Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Illness appraisal, religious coping, and psychological responses in men with advanced cancer

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Supportive Care in Cancer Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Patients experience diverse psychological responses to cancer. Appraisals and coping have been shown to predict psychological responses to stressors. For men with advanced cancer, appraisal of cancer’s impact on their lives (illness appraisal) and religious coping may be particularly important predictors of psychological responses. We examined the relationships among illness appraisal, religious coping, and positive and negative psychological responses while controlling for disease and patient characteristics.

Method

Eighty-six men with advanced cancer completed measures, including constructed Meaning of Illness Scale, Brief Religious Coping Scale, Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, mini-Mental Adjustment to Cancer Scale, and Posttraumatic Growth Inventory. Treating oncologists completed questions about disease status and estimated the chances of the patient surviving 6 months.

Results

Psychological distress was predicted by prognosis (β = −0.20), illness appraisal (β = −0.48), and negative religious coping (β = 0.24). Negative mental adjustment was predicted by prognosis (β = −0.23) and illness appraisal (β = −0.57). Positive mental adjustment was predicted by illness appraisal (β = 0.46) and positive religious coping (β = 0.29). Posttraumatic growth was predicted by positive religious coping (β = 0.49).

Conclusions

Illness appraisal was more consistently associated with psychological responses to advanced cancer than patient or disease characteristics. Consequently, helping patients with their illness appraisals may be effective for improving patient psychological well-being.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Carlson LE, Bultz BD (2003) Cancer distress screening: needs, models, and methods. J Psychosom Res 55(5):403–409

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Vachon M (2006) Psychosocial distress and coping after cancer treatment. Cancer Nurs 29(2 Suppl):26–31

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Zabora J et al (2001) The prevalence of psychological distress by cancer site. Psycho-Oncology 10(1):19–28

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Massie MJ (2004) Prevalence of depression in patients with cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr 32:57–71

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Lechner SC et al (2003) Do sociodemographic and disease-related variables influence benefit-finding in cancer patients? Psycho-Oncology 12(5):491–499

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Folkman S (1997) Positive psychological states and coping with severe stress. Soc Sci Med 45(8):1207–1221

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Linley PA, Joseph S, Goodfellow B (2008) Positive changes in outlook following trauma and their relationship to subsequent posttraumatic stress, depression, and anxiety. J Soc Clin Psychol 27(8):877–891

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Mazzotti E, Mazzuca F, Sebastiani C, Scoppola A, Marchetti P (2010) Predictors of existential and religious well-being among cancer patients. Supp Care Cancer. doi:10.1007/s00520-010-1033-4

  9. Lazarus RS, Folkman S (1984) Stress, appraisal, and coping. Springer, New York

    Google Scholar 

  10. Maes S et al (1996) Coping with chronic diseases. In Handbook of coping: theory, research, applications. Wiley, Oxford England, pp 221–251

    Google Scholar 

  11. Fife BL (2005) The role of constructed meaning in adaptation to the onset of life-threatening illness. Soc Sci Med 61(10):2132–2143

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Akechi T, Kugaya A, Okamura H, Nishiwaki Y, Yamawaki S, Uchitomi Y (1998) Predictive factors of psychological distress in ambulatory lung cancer patients. Supp Care Cancer 6:281–286

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Walker MS, Zona DM, Fisher EB (2006) Depressive symptoms after lung cancer surgery: their relation to coping style and social support. Psycho-Oncology 15(8):684–693

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Pargament KI, Koenig HG, Perez LM (2000) The many methods of religious coping: development and initial validation of the RCOPE. J Clin Psychol 56(4):519–543

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Cotton SP et al (1999) Exploring the relationships among spiritual well-being, quality of life, and psychological adjustment in women with breast cancer. Psycho-Oncology 8(5):429–438

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Nelson C et al (2009) The role of spirituality in the relationship between religiosity and depression in prostate cancer patients. Ann Behav Med 38(2):105–114

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Pargament KI et al (1998) Patterns of positive and negative religious coping with major life stressors. J Sci Stud Relig 37(4):710–724

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Carver CS et al (1993) How coping mediates the effect of optimism on distress: a study of women with early stage breast cancer. J Pers Soc Psychol 65(2):375–390

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Kiss A, Meryn S (2001) Effect of sex and gender on psychosocial aspects of prostate and breast cancer. BMJ 323(7320):1055–1058

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Keller M, Hendrich G (1999) Illness-related distress: does it mean the same for men and women? Acta Oncol (Stockholm, Sweden) 38(6):747–755

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Rinaldis M et al (2009) Development, confirmation, and validation of a measure of coping with colorectal cancer: a longitudinal investigation. Psycho-Oncology 18(6):624–633

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Lee SJ et al (2001) Discrepancies between patient and physician estimates for the success of stem cell Transplantation. JAMA 285(8):1034

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Fife BL (1995) The measurement of meaning in illness. Soc Sci Med 40(8):1021–1028

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Zigmond AS, Snaith RP (1983) The hospital anxiety and depression scale. Acta Psychiatr Scand 67(6):361–370

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Smith AB et al (2002) Factor analysis of the hospital anxiety and depression scale from a large cancer population. Psychol Psychother Theory Res Pract 75(2):165–176

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Johnston M, Pollard B, Hennessey P (2000) Construct validation of the hospital anxiety and depression scale with clinical populations. J Psychosom Res 48(6):579–584

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Aylard PR et al (1987) A validation study of three anxiety and depression self-assessment scales. J Psychosom Res 31(2):261–268

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Watson M et al (1988) Development of a questionnaire measure of adjustment to cancer: the MAC scale. Psychol Med J Res Psychiat Allied Sci 18(1):203–209

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Nordin K et al (1999) The mental adjustment to cancer scalea psychometric analysis and the concept of coping. Psycho-Oncology 8(3):250–259

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Watson M et al (1994) The mini-MAC: further development of the mental adjustment to cancer scale. J Psychosoc Oncol 12(3):33–46

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Greer S, Watson M (1987) Mental adjustment to cancer: its measurement and prognostic importance. Cancer Surv 6(3):439–453

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Watson M, Homewood J (2008) Mental adjustment to cancer scale®: psychometric properties in a large cancer cohort. Psycho-Oncology 17(11):1146–1151

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Tedeschi RG, Calhoun LG (2004) Target article: ‘Posttraumatic growth: conceptual foundations and empirical evidence. Psychol Inq 15(1):1–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Tedeschi RG, Calhoun LG (1996) The posttraumatic growth inventory: measuring the positive legacy of trauma. J Trauma Stress 9(3):455–471

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Cordova MJ et al (2001) Posttraumatic growth following breast cancer: a controlled comparison study. Health Psychol 20(3):176–185

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Ransom S, Sheldon KM, Jacobsen PB (2008) Actual change and inaccurate recall contribute to posttraumatic growth following radiotherapy. J Consult Clin Psychol 76(5):811–819

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Widows MR et al (2005) Predictors of posttraumatic growth following bone marrow transplantation for cancer. Health Psychol 24(3):266–273

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. MacKinnon DP, Fairchild AJ (2009) Current directions in mediation analysis. Curr Dir Psychol Sci 18(1):16–20

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. MacKinnon DP et al (2007) Distribution of the product confidence limits for the indirect effect: program PRODLIN. Behav Res Meth 39(3):384–389

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Zavala MW et al (2009) Spirituality and quality of life in low-income men with metastatic prostate cancer. Psycho-Oncology 18(7):753–761

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Hebert R et al (2009) Positive and negative religious coping and well-being in women with breast cancer. J Palliat Med 12(6):537–545

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Proffitt D et al (2007) Judeo-christian clergy and personal crisis: religion, posttraumatic growth and well being. J Relig Health 46(2):219–231

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Laubmeier KK, Zakowski SG (2004) The role of objective versus perceived life threat in the psychological adjustment to cancer. Psychol Health 19(4):425–437

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Janoff-Bulman R, Frieze IH (1983) A theoretical perspective for understanding reactions to victimization. J Soc Issues 39(2):1–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Nunnally JC (1967) Psychometric theory. McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by a grant from the Paul Ogle Foundation (Jeffersonville, IN).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Psychology, Indiana University-Purdue University, 402 North Blackford St., LD 124, Indianapolis, IN, 46202, USA

    Kevin L. Rand

  2. School of Medicine, Indiana University, Indianapolis, IN, USA

    Larry D. Cripe, Patrick O. Monahan, Yan Tong & Karen Schmidt

  3. School of Nursing, Indiana University, Indianapolis, IN, USA

    Susan M. Rawl

Authors
  1. Kevin L. Rand
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Larry D. Cripe
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Patrick O. Monahan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Yan Tong
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Karen Schmidt
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Susan M. Rawl
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kevin L. Rand.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rand, K.L., Cripe, L.D., Monahan, P.O. et al. Illness appraisal, religious coping, and psychological responses in men with advanced cancer. Support Care Cancer 20, 1719–1728 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-011-1265-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-011-1265-y

Keywords

Search

Navigation