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(16)32517-X

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Wolchok JD, Chiarion-Sileni V, Gonzalez R, Rutkowski P, Grob J-J et al (2017) Overall survival with combined nivolumab and ipilimumab in advanced melanoma. N Engl J Med 377:1345–1356. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1709684

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Motzer RJ, Escudier B, McDermott DF, George S, Hammers HJ et al (2015) Nivolumab versus everolimus in advanced renal-cell carcinoma. N Engl J Med 373:1803–1813. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1510665

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Galsky MD, Arija JÁA, Bamias A, Davis ID, De Santis M et al (2020) Atezolizumab with or without chemotherapy in metastatic urothelial cancer (IMvigor130): a multicentre, randomised, placebo-controlled phase 3 trial. Lancet 395:1547–1557. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(20)30230-0

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Ansell SM, Lesokhin AM, Borrello I, Halwani A, Scott EC et al (2014) PD-1 Blockade with nivolumab in relapsed or refractory Hodgkin’s lymphoma. N Engl J Med 372:311–319. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1411087

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Kennedy LB, Salama AKS (2020) A review of cancer immunotherapy toxicity. CA Cancer J Clin 70:86–104. https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21596

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Khorana AA (2010) Venous thromboembolism and prognosis in cancer. Thromb Res 125:490–493. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.thromres.2009.12.023

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Prandoni P, Falanga A, Piccioli A (2005) Cancer and venous thromboembolism. Lancet Oncol 6:401–410. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1470-2045(05)70207-2

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. BLOM JW, Vanderschoot J, Oostindier M, Osanto S, Van Der Meer F et al (2006) Incidence of venous thrombosis in a large cohort of 66 329 cancer patients: results of a record linkage study. J Thromb Haemost 4:529–535

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Roopkumar J, Kim AS, Bicky T, Hobbs BP, Khorana AA (2018) Venous thromboembolism in cancer patients receiving immunotherapy. Blood 132:2510–2510. https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2018-99-116439

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Sainz LG, Martínez-Marin V, Lozano DV, Pérez DM, Barbas JP et al (2019) Incidence of vascular thromboembolism events in cancer patients receiving immunotherapy: a single institution experience. Ann Oncol 30:v725

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Charlson ME, Pompei P, Ales KL, MacKenzie CR (1987) A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation. J Chronic Dis 40:373–383. https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-9681(87)90171-8

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Khorana AA, Kuderer NM, Culakova E, Lyman GH, Francis CW (2008) Development and validation of a predictive model for chemotherapy-associated thrombosis. Blood 111:4902–4907. https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2007-10-116327

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Masnoon N, Shakib S, Kalisch-Ellett L, Caughey GE (2017) What is polypharmacy? A systematic review of definitions. BMC Geriatr 17:230. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-017-0621-2

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Konstantinides SV, Meyer G, Becattini C, Bueno H, Geersing G-J et al (2020) 2019 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of acute pulmonary embolism developed in collaboration with the European Respiratory Society (ERS): The Task Force for the diagnosis and management of acute pulmonary embolism of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Eur Heart J 41:543–603. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehz405

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Lutgens E, Seijkens TTP (2020) Cancer patients receiving immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy are at an increased risk for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. J Immunother Cancer 8:e000300. https://doi.org/10.1136/jitc-2019-000300

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Carmona-Bayonas A, Gómez D, Martínez de Castro E, Pérez Segura P, Muñoz Langa J et al (2020) A snapshot of cancer-associated thromboembolic disease in 2018-2019: first data from the TESEO prospective registry. Eur J Intern Med 78:41–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejim.2020.05.031

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Giustozzi M, Curcio A, Weijs B, Field TS, Sudikas S et al (2020) Variation in the association between antineoplastic therapies and venous thromboembolism in patients with active cancer. Thromb Haemost 120:847–856. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0040-1709527

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Nichetti F, Ligorio F, Zattarin E, Signorelli D, Prelaj A et al (2019) Is there an interplay between immune checkpoint inhibitors, thromboprophylactic treatments and thromboembolic events? Mechanisms and impact in non-small cell lung cancer patients. Cancers (Basel) 12. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers12010067

  22. Nick van E, Marcello Di N, Gabriela C, Ankie K, Hans-Martin O et al (2017) Comparison of risk prediction scores for venous thromboembolism in cancer patients: a prospective cohort study. Haematologica 102:1494–1501. https://doi.org/10.3324/haematol.2017.169060

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Fukumura D, Kloepper J, Amoozgar Z, Duda DG, Jain RK (2018) Enhancing cancer immunotherapy using antiangiogenics: opportunities and challenges. Nature reviews. Clin Oncol 15:325–340. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrclinonc.2018.29

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Reardon DA, Nayak L, Peters KB, Clarke JL, Jordan JT, de Groot JF, Nghiemphu PL, Kaley TJ, Colman H, Gaffey SC, Caruso V, Bednarek Debruyne M, Bhavsar C, Molinaro AM, Smith T, Severgnini M, Wen PY (2018) Phase II study of pembrolizumab or pembrolizumab plus bevacizumab for recurrent glioblastoma (rGBM) patients. In. Proc Am Soc Clin Oncol 6:2006

  25. Rini BI, Plimack ER, Stus V, Gafanov R, Hawkins R et al (2019) Pembrolizumab plus axitinib versus sunitinib for advanced renal-cell carcinoma. N Engl J Med 380:1116–1127. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1816714

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Finn RS, Qin S, Ikeda M, Galle PR, Ducreux M et al (2020) Atezolizumab plus bevacizumab in unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma. N Engl J Med 382:1894–1905. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1915745

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Bach AG, Schmoll HJ, Beckel C, Behrmann C, Spielmann RP, Wienke A, Abbas J, Surov A (2014) Pulmonary embolism in oncologic patients: frequency and embolus burden of symptomatic and unsuspected events. Acta Radiol 55:45–53. https://doi.org/10.1177/0284185113491569

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Bozas G, Jeffery N, Ramanujam-Venkatachala D, Avery G, Stephens A et al (2018) Prognostic assessment for patients with cancer and incidental pulmonary embolism. Thromb J 16:8. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12959-017-0157-x

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Gutierrez-Sainz L, Martinez-Marin V, Viñal D, Martinez-Perez D, Pedregosa J et al (2020) Incidence of venous thromboembolic events in cancer patients receiving immunotherapy: a single-institution experience. Clin Transl Oncol. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12094-020-02515-3

  30. Guven DC, Sahin TK, Aksun MS, Taban H, Aktepe OH et al (2020) Evaluation of emergency departments visits in patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors. Support Care Cancer. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-020-05702-8

  31. Cooksley T, Gupta A, Al-Sayed T, Lorigan P (2020) Emergency presentations in patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors. Eur J Cancer 130:193–197. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejca.2020.02.025

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Scotté F, Leroy P, Chastenet M, Aumont L, Benatar V et al (2019) Treatment and prevention of cancer-associated thrombosis in frail patients: tailored management. Cancers 11:48. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers11010048

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Metcalf RL, Fry DJ, Swindell R, McGurk A, Clamp AR et al (2014) Thrombosis in ovarian cancer: a case control study. Br J Cancer 110:1118–1124. https://doi.org/10.1038/bjc.2014.3

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Ferroni P, Riondino S, Formica V, Cereda V, Tosetto L et al (2015) Venous thromboembolism risk prediction in ambulatory cancer patients: clinical significance of neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio and platelet/lymphocyte ratio. Int J Cancer 136:1234–1240. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijc.29076

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Carmona-Bayonas A, Jiménez-Fonseca P, Font C, Fenoy F, Otero R et al (2017) Predicting serious complications in patients with cancer and pulmonary embolism using decision tree modelling: the EPIPHANY Index. Br J Cancer 116:994–1001. https://doi.org/10.1038/bjc.2017.48

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Code availability

N/A

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

DCG and ME have planned the work. DCG, MSA, TKS, OHA, HCY, HT, FC, NK, ZA, OD, SK, SA, SY, and ME participated in patient care and data collection. All authors, namely DCG, MSA, TKS, OHA, HCY, HT, FC, NK, ZA, OD, SK, SA, SY, and ME, have made significant and substantive contributions to the reporting of the work. All authors have participated in the review of relevant literature, drafting of the manuscript, and review and revisions of the final draft. DCG, MSA, TKS, and ME have analyzed the data and determined the main conclusions. DCG has prepared the first draft of the manuscript. All authors reviewed and participated in the preparation of the revised and final version of the manuscript. DCG and ME are responsible for the overall content as guarantors. All co-authors qualify the criteria for authorship according to Vancouver protocol.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Deniz Can Guven.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. The study was approved by the ethics committee of Hacettepe University.

Consent to participate

N/A

Consent for publication

N/A

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Guven, D.C., Aksun, M.S., Sahin, T.K. et al. Poorer baseline performance status is associated with increased thromboembolism risk in metastatic cancer patients treated with immunotherapy. Support Care Cancer 29, 5417–5423 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-021-06139-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-021-06139-3

Keywords

Navigation